6 Famous Unsolved Mysteries (That Have Totally Been Solved)
One of our favorite pastimes here at Cracked is sucking the mystery out of life like the cream out of a Twinkie, leaving only the bland, dry sponge cake of reality behind. To that end, we've decided to list the often mundane solutions to some of the world's most enduring mysteries, and once again, you're welcome.

The disappearance of Amelia Earhart is probably the most well-known mystery in the world that doesn't involve Tom Hanks looking for clues in old paintings. In 1936, Earhart planned to reserve herself a page in the record books by flying around the world; a 29,000-mile journey. On the last 7,000-mile leg of her second attempt in 1937, she disappeared after giving her last radio transmission. The transmission was not anything helpful like, "I'm going to try to just fly through this mountain. I saw it in a cartoon once."

More has been speculated about her disappearance than has probably been written about her life. One of the more epic theories is that Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, went down over part of the Japanese Empire and were captured, interrogated as spies and executed. Some assert that she was actually a spy for President Roosevelt, and that she secretly lived to the end of her days in New Jersey. Still others, with less imagination, think that she deliberately flew her plane into the Pacific because fuck it.

Maybe her gigantic head popped at high altitude.
The Answer:
Remarkably, we've pretty much had the Earhart mystery solved ever since partial remains were found on an island... in 1940. That's right, 70 years ago. Only four years after she vanished.
To be fair, half of the bones were carried away by giant crabs, and the rest have since been lost because nobody thought it was important or even curious that a skeleton should turn up on an island just southeast of where Amelia freaking Earhart was going. Neither did it strike a chord that the remains turned out to be those of a white woman with Earhart's measurements, or that they were found alongside a pocket knife, a broken cosmetics jar, a piece of glass from an airplane windshield and the same exact type of navigational system Earhart had been using. It's inconclusive, dammit!

The truth is out there. And we won't rest until we find it, or we get too drunk to remember how to spell "Eaerhurt."
Even though all of this evidence is circumstantial, it's a freaking slam-dunk compared to what we have been forced to swallow from conspiracy theorists, who rank Earhart's disappearance right up there with the mystery of the Mary Celeste.
Which reminds us...

In 1872, the ship was spotted off the Azores in the Atlantic completely intact and undisturbed, aside from its missing crew. Not a single person, alive or dead or undead, could be found, despite everyone's personal belongings still sitting undisturbed where they had been left. Even little things like valuables and piano music were right where they should have been. It was as if its crew had simply evaporated.
The strange case of the disappearing crew of the merchant ship Mary Celeste is not only the most famous maritime mystery in history, it is the episode which served as midwife to the Bermuda Triangle hysteria.

We are through the looking glass here, people.
So how did everyone just vanish? Ghosts? Aliens? Sea monsters? Dimensional vortex? According to the History Channel, yes. After all, the case has proven a tough one to crack. All the ship's papers were missing, but the logbook was still safe and sound. Piracy is unlikely since there were no signs of a struggle and no booty missing. The main hatch was sealed, and there were no storms or time/space disruptions reported in the area.

Reports of elevated Old One activity remain unconfirmed.
The Answer:
Scientists now point to the one baffling clue that the ship left us with: Of its cargo of 1,701 barrels of alcohol, nine were empty. We know what you're thinking: The crew threw their captain overboard so that they could get drunk off raw alcohol and take the lifeboat out for a joyride, which went splendidly until they crashed it into a whale. Sounds like one hell of an interesting weekend, but the truth is actually a billion times more awesome.

You all ready for this?
The single greatest maritime mystery in history is now believed to have been the subject of one of the most incredible explosions in the history of alcohol. Dr. Andrea Sella, a professor of chemistry at University College London, created a replica of the Mary Celeste's hold back in 2006 just so he could find a MacGyverish way to blow it up without leaving a single sign of a fire. He simulated a leak of the ship's nine barrels of alcohol and found that once the vapor was ignited, say by a pipe or a spark, it created a "pressure-wave type of explosion... There was a spectacular wave of flame but, behind it, was relatively cool air. No soot was left behind and there was no burning or scorching."

Dr. Andrea Sella.
That's right, the Mary Celeste was likely subject to a freaky ghost explosion powerful enough to blow open all the hatches, but ultimately leave everyone and everything on the boat completely unharmed. The crew, however, would have experienced a freakout akin to when the Nazis opened the Ark of the Covenant.
It appears the missing crew were so utterly horrified that they piled into the ship's lifeboat without any useful things like food or water, eventually sinking or dying of thirst and exposure. Yes, the Mary Celeste would have still looked perfectly fine as they sailed off into Death's open arms, but ask yourself: Would you have volunteered to go back onto that ship?

