

|
Not many of you are watching TV any more, or at least not as many as in years past. And as more people tune out (or just steal the shows off Bittorrent) the networks think up more and more cheap tricks to keep you hooked. Well, here's some we've decided we won't be falling for any more. After next week. #5.
Cliffhanger Cop-Outs
Major Offenders: 24, Alias, Nip/Tuck, Star Trek: TNG, many others. This is when a show teases us with a cliffhanger, followed by an episode that returns everything to normal within minutes. So, in 24 Jack Bauer winds up in a Chinese prison at the season finale. How will he possibly get out of this one? Oh, wait, he just walks off a plane in the next season opener, back in the good ol' USA and with a kick-ass beard for his trouble. In one season finale of Star Trek: TNG, Commander Riker has to make the terrible decision to destroy the bad guys' ship with a captured Captain Picard still on board, ending the season with his pivotal decision to "Fire." We wait for the next season and, wouldn't you know, the weapon has no affect. Nevermind!
We can thank the 80s drama Dallas for starting this. They cashed in with the biggest cliffhanger of all time, when villain J.R. Ewing got shot in a March 1980 episode. After a long summer break (when "Who Shot J.R." became an international catchphrase) it was revealed that J.R. was alive, his would-be assassin was let go without any criminal charges, and the whole thing was barely spoken of again. Dallas, determined to top this retarded publicity stunt, years later opened a season by declaring everything that happened in the season before it was a dream.
Why it Works: Production schedules force most shows off the air for months, up to a year in some cases. The problem has always been that fans can wander off during the down time, so cliffhangers keep people talking through the dry months (in the case of "Who shot J.R.," the next episode got a then-record 83 million people to watch). And, once the show comes back, who cares that we bailed out of the cliffhanger with an unsatisfying resolution? You should just be glad the show is back at all, you ungrateful fuckers! Why it Shouldn't: It's in these cop-outs that a cliffhanger is revealed to be purely a marketing gimmick, having no actual impact on the storyline. These cop-outs let the writers off too easy, since they get to put the character through some kind of life-changing trauma, then just have them get over it (Jack Bauer recovers from his lengthy Chinese imprisonment just a few hours into the new "day.")
Where's the crippling depression that leads to alcoholism, or the post traumatic stress and years of counseling? They turn our surviving heroes into heartless bastards who don't care about anyone or anything for longer than a 2-hour season premiere. #4.
Couples That Constantly Break Up and Reunite
Major Offenders: The Office, Friends, Sex and the City, Scrubs, countless Soap Operas. After months or years of increasing sexual tension, two leads finally admit that they love each other and want to be together. This usually occurs with a passionate kiss and a high pitched "Whoooo" from the studio audience. We at home get to believe that we, too, will one day find true love with the one hot girl in our circle of friends.
Then, tragedy strikes in the form of a breakup. The sitcom gets serious for a while, showcasing the tension between the ex-couple. The exes start dating new people and we get all sorts of jealousy and wacky misunderstandings, based on the fact that the couple is really still in love. Eventually then they get back together, only to do it all over again (if the series runs long enough). Why it Works: Romantic love is an emotion that supersedes all others--at least on television--and there's no better way to engage the viewers than by constantly giving it to them and taking it away again. Also, the breakup stage allows shows to introduce guest stars to be the new love interests for a few weeks or months (Sarah Jessica Parker went through several in Sex and the City) which they believe will sustain the ratings until the next sweeps period, where they will reunite the beloved couple again.
Why it Shouldn't: Repetition. This is the writers just going back to the same well for storylines again and again. Yes, we realize there is some realism to it, because we all know real couples that do the constant "get together and break up" cycle. You may recognize these couples as the ones who you constantly want to punch in the face. #3.
