Moon Hoax Conspiracy
The Moon hoax conspiracy is a theory that the US Government faked the 1969 Moon landing, because faking a major historical event and then covering it up for all time is somehow supposed to be easier and cheaper than just going to the damn Moon.
Just The Facts
- The theory first became popular in the 70s, in part because the public had become more cynical about government after Watergate. Yes, this is all Richard Nixon's fault.
- It's been extensively debunked numerous times, but some people cling to it because they want to be part of a big secret the ignorant sheeple around them can't understand.
- An extensive study by NASA has concluded that everyone who believes the theory is retarded.
The Origins
The idea was first proposed in a book by a man named Bill Kaysing. He liked to talk about his theory by yelling loudly about it at anyone who would listen. When someone insulted his theory he took the calm and rational approach of suing them for libel.

My idea is THIS stupid!
It's believed that the 1978 movie Capricorn One helped popularise the theory. Capricorn One was about evil NASA scientists faking a manned mission to Mars because the spacecraft that looked suspiciously like the Apollo spacecraft would have killed all the astronauts. They then destory the ship and tell the public the astronauts died anyway, so their plan is even sillier than the Moon theory. Also, OJ Simpson played one of the astronauts, so this is one more thing you can blame on him.

OJ Simpson pictured faking the moon landing while stealing sports memorabilia.
Ever since the 70s the idea has been promoted now and then by a variety of conspiracy nuts, initially through low budget videos that used tricky editing methods and ominous music to make their points. More recently the Internet has become the medium of choice for conspiracy theorists, in part because it allows them to reach a larger audience but mostly because they can just provide YouTube links to the aforementioned videos and hope people as dumb as them will buy into the theory without the need to do any actual work.
Polls have suggested that about six percent of Americans have doubts about the Moon landing, which means their numbers are too few to be taken seriously but the group is still much larger than the believers of most other conspiracies. Skeptic magazine suggests that this problem can be solved by slapping anyone you meet who believes in the theory.
The Theory
Conspiracy theorists generally make a few key points about the hoax. Like all good conspiracies, they tend to be based on pseudoscience and conveniently ignore those troublesome things we know as "facts". These include claims that the United States was technologically incapable of going to the moon, that numerous photos and films have been doctored, that a trip to the Moon would have resulted in radiation killing the astronauts and that numerous key members of the Apollo program died under suspicious circumstances. There are also questions as to veracity of rock samples brought back from the Moon and to the existence of the lunar landing sites.
Most of these questions can easily be addressed by anyone who paid attention during high school science class. For those of you who went to bad schools and/or slept through your education, five minutes on Wikipedia should clear things up.
Some argue that it was only the Apollo 11 landing that was faked, while the others were real. However, most conspiracy theorists believe all six landings were phoney, because why go through the trouble to fake something that elaborate just once when you could show-off and fool people six times?

"Man, this shit never gets old!"
Why the Theory is Idiotic
The biggest flaw in the theory is the fact that the moon landing missions involved hundreds of thousands of people, from scientists, engineers and skilled labourers, right down to NASA's coffee fetching interns. This means that the US Government has somehow managed to threaten, blackmail or buy the silence of these thousands of people, any one of whom could become rich and famous instantly by revealing the secrets of the hoax. To accomplish this massive task the Government would have to set up an entire organisation dedicated to keeping people quiet. The people in this organisation would in turn have to be kept quiet, and the cycle would continue until every person in the country was busy keeping each other from telling other people a secret everyone was already in on. Note that this logic can be applied to a variety of different conspiracy theories. For an example, see Was 9/11 an Inside Job?

"We know nothing!"
The alternative would be that the Moon landing was faked with as few people as possible, which would mean that everyone who was supposedly working on the Apollo project was just sitting around twiddling their thumbs, and would no doubt have been very surprised to hear they had been successful despite not doing any productive work.

"So uh, hey guys, it looks like we managed to land on the Moon over our lunch break .That's pretty cool."
There's also the fact that there was this little thing called the Cold War that was going down at the time, and the Soviet Union would have loved the chance to call bullshit on the whole Apollo project. They were strangely silent though, but that's OK because there were a few guys in tin foil hats who were more than happy to pick up their slack.






