5 Guilty Pleasures The Web Killed While You Weren't Looking
We're guessing not a single person reading this would be willing to take a time machine and go back and live in the pre-Internet era. Some of us start showing signs of physical withdrawal within 10 minutes of losing our iPhone.
Yet... there are things we miss about the world before the World Wide Web. Guilty pleasures that a less connected world used to let us get away with.

The odds are none of you have ever, say, robbed a liquor store or assassinated a public figure. But we've all broken the law, if only to sneak a beer before the statute said we were old enough, or to paint a dong on an abandoned bridge. Minor stuff. All part of growing up, right? And it's not like you're going to get caught...

Ah, but now you're living in the future, where the cops can use the miracle of social networking to nail you for crimes you didn't think anyone really gave a shit about.

Let's say you've gone off to college and, though you're still two years under age, you attend a party and have 27 beers. Your socializing has paid off--the next day you get a friend request from a cute girl on Facebook. You accept it and a few days later, you get summoned to court and fined for underage drinking.
It turns out the cute girl was actually a cop. In Wisconsin the police are using the fake profiles to get access to kids' photo albums. Once in, they find pictures of them or their friends holding beers. Charges filed. Case closed.

Or, say you're out on the town one day and your drunken best friend goes to urinate in an alley, because maybe he has a phobia of public restrooms. A policeman asks you about it later, at which point you swear you have never met the pissing man in your life.
The cops then go into your Facebook profile, find the pissing man on your friends list, and charge you with obstruction of justice.

Others have failed to get away with youthful shenanigans when pictures were posted of them charging onto a field after a football game. Then you have the students who have faced suspension or expulsion for making derogatory comments online about campus security online. It's become so common that in 2006, students at George Washington University decided to turn the tables. They deliberately bragged about an upcoming party on Facebook, waited for police to storm the place, and then revealed that they were all actually eating cake out of beer cups.

Parents everywhere have been telling children the same lie for thousands of years: "You sure wouldn't have caught me (acting/dressing/talking) like that when I was your age!"
Grownups have been shaming teenagers over their ridiculous fads and bad decisions since time began, on the basis that when they were teenagers, they were dignified, respectful and mature. They weren't, of course, but where was the proof?

"I never stole drugs from family. Strippers, sure, but never family."
Back in the old days, people only brought cameras to vacations and holidays. Old photo albums were therefore stuffed with wholesome, posed pictures with the family at Thanksgiving, or smiling shots of everybody at the fishing hole with Grandpa. No fireplace mantles are adorned with pics of Grandma puking in the parking lot at a Beatles concert. No, any embarrassing photos were hidden away harmlessly in shoe boxes, or if their owners were smart enough, taken out back and surreptitiously burned.

Grandpa, 1938.
That era is over.
Everyone has a camera, at all times, and every damned photo must be shared with the world via the Internet. Our generation is the first in human history to broadcast to the world every stupid thing we've ever done in our teenage years, via Facebook, YouTube and every other website in the world with an "Upload" button.
Sure, the photos you, your friends or your parents post on Livejournal or the local parenting forum aren't all that embarrassing or shameful now. Just as Eminem didn't think this photo was ridiculous at the moment he had it taken.

The partying, the alcohol poisoning, the boob-flashing, the Ugg boots and jeggings, it's all part of the public record. Forever. In 10 or 20 years' time, when these kids are in their 30s and 40s, married and starting careers as lawyers or police officers or guidance counselors, we will still have pictures like this floating freely around the internet:

Mom?
Of course, that's just the pics. That rant against corporate greed you made on the Nine Inch Nails forums in 1998? It's still around, waiting to be Googled by your prospective employer. Your short-lived career as a blogger and passionate advocate of heroin legalization and lowering the age of consent to 16? That's still floating around as well, ready to be stumbled upon by the Mormon congregation you just converted into. It's all up there, archived forever, for your children and grandchildren to read.

Your wild night of no-strings-attached passion hadn't turned out quite as you expected. As the sun begins to rise outside the window, you quietly roll out of the inflatable kiddie pool full of jelly, pushing aside a few road flares and a slightly singed bunny suit. Rubbing your aching wrists, you quickly write down a fake number next to the telephone, and leave the strange apartment as silently as you can. It will take years of therapy to fully recover, but at least your one-night stand with the clearly imbalanced 20-something you met at a Waffle House, is behind you.

