What Campaign Ads Would Look Like If the Voting Age Was 6
-
#23 Sputnik
-
#22 charlatantric
-
#21 Boron
-
#20 bonzozzy
-
#19 SoupIsMoney
-
#18 DCD
-
#17 joscott
-
#16 Hollyvvood
-
#15 McBeefy
-
#14 Rykan
-
#13 Bell110
-
#12 DCD
-
#11 pizzamogul
-
#10 Bishopwhitet
-
#9 Shadowbolt
-
#8 Rimshot
-
#7 bunker6
-
#6 McBeefy
-
#5 redsoxmb545
-
#4 McBeefy
-
#3 Darren_Darby
-
#2 Lord Cownostril
-
#1 penperv
-
Other Photoplasty Contests
Next Contest
I'm trying desperately to erase the image of #8 from my mind…
ReplySome of these were good but I don't understand the ones that were sex related, why would a 6 year old want condoms?
ReplyIf you'll read the intro, it'll say it's not only towards 6 year-old , but teens and preteens as well
20 is my fave.Most of these are awful.
Reply#14 is my new wallpaper
Reply14 is amazing on so many levels.
Reply#21 is mad fresh. Obama blows up a tiger with laser fingers? If he ran that ad, I would vote for him.
Reply#14 would get me to vote for Barack either way
Reply#8 is all kinds of fucked up!!!! Well done!!!
Reply@AnthArmo
ReplyYou get it good sir. Someone who is intelligently voting would know what candidate would be standing for what and who they agree with, something an ad cannot tell you.
Nananananananananana MacCaaain!
ReplyMost ad campaigns are already designed to appeal to a very simple mindset, so they wouldn't actually change.
ReplyIntelligent people have already picked a party, and always vote for them. Swing voters are more apathetic/uninformed, they're the target audience. So the level of comprehensibility needed for a 30 year old voter and a 10 year old voter isn't actually that different.
You'd probably see a lot of "We'll make sure your classrooms are smaller/school will be less crappy" campagins from dems and "We'll make sure the Liberals don't steal christmas!" from the Republicans.
"Intelligent people have already picked a party, and always vote for them."
That doesn't sound very intelligent to me. It sounds more like "I'm lazy, so I'll just vote for whomever the democrat or republican candidate happens to be, instead of researching a candidate independent of their party."
Swing voters vote for the candidate, not the party, or their political views don't fit entirely with either major party. Not all democrats or republicans have the same stance on every issue as the rest of their party.
To me, people that always vote party lines seem more apathetic and uninformed.
Indeed. You shouldn't become trapped in the party mindset. You should vote based on the position, principles, and plans of the canidate. Not based on the logo.
What's sad is that one can never seem to vote FOR a canidate anymore. One always ends up voting against the other.
I have to wonder; if the party system were abolished, and every canidate had to instead write a paper clearly stating their intentions and ambitions; would that do any good?
Does anyone else feel McCain would probably have won if this were true? I mean, he would have been terrible, but his were clearly the best. G.I. Johan and McCain Secret files.
ReplySome of these pictures seem like they'd appeal to six...teen year olds..
Replyboobies
"Barack Obama: A New Hope" was my favorite! XD
Replyi'm sorry....he would bring "mittens" back to life? wtf? is there something about mittens i'm not aware of?
ReplyIt's a cat name.
Don't worry I didnt get it at first.
#3 ruled, I woulda picked it.
ReplyI don't want the old Facebook
ReplyNumber 3? Dirsturbing as all hell...
Replyworst part about this? A few of these could conceivably work as campaign ads.
ReplyI'm a little late, but good contest X)
Reply