

|
"So you're going to tell us that this Monkeysphere thing runs the whole world? Also, They Live sucked."
Now click over to a liberal show now, listen to them describe "Multinational Corporations" in the same diabolical terms, an evil black force that belches smoke and poisons water and enslaves humanity. Isn't it strange how, say, a lone man who carves and sells children's toys in his basement is a sweetheart who just loves bringing joy at Christmas, but a big-time toy corporation (which brings toys to millions of kids at Christmas) is an inhuman soul-grinding greed machine? Strangely enough, if the kindly lone toy making guy made enough toys and hired enough people and expanded to enough shops, we'd eventually stop seeing it as a toy-making shop and start seeing it as the fiery Orc factories of Mordor. And if you've just thought, "Well, those talk show hosts are just a bunch of egomaniacal blowhards anyway," you've just done it again, turned real humans into two-word cartoon characters. It's no surprise, you do it with pretty much all six billion human beings outside the Monkeysphere.
"So I'm supposed to suddenly start worrying about six billion strangers? That's not even possible!"
What is hard to understand is that it's also impossible for them to care about you. That's why they don't mind stealing your stereo or vandalizing your house or cutting your wages or raising your taxes or bombing your office building or choking your computer with spam advertising diet and penis drugs they know don't work. You're outside their Monkeysphere. In their mind, you're just a vague shape with a pocket full of money for the taking. Think of Osama Bin Laden. Did you just picture a camouflaged man hiding in a cave, drawing up suicide missions? Or are you thinking of a man who gets hungry and has a favorite food and who had a childhood crush on a girl and who has athlete's foot and chronic headaches and wakes up in the morning with a boner and loves volleyball? Something in you, just now, probably was offended by that. You think there's an effort to build sympathy for the murderous fuck. Isn't it strange how simply knowing random human facts about him immediately tugs at your sympathy strings? He comes closer to your Monkeysphere, he takes on dimension. Now, the cold truth is this Bin Laden is just as desperately in need of a bullet to the skull as the raving four-color caricature on some redneck's T-shirt. The key to understanding people like him, though, is realizing that we are the caricature on his T-shirt.
"So you're using monkeys to claim that we're all a bunch of Osama Bin Ladens?"
Listen to any 16 year-old kid with his first job, going on and on about how the boss is screwing him and the government is screwing him even more ("What's FICA?!?!" he screams as he looks at his first paycheck). Then watch that same kid at work, as he drops a hamburger patty on the floor, picks it up, and slaps in on a bun and serves it to a customer. In that one dropped burger he has everything he needs to understand those black-hearted politicians and corporate bosses. They see him in the exact same way he sees the customers lined up at the burger counter. Which is, just barely. In both cases, for the guy making the burger and the guy running Exxon, getting through the workweek and collecting the paycheck are all that matters. No thought is given to the real human unhappiness being spread by doing it shittily (ever gotten so sick from food poisoning you thought your stomach lining was going to fly out of your mouth?) That many customers or employees just can't fit inside the Monkeysphere. The kid will protest that he shouldn't have to care for the customers for minimum wage, but the truth is if a man doesn't feel sympathy for his fellow man at $6.00 an hour, he won't feel anything more at $600,000 a year. Or, to look at it the other way, if we're allowed to be indifferent and even resentful to the masses for $6.00 an hour, just think of how angry the some Pakistani man is allowed to be when he's making the equivalent of six dollars a week.
"You've used the word 'monkey' more than 50 times, but the same principle hardly applies. Humans have been to the moon. Let's see the monkeys do that."
There's a reason why legendary monkeytician Charles Darwin and his assistant, Jeje (pronounced "heyhey") Santiago deduced that humans and chimps were evolutionary cousins. As sophisticated as we are (compare our advanced sewage treatment plants to the chimps' primitive technique of hurling the feces with their bare hands), the inescapable truth is we are just as limited by our mental hardware. The primary difference is that monkeys are happy to stay in small groups and rarely interact with others outside their monkey gang. This is why they rarely go to war, though when they do it is widely thought to be hilarious. Humans, however, require cars and oil and quality manufactured goods by the fine folks at 3M and Japanese video games and worldwide internets and, most importantly, governments. All of these things take groups larger than 150 people to maintain effectively. Thus, we routinely find ourselves functioning in bunches larger than our primate brains are able to cope with. This is where the problems begin. Like a fragile naked human pyramid, we are simultaneously supporting and resenting each other. We bitch out loud about our soul-sucking job as an anonymous face on an assembly line, while at the exact same time riding in a car that only an assembly line could have produced. It's a constant contradiction that has left us pissed off and joining informal wrestling clubs in basements. This is why I think it was with a great burden of sadness that Darwin turned to his assistant and lamented, "Jeje, we're the monkeys."