Keeping the Villains Around on Reality Shows
Major Offenders: The Apprentice, Hell's Kitchen, Rock of Love, any reality show with a "boss." Reality shows are always accused of being rigged. Who knows if American Idol is intentionally losing some votes along the way, right? Or if the judges' comments are meant to sway vote totals rather than give feedback? But then there is a whole category of reality show that that just advertise the fact. These are the shows where a "boss" type decides the outcome, rather than by a vote from the audience or other contestants.
Behind that boss is, of course, a team of producers who keep or kick off whoever the hell they feel like keeping or kicking off. And that means that the nastiest, most arrogant character you're most desperate to see go, will almost certainly be kept to the end. The show needs a villain, and the producers' job is to keep the best cast of characters, not the best contestants. So, on the first season of The Apprentice, millions of people were introduced to the queen bitch of the universe, Omarosa. With a resume that included being fired four times over two years for not being able to get along with anyone, and a part time job as a succubus, she was picked from thousands of people as a candidate to become a high paid employee of Donald Trump. Why? Because producer Mark Burnett knew that she would stir up some shit on camera.
Why it Works: The cheapest way to get drama out of a show is with conflict. The hardest part about reality shows, where there is no script, is making sure the conflict still shows up right on schedule, to keep the audience from getting bored. That's the villain's job. Why it Shouldn't: Reality show producers seem to think that drama and conflict can only come in the form of petty screaming matches. But how much screeching can we be exposed to before we go from being entertained, to bored, to just depressed?
Of course the show is forced to undermine its own competition along the way, as the boss character is forced to fire more qualified contestants week after week, saving someone like Omarosa for as long as possible (in her case, 9 episodes into a 13 episode season, only to be brought back in an all-star edition). Weeks and weeks of a villain skating through each challenge without having to be accountable for anything tends to make us lose faith in the show, and humanity in general. |
Star Trek's 6 Most Ridiculous Alien Races
The 8 Shittiest Transformer Disguises
The Awful Secrets of 25 Famous Cartoon Characters
6 Evil Henchmen Who Sucked at Their Job
ibmdvd.com is a great dvd online store, it is selling first - class
completed tv series DVD boxsets and some other hot movies at
reasonable price. There are thousands of tv series and the boxsets are
of high quality. The goal is to deliver the unforgettable shopping experience for the customers and
provide the customers 100% satisfaction.
Please visit our website for more DVDs: www.ibmdvd.com
In defense of the Star Trek: TNG, the end result of the cliffhanger (Riker fires, and it has no effect) began an even bigger story; the firing had no effect because, with Picard captured, the bad guys knew everything being planned. It went from, "How do we get our captain back?" to "They know everything the captain knew. WTF do we do now?"
Also, as shown in later episodes, Picard was seriously mindfucked over the incident.
Wait, something finally happened in Lost?
This is why I no longer have cable. The majority of new shows totally suck, and the few good ones can be seen via NetFlix.
"IF YOU WANT A RICH SOULMATE TO RIM YOUR ANUS DUTIFULLY EVERY MORNING AND NIGHT WITHOUT FAIL GO TO W e a l t h y s o u l M a t e .C O M" LOL! He's paid to talk dirty and thats what he comes up with! Classic.
#5: Weapon has no effect... NOT "Weapon has no affect." AFFECT IS A FRICKIN' VERB.
I've never seen most of these shows. Thanks for the heads up.
I stopped watching TV a long time ago. Thanks for reminding me why. :)
I stopped watching tv. back in Nov. 2008. I read the newspaper and go online more often, but there is absolutely nothing on tv I miss.
"I can rectify all of this in six words: You're still watching them, aren't you."
Well, no. I haven't watched television in two years now, relying solely on the internet for ad-free and better quality news and entertainment.
Lost is still awesome.
I can rectify all of this in six words: You're still watching them, aren't you.
#1 happens on House all the time. Once they had a dramatic preview of the next episode with images of house lying on the floor, apparently having had collapsed, and a voiceover saying 'What's wrong with house?' as if that was the main focus of the episode.