"Huh. Guess your phone wasn't waterproof after all."
Getting out of ill-planned one-night stands used to be just that simple. You faked your number, didn't reveal your last name or just relied on the fact that the two of you would probably never bump into each other again.
These days, thanks to the miracle that is the Internet, the information he or she has about you is more than enough to Google-stalk you. Does your workplace have a staff page with you on it? Got a LinkedIn account? If you had even one conversation over the course of the evening, odds are your drunken fling has all the information they need to find you.

Thanks, Google.
For instance, people have been tracked down and stalked by ex-lovers after revealing no more than a first name and what they did for a living--the kind of thing a lot of us accidentally divulge to the chatty homeless person at the bus stop.

Crazy exes can use this stalking technique as well: A woman in the UK was threatened after changing her relationship status on Bebo from "single" to "in a relationship". Another woman was killed by a jealous ex after posting pictures of herself on Facebook with another man.
Yep, we're three entries in, and already we've found two separate ways Don Draper would have been absolutely screwed in the Internet era.









>The cops then go into your Facebook profile, find the pissing man on your friends list, and charge you with obstruction of justice.<
ReplyFacebook games encourage inviting strangers to get more bonuses, your honor. The end, but nice robe! *cough, h**o, cough*
With regards to #5: If you've done something you know is illegal, even if it's something you think is entirely trivial, don't brag about or post pictures/videos of it. That's like putting up a neon sign that says "Here I am, I'm a moron, please come arrest me."
ReplyAlso, don't be a dumbshit and accept friend requests from people unless you've met them in the real world or can otherwise verify that they are who they claim to be.
There's nothing "dumb" about inviting "unverified" people. I met a ton of very good people that way. A flood devastated my city---and me---in 2008, but thanks to a message board full of people who were previously strangers I had shoes and a clean pair of clothes within 3 days. Nobody needs to be so paranoid as to perform background checks for effing facebook, c'mon.
I wholeheartedly agree about posting yourself in the act of doing stupid s**t, though. Even if you're of age, why do people feel the overwhelming urge to show themselves drinking and partying? "Hey look! I'm cool!" Definitely agree on that one.
Uh, has no one heard of sites like Spokeo! Get rid of facebook and all the social media sites you want, but the reality is that no matter what, if you live in the US you are searchable on the internet. Spokeo gives info on places of residence (former and current), income, family members, home value, etc. They get away with it because they are pulling from "public record". The thing is that majority of that info would not be easily accessible (to crazy stalker types), regardless of it being public record, if it weren't for the internet.
ReplyWait, wait, wait. Changing the wording = in your own words. Therefore, it isn't even f*****g plagiarism. What the fuck?
ReplyUnfortunately, if ALL the ideas in your essay happen to match ALL the ideas in one found online, many professors will assume you copied the ideas instead of thinking of your own. At this point, it's starting to really f**k over some students who did think of their own ideas and get failed out of a pure coincidence.
GOOD professors will take the "matching ideas" type of plagiarism flags with a grain of salt and give you the opportunity to explain yourself. REALLY GOOD professors will look for other ways to detect plagiarism.
What about sarcastic comments we leave on a comedy website? Are those going to indict us in crimes we may or may not have committed? Yes???
ReplyCrap.
Don't quote me on this but... isn't Wikipedia public domain? Meaning you can't actually plagiarize it.
ReplyNever mind. I Googled it. I guess I lied, it's not public domain.
Even if it was public domain, it would probably still count as plagiarism in an academic setting, if you copied large sections or main ideas without giving credit. "Public domain" doesn't mean "doesn't need citation."
Reasons why the United States needs to relax a bit: number 5. Seriously. Who gives a f**k if someone drinks when he or she is a year or two underaged. You let people drive cars when they're 16. But drinking... 5 years later. Seriously. If you're just drinking you're probably not going to kill anyone. While driving it's just a moment away. If cops are seriously going to start jailing/ticketing people for drinking while underaged their priorities are wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong.
ReplyDid anyone else try to add Cranky Mcfunhouse on Facebook?
ReplyStupid is as stupid does...
ReplyProblem with that last one is. It seems to me it would not matter if you come up with it or not that damn software would say you didn't.
ReplyYes, there is a problem with students getting punished for 'plagiarism' when the ideas they came up with by themselves happened to match someone else's.