"Oh, no you didn't."
If you think about it, our entire society has evolved around the limitations of the Monkeysphere. There is a reason why all of the really phat-ass nations with the biggest SUV's with the shiniest 22-inch rims all have some kind of representative democracy (where you vote for people to do the governing for you) and all of them are, to some degree, capitalist (where people actually get to buy property and keep some of what they earn).
A representative democracy allows a small group of people to make all of the decisions, while letting us common people feel like we're doing something by going to a polling place every couple of years and pulling a lever that, in reality, has about the same effect as the darkness knob on your toaster. We can simultaneously feel like we're in charge while being contained enough that we can't cause any real monkey mayhem once we fly into one of our screeching, arm-flapping monkey frenzies ("A woman showed her boob at the Super Bowl! We want a boob and football ban immediately!") Conversely, some people in the distant past naively thought they could sit all of the millions of monkeys down and say, "Okay, everybody go pick the bananas, then bring them here, and we'll distribute them with a complex formula determining banana need! Now go gather bananas for the good of society!" For the monkeys it was a confused, comical, tree-humping disaster. Later, a far more realistic man sat the monkeys down and said, "You want bananas? Each of you go get your own. I'm taking a nap." That man, of course, was German philosopher Hans Capitalism. As long as everybody gets their own bananas and shares with the few in their Monkeysphere, the system will thrive even though nobody is even trying to make the system thrive. This is perhaps how Ayn Rand would have put it, had she not been such a hateful bitch. Then, some time in the Third Century, French philosopher Pierre "Frenchy" LaFrench invented racism.
This was a way of simplifying the too-complex-for-monkeys world by imagining all people of a certain race as being the same person, thinking they all have the same attitudes and mannerisms and tastes in food and clothes and music. It sort of works, as long as we think of that person as being a good person ("Those Asians are so hard-working and precise and well-mannered!") but when we start seeing them as being one, giant, gaping asshole (the French, ironically) our monkey happiness again breaks down. It's not all the French's fault. The truth is, all of these monkey management schemes only go so far. For instance, today one in four Americans has some kind of mental illness, usually depression. One in four. Watch a basketball game. The odds are at least two of those people on the floor are mentally ill. Look around your house; if everybody else there seems okay, it's you. Is it any surprise? You turn on the news and see a whole special on the Obesity Epidemic. You've had this worry laid on your shoulders about millions of other people eating too much. What exactly are you supposed to do about the eating habits of 80 million people you don't even know? You've taken on the pork-laden burden of all these people outside the Monkeysphere and you now carry that useless weight of worry like, you know, some kind of animal on your back.
"So what exactly are we supposed to do about all this?"
So reject binary thinking of "good vs. bad" or "us vs. them." Know problems cannot be solved with clever slogans and over-simplified step-by-step programs. You can do that by following these simple steps. We like to call this plan the T.R.Y. plan: First, TOTAL MORON. That is, accept the fact THAT YOU ARE ONE. We all are. That really annoying person you know, the one who's always spouting bullshit, the person who always thinks they're right? Well, the odds are that for somebody else, you're that person. So take the amount you think you know, reduce it by 99.999%, and then you'll have an idea of how much you actually know regarding things outside your Monkeysphere. Second, UNDERSTAND that there are no Supermonkeys. Just monkeys. Those guys on TV you see, giving the inspirational seminars, teaching you how to reach your potential and become rich and successful like them? You know how they made their money? By giving seminars. For the most part, the only thing they do well is convince others they do everything well. No, the universal moron principal established in No. 1 above applies here, too. Don't pretend politicians are somehow supposed to be immune to all the backhanded fuckery we all do in our daily lives and don't laugh and point when the preacher gets caught on video snorting cocaine off a prostitute's ass. A good exercise is to picture your hero--whoever it is--passed out on his lawn, naked from the waist down. The odds are it's happened at some point. Even Gandhi may have had hotel rooms and dead hookers in his past. And don't even think about ignoring advice from a moral teacher just because the source enjoys the ol' Colombian Nose Candy from time to time. We're all members of varying species of hypocrite (or did you tell them at the job interview that you once called in sick to spend a day leveling up on World of Warcraft?) Don't use your heroes' vices as an excuse to let yours run wild. And finally, DON'T LET ANYBODY simplify it for you. The world cannot be made simple. Anyone who tries to paint a picture of the world in basic comic book colors is most likely trying to use you as a pawn. So just remember: T-R-Y. Go forth and do likewise, gents. Copies of our book are available in the lobby.
