5 Cheap Tricks TV Shows Use To Keep You Watching
Not many of you are watching TV any more, or at least not as many as in years past. And as more people tune out (or just steal the shows off Bittorrent) the networks think up more and more cheap tricks to keep you hooked.
Well, here's some we've decided we won't be falling for any more. After next week.

Major Offenders: 24, Alias, Nip/Tuck, Star Trek: TNG, many others.
This is when a show teases us with a cliffhanger, followed by an episode that returns everything to normal within minutes.
So, in 24 Jack Bauer winds up in a Chinese prison at the season finale. How will he possibly get out of this one? Oh, wait, he just walks off a plane in the next season opener, back in the good ol' USA and with a kick-ass beard for his trouble.
In one season finale of Star Trek: TNG, Commander Riker has to make the terrible decision to destroy the bad guys' ship with a captured Captain Picard still on board, ending the season with his pivotal decision to "Fire." We wait for the next season and, wouldn't you know, the weapon has no affect. Nevermind!

We can thank the 80s drama Dallas for starting this. They cashed in with the biggest cliffhanger of all time, when villain J.R. Ewing got shot in a March 1980 episode. After a long summer break (when "Who Shot J.R." became an international catchphrase) it was revealed that J.R. was alive, his would-be assassin was let go without any criminal charges, and the whole thing was barely spoken of again.
Dallas, determined to top this retarded publicity stunt, years later opened a season by declaring everything that happened in the season before it was a dream.
"Surprise!"
Why it Works:
Production schedules force most shows off the air for months, up to a year in some cases. The problem has always been that fans can wander off during the down time, so cliffhangers keep people talking through the dry months (in the case of "Who shot J.R.," the next episode got a then-record 83 million people to watch).
And, once the show comes back, who cares that we bailed out of the cliffhanger with an unsatisfying resolution? You should just be glad the show is back at all, you ungrateful fuckers!
Why it Shouldn't:
It's in these cop-outs that a cliffhanger is revealed to be purely a marketing gimmick, having no actual impact on the storyline. These cop-outs let the writers off too easy, since they get to put the character through some kind of life-changing trauma, then just have them get over it (Jack Bauer recovers from his lengthy Chinese imprisonment just a few hours into the new "day.")

Where's the crippling depression that leads to alcoholism, or the post traumatic stress and years of counseling? They turn our surviving heroes into heartless bastards who don't care about anyone or anything for longer than a 2-hour season premiere.

Major Offenders: The Office, Friends, Sex and the City, Scrubs, countless Soap Operas.
After months or years of increasing sexual tension, two leads finally admit that they love each other and want to be together. This usually occurs with a passionate kiss and a high pitched "Whoooo" from the studio audience. We at home get to believe that we, too, will one day find true love with the one hot girl in our circle of friends.

Then, tragedy strikes in the form of a breakup. The sitcom gets serious for a while, showcasing the tension between the ex-couple. The exes start dating new people and we get all sorts of jealousy and wacky misunderstandings, based on the fact that the couple is really still in love. Eventually then they get back together, only to do it all over again (if the series runs long enough).
Why it Works:
Romantic love is an emotion that supersedes all others--at least on television--and there's no better way to engage the viewers than by constantly giving it to them and taking it away again.
Also, the breakup stage allows shows to introduce guest stars to be the new love interests for a few weeks or months (Sarah Jessica Parker went through several in Sex and the City) which they believe will sustain the ratings until the next sweeps period, where they will reunite the beloved couple again.

Why it Shouldn't:
Repetition. This is the writers just going back to the same well for storylines again and again. Yes, we realize there is some realism to it, because we all know real couples that do the constant "get together and break up" cycle. You may recognize these couples as the ones who you constantly want to punch in the face.

Major Offenders: The Apprentice, Hell's Kitchen, Rock of Love, any reality show with a "boss."
Reality shows are always accused of being rigged. Who knows if American Idol is intentionally losing some votes along the way, right? Or if the judges' comments are meant to sway vote totals rather than give feedback?
But then there is a whole category of reality show that that just advertise the fact. These are the shows where a "boss" type decides the outcome, rather than by a vote from the audience or other contestants.

Behind that boss is, of course, a team of producers who keep or kick off whoever the hell they feel like keeping or kicking off. And that means that the nastiest, most arrogant character you're most desperate to see go, will almost certainly be kept to the end. The show needs a villain, and the producers' job is to keep the best cast of characters, not the best contestants.
So, on the first season of The Apprentice, millions of people were introduced to the queen bitch of the universe, Omarosa. With a resume that included being fired four times over two years for not being able to get along with anyone, and a part time job as a succubus, she was picked from thousands of people as a candidate to become a high paid employee of Donald Trump. Why? Because producer Mark Burnett knew that she would stir up some shit on camera.

Why it Works:
The cheapest way to get drama out of a show is with conflict. The hardest part about reality shows, where there is no script, is making sure the conflict still shows up right on schedule, to keep the audience from getting bored. That's the villain's job.
Why it Shouldn't:
Reality show producers seem to think that drama and conflict can only come in the form of petty screaming matches. But how much screeching can we be exposed to before we go from being entertained, to bored, to just depressed?

Of course the show is forced to undermine its own competition along the way, as the boss character is forced to fire more qualified contestants week after week, saving someone like Omarosa for as long as possible (in her case, 9 episodes into a 13 episode season, only to be brought back in an all-star edition). Weeks and weeks of a villain skating through each challenge without having to be accountable for anything tends to make us lose faith in the show, and humanity in general.