Only the laziest of jerkoff professors will refuse to believe this happens and fail the student anyway. The student still has to explain their thought process etc, but it's kind of ridiculous for anyone to expect that every single student out there can come up with completely different analysis of something like, say, 18th century British legislation.
wait a sec, On 1. if millions of people have worked on the same subject, then won't a lot of their essays sound similar already? Sounds like there would be a lot of false positives.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesThere are. That's the big problem with things like turnitin.
It happened to my friend. She had one sentence in her paper that sounded like a sentence from somewhere on the internet, just by coincidence. The teacher accused her of cheating.
That particular teacher sounds way overzealous. Most of the ones at my school are aware of the pitfalls of using turnitin and know that unless it's at a certain high percentage, a few so-called "stolen" sentences here and there don't mean anything.
@paper_crane
teacher was using it wrong
your supposed to expect a few flags needing no action, between a set number of flags would lead to investigation and over a certain number is probably copied
@veya - That's exactly what my professors do. One of the better ones has a policy where, if a certain number/percentage match, she will contact you and ask if you can explain the coincidence before failing you outright. If it goes beyond that, she will fail you and let you know why, at which point she will still let you try to defend yourself. Because coincidences do happen...
#5 is soo disturbing, kinda makes me glad im never gonna live in america. its worring how institutionalised privacy imbreechment is over there, like the government's confused Big Brother with a set of blue prints
ReplyThe internet and what's on it aren't a uniquely American invention. The examples here are American, but similar stuff happens elsewhere in the world too.
If you don't post your entire life to the internet privacy won't be a problem.
ReplyThat's the thing - even if YOU don't, if a single person you know talks about you online, too bad.
One of the advantages of being bilingual: Turnitin can't do s**t if you plagiarize an author writing in another language. Just translate, proofread, and go.
ReplyAs long as you don't just copy-paste from Google translate! Haha...
Grandpa,1938 was hilarious. Grandpa, 1944 was the same (including the mohawk) but with less piercings and more screaming eagle patch and thompson submachine gun
ReplySocial shunning isn't always about just avoiding someone. It's the only manners enforcement method available for stuff not serious enough to go to the cops about. In this case, facebook has made it work better.
ReplyAm I the only one who thought that #1 would be about having an affair?
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesThat's what I thought as well.
No. I thought of that too... =D
Well the introduction picture can't make one think of anything else :>
Especially considering that the internet and such (especially things like smartphones..) are making it much easier to discover affairs as well.
These kinds of embarrassing things are the reason I don't a have a Facebook account. Well, it's that, and everyone I care to talk to are people I see frequently, plus the fact that I try not to do stupid s**t in front of people who would take pictures anyway. Also, public face-to-face relationships are exhausting enough for me; I don't want to deal with them on my own time.
ReplyOf course, I don't mean to say Facebook is useless. My dad, for example, uses it to keep in touch with his siblings and high school classmates. It's just that I like my private life to be private. I guess I'm just introverted.
TurnItIn was ass. Whether or not I plagearized never mattered. It would always give like, 5%, and highlight the words "of," "the," "is," etc, etc. Never all together, never all of them. Just every once in a while, and usually from something totally unrelated
ReplyWhat the fuck? If you've changed the wording, it's not even plagiarism! Plagiarism is copying the stuff and submitting it as your own work. Putting it in your own words is called research. So, research is banned now?
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesYou can't just change one word of a sentence you're plagiarizing from and say it's in your own words.
Plagiarism is what you describe, but it's also taking any of the major ideas and representing them as your own. That includes the structure of your essay also. If this makes you angry, then you've justified it. After all, you wouldn't bother being angry about it if it didn't create more work for you, and it only creates more work because it's a difficult and thought-intensive process--which obviously needs to be taught and learned.
Using another person's ideas, even in your own words, is plagiarism if you don't give them credit. If the concept didn't come out of your head, a work has to be cited.
What you're describing as "research" is called paraphrasing. And mingleflorp is right, you've got to site that.