The End of Online Anonymity: Why Will You Be Freaking Out?
When you make forum posts beginning with, "I'm not a racist, but..." or call us retards in the comments, do you use your real name? What if you had to? Cracked has no plans to implement such a feature, but the world certainly seems to be heading that direction.

You probably saw the raging backlash that occurred when one of the world's largest video game companies tried to institute a "you must post under your real name" policy: The idea lasted about two days before they were forced to back down.
But that felt like a temporary reprieve for anonymity. Facebook Connect is turning up everywhere, and encourages (sometimes tricks) you into using your Facebook name on other sites (like ours!). As we speak, one of the world's most wired countries, South Korea, has had a real-name policy for Internet users since last year.

For all that's going to accomplish.
The curtain is coming down (or going up, depending on what type of curtain you're picturing) and it's fascinating to see how differently people react to that possibility.

OH GOD LOWER IT AGAIN.
So where do you fall on this spectrum?

Let's get this out of the way right now: We know you don't have to be a troll to be afraid of revealing your identity online. A whole bunch of us here at Cracked go by fake names so as not to be harassed by people who, for instance, preferred Michael Keaton's Batman.

"These people know nothing of my work. I must find them."
As commenters have pointed out, it's no different than how we all keep our real-life social circles separate--you're not the same person at the job interview that you were the previous Saturday night at the ICP concert, or at your weekly underground fight club sessions.
This is where it becomes a problem. There's no good reason an elementary school teacher shouldn't be allowed to pick up belly dancing as a hobby. However, if she were forced to upload her videos under her real name instead of "Fatima the Enchantress," she's much more likely to lose her job. People are quick to judge about that sort of thing.

Hint: It's the eyes.
Likewise, there's a lot of reasons you might not want people to see you posting on a forum for online gaming. Maybe you're running for office, like this guy.

Ed Hermes: hardcore Halo player, aspiring County Supervisor.
While your Halo skills may win you younger voters, that only helps you on the extraordinarily rare occasions that they actually vote.
Or maybe you just want to surf some forums without being surrounded by ass-kissers but you happen to be Axl Rose.
Unfortunately, in the argument over whether we should make online identities transparent, those of us who prefer online anonymity for innocent reasons will constantly be confused with the other groups on this list. Mostly because that's exactly how they want it.
Unfortunately, there are…

This is the actual intended target of anti-anonymity policies: the spammers that spam without consequence; the child pornographers; the trolls that badger kids into suicide; the anonymous assholes making up lies and destroying people's reputations for fun.

Much like Iago in Shakespeare's Othello.
Just this week you've heard how 4chan tracked down and spread the address and phone number of a girl who insulted them via webcam, rallying the forum to call the family at all hours of the night to make death threats. The girl was placed in protective police custody.
She is 11-years old.

Left: How 4chan sees themselves. Right: What 4chan is actually like.
Anonymity doesn't just make this kind of behavior possible, it seems to cause it. It's behavior that occurs purely because the perpetrators are sure they'll never be found out. It was a series of similar high-profile cyberbullying cases that made real-name laws possible in South Korea, starting with the infamous Dog Poop Girl. She saw anonymous Internet trolls post the addresses of her and her relatives, harassing her until she couldn't go out in public anymore and had to drop out of school. Because her dog pooped on the subway.

This isn't just a man cleaning up the poop of some girl's dog. This is history, folks.
Most of South Korea felt this was a little out of proportion for one dog poop. Between that and a rash of cyberbullying suicides involving celebrities, the public decided anonymity wasn't worth it. The U.S. isn't at that point yet, but then again, Natalie Portman hasn't been harassed to death by 4chan yet.

Even though she was partially responsible for a much bigger turd.
Ironically, it is this group that has spawned...

Some people don't have anything to hide about themselves except the fact that they exist, which they apparently believe is enough to cause someone to track them down and rape them, particularly if they are female. For example, here's some sample quotes from World of Warcraft players in response to the announcement that they would be required to use their real names:
"Not to be all gloom and doom, but just watch. Within the first month or two, we're going to see a kidnapping, assault, rape or murder that will be connected back to RealID."
"Did you ever consider that maybe anyone operating in the world as female shouldn't have to deal with the choice of either a) don't participate, and miss out on something you want, or b) participate, and risk being harassed, stalked, raped and/or killed?"

