| Featured |
|
#2.
Catwoman (Batman Returns)
Selina Kyle is a frumpy personal assistant to Batman villain Christopher Walken. She has the misfortune of being in the wrong place at the wrong time and her boss kindly shoves her out a window for her troubles. Fortunately, she is resuscitated by a group of stray cats in an alley. At this stage, Selina is left with only one option: dress in a shiny black leather cat suit and become a super villain. Well, we suppose calling the cops or going to an emergency room were also options, but who are we to judge? Supposed to be a Role Model Because: In this film, Catwoman is a gorgeous yet cunning adversary for Batman. The character also isn't portrayed as outright evil, so much as she just abides by her own complex moral code. She eventually defeats her evil boss, who made demeaning comments about her earlier in the film.
The "You Go Girl!" Moment: "I am Catwoman. Hear me roar." The Problem: Catwoman is a prime example of the femme fatale (literally "dangerous woman") stock character. It's an archetype that goes way back to probably the first male to ever write a story right after a nasty breakup. You can see the mentality of the guy writing the femme fatale, since he has the character basically using sex as a weapon against men. Sharon Stone in Basic instinct is probably the most gratuitous example, but maybe the most famous is Cleopatra who, regardless of what actually happened, has always been fictionalized as having seduced the world with the sheer force of her boobies.
So basically the femme fatale was created by insecure males to represent the dangers of unrestrained female sexuality. In these stories she's always a corrupting influence for the male hero and is always eventually punished for it, usually with a violent death. And, sure enough, the last we see of Catwoman is her "dying" from kissing Christopher Walken with a goddamned taser in her mouth. If that's not some kind of symbolism for herpes then we don't know what is. #1.
Elizabeth Swan (Pirates of the Caribbean)
Elizabeth (Keira Knightley's character) Swan is introduced in the first movie as the governor's daughter who has a fascination with pirates and effeminate blacksmiths. Over the course of the franchise, she learns to fight, shoot, go to war, lead armies and give boring speeches. Her and her one true love, Will (Orlando Bloom), endure many obstacles in their relationship and are rewarded when they are finally united in a thirty second Easter egg after the closing credits of the final movie.
Supposed to be a Role Model Because: Elizabeth is intelligent and resourceful, and knows a lot about pirates. In between movies Will teaches her to fight and she performs marginally well against opponents with no names or dialogue. She gets elected Pirate King and captains her own ship. Also, every leading man in the series falls in love with her at some point, leaving her the epicenter of a nautically themed love quadrangle. She's everything a girl should aspire to, right?
The "You Go Girl!" Moment: Elizabeth gives a rousing speech about freedom from oppression, to a bunch of rapists, killers and thieves. She then leads her rag tag fugitive fleet into battle against the evil forces of progress who are trying to stop them from raping, killing and thieving. You go, girl! The Problem: Tokenism. She's the female pirate version of the crusty black sergeant that threatens to pull the white protagonists off the case in a buddy cop flick. Elizabeth exists for the producers to point to and say "Look how enlightened we are!" Elizabeth is the only woman in the series who isn't a gossipy chamber maid, nameless whore or crazy sea goddess. Why do all the boys want a piece of her sweet, boobless ass? Because she's literally the only woman available. It's either her or one of the members of the film's catering staff.
Not to mention that she only gets command of a ship because Chow Yun Fat mistakes her for the crazy sea goddess, and she only becomes Pirate King (And why not the Pirate Queen while we're at it?) due to some elaborate double crossing scheme by Jack Sparrow, and not any actual qualifications. She just sort of lucks her way into everything. But the final straw is the Easter egg ending. After the day is saved and the pirates have won the freedom to rape and pillage across the seven seas, Elizabeth and Will are married, but must endure a long separation due to a curse.
