In theory, political cartoons should be a means to get a controversial point across in a concise, effective and humorous way. In reality, most usually convey less information than, say, grunting or gesturing.

LEVELS OF COMMUNICATION E By AMOUNTOF FINFORMATION CONVEYED HIGHEST LOWEST Republicans Since FART cat you can't heat H! the tone of (America) my voice

Whether you agree or disagree with the message is irrelevant, as these cartoons are often shitty ass vehicles for any message. Taken on average, political cartoons are the least effective way of making a point aside from suicide bombing and Internet petitions.

Political Cartoons: The Lowest Form of Communication

And the even less effective suicide bombing Internet petition.

Here are some examples of poor communication methods used by political cartoons that often fail to convey even the simplest, non-controversial ideas:

Pictures Requiring Excessive Labels

NEA. PARRISH CONFLICT OF '0A INTEREST

Usually the whole point of using a cartoon is that the picture is supposed to get the message across, and you use as few words as are needed to help people understand the picture. Some cartoonists, however, seem to think their readers are literally retarded.

VERMONTS OUT DISABLED YOU GO! JIM DOUGLAS RAVENING WOLVES ECONOMIC OF ADVERSITY cacecartoons.cam 2009 MONITE ADVERIN! THANX TO KTWN OCLASSEN

Sure, you have to label the politician, and maybe "Vermont's Disabled," I guess. Also, if you are really afraid your audience is too dumb to know that a politician screwing the disabled is probably doing it economically--and not literally feeding them to wild animals--then go ahead label the wolves "economic adversity."

But dear god, why do you have to label them "wolves"?

WHAT? ME WORRY? I'M GETTING A PERMANENT TAX CUT... THANKS TO THE G.O.P.! WEALTHY US WEALTHY PEOPLE tA PERSON CAN CONTNDE LIVING IN THE STYLE TO WHICH

So the guy in the suit. Is he wealthy? I can't tell. I need at least six clues and I only see five.

IF WE EXTEND PNVE TUL SAWORLD 7.20i0 YEAH, WOULDN'T UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS WANNA GIVE ALL WE LL ONLY ENCOURAGE THIS UP THE JOBLESS TO SIT BY THE FOOL W

I bet you could pick out at least one of those labels that could have been illustrated with, I don't know, a drawing. Hm, unconnected TV, hmm, hmm, how could I illustrate that? There's no way you could get that from a drawing. Oh wait.

h Q

And did that jobless guy write a note to himself to remove the water from his pool to use it as a tent?

Again, it doesn't matter whether you agree with the message. It's important that we not get caught up in that. The issue is that it's irritating no matter what message they're trying to convey. As someone with no ability to draw things, let me demonstrate what happens when you use too many labels to convey even a simple, non-controversial message (in this case: "fire hot").

BURNED LIBERALS TISSHE HAND WHERE THE BLANK SPACE HAND CONTACTED THE FIRE MAN GETING TENT HIGH BURNED TTETAPERANDABES CNOT THE TENT OF THE MLAN FIRE B

If the unnecessarily explanatory labels make you feel like your intelligence is being insulted and the apparently unrelated labels confused you, then that means I have done my job as a political cartoonist.

"Technology... uh... Exists"

SMALLER THAN AN IMac. PLAYS iTunes SONGS LIKE AN iPod. E-MAILS AND PLAYS VIDEO LIKE AN IPhone... iPad new iDoritgetit. from

From the below comic, you can gather that "Facebook" is something the kids use (but parents don't), and that they "friend" each other on it, and that's about all, because that's probably all the cartoonist knows.

FOR FATHERS DAY IM ENALLY IM GIVING YOU GOING TO THE GREATESTGIFT FRIEND YOU A SONCAN GIVE ON FACEBOOK TO HIS DAD.... AA BIIR

You see, there are three steps toward making a statement with an illustration:

1) Identify the subject you want to talk about.
2) Figure out what you want to say about it.
3) Figure out how to say it in picture form.

When it comes to new technology, many cartoonists valiantly struggle to lift themselves onto Step 1 and then collapse exhausted upon it, all their energy spent. There is a deadline coming and there is no time to figure out what "Facebook" or "Twitter" or "iPhones" are all about, much less what you can say about them. You are aware they exist and have been able to find the name of one function. WHAT MORE CAN ONE MAN DO?

