6 Logical Fallacies That Cost You Money Every Day

By Dan Seitz, CRACKED Staff Jan 19, 2010 1,138,268 views
article image
#3.
Throws Good Money After Bad

The competitive instinct is not just a phrase football commentators invented to give words to the tingly feeling they get watching Brett Favre play football. Our brain's natural tendency towards competition is arguably the reason your family survived the hunter gatherer knife fight of 2000 BC.

And as countless uninspired armies and poorly coached teams have demonstrated throughout the years, your ability to compete tends to be directly proportional to your ability to convince yourself that you're doing the right thing. This leaves us with a brain that loves to compete, and is awesome at convincing itself that it's right.

In the financial realms, when these two instincts collide, your brain will play a retarded game of chicken with reality that economists have termed "irrational escalation of commitment".


This applies to more than finances

As we've already established, when faced with the prospect of a $3,000 repair on your shitty car, or purchasing a slightly less shitty car for $2,500, your brain will tell you to go with the repairs because you "already sunk ten grand into the shit box." (Yes, we just quoted your brain. It talks like a little girl. Deal with it.) But what happens the next time your car needs a repair? Well thanks to something behavioral economists have termed post-purchase rationalization, your brain will have convinced itself that the last decisions was a great idea. And since you've now sunk 13 grand into the shit box, it's going to seem like an even better idea to keep piling up the bad decisions.

Throw in a little competitive instinct and pride, and it's not hard to see how this can go horribly, horribly wrong. Your brain will keep pushing your head further and further up your ass, piling up bad decisions with the ferocity of a rabid Glenn Beck.

The real world implications are everywhere, and tragic. For instance, it can justify escalation of a war. In 2005 America's President said that we "owed" the 2,000 American soldiers who had died in Iraq to "finish the task that they gave their lives for." Regardless of what your politics were, to a certain part of your brain, that sounds like a logically constructed argument. Why do these men have to die? Because these other men died, of course! And only the deaths of these additional men will cause those first men to come back to life!

After all, what else can we do, cut and run?

#2.
Has No Idea What Money's Worth

It turns out your brain is really, really bad at understanding that a $20 and twenty $1 bills are the same thing. That's why entertainment venues from strip clubs to arcades make you use tiny denominations: they know you'll spend a lot more. This is called the denomination effect, and while it'd be easy to claim that this is because we "lose track" of how much we're spending when we've got a gangster role of Washington's in our fist and some titties in our face, the study that coined the term says differently.

The scientists conducting it just gave two sets of (presumably confused) people either a $5 bill or five $1 bills and watched as the people with the fives held on to them while the folks with the ones, who had no titties in their face or time to lose track of the money, splurged on Jerky and trail mix.

This leads scientists to the depressing conclusion that your brain basically views the amount of money you make as a number, instead of what that money can actually buy.

This is called the money illusion, because in reality, your money is only as good as what it can buy. If you've got twenty dollars in your wallet, you should be thinking of it in terms of what it can buy you: Four beers, or two movie tickets, or a blowjob from any cast member of "The Facts of Life". But that's a lot of shit to keep track of, so your brain prefers to just stick with the number, and assumes a higher number means more beer and orgasms.


Which is important, as shown in the official USDA Man Pyramid

Of course that's not always the case. Your boss can give you a two percent raise in a year when inflation is expected to be four percent. But because your brain isn't built for complex concepts, you'll be thanking him as you and your family eat your breakfasts out of a can of Bush's.

#1.
Sucks at Figuring the Odds

In the olden days, your brain wasn't punished for locking in on some detail, and assuming it had some significance that wasn't there. Worst case scenario, you spent a few winters worshiping at the altar of the sun God, and sacrificing the kid who was born funny looking. These days there are people who know that we're all pattern seeking creatures who will look at a man winning money while wearing purple pants and go out and blow all of our money on purple pants.

As we've mentioned before, your brain sucks, and sucks hard, at probability. But there are all these wonderful ways in which, in the face of odds that makes the rational part think "This isn't such a good idea", the rest of your brain rams the pedal to the medal right into the brick wall of stupid.

