7 Priceless Works of Art Ruined by Staggering Acts of Idiocy
War, natural disaster, incinerating a painting because it's haunted by Vigo the Carpathian--there are all sorts of regrettable, but perfectly legitimate, reasons valuable art has been lost to the world. But sometimes there is no good reason. Sometimes we just screw up. Sometimes we do something silly, something like this...

When you think of the last supper, you probably only have one image in mind: Jesus sitting calmly at the center of the table while everyone else clambers around as if they've all misplaced their contacts. That image right there is Leonardo da Vinci's The Last Supper, perhaps his most well known masterpiece next to the Mona Lisa.

Apparently, "forgetting to give her eyebrows" was not considered a major blunder at the time...
So What Happened?
The painting is so well known, you might not be surprised to learn that it crossed paths with two of history's most famous figures. But, you probably didn't know that both figures went out of their way to treat it like it had been pooped up there by someone with a remarkably imprecise and explosive strain of diarrhea.
The first noted figure was Leonardo himself. See, frescoes are supposed to be painted on wet plaster or they start to peel. Unless you want your fresco to have the shelf life of a Banksy painting, the wet plaster is as important to the equation as the paint. But this wasn't any painter, he was Leonardo motherfucking da Vinci and if he wanted to paint on a dry surface, who's going to stop him? Unsurprisingly, the whole thing turned to a horrible peeling mess within his own lifetime.
By 1652, it was considered ruined and unrecognizable. This may explain why someone decided later to knock a hole right through the base of Jesus to make room for a door.

Just so we're clear how much of a mess this was, this is the 15th century Catholic Italy we're talking about. Jesus was sort of a big deal over there.
Then Napoleon, a great lover of art and anything Leonardo, came along and decided it was shit. When his troops were stationed in Italy, he decided to turn the whole room into a storage closet. Then, because he wasn't quite finished dragging his ass all over Leonardo's second greatest work, he decided to turn it into a prison.
By 1826, after a number of attempts to fix it, an attempt was made to move it to a safer location. Unfortunately, they commissioned a man who specialized in moving frescos to move The Last Supper. That'd be great if it was actually a fresco. His techniques ended up damaging the painting, and he quickly tried to glue the whole thing back together, which only added to the damage.

Clearly, The Last Supper. Or an out of focus photo of some laundry. We're not sure.

Monet was known to be one of the founders of the impressionist art movement and his lily paintings essentially kick-started a radical art community that was widely misunderstood in it's time. Of course now he is recognized as a genius, kind of like how generations from now the world may finally understand what Fred Durst was trying to tell us.

Maybe.
So What Happened?
Monet had cataracts. While nobody can say for sure if the condition was responsible for the blurred look that initially made his paintings so influential, we do know that as his condition worsened with age, his paintings became blurrier. And since cataracts affect your ability to perceive color, what began as paintings of green lilies...

...became lilies tinged slightly pink and brown and then, eventually, red lilies.

Eh, close enough for government work.
The art world assumed he was intentionally using the wrong colors and blurring images more than ever. If anything, this later work encouraged other impressionist painters to take more risks with colors and style. Everything Monet produced, including his red lilies, was considered invaluable, and would still be considered invaluable today... if Monet didn't go on his crazy lily destroying rampage.

His mighty beard hungered for fine art.
After Monet got corrective surgery on his eyes, a 1920s procedure that probably consisted of a rusty scalpel and a bottle of scotch, he actually started seeing things more clearly. When he saw that he'd been painting red lilies for all these years, even though they'd been partially responsible for his fame and critical acclaim, he decided to destroy them all. The only reason we know what some of these looked like is because friends and family saved some from Monet's wrath.

You don't have to appreciate his artwork to appreciate the insane amount of money LS Lowry's drawings, even his sketches, would get at an auction today. It's predicted today that even his most half-assed, coffee stained, possibly even suspiciously stained, sketches could fetch a tidy sum of one million pounds, which, by our own measurements, is like a shitload of American dollars.