This poor guy has not even managed to overcome Step 1 and figure out the name of the products involved:

THIS IS AN FTOUCH, GRANDPA. You WANTTHE LARGE PRINT EDITION.ITS CALLED AN I5PAD. FZSIMO GNAAONAS0TO CAGECRACOH

This guy is halfway through Step 1:

EVERYBODY SAIDI HAD THEN EVERYBODY SAID I TO GET AN iPOD. HAD TO GET AN iPHONE. So DID. SO I DID. BUT I BUT DON'T NOBODY REALLY EVER LIKE CALLS. Music

He has figured out what an iPod does and what an iPhone does enough to give his character reasons not to use them (I mean, a phone, who needs that). He is not entirely sure what an iPad does, so before anyone figures it out, he will distract you with a pun that is not really a pun. Hopefully you will be too busy going, "iGive up? Really?" to notice he does not know what iPads are used for.

Here, let me give it a try:

I DON'T SEE THE BIG DEAL WITH THESE NEW WHEELS LATER, DAD. IVE GOT TO GO ROL.

Straw Men

Political Cartoons: The Lowest Form of Communication

If you've spent time arguing with people on the Internet, you know that "straw man" is something you can yell at people arguing with you, and you might even know what it means. If not, it means you create a caricature of your opponent and put stupid arguments into its mouth that you can easily demolish; arguments they never made.

Evolution versus creationism arguments are the most fertile ground for this kind of thing. From the creationist side:

AFTER EDEN AFTER EDEN by Dan Liotha by Dan Lietha IAT wwwAnweSIGonesh.ong Tlta. 251 IREFUSE THAT'S NTERESTNG yOU TO LET THEBBLE HON DO YOU DECDE AND Y

I think these comics completely close the case on the debate. Evolutionists are stupid, rude hypocrites and creationists are polite and patient in response to them. Well, that settles 150 years of debate! Just look how frustrated evolutionists are when you trot out simple factual arguments!

Hell, check out the guy in the last panel of this one; this hoodie-wearing evolutionist is on the verge of physically attacking his opponent:

Oksy, SO if you You HAVE DO Well thsa's Hiecory Not necessariy. don'e belleve In be kidding me! The good way oF cant be Hieorisn wl OfLEM evollone whe

It's almost like God put them there to ask setup questions for you to roll out your carefully prepared statements. If that isn't proof of a Creator, I don't know what is.

Wait a second...

WHOAL WE DONT NEED DIAL DOWN THE RELIGION TO BE MORAL, LOVING RAGE, DUDE! PEOPLE. atheistcartoons.com I MEAN, RELIGIOUS DOGMA AND MYTHS TAKE A CHILL D

Hmmm... looks like I was wrong, apparently it is the non-religious who state their thoughts calmly and rationally while the religious spaz out and take offense for no reason. Dammit, what am I to believe?

Seienaest Peligion: . THE DEBATE CONTINUES

Oh, wait. Apparently the religious are filthy cavemen from the Stone Age throwing rocks impotently at spaceships. You'll certainly never catch a single religious person ever using technology or inventing anything. They'll just grunt and chuck rocks.

Once more, this debate always hits close to home, so you might find yourself actually siding with one comic or the other, regardless of the technique. Let's put that aside for a second and apply the straw man technique to a less controversial subject, like that your son Tommy should eat his vegetables. When he refuses, instead of talking to him, just draw this cartoon and hand it to him.

I HATE BEING HEALTHY!I WANT TO GROW HP RETARDED LALREADY AND FATAND WEAK LIKE AM! A BuR BUR BuUR! TOMMY

Most child-rearing experts don't recommend dealing with parent-child conflicts this way. And even if you don't care about the target's feelings, it's sure not going to convince them you're right. It will amuse other people who already agree with you, and that's it.

Is that the goal? If you want to make yourself a shiny trophy saying how smart you are compared to the other guy, just go order one. They have catalogs. Why disguise it as an argument?

Why Do You Need A Picture?

be c&kert 80 a leerid lore. IF, PFPE.. Yeshe gue. Bt Ws Sbou bine mswho wa hie however, Aborialnes mertor Che In in hle Fomnseive yesrr Communiot POry

Ever since Plato, people have been putting their boring ideas into dialogue form to try to interest people in reading them. While Plato spiced up works like his Symposium with a lot of sexual innuendo and explicit man-on-man flirting (I'm not exaggerating, look it up), modern political comics often just have two people sitting there with big speech bubbles that the artist can put his opinion in.

