The 6 Baffling Mistakes Every Horror Franchise Must Make
Horror franchises are like the monsters who populate them: Just when you think a horror series is dead, it'll rise from the grave in some new, grotesque-yet-unintentionally-ridiculous form.
Yes, like a serial killer who's been buried underground for years, most horror sequels stink to high hell. Mostly because they fall back on the same gimmicks to try to squeeze a little more cash out of the franchise. So we wind up seeing movies where...

When horror sequel writers begin running out of ideas, they'll often resort to throwing the antagonist in new, wholly unexpected settings. One particularly crass plot device places the monster in the midst of city-dwelling African Americans, thus fusing the yin and yang of what terrifies white folks.
One problem with this approach is that the writer must first drag the monster out of its element and shoehorn it into the inner city. In Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan (a.k.a. the lowest grossing F13 flick), it took the entire movie to chronicle the Rube Goldberg-esque chain of events that transported Jason from Crystal Lake to New York City. By the time he actually arrived in the Big Apple, the damn movie was basically over.

Similarly, the Children of the Corn franchise only made it to the third movie before throwing out the series' entire premise (demonic children in rural Nebraska killing adults). In Children of the Corn: Urban Harvest, the murderous tykes moved to Chicago and enrolled in an inner city school deserving of a #1 Coolio single.

The Worst Offender:
Leprechaun. We're not suggesting that the Leprechaun films are anything but stupid, but shit, when it comes to overkilling a lousy gimmick, Leprechaun leaves everyone else in the dust.

The fifth film, Leprechaun in the Hood is about gangsta rappers rising in the ranks of the music industry while being pursued by a marauding fairy of the Irish peasant tradition. It's perhaps the most bizarre instance of genre-bending in modern cinema. A Tyler Perry movie about Madea battling minotaurs would've made more sense.
Leprechaun Five = Lep in the hood
Leprechaun in the Hood was such a great idea that it got its own sequel, Leprechaun: Back 2 Da Hood. Presumably the correctly spelled title of the original just wasn't black enough.

Like the inner city, the cold, dark vacuum of outer space gets the average filmgoer all aquiver. The upswing of the intergalactic approach is that you rarely have to bother explaining how the villain got there in the first place. After all, space by its nature is vast and unfathomable. You could totally get drunk and just wake up there.

In Jason X, the ridiculously big-budget 10th Friday the 13th movie, a space-faring civilization of horny teens stumbles upon Jason Voorhees's frozen corpse. Apparently the Earthmen of the past got sick of Jason's resurrection antics and cryogenically preserved him. Even in the distant future, the guy still had it out for innocent campers.
If studios don't want (or can't afford) an all-out space opera, the least they can do is find a way to incorporate cyberspace into the film. In 2002's Halloween Resurrection, Michael Myers picked off teenagers through the course of a Big Brother-style webcast. A single Internet viewer eventually guides the teens to safety--oddly, the film never explains why he's the only person on the Internet watching the webcast.

The Worst Offender:
Hellraiser. It's the only series with a space episode and an Internet episode, thus proving that a movie studio will try to feed you the same shit sandwich twice.

It only took four movies before they decided to fire Pinhead into space in Hellraiser Bloodline, directed by Alan Smithee. By the way, "Alan Smithee" is a moniker that Hollywood directors use when they're so ashamed by a film that they don't want their name on it.

A few films later, and we got the straight-to-DVD Hellraiser: Hellworld, the dreaded online installment in which teens used their superior websurfing abilities to evade the denizens of Hell. And in a result that surprised absolutely nobody, it spelled the end of the franchise.

With some exceptions, the most notable of the dead-teenager franchises showcase non-supernatural villains. It's easy to understand why--horror stories rooted in reality are simply scarier. We're afraid of Michael Myers because men just as evil--shit, worse--have existed in the real world. He's just really strong and really good at killing people. You know, the way you imagine the hobo on the subway might be.

But when your franchise approaches the double digits, writers start to have a problem. Most of these films end with the killer being killed. It's the very first job of a sequel writer to explain how the killer survived his last mortal wound. When such explanations reach the point of ridiculousness, Hollywood employs a special group of writers to fix the problem once and for all. They're called "hacks."

"What if Crystal Lake WAS AN INDIAN BURIAL GROUND? BOOM, Saturn Award."
Michael Myers was perhaps the first of the horror icons to be granted sudden and inexplicable superpowers. In the sixth Halloween film (1995's Halloween: The Curse of Mike Myers) it was revealed that Myers was the victim of an ancient druid curse that makes him (A) obsessed with murdering his family, and (B) impossible to kill. Given that these were the only two components of his personality, it neatly summed his entire character motivation in one fell, totally retarded swoop.