It tunrned out that one of his patients was having a blood transfusion which wasn't having any effect and so House injected himself with that same blood to see what was wrong with it. He collapses after this as a result of the giddy feeling you get when you get needles stuck into your arm. 5 minutes later he was fine, there was nothing wrong with him.
Or shows like the Sheild.how does the strike team manage to f**k over every drug dealer gangbanger in town and still manage to live till the next episode? They have so much s**t on their plate and still functional as cops? and what happened to that show THEIF, they only made what? 3 episodes?
why is heroes not mentioned in even one of the major offenders... It offends at least 3 of the points!
IF YOU WANT A RICH SOULMATE TO RIM YOUR ANUS DUTIFULLY EVERY MORNING AND NIGHT WITHOUT FAIL GO TO W e a l t h y s o u l M a t e .C O M
Just a few things. First of all, an article like this that absolutely ignores the abomination that is "Heroes" cannot be taken seriously in any way, shape or form. They have been horribly notorious for: ending every single episode with a (usually) meaningless cliffhanger and never actually having any real deaths but absolutely reveling in death moments. I haven't watched the show since midway through the second season (couldn't stand it anymore) so maybe it got better, but I doubt it. Your examples on this point are ridiculous, especially in a world where "Heroes" airs. Yes, Buffy technically has died twice but once was resolved within moments in the first season and only one was a big cliffhanger. Sure, no surprise she came back but. . .come on, it happened ONCE. You also mention "Lost." On this show, the following characters (just off the top of my head) have died for good at this point: Boone, Charlie, Ana Lucia, Libby, Mr. Eko, Shannon, Michael, Rousseau (jury's admittedly still out on Jin and Locke). Yes, characters sometimes come back on this show for maybe a one-off dream sequence or something, maybe a flashback, but a show that has killed so many so permanently doesn't prove your point at all.
Finally, agree totally about the misleading promos, but your anger toward the show itself and the producers is misplaced and makes me wonder why you're railing against things you don't understand. Blame the network. They get the eps, they promote the eps. Do you really think that, for example, the producers of "Lost" want their secrets revealed in a stupid promo, if it's honest about someone dying or something similar? They'd rather you were surprised, rather than waiting for the inevitable shoe to drop all episode. But it's all about the Neilsens for the networks so any dirty tricks they can use to get more people to tune in is worth it. Unless people revolted en masse, which would cancel the shows, and it's not the shows' faults, and that makes us lose our favorite shows.
you cant throw words like faggot or c**t around, it takes away from their fun impact
So now you're calling people who don't want to see anymore of that wealthy soulmate bullshit 'faggots'?
Way to get people to visit that scam of a website!
6 Famous Characters You Didn't Know Were Shameless Rip Offs
7 Completely Unrealistic Movie Plots (That Came True)
6 Movies Based on a True Story (That Are Also Full of Shit)
5 Reasons The Terminator Franchise Makes No Goddamn Sense
| | [link] [11 comments] |
| | [link] [29 comments] |
| | [link] [39 comments] |
A Series of Poor Decisions: The Twitter Song
I'm pretty sure the show is called 'Lost' because producers, writers, even the viewers are just that - completely and utterly lost. Call me ignorant, call me impatient, call me whatever the f**k you want. No amount of s****y writing or creative fuckaround will make this show have any semblance of entertainment. 'Lost' fans who get upset and feel the sudden and dire need to defend their particular brand of hyper-crap, can shelf a donkey. I still can't understand what makes 'Lost' such an awesome show. Then again, I can't stand games like World of Warcraft either. Those games where you go through the same old s**t (with some different colours here or a new type of environment there) get really old, really quick. I suppose if you love menial tasks that you can repeat unendingly, and STILL make no headway, then both 'Lost' and 'World of Warcraft' are for you. Enjoy the rapid, degenerative effect it will have on your brain. I hope you remember to coat the walls in toilet paper before you start to hurl your own faeces in protest at this comment.