But I'm the only thing you can punch in the face. Online violence isn't actually possible, because we don't have a Matrix, and if we did, I would strongly recommend you spend some time with the Red Dress or Red Speedo program before interacting with other people. Threatening violence online is how you announce to the world that puberty didn't actually take and you're sulking too much to try again.

LUNAMARINA/iStock/Getty Images
"Screaming and yelling used to get me all the breasts I wanted!"

Threatening online violence is also legally actionable! Your goal is to tell that idiot how much they suck, and you won't be able to do that from jail. Which is beginning to happen! The Internet is part of real life, not an alternative to it, and screaming sexually violent threats is becoming more prosecutable. For example, this guy got sent to jail for twittering rape threats! That's awesome! Why, it's almost like broadcasting a threat of sexual assault to the entire planet, in a way permanently recordable and provable, is nearly as real as shouting it at a person in the street!

moodboard/moodboard/Getty Images
"I said I NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE GENE POOL AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE!"

Violent threats also create an appallingly toxic environment for pretty much everyone. No one has ever turned out to have been right about bullying others. History has always revealed the sexist and racist as "embarrassing assholes we'll run through a mulcher as soon as we can connect one to a time tunnel."

If you're going to all the bother of spelling "mangina" correctly, such as that's possible, it would be a shame if nobody even read your comment. But when sane humans receive messages from "Spanky Chokeabitch," well, I was about to say that they don't have to read that person's opinion on gender relations, but I'm afraid that they already have. We all already have. I'm sorry.

David Schliepp/Hemera/Getty Images
I'm sorry for pretty much everything that I'm used to say!

When you've got people going around with accounts named after their cause, why, it's almost like people are utterly defining their broken identities around irrelevant bullshit!

I'm not American myself (a lot of programming is outsourced these days, especially when it's for small anthropomorphized characters! Ni hao!), but I can tell that nobody in the US government is perfect. There are some important bipartisan differences between the right and way-way-further-right, but someone screaming about Nobama isn't going to be providing detailed commentary on the shortfalls of a democratic government (As, again, I've helped draft every single one of those comments!).

All these names do is remove any chance of rational debate. When someone types "Micro$oft", they've announced that their position is so utterly unchangeable by thought that it's started changing other parts of their brain around itself.

People are on Twitter for bite-sized updates. Nobody's going to choke down your feast of bullshit. Victor Hugo would take half a look at these immense images and decide he couldn't be bothered. This isn't a convenient way to deliver information. This is a convenient way to announce you haven't even thought about this. Literally copying and pasting your argument is the text equivalent of an autoplaying ad: turning a link into an annoying distraction that'll be automatically closed. And when someone is copy-and-pasting their worldview into every site they can find, they've turned themselves into a spambot, but without the same sense of job satisfaction.

CursedSenses/iStock/Getty Images
"I only wish I could offer people a larger penis."

Posting a ten-thousand-word image in a social media comment is like taking a ten-pound tower of bacon from a buffet, like carrying a mattress in your carry-on luggage, like using CAPS LOCK for an entire message, and oh god, you do all of those things don't you. And I'm helping you!

The problem is that "freedom of speech" really doesn't work like that. Freedom of speech means the government generally isn't allowed to come into someone's site and shut people up. But that someone? It's their site! They can shut people down like they're malfunctioning shit dispensers. The First Amendment doesn't compel people to endure every awful thing in a Clockwork Orange of comment sections.

Oh, and did you know that the First Amendment doesn't even apply to most of the world? There's quite a lot of world which isn't America. I know, crazy, right? The amendments aren't universal constants -- they're provincial ordinances, and they don't carry any weight in ethical or moral debates. For example, in most of the world, defending gun use with the Second Amendment sounds like defending samurai swords by explaining that Worf carries a B'atleth on the Starship Enterprise (As a CAPS LOCK key, gun rights and Star Trek are just two of the many subjects I'm now an expert in!).

Paramount
Carrying a blade makes you think you're all Worf, but you really look Quark.

Sometimes people don't even read things from their favorite authors if the first paragraph doesn't grab them. Why would they? When you're writing, it's your job to keep people reading. That's why writing is a job! If an asshole's first sentence establishes that they can't think, spell, or use the toilet without screaming at gravity for not making the process even easier for them, why should readers follow them around the U-bend?