No problem. We don't see exactly what she does for ten years, but from what we see after the closing credits, we can safely assume it was moping around waiting for Will to return and popping out his children. Oh, Hollywood. You came so close on this one. Jennifer is the chair of JordanCon, the first convention for fans of Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time series. For more feminism, check out the boob-aliciousThe 6 Most Gratuitously Cleavaged Women on TV or once again feel the wrath of our moral outrage in The 9 Most Racist Disney Character. |
|
|
Anyone ever notice the similarities between River and the Mamelukes from the Persian Empire? I'm not going to go into an in depth comparison, but you should wikipedia "Mameluke" if you are interested.
then again EVERY batman movie makes women out to be nothing but a damn distraction for batman to have his ass handed to him or have to make some fucked up choice between his girl and his friend... and then even when some girl starts to work her way in they just blow her ass up anyway. and you wanna know why!? Because Batman is the mother f*****g s**t and no one else compares...
"Batman Returns" is indeed a lousy feminist movie, and not just because Catwoman is a "femme fatale." The 1992 sequel is basically a 118-minute-long "up yours" to women in general. EVERY female character in the movie - from the blonde who gets felt up by The Penguin at the rally to the circus floozies in his gang to the fur-lined bimbo who gets knocked off the building - are all evil, corrupt, weak, or - in Selina Kyle's case, f***ing insane. It's the only Batman movie without a single positive female character. Its producers seem to be terrified of the idea of women having power - which is very strange, because one of those producers was a woman.
Worst of all, even the hero of the story is a total pig. Batman tries to "save" Selina from becoming a murderer, which is completely hypocritical. (He felt sorry for Penguin, too; why didn't he try to save HIM? Fact is, all Batsy was concerned about was getting into Selina's panties.)
All in all, "Batman Returns" teaches us that women are silly, stupid children who need men to take care of them so that they don't get themselves killed or go postal. It's my second-favorite Bat-movie, but even I have to admit it that it's sexist to the max.
I only read the River part, because I'm a Whedon-fan. And something I love in his work is that no ones perfect. He doesn't write about heroes or icons, saints or superpeople without flaws. That would be unrealistic and not really portaying humanity. River is insane, because she had experiments done on her. Who would not be crazy? I don't understand why people have to go "Willow, Buffy, River are such bad rolemodels, Joss really dropped the ball". Joss didn't create robots, he created humans.
"That's an awful lot of rescuing for a feminist hero." Has Joss ever claimed that his characters are suppose to be "feminist heros"? Jesus Christ, she's just a girl who has had a very tough time. Give her a break.
how did ripley from alien not get in?
The first two were actually pretty funny, but the last three... did you run out of ideas? I mean, I might be wrong, but I'm sure Catwoman was NEVER meant to be a Role Model to... anyone.
And I'm not sure if you read the article you linked to for River Tam, but it wasn't based in fact. Or logic. Or rationality. But neither was what you wrote, so I guess that makes sense.
And no one really cares about any character in Pirates other than Jack Sparrow.
The first two were actually pretty funny, but the last three... did you run out of ideas? I mean, I might be wrong, but I'm sure Catwoman was NEVER meant to be a Role Model to... anyone.
And I'm not sure if you read the article you linked to for River Tam, but it wasn't based in fact. Or logic. Or rationality. But neither was what you wrote, so I guess that makes sense.
And no one really cares about any character in Pirates other than Jack Sparrow.
Poor man's Sean Bean!! Best (nerdy) line ever!
I guess what I don't get about this article is that it takes the long-way-around in trying mock Hollywood's bullshit feminist moments instead of just pointing out that all these characters are lame attempts at feminism because they were all written by men.
