

|
Part of growing up is realizing almost everything your mom said was wrong. This is especially true when it comes to the human body (how many of you grew up with the "masturbation will make hair grow on your palms" thing?) where, as you'll see, mom often failed to do her research. "If you shave, your facial hair will grow back thicker!"
The Lie:
The Truth:
So why do moms perpetuate this one? Most likely out of the embarrassment most mothers of pubescent boys feel. It seems you didn't have the good fortune to hit the ground running with puberty like we Cracked staffers did, and it took you a few years to start looking and sounding like Powers Boothe. Consequently you had a fuzzy neck beard, and your parents didn't want to be seen in public with you until you shaved it. So instead of telling you straight up that you were a repulsive pock-marked abomination and having to hear you whine in your broken girly voice, they simply lied and told you shearing hair makes it stronger and thicker, knowing you would do it--and keep doing it--in a futile attempt look like Grizzly Adams. "You can't have anymore sugar, you'll be bouncing off the walls!"
The Lie:
The Truth:
Your mom was wrong on two counts: first off, gravity is unaffected by sugar. Secondly, hyperactivity is unaffected by sugar. Or at least, that's what dashing professor of neonatology and general pediatrics at UAMS Medical center, Dr. Bryan Burk says here. "No evidence exists that feeding children a high-sugar diet will induce hyperactivity, despite the common belief that it does." It seems that you need to consume something more along the lines of caffeine, dopamine or crack to achieve any hyperactivity. In fact for some children, sugar may very well have an opiate affect on their brain. In case you didn't know, morphine and heroin are opiates, so when your mom gave you sugar, it may have been like shooting you up with tiny little amounts of smack, and smack addicts are not known as the most active of people. Of course, the part about sugar destroying your teeth and turning you into a fatass are both still true, so in the end mom was right. "Turn on a light! Reading in the dark will ruin your eyes"
The Lie:
The Truth:
The truth is, due to the amazing resilience of the human eye, reading in dim light doesn't hurt our eyes. Dr. Katrina Schmidt, who is both a doctor and a woman, says here that, "Reading in dim light is not in itself going to ruin your eyes." However she does note that our eyes work a little harder in dim light, so if we keep moving the book to try and focus on it, it will tax our poor retinas to the point where they may well just leap off of our eyeballs and walk out the door. According to Wikipedia there have been five cases of this exact thing [citation needed]. "Don't swallow that gum! It takes seven years to pass through your digestive system!"
The Lie:
The Truth:
According to those killjoys over at Snopes, the reason your mom lied to you is because she was confused about the term "indigestible," which actually just means your stomach acids are unable to break down the components of gum. While this may sound unpleasant, note that no one ever accuses corn of ruining your digestive system, and it's just as hard to digest. So the only thing this means is that your gum will appear intact upon exiting your body, which leaves it open to any number of workplace pranking opportunities, Cracked is not responsible for any injuries or firings resulting from that idea, but will gladly own up to any resulting hilarity. "Put a jacket on! You'll catch a cold!"
The Lie:
The Truth:
What your mom misunderstood about our friend the rhinovirus is that he is just that, a virus. Viruses are pure undead malevolence encoded into genetic material and wrapped up in a creepy protein shell. They aren't even technically alive, so temperature has no affect on them. They're just tiny zombies that you can't even shoot in their microscopic zombie heads. So why do people get a cold when it's cold out? It depends on who you ask, but if you ask Robert Bradsher M.D. you'll learn that "cold weather usually makes people stay indoors, which might increase the person-to-person transmission of respiratory viruses." Really, if your mother was smart and well informed she would have kicked your ass outside so she could enjoy her Southern Comfort, childless home and germ-free air. It should also be noted that when you did finally catch that cold, your mom starving your cold and forcing orange juice down your throat did absolutely jack-all for curing you. Chances are, your mom didn't tell you why some men are total douchebags, did she? Allow us to explain in our rundown of 5 Douchebag Behaviors That Can be Explained by Science. Or, read about the large breasted country singer Yoko Ono is suing for being too much like her dead husband. |
|
|
The 6 Most Frequently Quoted Bullshit Animal Facts
5 Ways To Hack Your Brain Into Awesomeness
5 Species That Seem to be Trying to Take Over the Earth
5 Superpowers You Didn't Know Your Body Was Hiding From You
correlation =/= causation
btw if you want a Lockerz invite: http://bit.ly/12w7ZV
Well, all true. A Cracked First?
