Like when plucky famous boxer Manny Pacquiao stopped punching people long enough to share his opinion that people in homosexual marriages were "worse than animals." Sadly, Pacquiao's skill at defense doesn't extend beyond the ring, because he played the "out of context" card, despite the fact that his whole interview is available. Hard to say that anything is out of context when all of the context that exists is a click away.

If animal comparisons don't cut it for you, there was an imam in Canada who told a classroom full of students that gay people were like cancer or diabetes. Once video of this came out, he decided to go with every variant of this defense at once. He was doing it to be funny, he was misrepresented, he wasn't even teaching it, and all of his information about homosexuality came from a Wikipedia article. Remember, kids, the road to bigotry begins by not checking the links in the "References" section.

Finally, there's YouTube star and grown-ass man Pogo, who chose the "out of context" excuse after people unearthed YouTube videos of him referring to gay people as an abomination, celebrating the Pulse nightclub massacre by calling it "fantastic," and comparing homosexual men to 12-year-old girls. He even used the screen name "Faggotron," because he's "always had a very thorough dislike of homosexuals." Nonetheless, he insists you're missing the context. So maybe the context is ... yet to come? That seems like a really long game for someone who is so obviously a goddamn moron.

Related: 5 Terrible Excuses For Racism (That People Keep Using)

So did Dick really misspeak? It's hard to say, aside from the fact that you'd have to screw up multiple parts of a one-syllable name. Did he misspeak when he told Dave Barry that if there was a real dick army, Barney Frank would want to join? Or when he called being gay a sin? I don't know, maybe it was one of those Freudian slips or something.

Meanwhile, high school teacher and coach of the varsity intolerance team Bob Grisham was caught on tape first ranting about Michelle Obama's ass before transitioning into his thought-provoking opinions on homosexuality: "I don't believe in queers. I don't like queers. I don't hate them as a person, but what they do is an abomination against God." Of course, when it went public, he claimed that he misspoke in a debate situation. He also added that people who know him know that he loves everyone. Ah, the foolproof excuse of "Well my friends don't hate me."

Chicago alderman Emma Mitts somehow went even lazier with her version of this. She was at a public forum when she said, "I don't support the fact that we can have two women married, two men married, and yet we pay our fees, your tax dollars go, and they just get the same benefit as the woman or a man get, and I don't think that that playing field is level." To be fair, that's almost too garbled to even tell what she's complaining about. So when she claimed she misspoke because she lost track of her thoughts, she's probably right. Otherwise, her anti-gay statement would've been much clearer.

Related: 6 Types Of Apologies That Aren't Apologies At All

If you've never heard of folk singer Michelle Shocked, you may not be aware that she was once considered fairly progressive and apparently a lesbian. That seems relevant, given how she took time out of a concert in San Francisco to tell the audience to go on Twitter and say, "Michelle Shocked said God hates fags," and that when they force priests at gunpoint to perform gay marriages, it will be the downfall of civilization and Jesus will come back.

Backtracking from a statement like that is hard, but man did Shocked give it a try. In her apology, she explained that it wasn't her saying those things. Instead, she was saying what other people who aren't her believe. It would have worked better had she said that at the time, which she didn't. She then insisted that it was all part of some kind of ingenious point she was proving ("I was predicting the absurd way my description of, my apology for, the intolerant would no doubt be misinterpreted"), but if her point was "Saying horrible things about gays will make people mad," then it seems like she had plenty of existing data to work with.

Related: The 8 Stupidest Defenses Against Accusations Of Sexism