5 Famous Scientists Dismissed as Morons in Their Time
Every nutjob in the world with some out-there theory thinks he's Galileo, rejected for daring to think different. Virtually all of them are, in fact, simply insane.
Yet, there have been brilliant rebels who put their own world-changing ideas on the line, only to end up like Doc Brown in his alternate timeline: humiliated, ridiculed, ignored and/or straight driven to insanity.

You probably know Mendel as the guy who pioneered the science of genetics, and for keeping eighth-graders busy while science teachers watch porn at their desks. Anybody with a high school diploma has filled out those dominant/recessive trait Punnett squares ...

Be honest. How many of you had this explained by a PE coach?
... though astute readers are probably wondering why that technique is called a Punnett square if it predicts patterns Mendel discovered.
What you probably didn't know was that before making his revolutionary discovery, Gregor Mendel flunked his ass out of school and resigned himself to a quiet life as the abbot of a monastery. It had an extensive experimental garden and there Mendel patiently spent the next seven years of his life breeding and cross-breeding peas.

He also hosted a ton of cocaine orgies, but who wants to hear about that?
He carefully documented his work and developed what would eventually be known as Mendel's Laws of Inheritance. Then he wrote it up and got it published in an lesser-known journal, the Journal of the Brno Natural History Society in 1866.
His Genius Was Rewarded By ...
A quiet life of complete anonymity. Mendel's work was read by about zero people, even after he took it upon himself to contact the highest minds of his time by personally sending them copies of his theory. It turns out he would have been better off writing it on a paper bag filled with dog shit and leaving the whole flaming mess on porches.

"GODDAMN GENETICISTS!"
Why did they ignore him? Because the greatest minds of his time couldn't understand him. It wasn't until 16 years after his death that three independent botanists rediscover Mendel's work and started the genetics ball rolling.

We've brought up poor old Semmelweis once before, but just in case you don't have a running loop of Cracked articles going through your head, here's the recap: Back in 1847, Semmelweis found himself in charge of two maternity clinics. The first clinic was a teaching school, with medical students learning birthing, autopsying and everything in between. The second clinic was intended for women who couldn't afford health care and was serviced by midwives, not actual doctors or students.

His ear-hair acted as attending physician.
Yet it was the second clinic that women of all social statuses begged to get into. Why? Because if they went to the first clinic they'd have a 10 percent chance of dying of puerperal fever, a six percent greater rate of death than in the midwife-run hospital. Women literally had a better chance of surviving a birth on the street than in the first clinic. After an exhaustive study, Semmelweis figured out that medical students were smothered in disease cooties from cadavers, and that maybe, just maybe, they should wash their hands in between the autopsy room and the birthing rooms.

Not pictured: Sterility.
He insisted students perform a simple chlorine wash after handling dead guys and immediately got the death rate down to one to two percent. With numbers like that, you'd think the whole continent of Europe, much less the medical community, would have crowned him "king of live babies" or something.
His Genius Was Rewarded By ...
First dementia, then a beatdown at an insane asylum, then death, by virtually the same disease he had eradicated in his own hospital.

Semmelweis didn't just have the disregard of his contemporaries, he had their flat-out scorn. Maybe it was because he didn't get around to explaining himself on paper right away, so no one understood what hand-washing had to do with keeping people alive. Some doctors were actually insulted that he was accusing Viennese medical students being dirty enough to kill people.
Within 14 years of his groundbreaking discovery, Semmelweis just stopped giving a fuck. He got drunk all the time and called all his detractors "ignoramuses" and "murderers." He started chilling with prostitutes and lashing out at family. That last part proved to be a bad move, because in 1865 they had him committed to an insane asylum, where he was promptly beat up and stuck in a dark cellar.

Pictured: Mental Health Care, 1865-style.
He died two weeks later. It took another 20 years and Louis Pasteur's germ theory for the rest of the world to come around to the concept of washing your hands to keep from getting sick.

The year 1964 was a watershed year by any measure. The Beatles arrived, the Civil Rights Act was passed, Nicolas Cage was born and in two separate parts of the world, two separate scientists proposed the existence of quarks, the teeny-tiny subatomic particles that combine to form matter. If you've been paying attention, you know one of these guys is about to get screwed. (Hint: It's George Zweig.)

Zweig had three things going against him in 1964. One, he was a young graduate student, unpublished and unproven. Two, he was working at a particle research center in Geneva. You'd think that would be an advantage, but it turns out his institute had a stringent model for publication, and his paper on quarks, which he called "aces," didn't meet its standards (even though he had come up with a much cooler name for the particle). And three, an older scientist from his grad school proposed the exact same theory at the exact same time and because of his stature was able to publish that exact same theory with the exact same publication that rejected Zweig's.

Just seeing if you're paying attention.
At first, both men were called crazy for their insane notions of invisible particles. They had no model of behavior for the buggers and no methods of ever actually looking at them. But eventually the science world came around, and by 1969, Zweig's rival was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for his work. As for Zweig ...
His Genius Was Rewarded By ...
Being blackballed by a major university and accusations of being a "charlatan."

According to Wikipedia, that table-standing midget in blue is a charlatan.
It wasn't until the 1970s that anyone could actually prove the existence of quarks, and by that time, the Nobel Prize committee felt it had already given the little particles enough attention, so it was reluctant to revisit the subject. Nevertheless, in 1977, Zweig and his rival were both nominated, but neither won. Zweig ended up changing his field of study to neurobiology, presumably believing that if he made a seminal contribution to every area of science, he'd eventually get credit for something.

Sadly, they don't give a Nobel Prize for smoldering looks.