How World of Warcraft looks like to them.
The idea is that once people know you are female, by looking at your real name, someone will inevitably track you down and harass you, and maybe rape you. Or if you are any gender and get into a fight with someone over politics or over who is using hax, they will track you down and harass you, and maybe rape you.
What is disturbing is this calm acceptance that your own online community is home to a disproportionate amount of extremely dangerous people. No one seems to be worried about being murdered after showing their first and last name to hundreds of other students at their university (in a class roster), or cashiers, or postal clerks. Meanwhile, the same people who are terrified of their real photo being shown online have no problem showing their face to thousands of strangers at the mall, or at a baseball game, or even on the subway, which is almost statistically guaranteed to have seven or eight rapists on each car.
There have been murders over online disputes, sure. But it's a tiny, tiny fraction as many as have happened over real-life disputes. Yet somehow, we consider the Internet to be much more dangerous.

Computer labs are FULL of Internet users, so no smart woman would go in there without a rape whistle.
Now, there's no doubt that the situation with the 11-year-old 4chan target is the kind of mass harassment that could have really only happened on the Internet. But the people in this group would hold that example up as part of the case for anonymity. After all, she would never have been harassed if she'd remained anonymous! It's not that lifting the veil will make 4channers rethink how they treat little girls, it's that it will make little girls of all of us.

Most people in this category haven't murdered anyone and many don't have any embarrassing secrets, and may not in fact have any concrete fears about what would happen if they had to be themselves on the internet.
But they do believe in privacy, and in privacy as a human right that shouldn't have to be justified in a case by case basis. There are lots of things people hide every day that aren't nefarious, like pooping. No one thinks it's wrong to poop and no one is trying to keep the fact that they poop a secret. Yet we put up restroom stalls around our public toilets. We can't build some great logic for it. We just don't want to have to poop in front of other people and that should be the default position.

Even if people can't see in, you'd have to be a freak to feel comfortable pooping in this one-way mirror toilet.
Not as much of a freak as the guy who designed it though.
Sometimes you're not doing anything wrong but your family or your boss have different ideas about what "wrong" is. If you can't convince your mom that a computer can't physically kidnap you like in TRON, maybe it's best she doesn't find out how many friends you chat with online. And what if your boss is a headline-skimmer who thinks all gamers are troubled "addicts"? Maybe you're comfortable being gay around strangers on a forum, but aren't ready to come out to grandma yet.

I mean, you had a whole party planned out for that.
What can be frustrating about this group is that among them is a subset of some very loud bandwagon jumpers who treat every single issue as the tearing down of the fucking Berlin Wall. For instance, the backlash over RealID is nothing compared to the infamous Digg revolt over HD-DVD, when users rose up valiantly to defend the basic human freedom of being allowed to publish proprietary HD-DVD decryption keys, flooding the site until Digg was forced to give in.

For them, everything from net neutrality to marijuana legalization is the front line of an epic battle of good and evil, with the brave people of the Internet fighting for their very lives against tyranny of The Man. Or as one Digg user said of the mighty battle: "Universal Content Utopia is here, and we are the bold revolutionaries. All government, religion, and corporate domination systems are doomed. We are very lucky to be alive today and a part of the colossal overturning of the Powers That Pretend To Be."

They don't realize that it becomes harder to take their arguments seriously if they are finding something new to be hysterical about every other week. That means the people who are being calm and thoughtful get tuned out right along with them.

These people are rare, but they exist. They say they aren't particularly afraid of being murdered by strangers, have nothing to hide themselves, and can't really imagine why other people would be unless they were up to no good.
Their avatar is their own face. Maybe they're the type who have 4,000 Facebook "friends" and invite all of them to their birthday party. They show up on a public forum and announce what bar they'll be at that night, in case anyone wants to drop by.

But would they poop in public?
We have to believe more people think they're in this group than actually are. Even if they're so comfortable in their own skin that they would have a furry wedding, isn't identity theft a real concern?
Or maybe they're just underestimating how far it will go. It's easy to laugh at the WoW players getting worked up, thinking anonymity is all about Gertrude Bumgardner not being able to pretend she's a sexy night elf anymore. But are they thinking about that nasty review they left on Yelp.com two years ago, for the same restaurant they're trying to apply for a job at now? Do these people never anonymously vent or blow off steam online about their spouse or coworkers? We're not sure if we admire how open these people are, or if they just haven't thought it through.

"Sorry to interrupt, I just thought I should let everyone know I farted."
We should all be thinking it through, though, because it's looking like some day we'll all have to join this group. So try this now: When you hit that "Submit Comment" button under this very article, imagine your comment coming up with your real name and address.
DISCLAIMER: REAL NAME WILL NOT SHOW UP. CRACKED HAS NO INTENTION OF IMPLEMENTING A REAL NAME SYSTEM. THE WEBCAMS CRACKED HAS INSTALLED IN YOUR HOUSE ARE MORE THAN SUFFICIENT. WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY TO SEE YOUR GENITALS AT ANY TIME.
Read more from Christina and David in 6 Well-Intentioned Ways You're Ruining Your Dog and 100 Unintentionally Hilarious Spam Subject Lines.








