That we know of!
... and I honestly don't think we can say the same for Bill. Even a former prosecutor has said that, after interviewing Cosby about the allegations, he thought Cosby was lying. Unfortunately, he didn't have enough physical evidence to bring him up on charges or arrest him.
But, before you take that last tidbit and run with it, deciding that alone means the man is not guilty, know two things:
1. Cosby settled that case out of court.
2. There is nothing to be gained from accusing someone of sexual assault.
No one has ever gotten famous from making unfounded rape allegations. If anyone did, it wasn't in a good way. Rape is a horrific and traumatic experience to recount, especially on such a public level. It's also pretty fucking rare that someone lies about it (according to the Justice Department, it only happens about 2 percent of the time), yet society thinks that just because some comedian didn't use swear words on stage and was an actor pretending to be the patriarch of a fictional family, he must be innocent. Because, clearly, famous people are never shitty human beings.
Someone here looks like he knows that isn't true.
Even if we apply the statistics that only about 2 percent of people ever lie about sexual assault, that still means that odds are Cosby STILL did these things to 33 of the 34 women who are accusing him. The likelihood of one person using his money and influence to get away with whatever the fuck he wants is a lot higher than 34 random women conspiring to "take down" said man decades later, especially when that person has proven to always have been an entitled asshole and has admittedly had extramarital affairs that he paid money for to keep from public records.