Or $12, depending on if they turn it into one of those folk art calendars or not.
So What Happened?
He was giving them out as tips to his local milkman. The milkman, thinking they looked like garbage, immediately scrunched them up and threw them into the trash. Which is exactly how you should behave when someone is just trying to share their art with the world. Please, if this article isn't up to your standards, feel free to print this page off, spit on it, rub it into the mud and then burn it in a trashcan.

That'll teach you to art.
Ben Timperly, the milkman, only found out later how big a deal Lowry was. While sitting in a doctor's office, he noticed a drawing on the wall of the waiting room which looked surprisingly similar to that one he threw out so he could finish a minimum wage-paying job. We're guessing he destroyed that one as well.
According to Timperly: "I just thought my children could paint better than him." He then said Mt. Rushmore "looked like something my dog threw up" and dismissed the entire history of human achievement by saying, "Eh, I could do better."

What is this shit?

In ancient Greece, Rome and essentially all of Europe way up till the 1500s, public nudity was just a fact of life. A dirty, sexy fact of life. So if nudity was so great to these guys, why are so many of these statues missing their most valuable parts? Why are there fig leaves on their crotches, a fashion choice that defies both logic and physics?

So What Happened?
You can thank 16th century sensibilities and the Catholic Church. In ancient Rome, Greece, and even right up to the Renaissance, artists liked to show off their work to its full extent. After several centuries of just letting them flop on out there in the open for the whole world to see, a few popes launched the whole Dick Crusade, which is totally what it should have been called.
Dan Brown, for instance, claims the whole thing started in the 19th century when Pope Pius IX whacked off (figuratively speaking) a bunch of stone dicks so they would not corrupt the minds of the citizens. While we can't vouch for what Dan Brown calls "historical accuracy," nor can we vouch for what Pius was up to in his spare time, the whole dick thing started much, much, earlier.
In an effort to keep up with the Protestant Reformation's sense of piousness during the 1500s, the Catholic Church decided to ban any depiction of genitalia, breasts and buttocks (essentially, all the fun bits) in art. Pope Paul IV turned the church away from its more sinful, penis-filled past by adding marble and plaster fig leaves to groins of the statues within the Vatican, permanently damaging many statues.

You'd think a man dressed as the head of a penis would be a little more open.
Pope Innocent continued Paul's work in the 1600s, but for reasons unknown (we suspect it was his "thing"), he added metal fig leaves instead of marble leaves to the statues. Whatever the case, within a few generations of dick Popes, statues across Europe lost their manhood.
Of course, this doesn't explain why they're all missing their members. The Bacchus statue by Michelangelo may have been mutilated purely to make it look more antique. It seems that no matter where you look, history is rife with a strong hate towards anything penisy.









