5 Scientific Reasons You're a Bad Employee
There is a rule of thumb that says in any company, 20 percent of the employees will give you 80 percent of the top-notch work. Which means the other 80 percent of us are just a waste of company money and vending machine sandwiches.
So why do so few of us really excel at our jobs? Well, science says...

Are you at work? Stop and count how many windows you have open on your computer screen. Count each tab on your Web browser separately. You've probably got your email open, maybe an Office document, a chat window, Facebook, a Tower Defense flash game. This site. Maybe you're on the phone while you're looking at all that. And depending on what time of day it is, who knows where your blood alcohol count is hovering ...

Sober people do not look that happy while working.
It's all part of life in the modern world, right? Multitasking, we all like to think, comes as naturally as Irish-ing up our coffee on casual Mondays and Tuesdays. Science says you're wrong.
Reputable neuroscientists claim that, for the most part, multitasking is physically impossible. Instead, the brain is able to switch its focus between separate processes really fast. Multitaskers are not saving time by doing multiple tasks at once. They're just segmenting the workload and making it harder to concentrate on any one task enough to actually get it done correctly.

Things get even worse once he adds "drinking" to the queue.
In fact, researchers at Stanford University have found that the more we multitask, the worse we are at it. When tested on memory, ability to switch tasks and ability to focus exclusively on one task, heavy multitaskers (that is, people who reported that they routinely used multiple media at once) scored worse across the board. While non-multitaskers were able to switch their focus completely between tasks, the experienced multitaskers were not able to stop thinking about the other activities while focusing on the job at hand.
In one test, researchers told the subjects to focus on some red rectangles on a computer screen and note changes in position. They then filled the rest of the screen with some useless shapes. A normal person had no problem with the task, but the mutlitaskers couldn't keep from getting distracted by the irrelevant noise. That's right. Multitasking happens to be the one skill that practice makes you worse at. Well, that and the people who consider themselves "heavy multitaskers" also tend to be the type who lose an entire workday every time someone brings a laser pointer into the office. Either way, our projections indicate that if work habits continue on their current path, in 30 years there won't be a single productive employee remaining on earth.

Google corporate HQ, 2047.

If you think you've never caused a disastrous misunderstanding via email, it's for one of two reasons:
1) You've never used email before;
2) You were simply oblivious to the misunderstanding when it occurred.

"All I did was post a comment on Jan's wall saying her thighs looked less huge. That's mostly a compliment."
The rest of us can remember vividly at least one occasion where an email was badly misinterpreted because the nod and wink we made while typing it somehow didn't come across in the text. Or, the recipient projected a tone of voice in the message that you didn't intend.
Once more, science confirms what we've seen from the cubicle. One study had participants write an email that they considered to be funny, and then estimate what readers would rate it on a one to 10 comedy scale. The writers guessed they'd be rated at an average of 7.27, while in actuality recipients gave them a measly 3.55 (by comparison, getting a nostril stapled shut is a 4.1).

"The office can't get enough of my witty shenanigans!"
But sarcasm is the real killer. Before sending your coworker your totally sarcastic quips about what you'll do if they don't return your stapler (staple their freaking nostril shut), consider this: In one study, only 56 percent of people could even figure out whether a message was phrased in a sarcastic tone. If you're the type of person who reads Cracked, that should set off some real freaking alarms right there.
No, that girl across the hall doesn't know your sexual advances are a wacky "I could NEVER think of you that way!" joke. Your boss won't get that the 47 paragraphs graphically describing his torturous death are just part of a polite ribbing.
Seriously. We're trying to help you here. Careers end because of this. The cops get called.

One less page view for us.

There is a very easy way to start a raging, near-riot in any office:
Upgrade the equipment.
Have management buy everyone new, state-of-the-art keyboards, where the keys are just a little off from where they were on the previous versions. Let them upgrade the software or operating system to the newest and best... which includes moving around all of the menu options the employees depend on. By the end of the first day, the staff will be demanding they bring the obsolete equipment back or else they'll set the new stuff on fire and chuck it all out of the top floor window.

Windows Vista has caused more violent uprisings than the Communist Manifesto
It's not just that we blindly resist change, either. After all, we tend to spend a lot of our working hours complaining about the ancient copier or how the computers still run Windows 3.1. If the bosses get everyone together and promise we're finally getting all-new stuff next week, we'll break out the extra-fancy microwave popcorn in celebration. It's only when we sit down to actually use the new stuff for a day that the rage sets in. Why?
Well, psychologists have actually studied this, and found that for whatever reason, we can't quite get a handle on our own learning curve. Before actually using a new piece of equipment or trying a new task, we tend to overestimate how easy it will be to learn it (think of all the guitars sitting abandoned in closets right now).

He'll be that excited for about six seconds.
But then, after actually trying it, we go the other way--we overestimate how long it will take to get good at it ("I'll never be able to use this stupid thing!"). It's as if we have a balloon-like sense of our own competence. Overinflated, and easily punctured.