Why look at this, here's a mention on the LA Times site. Is this word in the dictionary yet?
|
|
|
Review of KFC's Terrifying New Double Down Sandwich
7 True Stories That Prove The Airlines Hate You
Why Obama Makes Americans Want to Stockpile Ammo
5 Ways People Are Taking Harry Potter Waaay Too Seriously
The first page is really brilliant. The second is dubious, there is some truth in it (the reason why morality doesn't work: where there is oppression, there are lies.) However you lost your objectivity as seen in the first page; saying what's right isn't quite enough, you still need to say it in the right way. By using language that incites anger in many, you fail to speak in a way that resonates with many, as you did wonderfully in the beginning.
Just to illustrate, for example you could say "so don't feel bad when you find it hard to care for others; the compulsion you have is merely a shackle of morality" instead of "if you think that you care about them and they care about you, you're just naive and empty-headed." The two statements convey roughly the same idea, but it is obvious which one is more effective.
This is the smelliest piece of behaviourist propaganda I've ever read. The logic of this article is really really flawed, and it surprised me how much explanation and examplification was put on this as opposed to other notes.
I'll elaborate on this later because I must get up in 1 hour but I'm really ashamed as how this page, among so much entertaing and intresting info, is trying to pass this article as a serious way of understanding human behaviour. Its logical flaws really offended me as this article flagrantly ignores the improved symbolic capacities of our brains and the resposability we must take in front of each one of our actions, human properties WE DON'T share with "monkeys".
"It doesn't matter It's just an issue of degree"
Readers beware, as the "Monkeysphere" is one of the most dangerous, profoundly anti-humanistic (as its mere name implies) memes trying to arise from the internet. Probably somebody could stablish strong structural similarities between simian and human behaviour, but if the difference "it's just the degree" there isn't a single reason not to matter. After all, a lot of completely different things are just a different degree of other things, as the "Rape Oil article" from this site arguments as rebuttal for a mislead information. And even in that quantitative difference we can find structural differences between humans and chimps. After all, trips to the moon are the kind of thing that supposedly the limitations of the Monkeysphere would prevent us to do, right?
Nicolas - Argentina
This is the smelliest piece of behaviourist propaganda I've ever read. The logic of this article is really really flawed, and it surprised me how much explanation and examplification was put on this as opposed to other notes.
I'll elaborate on this later because I must get up in 1 hour but I'm really ashamed as how this page, among so much entertaing and intresting info, is trying to pass this article as a serious way of understanding human behaviour. Its logical flaws really offended me as this article flagrantly ignores the improved symbolic capacities of our brains and the resposability we must take in front of each one of our actions, human properties WE DON'T share with "monkeys".
"It doesn't matter It's just an issue of degree"
Readers beware, as the "Monkeysphere" is one of the most dangerous, profoundly anti-humanistic (as its mere name implies) memes trying to arise from the internet. Probably somebody could stablish strong structural similarities between simian and human behaviour, but if the difference "it's just the degree" there isn't a single reason not to matter. After all, a lot of completely different things are just a different degree of other things, as the "Rape Oil article" from this site arguments as rebuttal for a mislead information. And even in that quantitative difference we can find structural differences between humans and chimps. After all, trips to the moon are the kind of thing that supposedly that the limitations of the Monkeysphere would prevent us to do, right?
Nicolas - Argentina
This makes beautiful, beautiful sense. Thanks for writing, despite the fact it was years ago.
i dont think this anology really works. Monkeys arent a member of my species, i'm interested in human survival - so no, i dont care if all 100 monkeys die as long as it doesnt affect any humans. screw the monkeysphere, humans will dominate the earth!!!
until 2012. :)
d_senti...None of the things you mentioned were truly altruistic. Nothing is. Mostly people doing nice things are for very personal reasons. The greatest one is superiority. People do alot of things to feel not only better about themselves, but to reinforce their image of themselves as being 'better' than others. Others may do it simply because they need attention by or interaction with others in order to boost their self image. The thing that I think most of those who have posted negatively to this article fail to understand that these are ideas are free from value judgements. Being an individual who functions in accordance with realities that have evolved socially through the the course of our species is not bad. Rid yourself of that Aristotlean logic right off.
Interesting, I love this article. However I think it's the opposite in my case: I tend to insult only the ones I know and if I am only with them, but not strangers I do not know, let alone random persons in public, for the fear of not embarrassing myself. I am more friendly with strangers than with my friends for that matter. Albeit, this article perfectly describes everyone I know.
p.s. sry if I misspelled anything, english is not my first language.
"Any claim that the root of a problem is simple should be treated the same as a claim that the root of a problem is Bigfoot," says the guy who claims that the source of all problems in the world is the Monkeysphere. I call shenanigans.
I don't deny that we have these biological impulses - of course we do. But people overcome them all the time. Everyone who donates to an organization for a disease (that they don't know anyone who has it), gives money to the Third World, drops change in the cup of some bum they barely notice, they overcome these instincts.