Actually, painting on wet plaster gave da Vinci less colors to work with.
Replystupid Catholic church, takin' away all the dongs.
ReplyWhich is funny, considering how their members are: a) prone to fondling immature ones, and b) prone to shoving ones into altar boys.
And showing off their gay porn collections to parents at school meetings... No really, google it.
The laptop mysteeeerriiouussly disappeared.
Well, I'm off to yell at an underwear model and some teens.
ReplyThe end of the 'hatred of all things penisy' line is a bad place for that intuos ad. Because the ad features a touch pen that very closely resembles a pointy penis. A line about penis hatred directly above your penis pen ad /might/ be bad placement, intuos. Good job.
ReplyI feel depressed now. We as humans seem to REALLY hate art for no reason. :/
ReplyI think by the time they become a pope, those guys are so sexually jaded that nothing less than a master's centuries old marble dildo will do the job anymore.
Replyanyone else think about how the gesture the fig used to mean f*ck u so fig leaves over dongs.....
ReplyOof. I actually winced when I read the title of number one. (I imagine number four got that reaction, too.)
ReplyNever have truer words been spoken about the amazing poetic lyricist that is Fred Durst.
ReplyTruly, he did it all for the Nookie
So in other words... it's all Protestants' fault. As usual.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesFuckin' Protestants with their Bible-thumping "enlightenment" and historiographical bullshit.
That's not Protestants, you're thinking Deists. Early Protestantism looked just like Catholicism with the exception of a few Sacraments. If you want a religious order founded on the pursuit of rational knowledge, try the Jesuits.
Deists? Bible-thumping? Are you sure?
Early Protestantism protested for a reason, and often enough this wasn't an issue with a few assorted sacraments. Deists, by definition, believe in a clockwork god who doesn't interfere with the universe - so, pretty decidedly not bible thumping. Jesuits were founded to forcibly convert the pagan primitives of the new world and Africa. So...nothing you said was true, at all. Congrats, Can.
I too have the pope's face on the tip of my penis.
Replyin future, you should refer to your member as 'his holiness".
They also hired someone to paint underwear over all of Michelangelo's painting during this famous enlightened era...Botticelli was made to feel so ashamed of his "pagan" works of art that he burned his own paintings in the infamous bonfire of the vanities...
ReplyIs anyone else a bit concerned by the fact that half of the people commenting on this article have no sense of humour whatsoever?! One chick can't let it go about dildo comments and like five people have had nervous breakdowns about the Mona Lisa's eyebrows! Relax, for God's sake!
ReplyMona Lisa's dildo?! RAAAAARGH!!!! >:[
If you're concerned about the comment section here, you probably should just save yourself a lot of trouble and stop reading it altogether.
The people of Ephesus knew how to dish out justice. A guy burns something down to be famous? Forbid anyone from mentioning his name, ever again. If only everyone had stuck to that rule.
ReplyAs for the first one, Leonardo couldn't have painted the last supper if it wasn't for the way he used the plaster, so maybe it wasn't quite so stupid.
ReplyYou mean procrastinating until it was too dry to take the paint, and then dicking around with it for 3 years to finish it?
Absolutely stupid!
ReplyThis reminds me of the time I worked on an art project for weeks, I was quite fond of it and allowed people to look at it, but one of my classmates got too rough and weren't careful with it that it ripped.
ReplyI was beyond angry and made it a point that I didn't want to be forgiving him...(Of course, eventually, I DID forgive him...but this was a year later and after we met again in a different class).
Of course, my work could never compare to the work that has happened many years ago. It kind of hurts inside when I read of how works of art get destroyed by people's pure ignorace or stupidity...
nobody cares
Clearly you care wahoowa, you cared enough to comment
How was the Sphinx getting her nose blown off by soldiers for target practice not mentioned? They still have no idea how the thing was built, just like the Pyramids!
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesIt was erosion.
It wasn't erosion, the Sphinx was defaced on purpose. Look it up.
ha! "defaced"
Actually the nose was defaced prior to Napoleon's target practice legend. A Muslim leader found out the Egyptian peasants were leaving offerings in front of the Sphinx for a good harvest, so in his outrage, he destroyed the nose of the Sphinx. Sketches of the Sphinx done before Napoleon was there show the Sphinx already missing the nose.
The theory about the offerings wasn't detailed until centuries after it allegedly happened, but the marks on the statue suggest it was intentionally removed.
But not by Napoleon, and not by cannon fire. There was a picture of it made more than 60 years before Napoleon's army even showed up in Egypt, which showed the nose was already missing.
"True purists burn things for the sheer joy of setting s**t on fire".
ReplyThis statement is awesome in the deepest of ways. The word "purist" comes from the Greek word "pur" which means "fire." Re-read it knowing that. Wow.
It's from Latin purus, -a, -um, which means, surprisingly: "pure".
Yeah. Sorry, I wish it were true too, but that's folk etymology. U becomes Y on the way from Greek to Latin; words derived from Greek "pur" have "pyr" in them instead, like pyre or pyromania.
Ironic that you mention 'the shelf life of a Banksy Painting' in this article, since a few months ago, here in Melbourne,Australia, a graffiti clean-up crew painted over a well-known Banksy work
Reply