Register

What is the Monkeysphere?

By David Wong September 30, 2007 291,229 views
article image
"So you're going to tell us that this Monkeysphere thing runs the whole world? Also, They Live sucked."

Go flip on the radio. Listen to the conservative talk about "The Government" as if it were some huge, lurking dragon ready to eat you and your paycheck whole. Never mind that the government is made up of people and that all of that money they take goes into the pockets of human beings. Talk radio's Rush Limbaugh is known to tip 50% at restaurants, but flies into a broadcast tirade if even half that dollar amount is deducted from his paycheck by "The Government." That's despite the fact that the money helps that very same single mom he had no problem tipping in her capacity as a waitress.

Now click over to a liberal show now, listen to them describe "Multinational Corporations" in the same diabolical terms, an evil black force that belches smoke and poisons water and enslaves humanity. Isn't it strange how, say, a lone man who carves and sells children's toys in his basement is a sweetheart who just loves bringing joy at Christmas, but a big-time toy corporation (which brings toys to millions of kids at Christmas) is an inhuman soul-grinding greed machine? Strangely enough, if the kindly lone toy making guy made enough toys and hired enough people and expanded to enough shops, we'd eventually stop seeing it as a toy-making shop and start seeing it as the fiery Orc factories of Mordor.

And if you've just thought, "Well, those talk show hosts are just a bunch of egomaniacal blowhards anyway," you've just done it again, turned real humans into two-word cartoon characters. It's no surprise, you do it with pretty much all six billion human beings outside the Monkeysphere.

"So I'm supposed to suddenly start worrying about six billion strangers? That's not even possible!"

That's right, it isn't possible. That's the point.

What is hard to understand is that it's also impossible for them to care about you.

That's why they don't mind stealing your stereo or vandalizing your house or cutting your wages or raising your taxes or bombing your office building or choking your computer with spam advertising diet and penis drugs they know don't work. You're outside their Monkeysphere. In their mind, you're just a vague shape with a pocket full of money for the taking.

Think of Osama Bin Laden. Did you just picture a camouflaged man hiding in a cave, drawing up suicide missions? Or are you thinking of a man who gets hungry and has a favorite food and who had a childhood crush on a girl and who has athlete's foot and chronic headaches and wakes up in the morning with a boner and loves volleyball?

Something in you, just now, probably was offended by that. You think there's an effort to build sympathy for the murderous fuck. Isn't it strange how simply knowing random human facts about him immediately tugs at your sympathy strings? He comes closer to your Monkeysphere, he takes on dimension.

Now, the cold truth is this Bin Laden is just as desperately in need of a bullet to the skull as the raving four-color caricature on some redneck's T-shirt. The key to understanding people like him, though, is realizing that we are the caricature on his T-shirt.

"So you're using monkeys to claim that we're all a bunch of Osama Bin Ladens?"

Sort of.

Listen to any 16 year-old kid with his first job, going on and on about how the boss is screwing him and the government is screwing him even more ("What's FICA?!?!" he screams as he looks at his first paycheck).

Then watch that same kid at work, as he drops a hamburger patty on the floor, picks it up, and slaps in on a bun and serves it to a customer.

In that one dropped burger he has everything he needs to understand those black-hearted politicians and corporate bosses. They see him in the exact same way he sees the customers lined up at the burger counter. Which is, just barely.

In both cases, for the guy making the burger and the guy running Exxon, getting through the workweek and collecting the paycheck are all that matters. No thought is given to the real human unhappiness being spread by doing it shittily (ever gotten so sick from food poisoning you thought your stomach lining was going to fly out of your mouth?) That many customers or employees just can't fit inside the Monkeysphere.

The kid will protest that he shouldn't have to care for the customers for minimum wage, but the truth is if a man doesn't feel sympathy for his fellow man at $6.00 an hour, he won't feel anything more at $600,000 a year.

Or, to look at it the other way, if we're allowed to be indifferent and even resentful to the masses for $6.00 an hour, just think of how angry the some Pakistani man is allowed to be when he's making the equivalent of six dollars a week.

