Featured  

5 Psychological Experiments That Prove Humanity is Doomed

article image
#2.
The Stanford Prison Experiment (1971)

The Setup:
Psychologist Philip Zimbardo wanted to find out how captivity affects authorities and inmates in prison. Sounds innocent enough. Seriously, what could go wrong?

Zimbardo transformed the Stanford Psychology Department's basement into a mock prison. Subjects volunteered by simply responding to a newspaper ad ...


Not the actual ad

... and then passing a test proving good health and high-quality mental stability, which are very important factors in deciding who goes to prison. These volunteers were all male college students who were then divided arbitrarily into 12 guards and 12 prisoners. Zimbardo himself decided that he wanted to play too, and elected himself Prison Superintendent. The simulation was planned to run for two weeks.

Yep, nothing at all can go wrong with this.

The Result:
It took about one day for every subject to suddenly go as insane as a shit-house rat. On only the second day, prisoners staged a riot in the faux detention center, with prisoners barricading their cells with their beds and taunting the guards. The guards saw this as a pretty good excuse to start squirting fire extinguishers at the insurgents because, hey, why the hell not?

From that point on, the Stanford Prison that had already gone to hell, just continued to ricochet around in hell for day after day. Some guards began forcing inmates to sleep naked on the concrete, restricting the bathroom as a privilege (one that was often denied). They forced prisoners to do humiliating exercises and had them clean toilets with their bare hands.

Incredibly, when "prisoners" were told they had a chance at parole, and then the parole was denied, it didn't occur to them to simply ask out of the damned experiment. Remember they had absolutely no legal reason to be imprisoned, it was just a damned role-playing exercise. This fact continued to escape them as they sat naked in their own filth, with bags on their heads.

Over 50 outsiders had stopped to observe the prison, but the morality of the trial was never questioned until Zimbardo's girlfriend, Christina Maslach, strongly objected. After only six days, Zimbardo put a halt to the experiment (several of the "guards" expressed disappointment at this). If you were about to applaud Maslach as the only sane person involved in this clusterfuck, you should know that she went on to marry Zimbardo, the guy who orchestrated the whole thing.

What This Says About You:
Ever been harassed by a cop who acted like a major douchebag, pushing you around for no reason? Science says that if the roles were reversed, you'd likely act the same way.

As it turns out, it's usually fear of repercussion that keeps us from torturing our fellow human beings. Give us absolute power over somebody and a blank check from our superiors, and Abu Ghraib-esque naked pyramids are sure to follow. Hey, if it can happen to a bunch of Vietnam-era hippie college students, it sure as hell could happen to you.

#1.
The Milgram Experiment (1961)

The Setup:
When the prosecution of the Nazis got underway at the Nuremberg Trials, many of the defendants' excuse seemed to revolve around the ideas of, "I'm not really a prick" and, "Hey man, I was just following orders." Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram wanted to test willingness of subjects to obey an authority figure. Maybe he could just, you know, ask people? Oh, hell no. That would not be nearly horrifying enough.

Instead he ran an experiment where the subject was told he was a "teacher" and that his job was to give a memory test to another subject, located in another room. The whole thing was fake and the other subject was an actor.

The subject was told that whenever the other guy gave an incorrect answer, he was to press a button that would give him an electric shock. A guy in a lab coat was there to make sure he did it (again no real shock was being delivered, but the subject of course did not know this).

The subject was told that the shocks started at 45 volts and would increase with every wrong answer. Each time they pushed the button, the actor on the other end would scream and beg for the subject to stop.

So, can you guess how this went?

The Result:
Many subjects began to feel uncomfortable after a certain point, and questioned continuing the experiment. However, each time the guy in the lab coat encouraged them to continue. Most of them did, upping the voltage, delivering shock after shock while the victim screamed. Many subjects would laugh nervously, because laughter is the best medicine when pumping electrical currents through another person's body.

Eventually the actor would start banging on the wall that separated him from the subject, pleading about his heart condition. After further shocks, all sounds from victim's room would cease, indicating he was dead or unconscious. If you had to guess, what percentage of the subjects kept delivering shocks after that point?

Five percent? Ten?

Between 61 and 66 percent of subjects would continue the experiment until it reached the maximum voltage of 450, continuing to deliver shocks after the victim had been zapped into unconsciousness or the afterlife. Repeated studies have shown the same result: Subjects will mindlessly deliver pain to an innocent stranger as long as a dude in a lab coat says it's OK.

Most subjects wouldn't begin to object until after 300-volt shocks. Zero of them asked to stop the experiment before that point (keep in mind 100 volts is enough to kill a man, in some cases).

What This Says About You:
You might like to think of yourself as a free-thinking marauder, but when it comes down to it, odds are you won't stick it to The Man because of the fear The Man will stick it right back up your ass. And this was just a guy in a lab coat--imagine if he'd had a uniform, or a badge.

Charles Sheridan and Richard King took this experiment one step further, but asked subjects to shock a puppy for every incorrect action it made. Unlike Milgram's experiment, this shock was real. Exactly 20 out of 26 subjects went to the highest voltage.

Almost 80 percent. Think about that when you're walking around the mall: Eight out of ten of those people you see would torture the shit out of a puppy if a dude in a lab coat asked them to.

If you enjoyed that, you might like our rundown of 5 Mental Disorders That Can Get You Laid. Or check out the T Shirt designs you'll be wearing tomorrow and submit your own in the Photoshop contest in the forum. If you're out of ideas, head over to eHow for Cracked.com Editor Jack O'Brien's handy guide on How to Design a Funny T-Shirt. And if you're tired of finding the best Cracked has to offer on your own sign up for the Cracked Newsletter and receive the choicest articles in your inbox every Thursday morning.





