6 Amazingly High-Tech Ancient Weapons
When you picture a war from, say, a thousand years ago, what are the combatants fighting with? Swords, right? Maybe with the odd bow and arrow thrown in?
Well, one thing you should never underestimate is mankind's ability to come up with cool-ass ways to kill each other. Believe it or not, our ancestors were equipped with weaponry as high-tech as...

In short, it was a semi-automatic weapon... from 2,400 years ago.
In fourth century B.C., the Chinese developed a new kind of crossbow that revolutionized the way siege warfare was fought:

That's a feeder on top and the lever near the end is the repeating action. The repeating crossbow was the first semi-automatic weapon ever invented. Trained soldiers could let fly 10 bolts in 15 seconds before the magazine needed to be reloaded. Due to the nature of the action, it needed to be shot from the hip in order to fire that quickly. Oh, and the bolts were often dipped in a fast acting poison so that just a scratch could be fatal. Fighting in small teams reduced the risk of friendly fire.
Siege warfare was all the rage when this baby hit the scene. It proved to be an essential defensive weapon as one could keep backing away from the enemy while shooting wildly into the advancing horde.

Seriously, just look at that shit. It was a damned crossbow assault rifle, and it existed so long ago Jesus could have owned one. An old one.

"Jesus Christ! Cover me!"
The repeating crossbow never goes out of style and in fact was still in widespread use during the early part of the 20th century as an anti-burglar weapon. This makes it the longest continuously used mechanical device in the world.

When the Byzantine Empire invented Greek fire around 673 A.D.--a terrifying, napalm-like liquid that could keep burning even sitting on water--the only thing they were worried about was finding new and exciting ways to deploy it in battle. When the "light-it-and-run" method just didn't cut it anymore, they were inspired to invent the first hand grenades. But as cool as that probably was, they had another method which they preferred: flamethrowers. Probably because they cut down on the time it took to fry their enemies into charred little pieces.

"You wanted yours well done, right?"
Flamethrowers, which experts say rank on the badass scale somewhere above Monster Trucks and just below playing the solo from "Stairway to Heaven" with your junk, were the most powerful weapon of the Byzantine navy. It allowed them to rule the seas for hundreds of years, and they somehow existed in an age when humans were pretty sure outer space was a blanket of smoke emanating from Bezelda, the She-Dragon.
Even more surprising, the way they were made and operated back then was not that different from their modern counterparts in design. The Byzantine flamethrower used a piston to shoot liquid naphtha through a lit flame.The Chinese improved the Byzantine design by adding double-piston bellows which were able to shoot fire with both the up and the downstroke, creating a steady stream similar to modern flamethrowers.

Above: either a flamethrower schematic or IKEA instructions.
But the device's roots go back even further than that. The basic idea of the flamethrower existed long before the invention of Greek fire, as early as third century B.C. The dream was always there. When mankind discovered the secret to creating fire, the next challenge was figuring out how to hurl it at people we didn't like.

This would be the Chinese model.

By the 14th century A.D., just when all of Europe was enjoying being almost completely wiped out by the Black Plague, the Chinese had mastered the many military implications of gunpowder and had become well versed in the ancient art of "blowing shit up." But trust us, they weren't just using their exploding rockets to celebrate the New Year.

The Chinese had invented goddamn missiles that could fire rockets. These beasts could climb hundreds of feet into the air before descending on their enemy. Then, once the main booster of the missile depletes, the rockets inside are automatically ignited, sending down a flaming hailstorm of pants-shitting terror on the soldiers below.

The first multistage rockets were used by the Chinese navy and were called "huo long chi shui" which translates to "fire-dragon issuing from the water." The multi-stage rockets could launch over walls and fire projectiles that would explode on impact. Packed with 750g of gunpowder and weighing five to 10 kilograms, one of these missiles could cruise up to a mile and a half.