"You've used the word 'monkey' more than 50 times, but the same principle hardly applies. Humans have been to the moon. Let's see the monkeys do that."

It doesn't matter. It's just an issue of degree.

There's a reason why legendary monkeytician Charles Darwin and his assistant, Jeje (pronounced "heyhey") Santiago deduced that humans and chimps were evolutionary cousins. As sophisticated as we are (compare our advanced sewage treatment plants to the chimps' primitive technique of hurling the feces with their bare hands), the inescapable truth is we are just as limited by our mental hardware.

The primary difference is that monkeys are happy to stay in small groups and rarely interact with others outside their monkey gang. This is why they rarely go to war, though when they do it is widely thought to be hilarious. Humans, however, require cars and oil and quality manufactured goods by the fine folks at 3M and Japanese video games and worldwide internets and, most importantly, governments. All of these things take groups larger than 150 people to maintain effectively. Thus, we routinely find ourselves functioning in bunches larger than our primate brains are able to cope with.

This is where the problems begin. Like a fragile naked human pyramid, we are simultaneously supporting and resenting each other. We bitch out loud about our soul-sucking job as an anonymous face on an assembly line, while at the exact same time riding in a car that only an assembly line could have produced. It's a constant contradiction that has left us pissed off and joining informal wrestling clubs in basements.

This is why I think it was with a great burden of sadness that Darwin turned to his assistant and lamented, "Jeje, we're the monkeys."

"Oh, no you didn't."

If you think about it, our entire society has evolved around the limitations of the Monkeysphere. There is a reason why all of the really phat-ass nations with the biggest SUV's with the shiniest 22-inch rims all have some kind of representative democracy (where you vote for people to do the governing for you) and all of them are, to some degree, capitalist (where people actually get to buy property and keep some of what they earn).


Above: Democracy

A representative democracy allows a small group of people to make all of the decisions, while letting us common people feel like we're doing something by going to a polling place every couple of years and pulling a lever that, in reality, has about the same effect as the darkness knob on your toaster. We can simultaneously feel like we're in charge while being contained enough that we can't cause any real monkey mayhem once we fly into one of our screeching, arm-flapping monkey frenzies ("A woman showed her boob at the Super Bowl! We want a boob and football ban immediately!")

Conversely, some people in the distant past naively thought they could sit all of the millions of monkeys down and say, "Okay, everybody go pick the bananas, then bring them here, and we'll distribute them with a complex formula determining banana need! Now go gather bananas for the good of society!" For the monkeys it was a confused, comical, tree-humping disaster.

Later, a far more realistic man sat the monkeys down and said, "You want bananas? Each of you go get your own. I'm taking a nap." That man, of course, was German philosopher Hans Capitalism.

As long as everybody gets their own bananas and shares with the few in their Monkeysphere, the system will thrive even though nobody is even trying to make the system thrive. This is perhaps how Ayn Rand would have put it, had she not been such a hateful bitch.

Then, some time in the Third Century, French philosopher Pierre "Frenchy" LaFrench invented racism.


Above: The French

This was a way of simplifying the too-complex-for-monkeys world by imagining all people of a certain race as being the same person, thinking they all have the same attitudes and mannerisms and tastes in food and clothes and music. It sort of works, as long as we think of that person as being a good person ("Those Asians are so hard-working and precise and well-mannered!") but when we start seeing them as being one, giant, gaping asshole (the French, ironically) our monkey happiness again breaks down.

It's not all the French's fault. The truth is, all of these monkey management schemes only go so far. For instance, today one in four Americans has some kind of mental illness, usually depression. One in four. Watch a basketball game. The odds are at least two of those people on the floor are mentally ill. Look around your house; if everybody else there seems okay, it's you.

Is it any surprise? You turn on the news and see a whole special on the Obesity Epidemic. You've had this worry laid on your shoulders about millions of other people eating too much. What exactly are you supposed to do about the eating habits of 80 million people you don't even know? You've taken on the pork-laden burden of all these people outside the Monkeysphere and you now carry that useless weight of worry like, you know, some kind of animal on your back.

