6 Terrible Cameos That Just About Ruined the Movie
A well-handled cameo subtly acknowledges the fourth wall without taking the audience out of the flow of the movie. A poorly-handled cameo hurtles through the fourth wall and furiously pimp slaps you until you're unable to remember what the fuck this movie was about in the first place. Here are six of the pimp-slappingest cameos of all time.

The Cameo:
Ted Danson
The Lead Up:
We're immersed in the movie for a full hour already. We've seen the most graphic vision of D-Day ever shown on film. We've learned of the mission to save one man and we've seen the team lose a man in exchange.
Philosophical questions abound when suddenly the soldiers find themselves face to face with a squad of Nazis. Everyone has their guns pointed at one another, sweat is slowly forming on top of each and every brow. People are screaming in German and English and the entire theater is quiet with tense anticipation. And then it happens, the Germans get mowed down by ... Sam mother-fucking Malone from Cheers. Hey, Sammy!
Why it Nearly Ruined the Movie:
Maybe they got the idea to cast an '80s sitcom star in a war movie from Casualties of War. That Vietnam movie answered the question "Who do people want to see in a horrifying movie about cultural and oh so literal rape?" with the name Alex P. Keaton.
But Sgt. Sam Malone causes even more problems than Private Marty McFly, because his whole comedic persona on Cheers was based around a stone-faced droll delivery. So when he actually tries to be serious, you just keep waiting for him to crack a joke about how much tail he used to score when he was pitching in the minors.
Think back right now and see if you can remember anything about Ted Danson's role in the movie. If you're like us, all you hear is:
Sam: Hey there guys, looks like you've had a rough day. Sit down and tell me all about it.
Tom Hanks: We're looking for a Ryan. Private James F. Ryan.
Sam: Ryan eh? Let me go check. Carla! Hey Carla! You know guy named Ryan?
Sergeant Carla: Yeah, two of my eight kids are named Ryan.
Sam: No, Private James Ryan. Poor sap lost all his brothers and these guys need to find him.
Sergeant Carla: Haven't seen 'em. But you can have my boys instead. They're already proficient with firearms.
Tom Hanks: Thanks anyways, we'll be leaving now.

Lucky for us, Danson's only on screen for about six minutes, and Spielberg sucks us back into the action with a 10-minute scene of the guys holed up in a church for the night doing nothing but talking.

The Cameo:
Christopher Lloyd
The Lead Up:
Spock is dead, Bones has Spock's soul, the Vulcan chick isn't Kirstie Alley anymore and Scotty's weight gain continues unabated. Kirk and crew then proceed back to the Genesis planet so that they can save Kirk's bastard son because he's being threatened by ... Christopher Lloyd?
Why it Nearly Ruined the Movie:
This cameo transcends the space-time continuum that Trek writers regard with such reverence that they screw with it at least once per movie (and 10 times per season). People who watched The Search for Spock on the big screen in 1984 did not see the Klingon villain Kruge, but rather the perpetually stoned cab driver "Reverend" Jim Ignatowski from the recently canceled TV show Taxi. For our under-30 readers, imagine if The Matrix had ended with Neo having to fight Kramer.

And while the makers of The Search for Spock can't be blamed for what came later, it should be noted that things didn't get any better for the later generation, who watched it post 1985 and saw the guy from Back to the Future who liked to say Jiggowatts.
While he's on screen for a large portion of the movie (being the main villain and all), Lloyd's role seems less like a top-billed performance and more like a cameo that just won't end. In trying to pinpoint exactly what it was about Christopher Lloyd's performance that made a horrible movie worse we discovered that he bore a striking resemblance to a stereotypical relative most of us have.
Lloyd is that annoying uncle that comes for Thanksgiving and doesn't leave until Groundhog's Day. While he's there he eats all the food (takes up all the screen time), bullshits about how he used to be in the special ops (pretends he's a barbaric Klingon warrior) even though there's no picture of him where he weighs under 200 pounds (looks like he could scare a 4-year-old). When he finally leaves (gets kicked into a river of molten lava) we feel relieved that we will not have to see him until next Thanksgiving.

The Cameo:
M. Night Shyamalan (playing a douchebag/himself)
The Lead Up:
Mel Gibson is an ex-Episcopal priest who stopped believing in God after M. Night's character killed his wife by being a drunken asshole.
Mel and his family discover a crop circle in their farm, they see an alien on their roof and chase it into a corn field where it disappears. It's around this time that they start to suspect something out of the ordinary might be going on. Unfortunately, it's not much longer before the audience starts to suspect the same.

It starts innocently enough. M. Night drives by in a car. No big whup. M. Night had tiny parts in The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable. Sure it's egotistical, but Hitchcock did the background cameo thing, and Hitchcock has always given M. Night a boner. Time to get back to the business of story telling as the family has another close encounter and then ...
Wait a second, now M. Night is calling them at home. A voice cameo in addition to the visual? Wait, what is Gibson doing at M. Night's house? Oh, M. Night just happens to possess key plot development points (they don't make crop circles near water) while also inviting Gibson to go deal with the alien stuck in his basement. Why, that doesn't make sense at all.
Why it Nearly Ruined the Movie:
Up until this movie, fans of M. Night's work had two assumptions that always came to fruition:
1) The movies would have an engaging plot with a twist that would make your skull explode.
2) He'd have a short cameo that had little to do with the actual plot.
But this movie fell short on both accounts because:
1) A "twist" being that your dead wife gave you a clue to defeat ONE fucking alien, instead of ALL of them seems like a waste of the power to see into the future.
2) M. Night's cameo was one of the first "Signs" (betcha didn't see that coming!) that he was descending into clinically insane narcissism.
We're guessing the character he plays is supposed to be mysterious: is he a deeply remorseful man seeking redemption or a sadistic bastard that still wants to fuck around with Mel Gibson's mind? Of course this would have only been mysterious if the character wasn't such an unremitting asshole: he killed his wife and only apologizes to him when he needs someone to kill the alien in his basement? That's not spooky, that's just fucking wrong.
Also, if you're going to create a character who's only reason for existing is to deliver a key piece of information and move the plot forward, it's probably best not to cast yourself. That tends to feel less like a cameo and more like you realized your plot wasn't going anywhere, and jumped in front of the camera and made up a bunch of shit that would get your movie to make sense again.