Well, I actually use my name in pretty much everything, but I still think that taking away the right for anonymity is wrong. Specially taking away anonymity because of bullying, because bullying would just increase if everybody can just go online and discover his best friend or that one dude he doesn't like very much is into some weird kinky stuff.
Replyrofl i use my facebook to say things like f**k christians, and there is no heaven. some people have ALOT of things to hide. i think thats the issue. for example my father tapes his laptop camera up so nobody can see him supposedly.......what i wonder is.....is something scary about someone watching his face? or does he not want someone to find out hes jerking off 8 times a day.......
Reply.
An ellipsis has only 3 periods, unless it's being used to end a sentence, in which case it has 4. Also, learn to type like you actually want people to read what you typed. Retard.
I posted some stuff in the comments on Collegehumor, which was funny at the time, but now I am 5 years older and not in college anymore. However, I can't delete the comment. So to any prospective employers, if that account gets linked to me, I will always be making those comments. Websites really should let you delete old comments.
Reply Hide All See All 3 Replieswell, you could always not say stupid things that you wouldnt say to someone in person but would behind their back?
Or more honestly, prospective employers should not be able to use it against you. Its amazing how people can scream and fight for the defense of freedom but immediately accept the tyranny of the workplace. It's fine, they replace freedom with money
he said he was in college. everyone knows youre allowed to be stupid in college.
Wait -- stripping anonymity would actually make it easier for anyone to bully people by electronic means. This would achieve the exact opposite effect. Moreover, consider that ganging up and bullying has gone on in far more personal terms way before the Internet (after all, armies ave conquered others by intimidation, harrassment, murder, pillaging, etc.) for centuries, and even on lesser levels it's been happening. How would this do anyone a service? Consider, too, the means of verification: your credit card number. Who wants to give access to one's credit card for something which is ostensibly free, unless they're planning to zap a charge out unseen when they decide it should be a pay service?
ReplyBut in this case the would-be attackers are also completely visible and so far less likely to commit the offence as it would be completely documented and impossible to hide from. This of course does not take into account hackers
Why is the government so keen on controlling the internet? I mean, did they forget internet made our lives many times more efficient?
ReplyFirst of all, if I lived near a bathroom like the one-way glass one up there, I'd walk around with a friend, and when someone walked in, I'd walk up to the glass and point and laugh and stuff at where the toilet would be.
Replyapathy is basically approval in the eyes of the government in regards to legislation. if you don't actively show your dislike for acts and bills violating your rights than you might as well be supporting it. becoming radical and vitriolic is oftentimes a result of this unfortunately but is certainly better than nothing. if there was more passionate and vocal disapproval amongst the American public than maybe we wouldn't have the Patriot Act or the very real threat of American citizens being indefinitely detained without trial under NDAA or AUMF. obviously, everyone is scared of terrorism but a lot more people should be scared of a police state as well.
Replyas far as i'm concerned people can be as obnoxious as they want when they talk about the government as long as they raise awareness while doing so.
If anonymity was abolished than yes, it would result in people being able to track each other down. It wouldn't happen all the time but it would happen often enough
Replybut remember there will be an electronic trail of the person doing the tracking, so if it is deemed illegal then they're very guilty.
I'm totally in group one, without the impression that other people ought to be as well. I understand that identity theft is a very real issue, but have taken extreme measures to ensure no one would actually want my identity. I do think before I press "submit" and have totally interrupted board meetings to inform everyone that it was I who ripped that massive and awesome flatulence induced butt crack flapping noise, followed by the pleasant, if not nausea inducing, aroma. Also, I sing songs to my fiance about poop (and she insists she's never once pooped, ever, though I suspect this may be a lie). Also, if you bring any harassment against me in the form of massive information leaks or blatant lies to ruin my reputation, you're wasting your time, as I mentioned previously how I have taken extreme measures to ensure no one would want my identity (including a horrible credit rating with no intent to pay off my student loans). so there's that... Also, I have a massive meat wand.
Replyok, good for you
You didn't have to install cameras to look at my genitals. All you had to do was ask.
Replyasking isn't as fun.
Now I'm done posting replies to comments.
I disagree with making all information public, not only on moral grounds but on a question of what I've done. It's not my choice, but I was born with an attraction to younger girls. I'm still able to lead a normal life, and I'd kill myself before ever doing anything to a child (I could never be so selfish as to cause that much damage), but I have gone online occasionally and looked at drawn images of younger girls. Nothing real (no photos, just hentai and that sort), as I'm against the sources of that (the sexual abuse of children), but still, this could haunt me and ruin my life if it became public.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesI'm not a bad person, and I'd change it in an instant if I could, but somehow I doubt the world could understand.
I am rather surprised you haven't been denuded with downvotes yet.