"So what exactly are we supposed to do about all this?"

First, train yourself to get suspicious every time you see simplicity. Any claim that the root of a problem is simple should be treated the same as a claim that the root of a problem is Bigfoot. Simplicity and Bigfoot are found in the real world with about the same frequency.

So reject binary thinking of "good vs. bad" or "us vs. them." Know problems cannot be solved with clever slogans and over-simplified step-by-step programs.

You can do that by following these simple steps. We like to call this plan the T.R.Y. plan:

First, TOTAL MORON. That is, accept the fact THAT YOU ARE ONE. We all are.

That really annoying person you know, the one who's always spouting bullshit, the person who always thinks they're right? Well, the odds are that for somebody else, you're that person. So take the amount you think you know, reduce it by 99.999%, and then you'll have an idea of how much you actually know regarding things outside your Monkeysphere.

Second, UNDERSTAND that there are no Supermonkeys. Just monkeys. Those guys on TV you see, giving the inspirational seminars, teaching you how to reach your potential and become rich and successful like them? You know how they made their money? By giving seminars. For the most part, the only thing they do well is convince others they do everything well.

No, the universal moron principal established in No. 1 above applies here, too. Don't pretend politicians are somehow supposed to be immune to all the backhanded fuckery we all do in our daily lives and don't laugh and point when the preacher gets caught on video snorting cocaine off a prostitute's ass. A good exercise is to picture your hero--whoever it is--passed out on his lawn, naked from the waist down. The odds are it's happened at some point. Even Gandhi may have had hotel rooms and dead hookers in his past.

And don't even think about ignoring advice from a moral teacher just because the source enjoys the ol' Colombian Nose Candy from time to time. We're all members of varying species of hypocrite (or did you tell them at the job interview that you once called in sick to spend a day leveling up on World of Warcraft?) Don't use your heroes' vices as an excuse to let yours run wild.

And finally, DON'T LET ANYBODY simplify it for you. The world cannot be made simple. Anyone who tries to paint a picture of the world in basic comic book colors is most likely trying to use you as a pawn.

So just remember: T-R-Y. Go forth and do likewise, gents. Copies of our book are available in the lobby.

Why look at this, here's a mention on the LA Times site. Is this word in the dictionary yet?



What really worries me is our capacity to understand. Whenever I read an article that 'blows my mind', like this one did, I always get the same feeling, "I already knew this on some level" and, "I'm not going to remember it". I'll probably recount the main points of this article to those within my monkeysphere only to have them say, "yeah I knew that". In truth they do know about the monkeysphere, just like they know about children starving in Africa and global warming but they can't think about more than one at a time. Even the monkeysphere has too many elements to digest or express in one clear thought. - So my scary conclusion; not only can we not care about anyone outside our monkeysphere, this gigantic social issue probably won't orbit around most of our give-a-s**t-spheres for more than a few hours.

7/1/2009 9:12:48 PM
BHB

I had to say something... YOU f****n ROCK!!!!!!!!!!!!
you may be a monkey like all of us, but you are really good at elliciting your point... you should be a teacher!!!

PS: we had to write a paper in cultural anthro class on the dynamics of society and the monkeysphere number that we studied was actually around 200...

7/1/2009 3:46:49 AM
Wyndam

the ending bit was wrong. Just be nice to everyone you meet and smile as much as you can. Dont worry, be happy and relaxed and then do you best to make as many people as you can feel better. Then no matter what, you can sleep at night knowing that because of you the world is a little bit better.

6/30/2009 8:50:40 PM
Quesoformagio

This was one of the most educational things I have ever seen. It all makes sense and stuff too. Incredible. Simply incredible.

6/30/2009 11:46:07 AM
screaminbean

Hee hee...monkey

6/18/2009 8:57:22 PM
manusmactibilis

"Know problems cannot be solved with clever slogans and over-simplified step-by-step programs.