I daresay #4 explains the majority of Cracked comments.
ReplyI can say this doesn't apply to me because I'm a cashier.
ReplyOn multi-tasking, I hate "Time Management". It's the most stupid thing office type jobs push at you. Yes, the reason I am behind in my work is that I can't manage my time. Not that you expect one person to do three peoples jobs and interrupt my work to make something else a priority every twenty minutes!
ReplyAnd sometimes the updates are actually worse and slower than old systems.
ReplyOur newer main access suite of programs is way more slow and buggy than our old single program that had more functionality.
And our old scanning program allows multiple scans of data and faster filing than the new one which only allows single scans and routing.
I'm with you! Our new system means we can no longer scan a persons details into the computer but have to manually enter it. It takes at least 10 minutes longer.
#3 I would say it's not from the fact that people don't like new things, but it's more, people have to learn how to use the new tech WHILE having all of their work done still, so not only are they trying to figure it out, but they have to get their regular amount of work done, because bosses/managers/supervisors don't want to let people learn how to use the equipment before starting work again.
ReplyMost "Multi-taskers" rush their work = half-ass effort. And are metal breakdowns/anxiety attacks waiting to happen. However, some people (like chefs/culinary artists/stock brokers) can somehow do that crap with proficiency (or that's just the result of passion towards your career) Me, I'd melt down in screaming stress!
ReplyThis reminds me of the Office.
ReplyI read the article fully expecting it to relate to me, and hoping it would help me not be terrible at everything ever...
Replyi thought the article was interesting, but not applicable to everyone, especially not all readers. maybe humans weren't made for multitasking, but that depends on your definition. i charge anyone who argues against the ability to multitask to hold a service industry job. the best servers are the ones who can keep an eye on multiple tables, remember the five tasks they have to do immediately, calm down a frustrated coworker, take criticism from the manager, and still remain focused on which button orders the right menu option. or look at teachers: grading papers while keeping an eye on 30+ students as they do an exam. on another related note, the argument focuses on ability to do multiple things at the same performance level as the other tasks done individually. this does not include the ability to focus on multiple things in rapid succession, which is what most "heavy multitaskers" are actually doing.
Replyalso, on the topic of overrating oneself: the statistic did not include the number of people who underestimate themselves or any research backing that.
on the topic of racism: everyone has something against someone. preconceptions are how we protect ourselves. it's what you use that information for, and how much you really buy into it. and it's not only skin color, but culture as well. people, in general, are much more receptive to someone they can relate to, someone they respect and are respected by, regardless of skin color.
I despise people who announce what great multitaskers that they are. When I hear someone say something along those lines about themselves I know to be careful about everything they tell or give me. These people are ALWAYS f*****g up. Why? Because human beings can't multitask. These assholes rate right up there with the walking disaster areas who consider themselves "big idea" people who can't be bothered with mundane attention to detail.
Reply#2 was filled with bad logic.
ReplyAnd the final paragraph was even WORSE. It essentially said, "30-40% of people overrate themselves. Therefore, so must you!"
While it's true that far too few people work on introspection and things along those lines, it's entirely possible to rate yourself as above average and for it to be true. The question is not whether you rate yourself as such, but whether you're capable of accepting the alternative.
It could also come from a low opinion of people in general. You think you're above average because you rate the average so low.
Tomato tomahto. Either way, people have a tendency to rate themselves above average-- whether it comes from inflated self worth or low opinion of people in general is irrelevant.
>Read the first page of the article
Reply>First two have horribly misinterpretted scientific studies
Yeah, this'll be a GREAT article! I mean, who doesn't love writers BSing their way through things?
I don't think that guessing that a person's I.Q was the same as they guessed is science. I.Q is all nonsense anyway.
ReplyWell, it's certainly effective at measuring how good they do on an IQ test.
Are we just assuming everyone who reads Cracked is doing so from their cubicle?
ReplyYeah. Mostly because we ARE.
My mom can have a conversation on the phone and with her kids at the same time. But that's probably from decades of being the emergency contact of the entire freaking town, and having five kids.
ReplyHave you ever been on the other end of that phone? I HATE talking to parents because they are always saying something to their kids at the same time.
@iDrum: Congratulations! You can hit a drum in time (that's kind of part of the deal when you're a drummer) and walk at the same time, without getting lost. We're all so very proud of you.
ReplyAny mention of racism on Cracked does not address hostility towards any of the other ethnic groups (ESPECIALLY not white people, but you already know that).
Replywell this is a little awkward, i have actually everything up that they described in the article: facebook, tower defense, plenty of tabs open, and im currently on the phone. I need to get a new job
Replyyou job sounds pretty sweet actually.
Based on this article, I am awesome at work. Damn. I rock.
ReplyNice article.
Reply