CGI Boobs: 7 Special Effects The Stars Want to Keep Secret
If you gave any one of our big tech industries millions of dollars, a team of computer geniuses and cutting edge technology, they would probably waste it on AIDS vaccine research or nanocomputers or something. Hollywood will invest it in CG penis enhancement.
The reason is sometimes hours of makeup and the perfect lighting still aren't enough to make some stars look like stars. Welcome to the world of "vanity visual effects."

Beowulf continued the proud tradition of "performance capture" earlier exhibited in Polar Express, where real actors' bodies and motions are painstakingly captured and digitized into the computer world to play terrifying dead-eyed zombies (it is believed eye performances were captured separately, from that cupcake dog.)

In Beowulf, Angelina Jolie plays a nude lizard woman. In an interview, Jolie speaks about how shy she was about having her naked body scanned for the part, which is odd considering that the body you saw in the film came from Rachel Bernstein, who "has made a living winning swimsuit competitions" while "appearing in almost every lingerie catalog in LA."

That resume certainly qualifies her for the role, but leaves a few questions unanswered. Angelina Jolie, by all appearances, has a perfectly fine body, and any worrisome changes due to her three-month pregnancy at the time could have easily been touched up as they freely admitted to doing with the male actors.

"Ugh, she is hideous. Hire a body double, I'm gonna puke."
It might just be a symptom of society's double standards that actors can freely brag about getting better fake bodies while actresses have to keep up a pretense of being physically perfect. Or maybe she honestly didn't know. It certainly seems possible that when Angelina Jolie asked if they needed her to disrobe to have every square inch of her naked boobs scanned into a computer, some unscrupulous devil at the Sony scanning lab conveniently forgot to mention the body double.

Waterworld holds a special place in entertainment history as one of the easiest punchlines of all time. When produced in 1995, for a budget of $175 million, it was the most expensive film ever made; money clearly well-spent on CG representations of things you can't find in real life, like the ocean. It turned out that, in addition to the planned out effects, after shooting had wrapped, some unfortunate observations came to light, such as the fact that Kevin Costner was losing his hair.

Costner in 1995. According to our Photoshop Department.
At this point, Costner realized that audiences would never be able to take his role as a half-fish/half-man seriously if they kept being distracted by his male-pattern baldness. Costner reportedly asked for reshoots and CG fixes, leading to one of many arguments that eventually got director Kevin Reynolds kicked off the movie.
Costner may have been inspired by another aging action hero. In 1991, it was rumored that Bruce Willis ordered his thinning hair touched up in Hudson Hawk which, if true, would have been even more ridiculous, budget-wise, as photorealistic CG wasn't available in 1991, and the hair would have had to be pretty much hand-painted frame-by-frame by a 2D artist. It seems like Costner may have taken the wrong lesson away from this cautionary tale of vanity (The biggest flop of the 90s prior to Waterworld? Hudson Hawk).

More understandable was some after-the-fact CG gill modification. Costner, as a fish-man in the movie, had gills on his neck. Above water they looked like gills, while underwater, as it turns out, they looked like vaginas. Needless to say, additional budget was found for some quick digital fixes. While they had saved themselves from losing the "family" audience, sales in Japan would suffer.

It's easy to think that vanity visual effects started with the introduction of CGI to movies, but phoniness and gratuitous image manipulation have always been an integral part of Hollywood movie making, as the urge for this kind of arbitrary after-the-fact tinkering transcends technological limitations.

Like when they digitally added Jabba the Hutt into Citizen Kane.
In 1936, when it came time to cast an actress for the green-eyed Scarlett O'Hara in Gone With The Wind, producer David Selznick went through an enormous two-year talent search looking at all the top actresses of the day. The final choice for the green-eyed Southern belle was a blue-eyed English actress named Vivien Leigh.
As production kicked into gear, in 1939, it suddenly occurred to Selznick that films were now in color. Technicolor had only introduced its groundbreaking three-color process for live action films in 1934, five years before, so Selznick could be forgiven for letting it slip his mind.
Rather than entertain the thought that the eye color of the main character may not be the most important aspect of a movie, Selznick pressured Monty Westmore, the makeup artist, to cover his ass on this one. He would call Westmore repeatedly at three in the morning and other odd hours, to explain that Vivien Leigh's eyes were still not green. Fans of the book would apparently settle for nothing less.

On the left you can see Vivien Leigh with green eyes as seen in Gone With The Wind, and blue eyes have been added on the right so that- oh seriously, who even cares?
Rather than wait decades for the introduction of colored contact lenses, the unfortunate Westmore, the cinematographer and the costume designer struggled to do their jobs using a combination of lens filters, reflective green costumes and enough green eyeshadow to drown a grown man.

Nicolas Cage has always been a little like a mild version of post-steroid Carrot Top--someone whose head doesn't seem to belong with his body.
Since at least Con Air, Cage has put a lot of work into his body, with fairly impressive results. Meanwhile, his head continues to look like Nicolas Cage's head, and his hairline in particular seems to take a step back for every ounce of muscle he gains.

This discrepancy is probably what has fueled accusations of CG muscle fakery against Cage from time to time, much of it likely to be unfounded. His action hero role in Ghost Rider once again calls for a handsome, ripped young man, but Cage was cast instead, and he did his best. He's talked about the amount of work put into getting in shape for the film and photos of him on the set seem to show the results:

So you'd think no CG help would be needed. However, some after-the-fact tattoo removal had to be done, and it seems that while they were in there, they couldn't help but fix a few other things here and there:

And now it's just silly. Why bother with a trainer at all, when they're just going to use the body of a Rambo action figure instead.