You can do that by following these simple steps."

That says it all, really. But the article sure is insightful, otherwise.

6/14/2009 10:07:44 AM
Grognor

The article starts out great but sadly soon degrades into a series of non-sequiturs. Most of page 2 is rife with the very vice the author's warning against: Oversimplification.

6/13/2009 5:20:26 AM
Hannu

well... this most certainly explains multiple-personality disorders as the necessity to have two largely different monkeyspheres... right?

6/7/2009 3:12:23 PM
dabomber279

Well, Ira, I think you make some interesting points. However, you seem to have been born without a sense of humor.
The quote that you are 'correcting' is translated from German. Therefore, your translation is no more correct than the one in the article. The Kevin Federline thing is a joke. So really there is no mistake in the article.
I hate to be a pedantic douchebag, but, y'know, you started it.

5/26/2009 4:37:01 PM
Tristan MacKinlay

I will be a little bit off topic but there is a common mistake done in the very beginning of the article:
"One death is a tragedy. One million deaths is a statistic." - Kevin Federline
The quote is actualy : "The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic." and it is commonly misattributed to Josef Stalin. This quotation probably was originated from the novel "Der schwarze Obelisk" by Erich Maria Remarque (1956) [see article on wikipedia]

Now back to "the monkeysphere" article

The problem is that we understand the situation, we see it every day around us, we sometimes even try to break the habits and lie to ourselves and to others that things can be changed, can be different. We pretend that the dehumanization brought by the society in it's marvelous and hypnotic dance towards the future, the so-called globalization, is not actually real.
The truth is that our minds can't grasp the enormity of what is the global reality, so, with or without our consent, our minds hold to whatever is closest to reach. If you can't see the whole picture in one gaze than you just stare at the details in front of you.
It's ironic, the "greater good" idea has to treat people as numbers, the same way we have to see the "rest" of "them" in a blur, meanwhile it's the same you that feels the rapture created between people, the detachment, the dehumanization... and you don't like it, and you don't agree, and you want to change it but ... how can you?
You're one man, not against, not beside, just coexisting with millions of others. Believe me, you're gonna loose your mind if you try to feel, see, get involved and care about all of it. It sounds wrong, sad and pessimistic, but it's not far from the truth.
All you can do is feel, think, act as best as the situation allows you, i mean do all of those as long as they don't interfere with your well being and your survival. It's just a matter of personal choice, the free will still governs all of us. You can present the ideas, you can show the world as it is and the rest is up to every man to decide for himself if and how much will take in.
Tell, show, explain and then hope for the best, while you go on living your life in accordance with your ideology.
After all, we're only human! We have good and bad parts as well, we might just accept that and focus on the things we really care and we really can change. Start with yourself, do what you want, what you like, what you believe and what you feel, be happy with yourself and you will be amazed of the effect on others. It's one thing to see the problems in the world, to see the suffering, the injustices, etc etc and be consumed by them, and another to acknowledge their existence have opinions about them but continue to live your life. As long as you can't do anything to change one problem, let it be, go solve one that you can, don't waste time loosing your mind on the impossible and miss the chance to really change something, even if it's at a smaller scale. If everyone would do the same, little by little the situation would change.
I'm sorry if i was unclear and maybe just tangent to the topic but i got carried away by the idea. The bottom line is that i think you have a good point, but you're a bit too acid and dramatic in your exposure, and you are too much in your writings [you let your your emotional implication into the page - disappointment, maybe a little disgust, and the one that jumps out of the page is the contempt]

The golden rule still says it best : "do unto others what u want others do unto you" [or the negation variation "don't unto others what u don't want others do unto you"] - the "ethics and reciprocity" idea is found in most of the religions around the world, more than twenty of them anyway.
"Every religion emphasizes human improvement, love, respect for others, sharing other people's suffering. On these lines every religion had more or less the same viewpoint and the same goal." The Dalai Lama

and the 2 quotes that i find appropriate to complete and end my reply to this topic:
"The more you know, the more you realise how much you don’t know — the less you know, the more you think you know." - David Freeman
"I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance" - socrates

5/15/2009 8:08:42 AM
iraflame

Actually, Lenin's brother was excecuted for trying to kill Alexander III-so it wasn't like he was murdered in cold blood. And they weren't exactly close at the time of his execution. Neither he nor his brother, Alexander, were close, nor did they get along.

