The 7 Most Retarded Ways Celebrities Have Tried to Go Green
With the threat of global warming looming, it's more important than ever that all of us appear to care about the environment.
Maybe no one works harder on this than celebrities, who make it a point to show up in the papers every now and then with their latest eco-friendly gesture. We would applaud them for this, if it wasn't for the fact that the gestures are often mind-blowingly retarded.

Earlier this year, Paul McCartney bought (or may have been given) a hybrid car from Lexus, after he had done some promotional work for them. See! This is what John Lennon was singing about, people.
So What's the Problem?
The car was specially flown in from Japan, thus creating several hundred times more emissions than it would ever save. Reports differ as to whether or not McCartney bought the car and demanded it be flown to him, or if Lexus took it upon themselves to send it to him to make McCartney look like even more of a dick than he usually does.

In an interview, McCartney claimed to be horrified by the whole thing, but he couldn't talk for long as he had to go protect animals from potential forest fires by chopping down the Amazon rain forest.
It Could Have Been Worse...
He could have left it in the plane, then just had the plane fly him around England while he sat behind the wheel making engine sounds.

On the eve of Al Gore's Live Earth gigs in July 2007, Jennifer Aniston said that because every two minutes of showering uses as much water as an African person has for an entire day, she restricts herself to a three minute shower (why fuck just one African's day up?). Also, she pointed out that she brushes her teeth in the shower to save on water, and that she painted her house green so it could be powered by photosynthesis.

OK, we made the last one up.
So What's the Problem?
For the moment we'll forgive the fact that dentists say it takes two minutes to brush your teeth properly, leaving Jennifer only one minute in the shower to clean the rest of her body (though perhaps making it clearer why Brad Pitt left her).

The bigger problem is that two minutes of brushing in the shower uses about five gallons of water, where two minutes of modest faucet usage (even if you're the type who leaves it running the whole time) only uses about two gallons. You don't need a spreadsheet to tell you which one saves the most water. Also, we can say from personal experience that you can save way more water than either method by simply not showering at all.
It Could Have Been Worse...
She could have suggested just taking your toothpaste and brush to the car wash, then sticking your head out of the window as you go through.

Sheryl Crow took time out from her role as least offensive musician ever to tell people to use only one square of toilet paper back in April 2007. Crow had been touring, so we've got a feeling she came up with the "one square" idea after an incident on the tour bus that we never, ever want to hear about.
So What's the Problem?
We don't know about you, but there have definitely been times when one sheet of toilet paper just isn't enough. And that's every time.
"I'm clearly not familiar with standard pooping."
Crow helpfully suggests that we can use two or three sheets for when that rare, exceptional shit calls for it. Now, without getting too graphic here, let's just say that after a night out involving a case of beer and a heap of heavily-spiced Indian food, two or three sheets would be nothing more than a preliminary damage assessment.
Crow later tried to pretend she had meant it all as a joke, but this was probably after she realized everyone was sitting on the opposite side of the tour bus from her.

Look how uncomfortable Sheryl Crow's butt makes John Mayer.
It Could Have Been Worse...
Crow could have taken her war against paper wastage to above anal levels and suggested making clothing with built-in napkins on the sleeves. Oh wait, she already did.

Woody Harrelson was apparently a huge activist for environmental causes even before it became fashionable. He even boasts that he wears "vegan" clothes. We're not sure what constitutes vegan clothes, but we like to imagine Woody leaving bacon and sausages by his closet overnight, then smiling approvingly when he finds them untouched in the morning.
So What's the Problem?
Woody was attending the Cannes Film Festival this year and took part in a Charity Poker event with other celebrities like Salma Hayek and Tim Robbins, but once there he noticed he had forgotten his favorite vegan shoes and belt.
Woody's favorite belt buckle.
At this point he did what any of us would have done, and had them flown in from California on a private jet.
Actually, upon further consideration, we wouldn't have done that. We would have probably sat at the card table naked from the waist down and yelled "Poker? Damn near killed 'er!" over and over again while staring Salma Hayek right in the eye and rhythmically thrusting our hips in her general direction.

We're rarely, if ever, invited to poker nights.
It Could Have Been Worse...
He could have found a gravy stain on his favorite vegan shirt, and had it flown to California and back to be washed at a special vegan dry cleaner. Or even worse, he could have found out that it was chicken gravy and loudly accused the shirt of eating meat behind his back.