Is that "In case you're paying attention" picture of Russel Brand? Because he and George Zwieg look really similar.
Reply????????????
ReplySorry, stickler for this one, he hanged himself... hung is entirely different. Good article though, definitely going to have to check these people out.
ReplyMaybe he wasn't hung, so he hanged himself.
Einstein was also recognized as the standard-bearer of physicists pretty much from 1907 until his death. I think he was doing OK.
ReplyI agree. His genius might not be fully appreciated back then as it is now, but he was never treated badly. He was well respected by the scientific community, up to his death, even with a few mistakes here and there...
I would have included Giordano Bruno. He theorized that the Earth was not the center of the universe, the sun was a star, and that other stars also have intelligent beings living on planets orbiting them. And unlike Boltzman, who killed himself, Giordano Bruno was actually executed by the Catholic Church.
Reply"Back then, defending the existence of atoms was akin to defending creationist version of the origins of man today. Boltzmann wasn't just forced to defend something that would be accepted as fact within a few years, he was shamed for his stubborn refusal to yield and for his so-called materialist beliefs."
ReplySomething very wrong with that analogy.
Yeah, implying that creationism is relatable to anything other than flat-earth idiocy
I didn't get it either when I was just reading this. So he's saying that in a few years, we'll accept the creationist theory of how humanity was created as fact?
We'll accept "invisible man who had been hovering in darkness forever created two people and put them in a garden" as fact?
Either this guy is a time-travelling prophet and to avoid governments pining to take him under custory and question him relentlessly for forever, he leaves little, subtle clues like these in Cracked articles, or he's kind of dumb.
Or maybe he just didn't quite read it over after he wrote it and that's not what he meant.
rosalind franklin too. she published an article about DNA in the exact same issue of nature as watson and crick. and they also stole from her. and she died of cancer a few years later.
ReplyWell, to be fair, the whole "Cancer" thing was due to the fact that everyone back then had the same attitude towards cancer as everyone in Fallout. They were just throwing the s**t everywhere.
*Radiation
Sorry, I have cancer on the brain.
pfffft, Dr. Who > Quantom Leap
ReplyIt was meant to be sarcastical and I do not even want to know how you could not deduce that from the "Suck it, Dr. Who" comment under the picture.
Or are you sarcastic too?
Only that that isn't funny or clever in any way.
I'm pretty sure someone's already said it at one point, but Galileo was arrested for his ideas and was forced to deny them all if he didn't want to be killed. Soon afterwards, he died while he was in house arrest AFTER the original trial. Sure, he wasn't considered "moronic", per say, but he certainly was under appreciated while he was still alive.
ReplyLisa Meitner anyone? She was a Jewish physicist in Germany during the Nazi takeover. A coworker ratted her out when she left, and another took credit for work they had done together. Admittedly, her work contributed to making the atom bomb, but she never meant it to go that route. And even Albert Einstein called her Germany's Marie Curie.
Reply"Nevertheless, in 1977"
ReplyStarting thinking about star wars from here on.
Did Gregor Mendel REALLY have cocaine orgies?
Reply"Back then, defending the existence of atoms was akin to defending creationist version of the origins of man today. Boltzmann wasn't just forced to defend something that would be accepted as fact within a few years, he was shamed for his stubborn refusal to yield and for his so-called materialist beliefs"
ReplyWTF? I think you meant evolutionist, not "creationist". At least I hope.
NO, I'm pretty sure you'd get laughed at for suggesting a theory of Creationism while a theory of Evolution may just spark mild debate. So he meant to say Creationism.
Dr. Who is wayyy better than Quantum Leap. (I've never actually seen Quantum Leap. I'm just ASSuming.)
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesI have seen it (and you should) it's good but you're right.
Don't see why this got so many down votes, Doctor Who pawns every other television show ever!!
everyone with me now! dun du da dun du da dun du da whoooweewhooo
funny how there's another cracked article on how Einstein stole his "big idea"...
ReplyThat article's quite a bit off. The idea of relativity had in fact been around for a while. Einstein came up with the math proved it in 1905.
And this article is discussing GR, not SR. I don't know of anyone who seriously questions that Einstein is the origin of GR since it was unlike anything anyone else had worked on up to that point.
Quantum Leap is not really time travel and sucks way more than Doctor Who. Doctor Who 32 Seasons strong and still going. Need I say more.
ReplyAlmost as many as SNL which is always good, right? But no I've never actually seen Dr. Who.
The Simpsons is pretty old to but I don't take familial relationship advice from it...
Yeah, good job science ¬¬
ReplyYou guys left off Nikola Tesla & Giordano Bruno. The latter of whom was actually burned at the stake for saying Earth was not the center of the universe.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesNo, Bruno was burned for actual, liturgical heresies. He also held that Earth was one of many worlds and, yes, that did come up at his trial. But the Church was probably a lot more interested in his heretical notions of the Trinity, transubstantiation, Jesus, and Mary (among others). Especially considering that the Church had no official position on the Copernican system at that time.
That's all true.
But keep in mind that the emphasis of this article is scientists that were dismissed because they were "morons". That's a pejorative that could have applied to Bruno as well - as far as the Catholic Church was concerned. He didn't accept conventional (Papal) wisdom so therefore he was a "moron".
But conventional (Papal) wisdom did not have an opinion on matters relating to science. Also, Bruno did not theorise his views of Earth being one of many worlds, out of rationalistic scientific inquiry. Rather, his reason was that as a mystic, he believed God's power was such, that he could create as many worlds as he wanted.
loved this article. i'm very lucky to have heard of some of these before; high school was a long time ago, but i had some really amazing teachers. thank you!
ReplyNikola Tesla
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesNo one ever accused Tesla of being a "moron". Being brilliant to the point of "crazy-insane" yes, but "moron"? No.
What do mormons have to do with it?
Tesla= right side of batshit insane