Oh, and you forgot Hitler, dearest. And Mussolini, and Franco. And Pinochet, Samoza, Batista, the Shah of Iran, etc.

4/24/2009 1:51:46 PM
Guinastasia

Society is utterly screwed? I think I knew that already.

4/21/2009 8:43:14 AM
Dracocron

i thought this was very, very good. a little over simplified itself, and therefore a touch hypocritical, but good. just because i would take my best friend's death harder than a bus load of kids crashing, doesn't mean i don't care at all. but still, it made me think. i know alot of people who would really benefit from reading this.

4/8/2009 3:10:07 PM
jquincy

I enjoyed the article, though. Very well-written and insightful.

4/3/2009 2:17:06 AM
4udball

I assumed that some of you pictured the non-people with lives for fun.
Or am I the only one that actively muses about sociology/psychology outside of the internet? Please.

4/3/2009 1:04:52 AM
4udball

That was very good. Very good indeed.

4/2/2009 1:53:14 PM
Im_a_Vandal

Point taken on the non-existent "super monkeys"...

I blew about $1400.00 on Landmark "Education" Forum in 2005 to realize that B.S. is an ancient art that socio-pathic personalities have been perfecting it for thousands of years.

Deliberately screwing people in your own "monkey-sphere" for shits, giggles, grins and profit has been termed "sophistry", "bullshit", and "marketing"...

So let us not come down on the hummers with the 22 inch rims(?)...we have been carefully conditioned to lust after our pimped-out rides for decades now.

And in truth we have already had the "get responsible" or "simple life" movement...which in and of itself is nothing but, more coercive "marketing" based on massive amounts of pseudo-science...in pursuit of the political goal of the paralysis of present producers of goods and services...to subvert and/or supplant them.

Whether it be through regulation and taxation or "cult-ural" efforts... It is about the ability to control such...or to paraphrase and shorten Marx: Get control of the means...

..then ALL the "monkeys" have to "go green" or die(?)...

Lenin screwed the Czars over for the death of his brother and then foolishly selected Joseph Dugashvili(Alias Stalin) for his hatred of all things Christian and relgious...which degenerated into a hatred of all "things" between him and absolute power(oops!)...

All told, 40 million people lost their lives from the pre-Soviet revolutionary period to 1959(The Gulag Archipelago?). There were "good" monkeys with strong value for their families and communities, education, etc...but, such were not "good socialists" (read "puppets").

Mao outdid Stalin by an additional 20 million when he topped 60 million murders during his "Cultural Revolution".

Add in the "Killing Fields" of Cambodia and every other Marxist-nonsense inspired group's murderous indiscretions...

Then you cannot whine so loudly about the so-called "religious" wars of Europe without coming off as completely ridiculous...

Socialist ideology has been cited to justify the murders of far more people than Islam, Judaism, and all variations of Eastern and Western Christianity combined.

Further, it used evolutionary "science" to justify most of that slaughter while hypocritically killing the best and the brightest individuals...go figure(?).

3/18/2009 9:32:59 AM
ParadigmBlaster

"A good exercise is to picture your hero--whoever it is--passed out on his lawn, naked from the waist down."
What I do is picture the guy taking a dump. And if it's a woman -sucking dick or engaging in raunchy anal sex.

3/17/2009 1:20:35 PM
itsnotlupus

...as much as I despise you as a person Wong, I do so love your work!

3/13/2009 11:40:40 AM
FishBulb

This is the greatest arcticle ever written! I have made all of my friends and family read it too. Monkeysphere is now a household word.

3/13/2009 11:38:55 AM
FishBulb