It's not like Ted Danson never did dramatic roles in his life. Ever see The Onion Field or the Gulliver's Travels miniseries?
ReplyBruce Willis is awesome in everything
ReplyThe problem with every "famous person appears in a small, supposed-to-be-humorous role" is the famous person himself. He (or she) knows that he's only there because he is who he is, and thus their own ego and presence get in the way of everything else that happens to be going on onscreen, good or bad. It's also completely distracting from the plot of the movie. It's like the damned CGI singers from Jabba's Palace in the Star Wars Episode VI "George Lucas decided to take a large, steaming s**t on your childhood" edition.
ReplyOnly #1 on this list is an actual cameo. Learn what the word means before making an article about it.
Replyyou forgot Dustin Hoffman in Luc Besson's The Messenger (Joan of Arc) ... an otherwise excellent film with a stunning performance by Milla Jovovich and, suddenly, there at the end Dustin Hoffman appears as a monk sounding totally contemporary and with that knowing L.A. smirk on his face - destroyed the movie ... yet, later, in Perfume, Hoffman redeems himself in a period piece - go figure
ReplyHoffman could never redeem himself after that, in my book. Also, I actually said out loud in the theater, "What is Samuel L. Jackson doing on the Jedi High Council?" All these cameos do is remind you that you are watching a Hollywood movie, so forget the idea of becoming engrossed in the story.
Yes, actors ruin movies. Need more giant CG smurf-cats with no tits
ReplyI skipped down to the bottom specifically to point out that TOM HANKS WAS AN 80s SITCOM STAR TOO! Remember Bosom Buddies?
ReplyHow can "Signs" possibly be "ruined" as a film? It was terrible!
Replyyes, but this part made it even worse... somehow
Bruce Willis did an excellent job of being a creepy guy who appears to stalk Madeleine Stowe in 12 Monkeys. Its more Soderberg's fault than Willis's.
ReplyI thought Christopher Lloyd was a very effective villain, especially considering he had to follow Ricardo Freakin' Montalbán's masterful performance as Khan.
ReplyI certainly never thought of him as Rev Jim or Doc Brown. He gave a terrific performance. As did John Larroquette (forgot he was in Star Trek III as well, didntcha!).
The last paragraph is absolutely amazing.
ReplyDude you obviously haven't seen sukiyaki western django. Quentin Tarantino pops up a twice, I think, and he can't help but be his arrogant self.
ReplyDude do you realize who you're comparing? Besides, Tarantino has been acting in films for decades, and SWD wasn't even his movie. I'm pretty sure the only reason M. Night keeps getting his garbage greenlit is because he has a cool sounding name that looks good on a bill.
Dude you're comparison is severely misguided. Tarantino has had acting roles in films for decades. I think the only reason M. Night keeps getting his garbage greenlit is because he has a cool sounding name that looks good on a bill.
Christopher Lloyd was totally awesome in "Trek". You might be right about the others, but I don't know - you lost all credibility with me by dissing Kruge.
ReplyChristopher Lloyd was totally awesome in "Trek". You might be right about the others, but I don't know - you lost all credibility with me by dissing Kruge.
ReplySigns was ruined by being filmed.
ReplySigns was ruined by many things...especially the huge plot hole. The aliens are killed by water. However, they are able to walk through a corn field at night covered with dew...and nothing happens to them.
Do you think they fired the scout alien that identified Earth, a planet 75% covered in a deadly liquid, as a suitable new home? That would be like deciding to buy a home next door to Chernobyl...
A bald Cheshire cat seems odd and wrong.
ReplyRe #2: I felt the exact same thing about the 1999 version of Alice in Wonderland with Whoopie Goldberg as the cheshier cat. Far too many famous people distracting from the plot, plus god-awful songs that noone wants to hear.
ReplyIn All Honesty, I Think Kramer Would Win that Fight
ReplyTed Danson was fine in Private Ryan. This writer watches too much TV, or I don't watch enough. Paul Giamotti was good in there too.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYes. If the writer is pulled out of the movie just because he recognizes an actor from a previous role, he's gotta' be awfully limited on what he can watch.
Personally I liked that these actors were in the movie. Saving Private Ryan really gave me the sense at times that a lot of the soldiers would have just been ordinary guys otherwise. Even Hanks was just a school teacher before heading into the war. I got that sense a lot in that movie, watching and looking at the actors in it, and it made sense. I think thats kind of what they were going for anyways.
I think with Ted Danson in the role, it was meant to show what everyday guys had to do during the war to survive.
Signs did not need any extra bonus footage to ruin the movie. The director did that just fine on his own. I wonder how many bombs m. night will make before he realizes he made the best movies he will ever create and every movie since unbreakable has been comically awful. Never seen a director nose dive like him, from the masterpiece of the 6th sense to the utter stupidity of lady in the water. Its like someone smashed him in the head with a hammer after the first few movies. Also Christopher lloyd can be in any damn movie he wants! lol. You cant beat shatners awful acting anyway. No way he would make it any worse. Never knew how shatner lasted this long and is so respected as an actor, he has never been that good of an actor. I guess im just not a trek fan so i cant understand.
Reply