This is why you don't see anyone speaking out in the Dog's Purpose footage. A boom mic operator who has been standing for the last 10 hours simply doesn't have the emotional bandwidth to risk their entire career because a dog looks frightened. The reality is that everyone in that video probably just wanted to get the shot and go home. And considering that this was a second unit crew which included neither the director nor the actors, there's no one with the confident authority to shut the production down.
"But isn't this why the American Humane Association exists in the first place?" you ask. Yes! It is! Only, as several reports by both The Hollywood Reporter and The LA Times have uncovered, the Humane Association does a garbage job of policing the studios, and has a long history of representatives withholding cases of abuse and even having romantic relationships with trainers and producers. It makes you wonder how many cases of cruelty go unpunished when the only time the AHA takes action is after some kind of public outrage.
Who watches the watchers' watchers?
It sounds scandalous, but imagine if your job was to rat on the only other people you work with all day. This is why when a tiger nearly drowned on the set of Life Of Pi, the AHA rep (who was dating the producer) downplayed it to her bosses to avoid a conflict.
The Hollywood Reporter
Oh, yeah. WAY better that you didn't purposefully try to drown the tiger, you heroes.
At this point, you might be asking, "Hey, wait. Why did Life Of Pi even need to almost drown a REAL tiger?" Good question, hypothetical you. After all, this award-winning film which everyone watched exactly once spent a hearty slice of its publicity yammering about how groundbreaking their CGI tiger was.
Rhythm & Hues
Which brings us to the obvious solution. For not only did the production nearly kill a living tiger, but it also successfully killed a VFX company in the process.
And thanks to oversaturation and overseas competition, we saw numerous effects companies go under during this same time. So in the dumbest dilemma ever, we have one group too overworked and corrupt to monitor animal abuse on film sets, and another that can create flawless CGI animals and is begging for business. How are either of these problems a problem when both problems exist?
For all the things we needlessly digitize, like stunts and blood effects, for all the dead actors we resurrect into Gumby-skinned abominations, the one thing CGI is really good at is replicating animals.
Disney/20th Century Fox/AMC
Guys, I'm not saying we have to replace every animal with a computer counterpart, but can Hollywood at least budget in the post-work needed to avoid drowning dogs? Is that too much to ask? Filmmaking is already an inherently insane act that serves no rational purpose except to placate one of the eight million species on this planet. So maybe it's time we stopped dragging terrified animals into our elaborate make-believe industry just so we can feel good about keeping them as tiny cuddle slaves.
Dave lives in your heart and also on Twitter.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel and check out 8 'Adorable' Viral Videos That Qualify as Animal Cruelty - Cracked TV, and watch other videos you won't see on the site!
Also follow us on Facebook. Check us meowt? Subscribe to our bird-feed? There has to be a pun for this.
Recommended For Your Pleasure
The main benefit of watching TV is seeing the plight of sad bastards who aren't you.
- By Ian Fortey
- March 10, 2019
The 'wellness' market is thriving right now.
- By Lydia Bugg
- March 08, 2019
Most people have a pretty basic idea of what it's like to be a parent.
- By Seanbaby
- March 15, 2019
There's no shortage of downright absurd conspiracy theories out there.
- By Boone Ashworth
- March 14, 2019
Instead of rebooting and recasting, we have a chance for something new.
- By Archie Grimm
- March 06, 2019