Atlantis sure is one hell of a tantalizing story. First documented by the ancient Greek philosophers, it serves constantly as a warning for modern society against every possible threat from war to climate change to alien invasion, where applicable. They were the most advanced civilization on Earth, but even they couldn't stop whatever catastrophe managed to sink their island into the Atlantic. For centuries we have dreamed about finding this lost city and unlocking the secrets to its fate, so that we might prevent the same thing happening to us!

And make an Indiana Jones video game with a better plot than two of the movies.
Unfortunately, the search for Atlantis has yielded exactly no results ever. Plato is pretty much all we have to work with, and he's too dead to return any of our calls. However, this hasn't stopped proponents of the theory of the lost city to draw fancy maps of it, which sure does feel like a step in the right direction for some reason.

The fact that they avoided Oklahoma is clear evidence of their status as a super-advanced society.
Nevertheless, Atlantis has turned into a bit of a super-conspiracy theory which absorbs just about anything you throw at it, and has served as a tentative answer to basically every other mystery in this article.
The Answer:
Atlantis is not a thing.
First of all, our knowledge of plate tectonics rules out the possibility of sunken mystery continents. But there's a far more convincing reason than even this: That is, Atlantis was something that Plato completely pulled out of his ass just so Socrates could have something to talk about, and he specifically mentions in his writing that Atlantis is a completely hypothetical city.

"No one will take this 'Atlantis' shit seriously. They'd have to be even more drunk and ignorant than ancient Greeks."
This is part of the reason why Atlantis was not taken seriously until modern times. Most ancients actually took Plato's dialogues as the thought experiments they really were.
What's more, the book that mentions Atlantis, the Timaeus, is fewer than 100 pages long. This is shit you can seriously knock out while you're killing time at the bus station. Though it should not come as much surprise that countless books and god knows how many hours of the History Channel have been dedicated to asking a riddle as easy to solve as looking up a word in the dictionary. It's pretty damn easy to pass yourself as an expert in a book that most people have never actually read past the first few pages.

The History Channel: For People Who Hate Reading.