Did we mention they looked like dragons?
And while we're on the Chinese, we should point out they also had...








u guys forgot about the lasers that destroyed the Roman fleets
ReplyThat was disproved on Mythbusters. They were mirrors, and they didn't even work when the boats were covered in fuel in hot weather.
That was disproved. The mirrors that they supposedly used as lasers couldn't burn an oil-covered boat, even with tons of mirrors.
Anybody else start thinking of the old Age of Empires games when they read this?
ReplyI believe it was the third century bc you were looking for. The romans had conquered carthage, syracuse, and spain for a good 300 some odd years by the third century ad. Second paragraph of the Claw section.
ReplyPlease check your facts, A Nimitz class aircraft carrier has a complement of over 5000. making 7200 less than 1.5 times more, not "almost 2" unless you are being incredibly vague with the world almost.
ReplySo tell me, how do those nits taste?
kinda like how you vaguely spelled "word" correctly?
i saw sir boots of amtgard in the woods doin at least 10 shots in 15 seconds with a standard recurve 35 lb bow, along with awkward foam tipped arrows. also good tactical footspeed, kentucky lol ;p we was playin in cali too, was pickin up arrows and also some lag in between findin open targets, but very fast reloads with arrows available, had nubs on arrow duty too
ReplyDon't you love it when the last guy who commented put down the exact thing you were going to.
ReplyOne small correction: though the Siege of Syracuse happened during the Second Punic War, Syracuse was actually an independent Greek city, not Carthaginian.
Replythat boat is pretty pimp
Replyfa sho.
#5 - that's the piston that was invented in the 3rd century BC, not the flamethrower. That's clearly what the linked article says.
ReplyI must have that last ship.
ReplyI will live on that, wear a felt suit, and demand to be called Mr. Bitches. Because I would have a legion of bitches.
Sorry. I already named my cat Mr. Bitches.
Another reason to fear the Chinese
ReplySemi-automatic means the weapons action system resets itself automatically after each trigger pull and the sequence is set off by the user individually. If you have to manually move a lever to do all of the work, it is not semi-automatic. It is a lever action repeating crossbow. Still bad-ass, but cracked needs to do more fact checking and a lot more proofreading before posting these things.
Reply Hide All See All 4 Repliesexactly. it's like calling a pump-action shotgun "semi-automatic"
No, actually your description is based on how we categorize modern firearms. Literally semi-automatic means exactly what the the two components of the word imply - that it has automatic features, but falls short of being fully-automatic. The fact that the weapon has an amo feed magazine that automatically loads the quiver into firing position as the string is c**ked qualifies the designation.
It actually is semi-automatic. The c**king and the firing happen at the same time, when you pull the lever. Once the lever gets all the way down, it fires.
I would post a video, but I can't find one. You'll just have to watch the Sun Tsu episode of deadliest warrior to see it in action.
I love how the filtering is editing out all references to cocking the bow.
Thought while reading #2:
ReplyNot The Craw, THE CRAW!
Archimedes, inventor of the original claw game.
ReplyHoly Shit!! I won a boat full of screaming romans!!
QUICK! somebody edit one of the articles captions to read this!
So the Chinese had semi-automatic crossbows then, but every fps has a manual reload crossbow. What the hell is that about?
ReplyMainly because the zhuge nu is so horribly inaccurate that the safest place to stand is probably right in front of it, thanks to that massive hand-cranking action. Firing it into an advancing wall of soldiers is pretty much all you can do.
It's such a shame that Greek Fire wasn't invented during the time of the Ancient Greeks. Imagine If Odysseus had a chemical like that. If he had used against the Sirens he would have convinced the pirate mermaids that he was a demigod with great power and they would have left him and his goons alone.
ReplyI never though I'd laugh at anything involved with someone named Homer ever again.
Syracuse was not Carthaginian, nor was it aligned with Carthage at the time of the siege (except in the sense that it fought Rome). Syracuse was a Greek city-state that warred as much against Carthage as against Rome.