There are two that really screw you in regards to that lottery, though: the gambler's fallacy and the focusing effect.

The gambler's fallacy is the belief that short term actions have an effect on long-term odds. You see the roulette ball fall into red three times in a row and you think it's due to fall into black next, or that the color red is somehow on a hot streak. Of course in reality, every time the ball is dropped into the wheel, your chances are exactly 50/50 of each color coming up. You're just looking at a display of total and utter randomness, and seeing a pattern that isn't there.

The gambler's fallacy is a permutation of the focusing effect, also known as anchoring. Your brain has a tendency to latch onto something and never let it go. It served you well back in the day when you were as likely to see the negative and positive consequences of people's decisions, helping you remember what happened to that farmer who tried to feed his family by burying a bunch of meat in his field.

But in modern times, we're far less likely to see the negative consequences. You hear about some hick winning $300 million and your brain latches onto that, conveniently forgetting that for the one guy who paid a buck and won $300 million, there are 299 million or so losers who might as well have paid a buck to get a swift kick to the shins.


Screw your rightness about the future, Orwell

There is one piece of good news to report: It turns out that one of the things that the focusing effect is most likely to make us over-value is how happy material wealth will make us (good health and being in love are much more likely to make you live a happy and fulfilled life - it's science).

In other words, maybe it's time we all bought a bottle of champagne, took a trip to the zoo, and told those Tigers who's number one.

Do you have something funny to say about a random topic? You could be on the front page of Cracked.com tomorrow. Go here and find out how to create a Topic Page.

To see how else your brain is screwing with you, check out 5 Ways Your Brain Is Messing With Your Head. But don't worry, because you can turn the tables on it, in 5 Ways To Hack Your Brain Into Awesomeness.

And check out The Top 99 Most Desirable Women of 2010 over at Ask Men or head to our Top Picks (Updated 1.19.2010) to see other stuff we're looking at around the web.

And don't forget to follow us on Facebook and Twitter to get dick jokes sent straight to your news feed.

Show Profanity  
204 Comments

I was both excited and saddened by the fact I own that issue of Skate Man ( was there ever a #2?)

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/2/2010 7:37 PM
Wisemantobes

yes, and i'll sell it to you for $700.

Posted on 5/12/2010 11:13 PM
Gabbledegak

I love people that think there's some sort of pattern to which lottery numbers come out. It's random. There is no pattern. They're basically rubber balls in a drum. There's just as much chance of 1 2 3 4 5 6 coming out as there is 8 13 18 22 33 45. Anyone that claims they have some way of predicting the numbers is either a liar, or they've rigged the game. If they weren't a liar, they'd be cleaning up on the wins regularly, not peddling a book of bulls**t to desperate people.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 4/10/2010 5:13 AM
francisrossi

#3 is exactly what PC games un-teach you(you get that right,I can't bear consoles). people have to play more or they stay the cattle they are now. look at the "Two and a half men" series, they eva heard of internet?

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 4/2/2010 5:23 PM
Dhatz

Awesome article

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 3/31/2010 11:26 PM
nodnarb232001

Great article. One of the best. And every point is true.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 3/31/2010 1:09 PM
luger7

I love people that play slot machines. They think if they keep feeding cash into the slots, or someone else, that it will get "hot." The machine will then reward them for being stupid for so long and give them the jackpot. Also people that buy lottery tickets. They always say, "Well someone has to win it!" I always tell them look at the odds at the ticket. "1 in 1,000,000,00? Yes, there's still a chance!"

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/28/2010 5:41 AM
Feuer_Frei!!!

Having done and scraped through an economics degree, I was aware of all of these, and being aware of them helps you avoid it. A bit. It's worth mentioning that 5) isn't entirely bad, the longer in the future, the bigger the risk the future won't happen. People die while perfectly healthy of heart attacks, strokes, car accidents, social meltdown, revolution, hurricanes that your world leading economic superpower country couldn't be arsed to spend money on protecting against. However it's arguable we over compensate for uncertainty.