Pretty sure the Tunguska explosion was of a meteorite in the sky, not from the actual collision with the Earth. An actual collision with a decently sized meteorite would do some pretty catastrophic damage.
ReplyI'll buy that the Anastasia and Atlantis myths are busted, since evidence exists to prove otherwise, and I'll assume those were Amelia Earhart's remains, although any evidence was circumstantial and its existence hearsay. However, the Mary Celeste mystery-debunking theory fails to mention whether lifeboats were indeed missing from the vessel and whether there was any sign (not just scorch marks) of an explosion - I can understand the "rescuers'" perhaps overlooking scattered debris and overturned objects, but find it hard to believe no one thought, "Hmmm... the lifeboats are gone - for some reason the crew abandoned ship." And the Tunguska hypothesis does little to explain the massive destruction and does not jibe with eyewitness accounts. I mean, how many trees did the the cloud from the space shuttle launch flatten and what kind of pressure was measured? From the this article and Cornell University's press release, seemingly none.
ReplyI think Atlantis might have been based on a real island and a real disaster. There's an island in the Medeteranian (the name of which escapes me at the moment). The shape of the island is similar to what Plat described ( a series of concentric rings with a mountain in the center) and the mountain in it is a volcano that did erupt destroying some of the land. No supernatural act of the gods, no super advanced civilization just a mundane island that suffered a mundane cataclysm. It might be wrong but it would seem to fit at least some of the story.
ReplyThera.
Unfortunately, it seems the author here equates "much more believable explanation" with "totally solved." Except maybe for the Anastasia one, all that's been done here is present slightly more reasonable explanations than "aliens done it."
ReplyI think they are about as solved as they will get after so long. The Atlantis one is testable, either they said its hypothetical or didn't. Until the aliens or Bermuda triangle proponents come up with some proof for their claims, I'd say rationality wins.
I remember that mythbusters scene!
Reply...damn that was lame of me...
While I like the bit on Amelia Earhart and the ship, I dislike pretty much everything else. Your research is off, and it lacks entertainment value. You totally discount the evidence that proves Atlantis existed, and said Anastasia was made by Disney(not that smart). I do agree, though, that it was a great movie. Hercules was too. Improve your articles next time.
ReplyWhat proof, exactly, is there for the existence of atlantis? Especially when the inventor of the world said it was hypothetical?
This article is condescending and terribly researched.
ReplyYeah, they found Anastasia, BUT. Did you know they didn't find Alexis? That's right, her younger hemophiliac brother? He's the real mystery.
ReplyUnless you actually read the link provided ("confirmed") which says that... yes, they found his remains as well.
Hercules>anastasia
ReplyI HUNDRED f*****g TIMES BETTER!
ps f**k Rasputin
Hercules had much less 80-year old political propaganda, too.
actually, Atlantis TECHNICALLY existed. It was a city in Crete, I believe, that was no more advanced than any other city of the time. The tie-in to Atlantis is that an earthquake buried the city in the ocean, since it was on a cliff, (if I remember correctly). The Plato Atlantis was given this event somewhere else and, presto! conspiracy.
ReplySince Crete had flush toilets before Hatshepsut's great-great-grandmother was born, there's no record of an Atlantis in Classical Greece, and the Minoan language is still undeciphered, I'm calling bullshit on all of this.
no, Plato is very very specific about where Atlantis was and what it was. You're referring to Minos and the eruption of Thera - it's a good story if you haven't read up on it I suggest it. We use Atlantis to mean any early and lost civilisation. It's not a good use - early civilisations absolutely did exist. Atlantis didn't.
Anastasia. Is. Not. Better. Than. Hercules.
ReplyAnastasia. Is. Not. A. Disney. Movie.
ReplyTechnically the article never said that it was.
Not Disney, ergo automatically better.
Hey, I liked Hercules!
Replyif the light from 3 was seen in the UK it would be like the 5th of november not the 4th of july foolish americans
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesExcept nothing exploded on the Fifth of November silly Brit.
Actually, in Britain, the 5th of November is Bonfire Night, when we set off fireworks. So things do explode of the 5th of November to celebrate the failed blowing up of the Houses of Parliament.
He's talking about the light from a suppossed smoke plume from a comet. Don't make your self look so foolish in your haste to make us look so.
Anastasia wasn't Disney
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesConfirmed by the DVD copy I have. You are correct!
I don't think they said it was, but that's a pretty interesting tidbit.
Lanei... it was right there in the article. I'm not sure how Quercia didn't discover that fact while doing a Google image search. Pretty hard to miss.
hahahaha... good read all around. I forgot about Amelia's disappearance... But I would've sworn she crashed somewhere or at the very least landed short of her goal due to technical difficulties and somehow met someone she fell in love with and lived happily ever after (yes I grew up with Disney films) but seriously... in 2011 she's obviously dead - mystery solved. I figured atlantis was fantasy... we've found absolutely NOTHING to support it ever existed... like oh, say the ancient egyptians, greeks, romans, Jesus... yeah - nothing like that... but overall a good read that makes you think.
ReplyYou really don't grasp the concept of "mystery," do you.
"What happened? Why did it happen? And how?"
"Who caaaaaaaares? It's olllllllllllld! I'm borrrrrrrred!"
well technically there's no solid independent evidence for Jesus..
Atlantis never existed, no, but there is real recorded history that might have served as Plato's inspiration. For instance, the Minoan explosion.
Replythe Epic of Gilgamesh (written down roughly 7,000 years ago) contains a good description of a civilisation being destroyed by volcano long before the Minoans; Plato probably had a selection of folk-memories to choose from.
Anna Anderson's corpse was DNA tested and they found that she was bullshitting. But a lot of people still believed she was Anastasia, despite you know, science, proving that little theory to be wrong.
ReplyMainly because people trust Ingrid Bergman and Helen Hayes more than they trust scientists. For a long time, that's where pretty much everyone got their history from. As you'd expect, the film played fast and loose with facts, like, for example, in the film, the Grand Duchess (Helen Hayes), the closest relative of the Tsar known to be living, acknowledges Anna Anderson as Anastasia; not only did this not happen, but they never even met. I predict, though, that as fewer and fewer people know who Helen Hayes and Ingrid Bergman were, and more and more people watch CSI, and demand DNA before allowing someone to be convicted of jaywalking, this one will finally be put to rest.
That's bullshit, there is no Disney movie greater than Hercules!
ReplyPeople, before you blindly parrot the guy making fun of people who didn't read the source, how about actually reading the source?
Reply"And when you were speaking yesterday about your city and citizens [in the Republic], the tale which I have just been repeating to you [about Atlantis and ancient Athens] came into my mind, and I remarked with astonishment how, by some mysterious coincidence, you agreed in almost every particular with the narrative of Solon."
"The city and citizens, which you yesterday described in fiction, *we will now transfer to the world of reality*."
In other words, when Critias was a boy, Solon told him about a factual prehistoric war between an Athens not unlike Socrates' fictional Republic and the city of Atlantis. And he outright says "this is factual."
Not that it was, or even that the readers were meant to take it as such, but if you're going to make fun of people for not reading a source, how about actually reading the source? And not saying it says the exact opposite of what it says?
I agree. It's clear that the fictional state referred to is Socrates ideal state. The story of Atlantis is given as part of the history of the early Athens which was lost to Athenian memory but preserved by the Egyptians.
Bad Cracked writer! Bad! To the dog house, git!