Sex-Off! Women of the '70s vs. Today
If you're like us, you yearn for a time when fondue, tennis and cognac ruled the social scene and the women were bra-less and easy. We're not talking about last Wednesday at Burt Reynolds' windowless Malibu chateau-we're talking about the 1970s. Not surprisingly, the women of that carefree, mustache-accepting decade were notably more attractive.
Why? Maybe it was the fact that their breasts were made of playfully droopy fat deposits rather than sacks of plastic, and their faces weren't stretched out and injected with horse semen (that's what Botox is, right?). Or maybe it's just the simple fact that cocaine hadn't really caught on yet. Either way, we conducted some scientific-ish research and proved indisputably that the women of the 1970s are tits and ass above the women of today.
|
TODAY: Lindsay Lohan
|
THE '70s: Bo Derek
|
During the 1970s, Bo Derek sent a strong, womanly message to men under 40: "Hey, why don't you jack off while you look at me?" And jack off they did. With four-inch-long nipples and the face of a sexy, whorish angel, Derek became a shower companion to men nationwide.
Lohan, however, fluctuates between 47 and 182 pounds, and her daily breakfast is usually a surprisingly accurate recreation of the last scene from Scarface. Oddly enough, she was a lot hotter back when she was 15. Yeah, we'd much rather bang the 15 year-old Lin-what? Nothing. Oh yeah-we were going to say that she also appears to be African-American from the waist down, and that's just weird.
WINNER: THE '70s
think you might be a bit baised
Replythe goth look isnt hot? since when has skin tight trousers and a corset not been hot?
ReplyDean Cain called me and said he liked this list. just sayin.
ReplyElisha Cuthbert is hotter but loses because she must be from the 70s?....what kind of nonsense is that???
ReplyElisha Cuthbert is way hotter than any of the girls on here, by the way. Not sure why that title was declared onto Kate Beckinsdale. Then there's the "Jessica Simpson is hotter, but Bach is sluttier", but what?... that argument doesn't work for the Paris Hilton one (Fawcett is hotter, but Paris is uber sluttier)? This whole article is ridiculous.
I've always thought that women's haircuts from the 1960s and 1970s were incomparably sexy. Sigh...
Replyput Kate Beckinsale in a wonder woman outfit and re-trail darn it!
Reply*trial
the 2000s killed Farrah Fawcet!
ReplyOn that alone the 00s should be beat down
I hate to say this, but I'm pretty sure cancer killed Farrah fawcet.
Lynda Carter was not hot. She has completely no ass, whereas Kate Beckinsale has some of the finest features this side of Venus. That category decision was a total failure.
Replyseriously, that Phoebe and Elisha pic nearly killed me!
ReplyWe get it Clive you miss the 70s.
ReplyOh and also Kate Beckinsale does crush the rest of the list and just because there are Goth chicks who are not hot doesn't mean the 2000s should be disqualified. Do you honestly believe that every woman who has ever dressed like wonder woman was smoking? Also the argument "The one from the 2000s reminds me of the 70s so the one from the 80s wins" is a horseshit argument.
I may alone here but I actually prefer the "modern" version in each of these categories.
ReplyAnyone is hotter than Paris Hilton!
ReplyAnd there's one downside to the 70's winning in a landslide: there was no ... down south grooming back then.
While I realize that a lot of guys prefer this, just as many don't!
Happy c**k touching!
ReplyNo way in hell Lynda Carter is hotter than Kate Beckinsale.
ReplyIt seems to me like half the entries basically say "Well sure, Kate Beckinsale is hotter, but I need to prove my thesis, so no she's not."
ReplyI was going to write something just like that right above you but then I saw your comment. Well played Ninja well played. Also does Farah Fawcett's smile freak anyone else the f**k out?
@Canid117, yeah, her smile in that shot always freaked me out. There are so many photos of her that are so much better, but that one turned into the classic image for some reason, and it looks like she's getting ready to eat your face. *shudder*
hey what about women in the 40's , 50's ? some were incredibly gorgeous .
Replythe only thing i can say 70' Girls been natural Beauty's no Airbrush or Heavy Make up dolls. This not means we don't have pretty Girls today, there are plenty on the Road who look Gorgeous.
Replyi find this article to b half correct
ReplyGod, what an insult to the late Farrah Fawcett to be compared to Paris Hilton of all people!!! If you woke up next to Paris Hilton you'd be horrified, but I'm pretty sure 70's Farrah woke up sexy and got hotter as the day went on.
ReplyIf I woke up next to 70s Farrah, I'm pretty sure I'd be pretty damn horrified too, because either I have time traveled into the past, or she has been flung forward into the future.
I'm 20 and I have to admit , I am a sucker for the 70's and everything related to that period.Women in the 70's , hell let's include the 80's as well.They just had something different... but please don't post a picture with underworld kate beckinsale and say she's not hot. There are plenty of hot women today. PLENTY
ReplyBut the hot women now are mass merchandised, Disney-ized hot and are all genetically altered to not have pubic hair.