Submit to: Reddit Facebook StumbleUpon Digg Del.icio.us Fark

Post Comment

256 Comments

I agree completely with the Waz. Fuck the world.

Posted on 8/27/2008 5:52:09 PM

Tay, I'm pretty sure your fears about people faking are out of proportion. I'm pretty sure you haven't researched how often people pretend to be in need as setup. The article points out that we will use any possible excuse to avoid helping, which means no matter how small the chances of you becoming the victim, even with no documented cases of such an occurrence, even if you'd only heard unsubstantiated rumors, you would still think the risk is too high.
I'm reminded of a communication theory--Mean World Syndrome--about how the mass media convinces people that the world is more dangerous and malicious than it actually is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_world_syndrome

Posted on 8/27/2008 11:28:34 AM

The bystander apathy experiment is just proof that people are just lazy motherfucking assholes

Posted on 8/20/2008 4:10:14 PM

When subjects believed that they were the only other person in the discussion, 85 percent were heroic enough to leave the room and seek help once the other began the fake seizure. This makes sense. Having an extremely personal conversation (again, presumably about tiny genitalia) with another person is difficult enough, but being forced to continue to carry on the conversation by yourself is just sad. But either way, 85 percent helped. So that's good, right?

One reasoning - they were helping because if they did not help they alone would responsible for the victim. If there was more than one person the responsibility is distributed and they can get away by not helping.

Posted on 8/15/2008 11:16:50 AM

ive lost all hope for humanity, when people are willing to torture puppies because someone asks them to. I mean, what happened to the time where people would just torture puppies for fun?

Posted on 8/9/2008 8:37:22 AM

DON’T MISS OUT THIS ONE!!!!!!!!

CLICK HERE AND ENJOY IT
http://www.subhehogayimamu.com/?um=133

Posted on 7/14/2008 6:47:34 AM

although reading this does make you think twice about helping someone in need. However there are so many concerns about those who pretend to be in need and end up being predators seeking to take advantage of you. Say for example the incidents when a woman would pretend her car had broken down only to carjack indivudals stopping to help her. Not to say everyone is like that, I think you just have to be more careful. I think people are more likely to help out if say the incident happens when a lot of people are walking along the street, since there are others to observe the occurance.
I can sympathize with individuals who are in a rush to get somewhere, we all are trying to get somewhere. When you are taught life saving skills, you become responsible and liable to help once you've stepped in and some people don't want the guilt of having something go wrong.
This world is a dangerous place, it's hard to tell who is in real need and who isn't.

Posted on 7/4/2008 11:15:14 PM

trained* psychologist...

Posted on 6/28/2008 6:40:27 PM

Philip Zimbardo is actually a very good person. He has tried atoning for the unethical cesspool that turned out to be the prison experiment in various ways. I've read his book and i can tell how much he regretted it, and it comes to show that ANYONE even a train psychologist can be seduced by the situation. So i wouldn't judge his marital relationship or him, for the results of his own experiment.

Posted on 6/28/2008 6:39:37 PM

daaaaamn.i wouldn't torture a puppy.

Posted on 6/27/2008 9:52:12 AM

very interesting
i hate people now i feel bad for the puppies where was Peta? lol

Posted on 6/22/2008 11:45:41 AM

There's a german movie called Das Experiment based on the Stanford Experiment

Posted on 6/21/2008 11:15:46 AM

How could they screw up that line-matching test. The answer is OBVIOUSLY B.

Posted on 6/17/2008 11:05:54 AM

i hate the human race now... poor puppies...

Posted on 6/14/2008 12:29:38 PM

I can now seek solace int he fact I have a lab coat.

=D

Posted on 6/9/2008 9:18:02 AM

Well, I like to be an individual. That is why I say "Fuck you Cracked, the Ps3 is Awesome, all of Metallica have always been inferior to Dave Mustaine, Musicals are more manly than anything you have seen or ever will do." Fuck You, I won't do what you tell me, as it were.

Posted on 6/9/2008 5:34:32 AM

That's interesting. So we should be confident and believe in ourselves! As for me, I am a sexy big-size beauty and I am very proud of my big body. And I have many admirers @ PlusMeet.c o m______, where many big boob women, big booty women and big manful guys meet and seek fun&romance together! Are you the one, too? hook up with me there!

Posted on 6/8/2008 11:59:46 PM

I have viewed many hottest videos at a celebrities singles dating site--- BLACKWHITEMEET.COM---- where many fans and stars can chat together. And there are many black and white singles who are seeking for ideal match seriously there.

Posted on 6/5/2008 8:30:11 PM

Who is this illiterate prick and why dont they delete the comment?

Posted on 5/21/2008 3:59:59 PM

The grammatical inaccuracy of fgdgf's post makes it all the more funnier.

Posted on 5/19/2008 10:54:21 AM

More Funny Stuff


Popular stuff


Avatar
Daniel O'Brien
Posted: 8/29/2008 1:42:17 AM
Post Subject: Labor Day: Exposed!

I kicked my way into Cracked.com Head Editor Jack O'Brien's office, armed to the teeth with fireworks, steak and hardcore pornography. "Jacktus Jack," I screamed when I got in. "Let's celebr ...

Avatar Email Spamming 101: The A-Z Guide To Becoming Human Garbage
So you're considering a lucrative, rewarding career in the exciting world of email spamming! ...
Avatar 9 Things (You Think) Your Beer Says About You
digg_url = 'http://www.cracked.com/blog/2008/08/26/9-things-you-think-your-beer-says-about-you/' ...