The ability to buy better weapons ruins the game twice over. Either you're paying real money to beat a game you already bought, which is how your self-esteem wins a pyrrhic victory, or you're struggling through battles with the knowledge you're deliberately wasting time that even the game wants you to skip. Hard levels are no longer finely-balanced tests, but blatant difficulty spikes added as aggressive sales pitches. This shatters your immersion, keeping you constantly aware that you're not escaping from reality by struggling against alien monsters; you're losing a real battle against an evil Terran corporation.

Solution: No Micropayments Mode

Every game should have a simple "I WILL NEVER BUY ANYTHING" toggle which removes all offers and options from every menu. Not greying them out, not defaulting them to "No" -- absolutely eliminating even the least glimpse of them from the game. If only to reveal how many holes are left. This would have to be instituted as a legal requirement, just like age ratings, and it could be forced for the same reasons. Parents used to be worried about violent games, but now they face the real problem of children being tricked out of thousands of dollars. Micropayments are a genuine scam that exploit children as a security flaw. Video games are meant to make dealing with kids easier, not worse.

It's a more horrifying Skinner box than a literal implementation of that term in a horror movie, because at least horror victims don't insist that they're enjoying it. The basic timer tactic has expanded into an array of time-killing traps wherein you have to do the same things over and over again to change one number into another, convert one resource into a second in order to get a third, repeat a mission until you have ten of a certain component, or any allegedly complicated "crafting" system which requires five steps but can only deliver a single result. They're all embarrassingly simple proto-Matrixes reducing the human brain to a simple WHILE ... UNTIL statement.

EA
I need different lumber to make a weapon handle to combine with flints and ores to make a firearm I can't fire. And I used to be an Assassin.

If you click through three menus to complete something which could have been done with a single keypress, then those menus were there to hide the lack of real gameplay. If changing one of those steps gives a different result, it's crafting. If the multi-step sequence has only one correct result, then it's not crafting; it's the world most boring quicktime event, which decided to swap the "quick" for "filing." And as in the previous point, the instant they offer you a chance to pay your way past any step is when you know it's all bullshit.

Solution: Macros And Smelting

Ideally, all games should have macros. A simple set of instructions in which you can map out commands like "IF this THEN that." It sounds complicated, but everything in the virtual world is already inputs and named components. If you can do it with menus and a keypad, then the game should be able to do that for you. Setting up a system to call button presses and menu elements really would be BASIC.

"I see what you did there."

Developers worry that players would skip parts of their game, but if players want to skip a part, then they should be allowed to. Video games aren't meant to be homework. More realistically, every crafting game should at least have a smelting option like in Team Fortress 2, which lets you take all unwanted items and resources and render them down into base material to be rebuilt into other items. That way, even the most useless items feel like progress towards a desired goal.

Don't just let players break the game; give us options for infinite resources so we can see just how stupidly awesome we can get with the wreckage. Then include an achievement or a cosmetic award item for people who don't use those options and complete the game "as it's meant to be played." That encourages people to try both modes and have much more than twice as much fun. All for the cost of less than a line of code as you change some resource variables. The core point is that we already have a world in which extremely un-fun people will make sure we don't break the rules. That's why we invented video games.

Developers think they're saving players from frustration by preventing them from doing anything stupid. But the most frustrating experience is wanting to try something stupid and having the game tut "No no no," presumably before telling you to eat your vegetables instead of dessert. When a game's physics engine is made of explosives and murder, we're not playing it to obey sensible rules.

Choosing the silliest possible car form can still be tremendously enjoyable. But choosing from preset lists of options isn't crafting. Especially when the game then forbids you from using half the options in many missions. A true racing crafting game would be a '90s-era Carmageddon engine connected to a Kerbal Space Program constructor, an open world, and while we're at it, let's have an open player-moddable database of parts and locations. That's also every million dollars for anyone capable of crowdsourcing and making it, and I'm giving the idea away in the dream of someday seeing it.

Solution: Admit It's Just Customization

Crafting would mean letting us build a car with a hundred wheels. Or no wheels and a load of rocket boosters, and then throwing it out into the wasteland to invent the sport of Mad Max Dust Surfing and unleashing video viral promotion the likes of which the game's marketers could only dream. Crafting is games like Kerbal Space Program, in which there seems to be far more fun screwing around than achieving the real goals, and then you find there's even more fun achieving those goals because it's really you building and achieving them, not someone else who gave you a few menu options to flick through.

Kerbal Space Program
More satisfying than defeating even the highest-difficulty boss

The crafting system is the barometer for how much the developers cared, running from "zero effort chore stitched on because marketing told us to" through "good fun, integrates well with the mechanics" to "glorious freedom which adds days, months, years of entertainment to the title." Which, in this world of yearly franchise sequels, is one of the reasons major developers aren't trying too hard.

Luckily, we have independent developers truly crafting finer things.

Read how The Worst Metal Gear Story Ever Predicted The Entire Series, or Enjoy Five Fantastically Fun Games for the price of one Call of Duty.

Luke has a website, tumbles, and responds to every single tweet.

Crafting systems might not be where they want to be, but then again, sometimes video games fail horribly when they go for more realistic. Check out 5 Video Games That Took Realism Way Too Far. AHHH, are those supposed to be human faces, or are the souls of the damned playing NBA2k? Well at least they didn't try to tackle chronic obesity like Fable II. See how it failed miserably in 5 Hilariously Failed Attempts At Video Game Realism (Pt.2).

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to see how raw meat can heal a video game character's bullet wounds in The Problem With Realism With Video Games - Fallout Parody, and watch other videos you won't see on the site!

Also follow us on Facebook, because it's like playing a socially realistic video game, except everything you say is followed by cat GIFs.