ReplyAn annoying oversight considering that this information can be gleaned from the article you linked to. Seriously guys. Do you read what you link?
Syracuse was Carthage's ally at that moment. You can read about it on the internet or your local library.
They failed because the conflict (2nd Punic war) and the siege of Syracuse where Archimedes was involved happened in the 3rd century B.C not A.D - you know Hannibal and the elephants, Noli disturbare circulos meos, Aut viam inveniam aut faciam etc etc.
Latin-pwnd. You don't see that everyday. We've come so far.
@RikiO The Chinese did try several times. Their first was during Han Dynasty, and ended up in financial disaster (and it's demise) because it's damn expensive to rule over the empty Gobi desert.
ReplyThe second was during Tang dynasty where they discovered there's another rich civilization at the other end of the world (Romans). But again, it's too expensive to go there, by land. This time they dodged the bullet and just stay home after some scouting missions.
The third was by Ming dynasty with admiral Zheng He at the dawn of the age of sails. His naval force was so big, they could land marines on any European ports with impunity. However, he only got to the west side of Africa because his sponsor, the emperor, had died and the new one hated his gut.
Rome was contemporary with Han Dynasty China, not Tang Dynasty China.
Again, Cracked makes yet another stupid inaccuracy over mundane details.
ReplyZhuge Nu was invented around the Three Kingdoms era which, if you are a fan of Koei games and you know who the hell is Zhuge Liang, is around 2nd century AD. That makes it 1800 years old.
And Archimedes were of 3rd century BC. The Roman didn't fight Carthaginians on 3rd century AD, because by then they were already master of Mediterrania and the last of Carthaginian had died half a millennium before.
Not necessarily true, repeating crossbow was invented during warring states around 250 B.C. One was even found in a 4th century ruin. Zhuge Liang just improved the design. Improved it a lot. So that's why he gets all the credit.
I think this article is great, EXCEPT the Claw and the Hellenistic Warships are not practical weapons. They may be "bad ass" weapons, but not high tech nor effective. In fact, these last two mentions don't have physical proof. Also notice, the size of Hellenistic Warships. It is too big for battle, it can only be used for transport. As tested by many ship engineers when the Chinese Sea Admiral Zheng He came out, a ship that size or bigger will break under sea currents and will not be stable since it's essentially still wood.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesAlso, for the claw, it's just plain ridiculous. I mean come on, really? Can't the people on the ship just cut the ropes or burn the ropes? Also, do you realize how many people it would take to actually pull a whole ship upward so far that gravity will have enough force to crush the ship using it's own weight??? Lastly, these claws work for short short ranges. Most ships has catapults and attack long range and thus probably destroys the claws before approaching the land.
Also, for Hellenistic Warships, the claw would have to clamp onto a part of the ship that can withstand the weight of the ship, otherwise, whatever the claw grabs, it just breaks when pulling upward.
'otherwise, whatever the claw grabs, it just breaks when pulling upward.'
Isn't that the idea?
Wow - clearly, you've never: a) tried to cut or burn a rope strong enough to lift a ship; b) seen what a catapult heavy enough to damage a wall does when fired from the deck of a ship (protip: its not great for said ship's stability); c) read anything about Roman-age naval warfare (that is absolutely not how they fought); d) bothered to read the links attached to the article, which clearly state that a version of the Archimedes claw has been built and tested successfully.
Honestly, try doing some reading before you share your uniformed opinions.
No, no, ares6 is saying that the claw itself breaks, not the ship.
"Shall we not make an end of fighting against this geometrical Briareus who plays pitch and toss with our ships to our confusion...if they (the Roman sailors) did but see a piece of rope or wood projecting above the wall, they would cry 'there it is again,'...insomuch that Marcellus (the Roman commander) desisted from all conflicts and assaults."
Plutarch.
Also: if the lever were long enough, and strong enough, it would take exactly one person to lift a warship.