The rest of it is stuff anyone who did an economics degree and tried to apply it to real life will have noticed. Most of us know we do this s**t too. The whole article could be summed up "we don't take a step back and look at it". If someone offered me $100 in a year or 50 now I'd take the hundred, if someone offered me 99 now or 100 then, I'd go with 99. (Savings interest, risk of things going tits up etc). This is rational. With most of these decisions there's an element of sense but people just loose track of the bigger picture and take it too far. What if you sunk $800 into a nice keyboard and needed to spend $50 more on an imac to enjoy it? Still a bad decision (I'm assuming it will still have some non PC functionality like helping you bed hipster girls, or guys, or something) Maybe it's worth taking the imac over the dell? Of course the smart person spends 2 or 3 hours learning to build a PC (and another 2 or 3 building it) or asking a PC savvy friend and saves $400, builds their own, and realises that's more than they'd have earnt if they worked overime in those hours. Well played. Of course this article is right and it still amused me, we all do dumb things because we make stupid mistakes or fail to see the big picture. However to sum it up like that is about as boring and dry as this comment.

2 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/24/2010 9:32 AM
n4445

Give your degree back, you are stupider now for opening your mouth then before. While people are dying of "social meltdown" they should probably keep an eye out for erupting volcan's, hords of zombies and dragon spawn. The good news is that "your world leading economic superpower country" (insert country of choice here) has larger fish to fry then protecting us against heart attacks and hurricanes.. but you'd know this having "scraped" through an economic degree. Is it possible our "over compensation for uncertanty" would come in the form of "insurance" (i know right, crazy) and Insurance would also be a form of... (drum roll) protection and security in the case of the above (minus the zombie invasion)which is kind of associated with your "world leading economic superpower country's" plan for "protection" and security. "the rest" though, would probably make more sence to impliment then "notice" but bravo for the insite and i'm greatful you didn't send this via paper so another tree wasn't wasted, and the global warming can wait another day.. Great choice with logical thinking also, though i assume most people can see that $100 aposed to $50 is a greater deal.. But you never know. Not too sure about the keyboard though, having studied economics i'm sure you ment investing the money and collecting on interest (Why buy the keyboard when you can buy the company). But then again.. my comment is no more interesting then your own.. why did i spend 10 mins of my life replying to your lame ass comment....

Posted on 2/25/2010 9:55 PM
starkravingmad

So you typed a whole, almost unreadable paragraph (due frighteningly poor use of punctuation, spelling and grammar) to chastise this guy for posting his opinion while not offering any real arguments to support your position other that you think you are right and he's wrong? Props for noticing the inaneness of your own reply before posting it, shame on you for clicking the submit button anyway.

Posted on 4/6/2010 7:38 AM
Maokun

Nice one!

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/15/2010 7:44 PM
kablooey

@ kaytopher, no because the ball still has a 50/50 shot of landing on red or black with every new turn. The ball isn't cognizant, it doesn't know where it landed before.

Dan, one of the best articles on here that I've read. Great job!

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/15/2010 4:03 AM
ReneeIsMe2day

Isn't the bit about the roulette table landing 3 reds in a row make the possibility of the next one being black higher?

2 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/12/2010 4:54 PM
kaytopher

no, it's not.
if you play a roulette wheel all night you won't see a perfect red-black-red-black-red-black-red-black-red-black (if that would happen the wheel is rigged and you should call the cops). instead it will be more like 2red-3black-red-black-2red-5black-red-black-2red. if you play like 100 times it would be strange if you would NOT have a row of 4 or 5 of the same color in there somewhere.

Posted on 2/25/2010 11:23 AM
clytamnestra

"if you play a roulette wheel all night you won't see a perfect red-black-red-black-red-black-red-black-red-black (if that would happen the wheel is rigged and you should call the cops)."


Fix: if that would happen the wheel is rigged and you should take them for all they are worth.

Posted on 4/9/2010 8:00 PM
CegorachLaughs

Was this a Dell commercial or an article on stupid things we do without knowing it?