Wow, I read this when it first came out and thought it was pretty funny. Now I check the comments and you guys are a bunch of oversensitive little...school...boys....
and f**k of about River! the is "teh roxxors"
yah, this is pretty crap. i'm not even going to go into my Tolkien rant as I assume my commerades have already made my point there clear
And furthermore, the fact that you link to an article written by that moronic psychopath shows that you either were not paying attention, or are an idiot yourself (I'll assume the latter). She mentions that she has never known a white man to hook up with a black woman where he did not beat or abuse her. She basically seems to think men are evil, and hate women, especially black women.
this article is full of fail. About the only part i really agree with is queen amidala. But pretty much everything about the starwars prequels sucked in a "let's sell crap to stupid children by using bad cgi effects" kinda way. LOTR was pretty much crap to from what i could tell; i didn't bother watching more than the first one, so i can't comment too much there. But FIREFLY? are you serious? did you read that LJer's posts at all? she's not a feminist, she's a retard. And she's a racist. And a sexist piece of garbage. Here's a direct quote from here article entitled "Men are REALLY REALLY FxCKING DANGEROUS ":
"Men are not safe to be around.
Men are dangerous. Stay away from men.
Do not leave your children with men.
Men are dangerous."
Her insane rant about firefly sounds almost rational if you have never actually watched the show, or have never interacted with another human being. The events of the show she describes (badly) might sound like instances of woman bashing, if you take them entirely out of context, and totally ignore the feelings and social interactions of the characters described. Say, for instance, if you are an alien or a robot.
Wait a minute! That crazy LJ beyotch was NEVER a fan. AND she also implied that ALL heterosexual sex was rape because - how could a woman REALLY consent to having sex with her husband or boyfriend - living in such a blatantly misogynist, patriarchal society? And I THINK she also said that Joss Whedon "rapes" his wife on a regular basis.
So you might want to rethink your sources, Ms. Liang... or at least use quotes from people who are relatively sane. Just sayin'.
Some good points made, but with Serenity there are two other women on the show, one of whom is very much a leader in her own right. Maybe society is still a bit sexist, but you madam, are a racist!! Btw, who remembers Captain Janeway from Voyager?
s****y article.
Quite funny, but, despite its scarce faults, Firefly still kicks ass.
I think we can safely agree that both men and women can kick my ass. And I think we should let the matter rest there.
Let's ruin Disney again!
Let us take a moment to appreciate these guys who helped make the original Star Wars great, and who have lived sad, sad lives since.
Check out the 10 most ridiculous overseas "re-imaginings" of American classics.
"Now let's see how we can make this film worse."
Also, it doesn't make you smarter.
And here we are, making it worse!
I’m not going to lie to you. After shutting down my wildly successful Hate By Numbers tm series, I wasn’t coming back. My self-imposed indefinite sabbatical was going really well, and I thought ...
Insane Messages We're Actually Sending Into Deep Space
The 8 Most Misguided Sci-Fi Versions Of 2008
YoSafBridge
While it pains me to expose how sad and meaningless my life is: the majority of Eowyn's lines were in fact written by Phillipa Boyens and Fran Walsh which means that she out of all your list of characters was the result of TWO woman. Granted, Tolkien, a man, wrote the book...but this article is referring to Hollywood after all.
Honestly, I don't think Eowyn should be counted as Hollywood's sad attempt as much as Tolkien's sad attempt. Walsh and Boyens made the character a lot more feminist in the movie, in the novel she fights in one battle for about half a second (Merry does most of the work to be honest) before injuring her arm and deciding to quit, while in the hospital she gives up trying to live ala Padme until Aragorn works his magic. And at long last she realises that her life has been meaningless, that woman were put on this world to make babies, hooks up with Faramir and becomes a nurse. Hell, if that wasn't bad enough Gandalf, Aragorn and Eomer talk s**t about her while she lies comatose next to them.
While we're on the subject...
Several episodes of "Firefly" were also written by women, including the before mentioned "puked on her brothers bed" one.
That said, great article. Hell, I'm just glad to see the Firefly nod (although that article you mention wouldn't happen to be "The Rapist view..." one that everyone keeps bringing up)? Because honestly that chick is nuts!
That was probably the most pathetic thing I've ever written in my...Today. Maybe...