GLEE is like guilty of most of these
ReplyA weapon without affect should seek therapy, I guess. It's important to feel.
Reply1. not all cliffhangers are cheap stunts. but yes when they clearly are and are poorly written at that, they need to be smacked
Reply2. in general I hate all 'next week' trailers. you know that they are worse than a reality show when it comes to telling you the truth.
The one show that never needed any of this? The Wire.
ReplyA thousand thumbs up if I could.
I stopped watching Lost after the pilot. As soon as I saw them dig up that audio recording of some other poor bastards that died on the island, I realised that the whole thing would be an endless cocktease of "where are we" and refused to watch another second of it. Every once in a while I would look it up on Wikipedia and be amazed at how little it had progressed while feeling pretty smug. Then I learned of the finale and laughed for about a week.
ReplyStarted good until I came to "24" and "chinese"; then I stopped reading, in a sort of panic. I'll come back when I'm done with season 6. On my DVD collection. Of which I've only seen, like, seasons 1 to 5. Like, at the point when that cliffhanger happened. Cliffhanger which you almost, you know, f*****g spoiIed. I hate you.
ReplyOkay - in defense of Six Feet Under. It was a dream or a hallucination - it was never meant to be literally taken that the character died. It was infuriating to wait for the new season to see if the character survived, but it was never a dead-and-resurrect story arc. The entire series - if you watch it from beginning to end - was built on the premise of people day-dreaming, hallucinating, and seeing things that were not real.
Replythis is why oz is the best show, they didn't hype anything about the next week, so when that big Ade-ah-bee-C guy got shanked and peoples was raped, stuff actually happened!
ReplyI stopped watching Lost because I got tired of waiting for the resolution. Still don't regret it.
ReplyHeros was a great show for the first season. Then it started getting soap operaish and predictable. You could tell they had run out of ideas.
Reply(warning: annoying picky grammar comment) Affect and effect are not the same word... affect is a verb and effect is a noun.
ReplySoap operas bring people back from the dead all the time...At one time, Y&R had two doppelganger story lines at the same time...
ReplyThe later seasons of Weeds use #5 as their lifeblood.
ReplyFirst of all I have caught myself trying to explain the last few seasons of Xfiles to a few people (Starting with *Spoilers* Mulder's death) and moving on from there. At one point I was going through the same recap as I did with everyone with my sister, she actually stopped me in the middle and asked me if I was making up s**t as I went along, and when I really thought about it....that's what the plot of the last few seasons of Xfiles really does sound like if you didn't watch any of it. "Mulder was dead, but he wasn't actually dead see cause he was actually in this hybernative state but they didn't know that so he was buried then Scully figured out he was alive so they put him on life support to save him before figuring out life support would just turn him into an alien...." See how crazy I sound?
ReplyI actually just straight up QUIT watching my FAVORITE current TV show, House, because of the s**t they pulled in season 7. The Huddy romance (Which I was all excited for, but as it turned out was a big disappointment) The insanely unrealistice series finale, House going to jail, and the crap cliche way that they got him out, and the ONE LINE they used to explain the absence of Cuddy was enough to kill it for me. So, like many of the used to be fans, I just like to pretend season 7 never happened....or at very least that the season finale was the series finale.
Bones does most of these, but I still love it. Good characters can make up for a lot.
ReplyDexter is sooooo guilty of number 1. I can recall an episode where the preview showed Dex chasing down an escaped victim when his coworkers were literally investigating a different crime right around the corner, then his sister is like, "Dexter!". In the actual episode he kills the guy before they round the corner and makes it look like a really weird crime scene. At least they did something with it later on I suppose.
ReplyI still love the show, but I've learned one thing. Crazy previews don't mean shit.
This is precisely why I don't watch T.V. shows until they come out on DVD.
ReplyExactly. Why watch it on TV and be disappointed, when you can buy it and be disappointed?
In #2 you TOTALLY forgot Supernatural. It's probably my favorite show ever, but Sam and Dean have each died like 4 times each and came back. Not to mention Cas, Bobby, and I'll be surprised if John doesn't make a return visit by the end.
ReplyFour times! At last count Dean's kicked the bucket at least 104 times. Beat that, Buffy.
I was just going to post this! Supernatural is pretty much my favorite show but jeeze those boys will never die lol They even did it to themselves at one point to become ghosts to talk to another ghost! Now Bobby's back even though he's dead lol those crazy boys :P
When Scrubs started off, it wasn't supposed to have that "star-crossed lovers who always just fail to get together" trope. In fact, in some ways, the creator of the show explicitly mocked that cliche. The guy and the girl hook up and then break up within one episode, not because of any crazy coincidences, misunderstandings, or hijinks, but because they realize that they can't stand each other. The guy ends up pining for her, convinced that she's his true love, until the end of the third season, when he finally gets her ... and then realizes that he doesn't like her one bit and he's been deluding himself into imagining some romance novel relationship.
ReplyThe entire point was two people who fit the Hollywood mold of destined lovers so well are actually incredibly bad together and the fantasy-prone main character keeps imagining something that isn't there.
That's how Scrubs started out, but it took a turn somewhere - they changed networks, some writers, presumably someone developed a brain tumor in their creativity lobe, and then it became your standard popcorn sitcom and the guy and girl live happily ever after and blah, blah, blah.
I literally stopped watching Scrubs after it became apparent they were going to bring the guy and girl back together A-FING-GAIN. I was ready to respect the writers and producers for actually letting both people move on without bringing up the tired old relationship again, but no... they had to go for the cliche. Ugh - that show makes me so mad.
Misleading editing is the major technique of "reality television." Every bogus reaction shot give me a bad case of cognitive dissonance.
Reply