Fucking Druids.
In 1994, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre followed suit in its fourth installment, The Next Generation, in which Leatherface and his redneck clan were revealed to be mind-controlled puppets of mysterious men-in-black who were aliens or some Illuminati-esque group. How does a group of chainsaw-wielding cannibals terrorizing hillbilly Texas advance the conquest of mankind? Better question: Why was Leatherface a transvestite in that film?

Thanks to the Bucket Bros. for the screencap.
The inexplicable superpowers gimmick never, ever catches on, as the next installment retcons it exactly 100 percent of the time. The sequel inevitably steamrolls the previous celluloid abortion out of existence, and the studio prays that you don't notice.
The Worst Offender:
Friday the 13th. Most of the time the supernatural card is used as a quick patch-up, whereas the F13 franchise picked up that ball of stupid and ran with it until they hit the sea and waded to Madagascar.
We can forgive the fact that Jason Voorhees was once raised from the grave by a lightning bolt. This was born out of laziness, not complete off-the-wall madness. But when the franchise hit nine movies, some intrepid writers decided it was time to offer at least a perfunctory explanation for his immortality.
So, in 1993's Friday the 13th Part IX: Jason Goes to Hell, it was revealed that Jason was an immortal demon-worm who can leap between bodies, an ability it took him nine films to discover.

Of course, this followed Jason Goes To Manhattan For 10 Minutes And Doesn't Really Do Much Of Anything When He Gets There, so no one cared.