and why arent you bad person? because you dont shoot people for fun? because your psychiatrist says your not? i say people who want to have sex with young, underdeveloped children are "bad". i think that if you feel the need to do this to someone, that the whole world does in fact have the right to know. is this some form of acceptance? your posting that your a pedophile? would you kill yourself first? if your not willing to disclose all your info as you say, what did you do instead of kill yourself that people would disagree with? also, nobody believes you occasionally go online and look ONLY at drawn pictures of children. why would you post something like this, are you insane?
You say you would change "it" in an instant if you could...yet 90% of your post is you rationalizing how "ok" the situation is in your mind. Until you admit you are a child's traumatizing nightmare waiting to happen, then YOU are the one who doesn't understand and you will not change. If you are not getting professional help, I suggest you start, or that is just another sign that your "I would change" line is bullshit.
(scratches balls) on web cam :} also rapist's pet i lol'd
ReplyJust an aside, isn't it weird that people (I'm guilty see below) who care about anonymity can't say what they have to say in less than a thousand words?
ReplyI don't think it's anonymity that causes people to gang up and become s**theads. That kind of thing has happened in real life years before the internet. Yeah, it was gangs of kids from the bad part of town instead of people you hang out with back then. The thing that made it more common wasn't anonymity though.
ReplyHow do I know that? Because all that bad stuff was made worse when pagers and cellphones became common, during the days when the internet was waiting for your modem to make a bunch of weird noises and tying up your phone line with AOL.
If you don't know someone from Adam, their real name is just as anonymous as a screen name. I've looked in vanity searches, there's over a hundred of me online and lots of me do jobs that are similar to mine or have similar interests.
So that's my $0.02. It isn't anonymity that's causing people to internet detective each other and give their Lord of the Flies reprisals. It's the fact that they can talk to each other for free. You can't get rid of that without getting rid of the internet.
One problem with requiring people to use their real identities online is this: what's to stop the real online troublemakers from finding workarounds and continuing their misdeeds? It's not like said individuals have any real respect for rules or the good of society to begin with. No my friends, the end of online anonymity means God only knows how many people who are not engaging in criminal activities or being pendejo sin nombres are most likely going to disappear from the internet completely because in their minds it wouldn't be worth the risks (and many of them would have good reason to think as much).
ReplyAll the groups who are discriminated against in person can have the freedom online of not having to face that when they choose not to. Why would anyone want to take that away?
ReplyI don't think any products, resturants, other businesses, apartment buildings or anything would get honest reviews if we weren't allowed to be anonymous. We could all end up in a tight spot and need to work for companies we don't like. For renters landlords call previous landlords for reference...if you gave a bad review of them with your real name you are screwed. Besides, being anonymous let's people see what you are saying objectively without preconception, and that has to be good for intellectual progress.
I used to Admin a smallish social website for a couple of years. There were a couple of pissed off former members who decided to harass the Admins by tracking them down at their work and making calls to their employers, posting crude commentary to their company's FB pages, and harassing their kids on their kid's FB accounts. Online harassment is very real, and all it takes is a couple of psychotic assholes.
ReplyThe article acknowledges several times that online harassment is real, but it makes the point that it is RARE, especially when compared to harassment issues that stem from real life relationships such as work, ect. You're example of 2 people taking the web too seriously is interesting...but still a rare occurrence.
I read this before, and found it informative, yet I was compelled to return here and comment on it when I noticed that google+ teamed up with youtube and added my real name to my youtube page. It bugs me, and I hope I can find a way to remove it, but, it may well be a sign of things to come. Online anonymity doesn't have a bright future.
ReplyI freaked out when I read this but then I checked my youtube page and fortunately they don't list my name ans still think I'm 13 years older than I am.
Personalized google searches annoy me though.
... Wow... With all the misspellings and grammatically incorrect sentences it's probably best to keep anonymity. The intelligence of the "future" will come to light and then... wait. That might be best. A jab at the masses' pride might make them learn how to communicate correctly in their native tongue.
ReplyI wouldn't be on the Internet. I have admitted things online to strangers that I can't even tell my own family. It's pretty sad when you have to worry about disownment from your own kin. My grandma is already afraid for my soul just because I cuss and can be really moody. So my questionable sexuality is not something I talk about to anyone in my family, except for the only person in my family I trust completely, because she has confided her secrets to me. If I had to use my real name online, it would just be another lie to tell. I don't even use my real name on FaceBook, because of the horrible harassment I faced in school. I tried using it once, and I had people I wanted nothing to do with friending me. Why should I accept the request of someone who tormented me? I don't understand the logic. >.
ReplyDid Luna Lovegood just call her own sexuality questionable? Fifty-seven fanfic writers just punched the air.