Humans like stories because we look for the world around us to fit into a narrative -- the rags-to-riches tale, the sports underdog overcoming the odds, the karaoke hustler singing a song about sex with his daughter, etc. You saw this happen immediately with Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's breakup. The original reason reported for their divorce was Pitt having an affair with his recent co-star Marion Cotillard. What goes around comes around, Angie! Once a cheater, always a cheater! People knew how to deal with that version of the story; it was nice and simple and fit into a form that we are all familiar with. When it turned out to have nothing to do with cheating and became much more complicated (like all divorces), people lost interest.

George Clerk/iStock
We moved on to the other 35 percent of topics: dreams we had, food we ate, and bowel movements we took.

While it might seem like this fixation is born of our fame-obsessed time, in reality, it's been around since we climbed down from the trees. In the past, we had gods and heroes filling this role. Think of the Greek deities, whose sexual exploits alone would fill a thousand tabloids. Then it was royals, military heroes, and explorers. Film stars and musicians showed up around the beginning of the 20th Century, and are merely the latest group filling this need. Who knows, your grandkids might get their rocks off gossiping about the Queen of Mars releasing a diss track about "those space station pussies."

But gossip can help in other ways. Even primitive tribes have hierarchies, with people looking to move up socially. In the modern world, this is often reflected in something called "status-jockeying," wherein we look to people similar to us and instinctively collect information that could change our social status. That's why studies show men care more about gossip about men, women about women, people in general about others their own age, and Ted Cruz and his many, many clones.

We want information that the "eat, fuck, kill" section of our brains believes will beat out biological competitors, and the best way to do that is to follow the lives of people like us who are successful and try to emulate them. It's why we're curious what diets starlets use to get thin and what workout regimens actors use to get buff. It's why we want to know how billionaires got rich, so that we too can mock the law with impunity. Sure, we'll almost certainly never be as hot or as rich as those famous people, but we don't need to be. We just need to use the information we learned to be hotter and better off than our direct competitors -- or the people in our Monkeysphere, if you will.

A study of Chinese students hooked them up to brain scanners and told them both positive and negative rumors about themselves, their friends, and a star they claimed not to care about. Their grey matter told a different story, with the pleasure centers lighting up the most when they heard tales about celebrities doing bad things. We can't draw too many conclusions from such a small study, but anecdotal evidence supports celebrity schadenfreude as our guilty pleasure as well. For example, in 2014, when Justin Bieber was arrested for drag racing while drunk and without a license, it generated a then-record 6,100 tweets per minute -- 4.28 million in 24 hours.

Miami Beach Police
Faces this pretty used to launch a thousand ships. Times have changed.

Now that we have such open access to the lives of celebrities, we are constantly comparing ourselves to them ... and usually, we're the ones found wanting, which is seriously annoying. But if we can't be as rich or as talented, we can still watch the complete breakdowns of stars like Britney Spears and Charlie Sheen with a sort of sick glee. Even when people actually die, like Amy Winehouse or Heath Ledger, it reminds us that they were flawed human beings like us. Basically, people are terrible.

Put simply, this is our brains confusing what a person is good at with everything else. For example, just because they are a good singer, we also expect them to be a good person. And this is why celebrity advertisements are so effective. We are more likely to trust them and their opinions than we are some random guy, since we know they are good at something else. Sometimes this is relatively innocuous, like when Kanye West convinces you to buy his ridiculous ugly Adidas collection, and sometimes it is downright dangerous, like when Jenny McCarthy and her crazy eyes convince you not to vaccinate your child.

gq-magazine.co.uk
Actually, I take it back. There is nothing good or healthy about this.

We follow what celebrities do and eat and wear because deep down, part of us wants to think we could reach their level of "perfection." Since we already know our friends and family members are imperfect, we have to look to celebrities for the idea of that flawless person we want to believe exists and think we could be with relatively little effort. That's how we end up in ridiculous situations like when Ted Nugent and Miley Cyrus are asked seriously about their political opinions, as if they have important thoughts that could expand our own worldview.

forevertwentysomethings.com
Here she is holding a forum on the merits of the TPP.

That's also why it can be so crushing when seemingly good celebrities turn out to be terrible people. The world was shocked that Tiger Woods, one of the greatest athletes of all time, would cheat on the beautiful mother of his children. Because it's unheard of for rich men who travel a lot to have flings, right? Of course not. We'd expect that of half the random businessmen out there. But Woods was different. He wasn't just some guy; he was a hero to millions of people. How could he swing a golf club so well if his dick was always out?

These days, celebrities can connect with their fans in a million ways, from chat show interviews to magazine spreads to actually contacting them directly on social media. And while this allows you tell the same story at every party you go to about the time Patton Oswalt favorited one of your jokes, this is a positive thing for the star as well. The more you feel like you have a relationship with them, the more likely you are to shell out cash money on their projects. So it is in their best interests to make you think you are their friend.

Will Alexander/WENN.com
This does not always go according to plan.

This means forming as many parasocial, or one-sided, relationships as possible. And it totally works. When you are as likely to see a picture of John Legend and Chrissy Teigen's new baby on your feed as your best friend's, the line between them gets blurred. Suddenly, you feel like you know them, even though they see you as just another one of their followers, part of the giant void they are shouting into.

Twitter
Unlike myself, who loves every single one of you. Especially you ... um ... @PorcupineEeyore.

But that doesn't have to be as bad as it seems! Since we feel like we are close to these people, when we read about their lives or tweet at them, it acts as a "psychological prosthesis" for shy or lonely people. Feeling like they have a connection to celebrities can literally act as a filler for relationships they wouldn't have otherwise. While that sounds kind of sad, psychologists assure us it's fine and healthy as long as it doesn't tip over into an obsession.

So don't worry, guys who guard Michael Fassbender, I'm totally safe. Though maybe don't check my browsing history.

Find out who the next contenders for faking their own deaths are in 5 Celebrities Who Hate Fame More Than Kanye Loves It and become obsessed with these bizarre celebrities habits in 5 Bizarre Celebrity Quirks You Can Never Unsee.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to see what these celebrities think of our crap in 9 Celebrity Freak Outs (That Were Totally Justified) and watch other videos you won't see on the site!

Also follow us on Facebook. We'll give you something to talk about.