For #4, the thing about horror stories rooted in reality are simply scarier or having it based on real life making it scary is part of the reason the first Texas Chainsaw Massacre. The director Tobe Hopper distributed it as based on a true story.
Replyi left out the phrase succeeded after the first Texas Chainsaw Massacre,
ok i must be weird. i like bride of chucky.. even tho its still a childs play movie i hold it seperatly to the original 3.. i also dont understand whats with all the reboots?? the originals are classics for a reason.. you dont see ppl redoing gone with the wind.. or the sound of music... and i know this is full of bad grammer and spelling...
ReplyI agree with you about Bride of Chucky, that movie was really awesome for what it was. And for all the reboots, It's all about the money.
Thinking about the Nightmare on Elm Street reboot, I felt they missed an opportunity to make the film into something more... substantive.
ReplyHere's what I mean: in the reboot, the parents kill Freddy because they suspect him of abusing their children... only that for a part of the movie, the two main protagonists think that Freddy was wrongly accused of the abuse, and was an innocent victim to vigilante mob justice of the parents.
At that point in the movie, I was honestly excited! I thought the filmmakers were going for a "we created the very monster that is hurting us" angle, in which Freddy was innocent when he was burned to death, but then he returns as a vengeful ghost, having now become the evil monster everyone thought he was in life. It would have added an interesting twist to the movie, perhaps a warning against the dangers of mob justice and the long-term consequences of having a society based on that sort of snap-judgment mentality.
But nooooo... turns out that the parents were right and Freddy was a pedophile, after all. So we feel absolutely no sympathy for Freddy, and since the protagonists are cookie-cutter horror movie heroes that follow ALL THE CLICHÉS, we feel nothing for them either. The movie is completely one-dimensional, and dull, and a "reboot" offered no added value to the original series.
...or maybe I'm expecting too much of the filmmakers here... this piece of s**t was produced by Michael Bay, after all.
Interesting. My problem with the reboot the inverse of yours. The idea of a daycare worker who may have been an innocent and suffered horribly following the false accusations of easily suggestible children (see Ray Buckey, who spent seven years in jail despite never having done a thing wrong or being convicted of a crime) isn't necessarily a bad one.
The method of execution, however, is problematic. I find the implied moral equivalency repugnant. The implication is that Freddy's actions in killing the kids who accused him as revenge on them and their parents for having killed him are mitigated by the fact that he was innocent. In simpler terms, he has some degree of justification for his revenge if he was innocent, and the parents were somewhat justified if he were guilty.
This I find morally reprehensible. Freddy molesting the kids was wrong. The parents murdering him, regardless of his guilt, was also wrong. Freddy taking revenge on the kids by killing them only compounds the series of immoral actions.
Lest someone think this is my reading too much into the movie, the entire thrust of the second act is that Freddy may have been an innocent victim the entire time, and whether or not he was is something that is important for Nancy to find out to determine whether he's just a monster or a tragic victim of Nancy, her friends, and their parents. In other words, whether he was, to some small degree, justified.
That simple, but almost universally applicable adage we all learned in kindergarten applies here: Two wrongs don't make a right. Being a victim doesn't give one the right to victimize others. Most child molesters were victimized as children. Many serial killers were the victims of abuse and/or neglect as young children. This doesn't mitigate what they choose to do as adults.
I thought both of Rob Zombie's remakes were good. It's a lot better than anyone else in Hollywood could have done. The Nightmare and F13 were terrible for obvious reason if you've seen them.
ReplyAnyone remember the Hellraiser movie that involved kids getting invited to some rich dude's party by solving the puzzle box on the internet, and then the ruch dude poisons the kids and buries them alive, and the only time Hellraiser appears is in one of their hallucinations? Or are we just going to pretend it never happened? Because I'm kind of okay with that.
Reply"Hellraiser" is the name of the movie, not the character. The character's name is Pinhead.
Yeah, the 6th 'Nightmare' film was pretty horrible. By the time it got to the video game scene I was sitting there going, "...the hell?".
Reply(I did not choose to see that of my own free will, mind, a friend was doing a 'Nightmare' marathon and I only saw this after dozing in and out through some of the other entries in the series)
What bothers me the most about this comment is that, in this scenario, using the term "Nightmarathon" doesn't even seem to have crossed anybody's mind...
"(or as they say in the biz, "putting a lampshade on it")."
ReplyOr as they say on TV Tropes, "lampshade hanging".
"so ridiculously self-aware that they're bashing you over the head with the kind of "LAUGH, DAMMIT!!!" desperation you usually only see in really bad comedies."
Reply... Or Family Guy.
yeah but in family guy, this still makes you laugh for 5 straight minutes, while few other forms of media have been successful in this tactic.
Nothing in Family Guy has ever made me laugh for 2 straight minutes, let alone 5. They just do things to the death. For me, the Conway Twitty s**t was where I just switched off. I still catch it occasionally, but the laughter died a long time ago.
Freddy from the start had superpowers.
ReplyThat's not the point you twat.
damn, and here I actually took the time to watch Bride and Seed of Chucky, but they were pretty awful.
ReplyOk... I've been reading alot of flat, boring articles here lately... This has been refreshing...
ReplyThe 2009 "Children of the Corn" was not really a reboot. It followed the original Stephen King short story.
Reply"Halloween III" was technically not an unrelated sequel because the whole "Halloween" series was intended to be an anthology of different tales every year that took place on Halloween. Since they made the second movie in the anthology a sequel to the first movie's storyline, they pretty much sealed their fate, so when it came time to make the next "Halloween" movie, people were wondering what the hell was going on when there was no Mike Myers. Suffice to say they simply got rid of the whole anthology idea after that.
ReplyOkay, the line about Saw made me crack up as rabid as a fan that I am. (I own a shirt that one of the lead characters wore for about 30 seconds in one scene of the 6th movie and I am damn proud of it) Yes I can see how ridiculous the formula to those movies is, however, I love the s**t out of them and will defend to the death that they are a million times better than that crap fest that beat them out of the box office, (Almost) Paranormal Activity.
ReplyMadea: Overbearing, terrible mother played by a black man in drag who does illegal and abusive things for the sake of underwhelming comedy.
ReplyMedea: Overbearing, murderous mother played by many Greek men in drag who does illegal and abusive things for the sake of excessive vengeance.
Who other than me wants to see a (non-comedy) where Medea comes back from Tartarus with the ability to summon and (mostly) control dead Greek monsters (including the Minotaur) through potion rituals in order to steal Madea's family for her own?
The only way to ruin this would be #2, and considering the point that /Madea/ is a major character...
I don't like it... I LOVE IT!
As an 80's kid who grew up on horror I was actually happy with the Nightmare reboot! TCM 2003 took the franchise to a whole new level of disgusting, and who thought that was even possible!
ReplyI never made it through the F13 reboot. Once Jason had to turn on the light switch to see I immediately stopped watching!
Pretty much listest all my favourite movies and movie series(except those leprachaun ones)lol!
Replyhalloween 3, if the film was just called Season of the Witch, the movie would have still fell flat. We had an evil CEO of a company making masks with his army of robots to kill all the kids powered by stonehenge, WHY? What purpose does it serve, not only that teh masks had the company stamp on them, so the grieving and angry parents could trace the evidence back.
ReplyThat movie immediately sprang to life when I saw the category "The Unrelated Sequel" as OCD as I am about my movie collections, Halloween still stands as the exclusive one franchise that I don't need to own every movie from.
I remember sitting in the theater when it aired saying "where the *&^% is Michael Myers??" for like the first 45 minutes of the film then i walked out and demanded a refund.
Then remembered I snuck in.. then realized i still felt really ripped off.
I liked Halloween 3...
ReplyNo, no, I wasn't thinking of staying... as you can see, I still have my coat on...
well...bye then...
*disappearing footsteps*
I'm still waiting for Jaws In Space: The Reckoning. Which of course would be about him eating unwary astronauts while somehow surviving in space.
Reply Hide All See All 3 Replies"You almost done repairing the satellite Bill?" Bill: "Roger that, two more minut-Holy F**k, a shar...Yeaghhh!" "Bill!? Bill... I'm gonna go check it out."
This would only work if it was the same damn family, and they moved to space to avoid sharks.
HOW DID JAWS GET UP IN SPA---
Never mind.