I don't know if anyone else has mentioned this yet, but... I brush my teeth in the shower too, and it does in fact save water although I do it more for convenience. I'm not spending extra time in the shower while brushing; I'd be in there anyway because I need to leave conditioner in my hair for at least the two minutes it takes to brush. So for those two minutes I can just stare at the wall, or sing very badly, or I can brush my teeth and therefore save the water that would've been used by the faucet.
ReplyEven if I immediatey rinsed my hair right after applying whatever product, I could still brush my teeth while I'm standing under the water rinsing stuff out of my hair or soap off my body. I don't get how brushing your teeth automatically means you're spending extra time with the water running that you wouldn't have otherwise.
And yeah, I often take very long pointless showers during which I absolutely do not consider my horrendous waste of water. I admit this. The fact remains that it's kinda silly to focus on this particular "wasteful" dumb thing a celebrity does (as opposed to all the other dumb things they do) when this one has a simple explanation.
I am curious: If your goal was to save water, would it not be more efficient to disengage the water until you are ready to rinse your hair conditioner out?
@ Viator
If your goal was to reply to the above post, would it not be more logical to first read and understand the pain point of it? They said they didn't actually care, they just believed that if you're already there under running water anyway, it doesn't add a helluva lot.
I think Sheryl Crow has a good point. That's why I only use kleenex after I'm done masturbating.
ReplyHey, I agree with Sheryl Crow! That's why I only use kleenex after I'm done masturbating.
Reply"I'm clearly not familiar with standard pooping"
Replylaughed out loud
I'm SUPER CEREAL!
ReplyIt's hard to appreciate the sheer beauty and importance of rainforests until you see them with your own eyes. If you ever get the chance, you should visit one by private jet.
Replyhaha f**k coldplay. kudos, cracked
ReplyI have a great idea for woman everywhere to reduce thier carbon footprint. Plant Tulips!!
Reply#1 reminds me of the Bono concerts for third world improvement. Except the dictators got to keep the money because the NGOs involved actually had 0 power. Image first folks! We're all fucked and we know it
Reply"And just to make sure you're imagining Harrison Ford ripping the hair off of his nuts" - LOL!! You're so BAD! Thanks for the giggle after a tremendously tiring day. :)
ReplyThe Harrison Ford one was actually kind of sensible. There's no obvious hypocrisy, and there's a good bit o' poetry between the pain felt on his chest through the removal of hair, and the pain felt by the environment trough the removal of forestry.
ReplyIf you and Harrison Ford are saying that his chest hair is as thick as a forest, then I'd follow the advice given in the article and barricade my house for couple months until things cool down.
Al Gore is one of the biggest hypocrites ever.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesHe was the Vice President, you are a troll on the internet. See the difference?
StealinUrSnatch, what you just said in response to pulpstress's comment makes absolutely no sense. He simply made the comment that Al Gore is a hypocrite, and the above inclusion in the article supports his claim.
So being a powerful politician makes you perfect?
I would brush Jennifer Aniston's teeth, but I would not wip Sheryl Crowe's as s. At least not until she wipes that thing off her face.
ReplyDamnit Al Gore...
ReplyYou're offsetting the good points you've made with things like this.
All he did was read a powerpoint presentation; you actually expect him to understand what he's talking about?
You mean the good points like him pushing the whole "buying carbon credits" idea? The kind of carbon credits you can buy from a company he owns and profits from? Or him using a shitload more power than the average person just to keep the lights on in his big-ass house? Those kind of good points?
Take heed....
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesThe time has come for the destruction of the wretched hive of moral depravity, and sickening opulence that is Hollywood, California. Join the movement to destroy the evil that oozes from it's studios, and put the celebrities in it on trial for their crimes against humanity. Unite and fight!
Instead of anarchy in the streets try boycotting.
hahaha... your name has Sack in it.
Boycotting is ineffective. We must form an Anti-Hollywood militia to take down the rich corporate studio heads, and intolerable celebrities that keep them in power. George Lucas and Michael Bay are our top targets.
I'll fly down to California in my private jet.
As long as your private jet has weapons and a crew ready to fight, we'd be happy to have you.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I kind of feel like the "short showers for Africa" thing is somewhat lacking in logic. It's like the "there are starving kids in Africa" thing. Okay, but eating all my food isn't going to make that change, it's just going to make me fat. Likewise, unless the water I don't use is being transported to Africa somehow, I don't see how taking shorter showers is going to help anything.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesSo much this.
I live in Québec, we have an insane amount of freshwater lakes and rivers all over the place. I'm all for not wasting tap water because we pay for it to be treated and more comsumption means costier infrastructure, but people need to STFU about African Sahel, I have no impact on that, whatsoever. They should stop cutting all their trees if they don't want the sand to fill up all their bodies of water.
I think I'll forgive Jennifer.
Reminds me of something Brian Lazanik said: "I was having dinner with some people and we ended up having a food fight. Then some lady came up and said, 'You shouldn't waste food. There are people starving in Africa.' I don't get it. How does me eating food help starving people? If I throw it, they still have a chance to get it."
Why do they keep trying to raise awareness with concerts? It's analogous to trying to get a teenager to see the importance of an education using hardcore porn. The last thing he's going home to think about is his future career (unless he was destined to be a "masseuse"
ReplyAre those pricks at the Noble Prize lair the only ones who can't see Al Gore is talking out his arse? Having a quick shower because people in Africa don't have much water is f*****g ridiculous. Are we to put this unused water into a big boat and send it to them? Where I live it rains 300 days a year, so I should have short showers because it doesn't rain much in Africa. Fuckwit.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesAl Gore needs to STFU. I don't understand the facination/hate Statians have for this person. How about getting ACTUAL climate scientist to make acurate speeches instead of a political has-been?
Tell you what: you go, find a scientist, get him to give the speech, and tell me who has more impact, Gore or the scientist.
Yeah, Gore may not be perfect (his method has a hell of a lot of issues) but at least he's doing something.
Instead of bitching on the internet about it.
your average ACTUAL climate scientist can't convey an idea in layman's terms to an audience. THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE. for everyone complaining about Al Gore you have to admit that his method of spreading information about global warming is infinitely more digestible and successful than ANYTHING before. even so he hasn't been a running success.
How about all the money he makes off of so-called Global Warming? I can be that convincing and passionate for tens of millions of dollars too!
The difference between Al Gore and actual climate scientists is that Al Gore is pushing bullshit to make a profit from gullible morons.
Well all of these could have been worse. Everybody could have gotten their private jets flown by private jets.
ReplyThat's what i was thinking.
I get it, jets use a lot of fuel.
Reply