You make a good point, initially, and what you say is entirely true on the macro scale. But on the micro scale, it isn't, not always. There are plenty of exceptions, plenty of people who do their job well all the time, refuse to steal ANYTHING, and live good, honest lives. I know many people like this. So you are falling into the very fallacy you condemn at the end of your article.
Brilliantly brilliant article.
Dammit! Nothing kills me like realizing I made a grammar error right after I post. Somehow the percieved anonymity of the internet isn't making me feel any better about it. How does the fact that I care about this relate to my own personal monkeysphere? That's going to bother me now.
The sphere within which I care about what people think about me is clearly a whole lot bigger than the sphere within which I actually care about other people. See how I keep typing annoyingly long comments with no regard for others!
Thanks again David Wong for writing a great article!
I want to write an obnoxiously long comment, but instead I'll keep it short and simple.
This is one of the best articles I've read anywhere. It would be easy to come off as callous, preachy, or insane when writing on this topic, but the author pulled everything off beautifully.
I generally don't read comments, and the only reason that I post one is to give kudos to a good author and hope it encourage him/her to keep writing. Anyway, David Wong's articles are almost all good to excellent. This is the best of them. Well, it's the best one that I've read so far.
I wound up writing too much anyway. Oh well.
great article. jdmills, you ignored the entire article, the point is to recognize why we do what we do. only by understanding our actions and acknowledging them can we hope to evolve enough to someday (hopefully) overcome them to some degree.
socran, i love your idea. we don't have to include everyone in our monkeysphere, just recognize what we are dumping outside our sphere and behave accordingly. that could at least be step one in the million plus steps to figuring out how to live in a global community of billions.
genius article... cracked is surely in my monkeysphere
I've always found the idea of the Monkeysphere a bit strange. I mean, I've always known it was there, but other people seem to react to it so much differently from me. For instance, I did a variant of the trash can thing myself the other day - I hauled a REALLY heavy trash can to the curb, and before walking back inside I realized that I could make it easier on the trash man by putting half of the trash in the much lighter can right next to it. It's not so much that I cared about the trash man as a person. It's just that I realized that a problem WITHIN my Monkeysphere - at the very center, i.e. me - was being dumped OUT of my Monkeysphere. Because I personally have nothing to do with anything outside my Monkeysphere, I have absolutely no business letting anything bad out of it and into someone else's.
'Course, the Monkeysphere is such an integral part of people that people within mine are insulted by my treatment of it. My friend is pissed that I refuse to unfairly vote for him in a contest unless I feel he deserves to win, rather than simply because he's within my Monkeysphere. It's probably best that I don't tell him I would let him die if saving him meant two or more people in China would die instead.
this is so true though..yeah u have helped an old lady cross the street but u only did it so u cant tell someone in ur monkeysphere that ur a "good person". ur only doing good things b.c. u think u will gain from it...
or maybe you do care outside ur monkeysphere or its just not filled up yet..
jdmills, did you even read the article? if yes, do yourself a favor and jump in front of a train.
this article is bullshit and it scares me to think that someone should try to instill the thought into people's heads that it's okay to not care about anyone but those close to you.....how short sighted and insulting....and i can prove it's bullshit....go to youtube and look up several different animal videos of wild animals taking care of the young of an entirely different species of animal....gee, i thought they would be outside of the "mokeysphere" ?
This article is highlarious. But check out them internal consistencies:
"Now click over to a liberal show now, listen to them describe "Multinational Corporations" in the same diabolical terms, an evil black force that belches smoke and poisons water and enslaves humanity."
Or click to this website: http://www.cracked.com/article_15967_awful-truth-behind-5-items-probably-on-your-grocery-list.html
Also, like them other notes below note, nice job chiding us not to listen to simplifications, then to give the most simplified version of Communism and Capitalism ever. Funny... and dumb, at the same time. Also, Cracked is the best website on the internet, seriously.
What really worries me is our capacity to understand. Whenever I read an article that 'blows my mind', like this one did, I always get the same feeling, "I already knew this on some level" and, "I'm not going to remember it". I'll probably recount the main points of this article to those within my monkeysphere only to have them say, "yeah I knew that". In truth they do know about the monkeysphere, just like they know about children starving in Africa and global warming but they can't think about more than one at a time. Even the monkeysphere has too many elements to digest or express in one clear thought. - So my scary conclusion; not only can we not care about anyone outside our monkeysphere, this gigantic social issue probably won't orbit around most of our give-a-s**t-spheres for more than a few hours.
The 8 Most Insulting Attempts to Raise Money for a Cause
5 Corporate Promotions That Ended in (Predictable) Disaster
Curse of the Duck Hunt Dog
6 Types Of Youtube Videos There Are Waaay Too Many Of
So, having more than 200 contacts in Facebook is just insane?