Kevin Bacon is always showing his dong in movies.
ReplyThe book is called The Invisible Man, not The Invisible Rapist
ReplyNo s**t -_-
I find it ironic that Disney edited Lindsay's boob's out.
ReplyRemember Pocahontas' jugs?
She's animated I guess
Nicolas Cage looks hot dont understand why they would bother adding a fake body, maybe just a tan a listo!
ReplyThis article reminded of the movie "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels." In the first scene where Steve Martin's character pretends to be handicapped, he backs his wheelchair out of a crowd and strikes something three times before he's able to wheel away. Director Frank Oz thought it crucial that he strike it FOUR times instead, thinking that was way funnier, and it took six figures to put in a fourth striking sound. I don't know why four would have been so much funnier than three, it's not that funny a scene in the first place.
ReplyMark Wahlberg didn't need no touch up. My dude is well endowed.
ReplyAre you talking about Boogie Nights? Cuz I do believe he did use a prosthesis, I remember reading an interview or something in a magazine.
Jolie is obviously gorgeous with a great rack but does not have a body like a lingerie model - she's kind of athletic.
ReplyImagine how different Labyrinth would have been if that dong eraser had come into play. I think some CGI team actually made Emma Watson's boobs bigger for the US's poster for the last HP movie.
ReplyThank God George Lucas has never used any of these techniques to modify his famous 'Star Wars' movies.
ReplyWait, what??
I've worked with many of the staff on Beowulf, and they confirm that they did do a naked body scan of Angelina Jolie. Of course, the end result may not have been her body in the end, but that doesn't change the fact that it was done. For that matter, naked body scans were done for Anthony Hopkins, John Malkovich, Ray Winstone, etc. so it's not like she was singled out or anything. CG bodies are always going to be stiched, stretched, pulled, etc.
ReplyFor that matter, because of the generally "artificial" nature of their bodies, it's often the case that some characteristics of every one of them is going to be slightly altered for each camera angle and lighting situation. And I'd be surprised if she didn't know about it, considering that's par for the course. The whole point of the original body scan is for reference. I think what creeped people out more was not the naked body scan so much as the fact that they all knew a physical maquette would be molded from it -- which means that somewhere in Sony's Imageworks studio, there are nearly a dozen plastic statues of a naked Angelina Jolie.
The way I see it, the special effects team probably got finished after a long day of naked-body-scanning Ray Winstone, Anthony Hopkins and John Malkovich, and they were like "You know what, f**k this. We're either doing Angelina right now or we go on strike."
Sooo... Completely unrelated, but does anybody know where Sony's Imageworks Studio is?
With Beowulf, the finished body is also a lot LOT more "full" than that Rachel Bernstein's, so who's scanned body did they really use ?
ReplyReally, REALLY didn't need multiple shots of Kevin Bacon's schlong.
Reply...The title "CGI Boobs" is very misleading.
ReplyVery.
Got you to check it out, though, didn't it?
If you've seen Wild Things, you'd know Kevin Bacon has nothing to worry about in the realm of CGI dongs.
ReplyAccording to the linked Superman article it appears the size of his wang wasn't the problem but rather the size and shape of the piece he wore over it. So all men can now rest happy knowing his schlong hasn't put their's to shame.
ReplyWaterworld had a GROSS of 250 mil in box office worldwide for about 100 mil NET. It has also made another 200mil post release with TV and Video/DVD sales. It’s an anchor for NetFlex On-Demand and one of the most popular streams. Major critics actually liked the movie when it came out. Another poorly acted expensive film with a slim plot was Big Trouble in Little China, the only difference…Waterworld made money. The article uses the same decades old jokes like it’s cool and fresh.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesDoes that sand in your vagina irritate much? Geez guy, you act like cracked is the only people who make fun of Waterworld. How long did you spend on imdb copying and pasting those little fun facts over?
Waterworld ruled!
how dare you talk about big trouble in little china like that?
Scarlett's eye color is a huge deal! Its the first thing Rhett noticed about her, its what made Mammy keep an extra close eye on her, its what made every man in Clayton County swoon over her, the flash in her eyes was a symbol of her determination. To Gone with the Wind geeks, Scarlett's eye color is THEE most important thing in the movie, the second would be Rhett's black hair.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesToo bad its next to impossible to find a classy green eyed southern bell in Clayco these days.
Some obsessions do not take you to good places. Look at Star Wars geeks and the extended universe stories.
blue is better
I laughed, but only BECAUSE I could totally see myself doing the same thing :-)
ReplySelznick - this man is my hero and I only wish they could be this dedicated now. Would it have f*****g killed them to get some black hair dye and green eyed CGI for Daniel Radcliffe and get Robert Downey, Jr. and Andew Garfield some damn contacts? No, it would not.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesI thought the same thing when I saw the first Potter Movie.The whole series everybody goes on about how he looks exactly like his dad except his green eyes. It wouldn't have been near the problem that it used to be to change. I wonder if producers of old would have loved our safe, color changing contacts that are soft plastic as opposed to pre 80's hard breakables.
At least they didn't just hire "actors" based solely on their resemblance to the character (Airbender, anyone?).
I was about to agree so hard until I read the Airbender comment. Fuck. But still, colored contacts, please! Now my childhood has been one of people I don't know thinking I look like Harry Potter. He is English, I am Mexican... To this day I, I don;t think my little cousin doesn't know I'm not HP.
Ok I can't say anything about CGI'ing the color, but they actually /did/ stick Daniel in colored contacts in preparation for the first film. They irritated his eyes to no end. J.K. Rowling herself stepped in and said "Dude, don't hurt an 11 year old for a freaking eye color." Contacts just don't work for everyone.
I Have an Erection :D
Reply