The last one, I'm assuming he meant the "causality", or rather, correlation, is that if you are out in the cold your immune system is lower, so a cracked writer in fact wrote an entire article without a single scientific/historic inaccuracy. Kudos.
Rhinovirus, schmimovirus! THAT's not the cause of colds. Everyone knows that even if 100 people stand around a sneezing coldy person and they get that virus in their noses not everyone will come down with a cold!
Ah man - I despise colds. And I know from experience that cold weather doesn't make you catch colds as I have always got them in Spring or Summer, sometimes Autumn, but, in my memory, I have NEVER had a cold in Winter... Also the worst cold I have ever had? Got it at the height of Summer while in SPAIN!! Guess I'm just unlucky... *weeps*
XD
You forgot what happens when you swallow a watermelon seed.
wow, comments are awesome. finally, no spam, no flaming, no "faggot!" no, "nobody cares about science man" comments. (: cracked has officially made my life better.
and to CbrStrShpGrrl: they likely used salt crystals because salt is more... i don't know, appealing than sugar at that magnification. sugar is harder to recognize as anything more than a white mess, whereas salt is small, white, and just looks like it could be a condiment.
BUT CRACKED!
The picture above the sugar article- Those are clearly SALT crystals! You can tell by the square shape. Salt is a mineral, and is square, while sugar is a super cool carbon chain, and therefore lumpy. Gosh. I'd expect you to know something like that. Maybe someones been putting salt in your sugar bowls?
"In your mother's defense, there's a definite causality between cold weather and colds"
Dude, I think you meant correlation. Otherwise, you're just contradicting yourself.
Another reason cold can increase someone's susceptibility to a cold is the fact that the cold temperature lowers immune system function.
Why does everyone I love lie to me!!!!!!
WHY!!!!!!!!
HA HA! When I was a kid I used to yell child abuse out the window all the time! Or that I was being kidnapped
"Understanding Diabetes," from the trusted source pictured left,
follows:
The simple molecular structure of sugar means that energy is easily released from its bonds. When the level of sugar in your blood is high, energy is readily available. This presence of readily available "surplus" energy is directly related to an increase in cellular activity and is thus directly linked to hyperactivity. Weight gain and feelings of sluggishness associated with sugar consumption are related to the insulin response that sugar induces. Insulin signals fat cells to withold stored energy because it is not needed. Sugar, easily broken down for energy, is also easily stored as fat. Dramatic sugar intake is met with a dramatic insulin response that causes a sharp and sudden decline in available energy as this surplus energy is rerouted for storage. Diabetics have a hyperactive insulin response and thus often feel sluggish and gain weight easily.
From what i have learned, and what i have experienced, catching cold does not depend on whether it is actually cold, since the rhinovirus is what is actually needed, if little or non is present in the air or in the surroundings, then there is little or no chance of you catching cold. This is a sound argument IMO since i have observed this myself. I currently am in a cold if not freezing environment, and since i keep my surroundings clean, though it does not have any inherent connections with cold, i am perfectly cold-free(can't think of an appropriate term), yet as the author suggests, contact through person-to-person increases the chance, plus the factor of one's immune system. It'll determine whether you'll easily catch one or your immune system will kick in first. Though cold temperatures reportedly lower ones immune system capabilities...sorry not very good in english
I caught a cold using jackets as bait!
What I've read in a science article a while back is that most types of colds need colder environment to "live". So actually you get cold if your nose is cold :D Try a mask or something to warm up your nose when outside.
They should have added "Men have one less rib than women."
See, the last one is a tricky one. Because one could also make the argument that you catch a cold because your immune system isn't able to fight the virus off. And being under-dressed in the cold weakens the immune system.
Thank goodness that was the only one of all these that my mom ever used on me!
you guys are too literal
6 Bullshit Facts About Psychology That Everyone Believes
7 Awesome Acts of Nature (That Science Can't Explain)
6 Things Your Body Does Every Day That Science Can't Explain
13 Real Animals Lifted Directly Out of Your Nightmares
Curse of the Duck Hunt Dog
6 Types Of Youtube Videos There Are Waaay Too Many Of
Oh gosh. Being cold makes you more likely to get sick because your body is using up energy heating itself rather than fighting off viruses. The immune system isn't up to its usual level.
Also, eating more sugar directly relates to the production of more ATP molecules in your cells (ENERGY). Although you cited that doctor, he is wrong. I tried to follow the link- it seems to be broken?