2 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/9/2010 6:56 PM
Umberphoenix

DELLS ARE *GREAT.*

BUY ONE.

RIGHT.
NOW.

Posted on 4/2/2010 12:04 PM
HopelessO

Macs are better.

Posted on 5/15/2010 7:45 AM
BNBazel

""Pedal to the Medal"?

Seriously?

Ruined the whole thing. "


I completely missed that, Oh well, the joys of dyslexia.

I quite liked this article. You can take the man out of 3 million years of evolution but you can't take the 3 million years of evolution out of the man.

Or something like that....

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/9/2010 4:02 AM
Robforfucksake

well then whats wrong with me? i had a car i paid 250 for, and it was going to cost 300 to fix it, so i junked it...alot of these things didn't apply to me

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/8/2010 6:48 PM
kbee87

maybe you could get another car (that was not broken) for 250?

Posted on 2/25/2010 11:25 AM
clytamnestra

That is exactly why the casinos designed those boards that show the numbers that have been rolled. People become convinced that the last few spins will give them better insight as to what is going to happen next, so they are more willing to put down larger sums of money, because they feel that 'red is hot right now', or whatever the case may be. As soon as they started putting those boards up, they started bringing in more money at the roulette tables. The best thing to do is to play the odds, putting even money on two of the three rows, and never changing your bet. If you even look at the board and use it to change your betting, you instantly put yourself at lesser odds. You will still be likely to eventually lose, but you have a much better chance of slowly earning chips. The hard part for me is walking away once I'm winning.

5 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/4/2010 5:26 PM
get_awesome

I don't agree, and neither does Las Vegas: there IS a "streak" to roulette ball patterns, that's why every third or fourth spin (or so), Vegas Casinos switches out the operator! You're dealing with body mechanics, which has a "finite" number of variables, and has "some" predictability. Casino must have analyzed this and don't want to lose money so they implemented the operator switch. Or so I think.

Posted on 2/9/2010 4:05 PM
ornarygentleman

What crap. A single hand rolling a ball onto a table will have hundreds of bilions of mechanics and even if two roll in a row were identical in body form, the air pressure, wheel posistion, wear on the ball would create billions more. Humans see streaks because they want to and if your bulls**t idea was correct the casinos would take the boards down. They want you to lose.

Posted on 2/15/2010 10:22 AM
Syn

thats good, for a second there i thought i was f**ked.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/4/2010 3:50 AM
tankgunner

So logically, because there is less than 50% chance of winning at roulette due to the 0 and 00, if I bet against what I think is going to win each time, I will end up on top. To the casino!!

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/3/2010 7:49 PM
Skorne

lol (at least i hope you were joking)

Posted on 2/25/2010 11:48 AM
clytamnestra

So basically, this was written after taking the class "Microeconomics in 1 Hour". Sunk costs, greater fool fallacy, gambler's fallacy.

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/2/2010 6:41 AM
kylep2

Plenty of people didn't take that class. The fact that YOU already know these things makes you far better at the Internet

Posted on 2/3/2010 12:18 PM
pangea33

Unless you're an olympic champ who leaves his medals on the floor of his car, "pedal to the medal" doesn't make sense. Granted, "pedal to the metal" doesn't make a whole lot of sense either, unless your car is unupholstered, but that's the phrase, nonetheless. Great article, by the way!

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 1/23/2010 12:23 PM
follicleman

======== http://www.ebuyings.com/ ========

have some cheaper and more good things ,such as nike shoes , fashion clothes ,brand handbags,wallet,jewerly . . .

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

UGG BOOT $50

Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
New era cap $15

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25

FREE sHIPPING


======== http://www.ebuyings.com/ ========

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 1/22/2010 7:43 PM
wully

Also, this isn't so much showing that you're genetically programmed for logical fallacies as it is that capitalism is an artificial system that does not abide by reality and is also probably trying to f**k your mom. But whatevs right.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 1/22/2010 1:50 AM
bluelemons
Cracked stuff on