This one has an entire essay listing everything that is wrong with the Democrats, in the speech bubbles of one man who I believe is cooking or something. I myself often memorize pre-written blog posts and recite them in their entirety to people I'm doing chores with, but I didn't realize how common it was.

.AN ADMINISTRATION THAT USES GOVERNMENT TO ATTACK PRIVATE CIIZENS, UNION THLIGS TO STIFLE FREE SPEECH ACORN FELONS TO MANUFACTURE VOTES, THE FCC TO TH

If you think the entire comic can't be a straight-out essay and he must be using the conversation to make some kind of point, feel free to take a look at the original.

Meanwhile, here's a man who is so proud of the song parody he has written about the BP oil spill that he posts the entire song in unreadable size, including repeated choruses.

Sympathy For The Dev'oil Apolrgins L The Rokne fewvrs Picase Hmm... industry and allow m to introduce mysclf I'm industry of wealth and taste. man

He didn't even bother to draw a picture because you don't need a picture when you've got dazzling wordplay that would make Weird Al shit his pants.

This is the same cartoonist with a shorter deadline:

My govemhilion spent $900 and all I got was $14 that l used to buy this shirt! Oh yeah... 1 also got Change'!

For this next one, I've taken the liberty of replacing the original punch line (don't worry, you're not missing anything) with one that I think makes more sense in the context of a comic where two characters are supposedly talking to each other.

PERE... Mortin' I'm upset that Yeshe aue. Bu: whse Dort. Momein hels no Hiecing Sboue tine msrt who we hie mertcor Who are you Kert. Obans hsrdler ort

After his loyal straw man donkey does him the courtesy of setting him up, the elephant abolishes him from his mind and drifts off into reciting what appears to be the artist's compiled notes about Obama's unsavory associations. His friend becomes a distant and unfocused memory as he focuses on the daunting task of jamming as many talking points as he can into a speech balloon that had only been designed to contain realistic conversation.

A Child's Wisdom

Political Cartoons: The Lowest Form of Communication

To top that, sometimes these straight political speeches are put into the mouths of cute animals or small children, to try to give the vibe of wisdom coming from the mouths of babes. One particularly terrible offender is Diversity Lane, a comic where a hateful female child with the face of an ageless malevolent being is able to see through the foolishness of her liberal hippie parents (guardians) with the clarity of a child's innocence. Or possibly using the power of the elder god incarnated in her.

DIVERS DIVERSICY DIVERSY EA04 ANVe LANIE e F Rer If giobal warming It's just ke Obama! A is S0-0-0 horrible. great big shiny Wow! Which kind of they'r

In the first two comics, the children use simple, innocent questions to handily demolish common claims by climate scientists: that global warming models predict no snowstorms ever again, and that specific models of cars cause local weather patterns. In the last strip, the she-beast scores a point against Obama using a complexly worded tenuous analogy, in that charming way young children often do.

UM_Vo LOST OK. ONC CRou OF M TUERE. FOLLOWER WILLINAY OL.AND TO PROS CXPLAIN THAT ARFIE TUWELE WIN ARG wuCL ONE AGAIN? 1o BLON UR PEOPLG TGY ALL 14 TU

This strip appears to be implying that three major religious groups are retarded and naturally inclined to violence. Which religions I'm not entirely sure because I'm not clear what major religion wants to blow up the entire planet. Probably Presbyterians. Never trusted them.

You can see why they used the technique here: If an adult said this, they would just be an asshole maliciously stereotyping people with broad generalizations. But a kid and her horse, they're just calling things like they see them.

In the real world, kids that say actual childishly misunderstood things get indulgent chuckles. Kids that try to make smug pseudo-deep statements, whether about politics or anything else, are usually going be less endearing to adults:

Y'EVER WONDERED WHY Do THEY WHY E A BLACK BO CALL IT CARO IS INDESTRUCTIBLE WHENL. Wy DON'T TIOEY MARKE THE WHOLE MOMMY WHY DO PLANE OUT OF THE YOUe W

Yes, I acknowledge that there are political cartoons out there that don't hit any of these pitfalls and get their message across clearly and intelligently. I don't want to say you'll have better odds of being struck by lightning, but I will anyway.

Check out more from Christina, in The 5 Biggest Mistakes Women (Like Me!) Make On The Internet and The 5 Miserable VFX Jobs That Make Movies Possible.

Get More of This!

Sign up for the One Cracked Fact newsletter to get even more craziness from our weird world sent to your inbox every day!

Forgot Password?