Should'nt this be un-biased ??
ReplyI find it awfully convenient that americans suddenly landed on the moon, despite the fact that the soviets were already in space and NASA was drastically lagging behind. Prove me wrong.
Reply"Like all good conspiracies" Is the person who wrote this an idiot? I'm not saying I believe the moon landings were fake, I'm saying 'conspiracy' is not a naughty word for something that never happens. There are such things as conspiracies you assclown. Which means a number of conspiracy theories have the potential to be true. In addition; any large scale project could involved any number of tasks which appear significant but are actually meaningless. If you do what's asked of you and you get results it doesn't matter if those results are remotely useful. Again not talking about the moon landing. But what kind of dumbass thinks the lowest guy on the totem pole is told the whole picture and knows the endgame? I work in a department store in the Women's shoes section. I don't know how many black pumps they're bringing in tomorrow, or even if they are. I don't even know what they're doing on the second floor, they could be having food fights and participating in petting zoo orgies. So I don't think you have a valid point.
ReplyIt's just pathetic that anybody would believe this theory after it having been burned alive, put out, set on fire again, pissed on, then laughed at and burned a third time by many, many, many people.
ReplyPossible conspiracy theorists are Communist sympathizers who are still pissed that America got to the Moon before the Soviets... true story, I know these people.
ReplyCome to think of it, why didn't the Soviets call BS anyways? I mean, if they propagandized it enough some people would believe it...
This article is all kinds of wrong, doesn't address any questions or [resent any facts. Read my blog for more info and a fun read about the Moon Hoax Conspiracy.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYour blog has even less facts and consists mostly of bullshit and fucktits crazy.
seriously? you're blogging about rebecca black sucking? no wonder you believe in the moon landing hoax. you're clearly incapable of thinking for yourself.
You cite not being able to see the lander in a photo that you specify has a resolution of 159 meters per pixel, even after blowing it up to 1000%.... The lander was less than 7 meters in diameter. Re-read what you write before you post it to check for idiocy.
My high school science teacher believes that it was a hoax.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesI fear for my education.
don't worry, my science teacher was a creationist, but that doesn't mean i don't know how to look at wikipedia
My history teacher thinks the same thing.
I has a sad.
Pokersad: And your English teacher is woefully incompetent.
Whoa, the government totally bribed you guys into writing this one!
ReplyBy the way about solar flares, imagine going to mars at the current rates.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesIt's more then a year(maybe 2) up and back.
That's why we ain't going to mars for a while.
that is why NASA and other space agencies/scientists must stop shitting around and star working on polarized hull plating, artificial gravity, magnetic shields, impulse drive, fusion reactors and space elevators.
Nnoitra, you just copied and pasted that list of tech of the Star Trek Enterprise wikipedia page, didn't you?
What they really need to focus on is creating Tribbles.
Heh, s**t, no I didn't, I swear :) And there was a space elevator in Star Trek??
Buzz Aldrin only punched him because he was being an a*****e and blocking the way to his car and threatening his wife. I cheered.
ReplyBuzz Aldrin punching someone is the most beautiful thing. Ugh. The atmosphere argument of the pro-hoax people is absolutely the best. You could see clear down into the Weddel sea at one point...because there was little to no impurities in the water. There is little to no atmosphere on the moon. Dur...Wha? It's not going to have a dense atmosphere like the planet earth? (Well, reasonably--it is mostly nitrogen, after all.) No! Also, pictures with jpeg fragments aren't evidence of NASA doctoring stills. Get a life.
ReplyFrom wikipedia: "4. The Apollo 16 crew should not have survived a big solar flare firing out when they were on their way to the Moon. 'They should have been fried.'
Reply"* No large solar flare occurred during the flight of Apollo 16. There were large solar flares in August 1972, after Apollo 16 returned to Earth and before the flight of Apollo 17."
Wait. So, if there had been a large solar flare they would have died? It just never happened that way? I know large solar flares don't happen everyday in space. (I get the impression the danger would have MOSTLY been if they were outside of the module when it hit.) But still, that's patriotic hardcore.
Oops "...on their way to the Moon." So, even if they were in the module. Since the duration of the mission was about a week and a half, that's a tad more risk of being caught in a solar flare.
We didn't land on the moon nine times, nor pretend to. It was six. Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17...
ReplyNot that I'm a proponnent of the conspiracy, but if they did it back then, why are they "making preparations to go to the moon in a few years" now? Shouldn't it be a peace of cake with modern tech, if they did it so long ago?...Just sayin'
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesI'm guessing it is because, until they get the means to establish a colony or whatever in the moon, there's no real point to it. The space race is over, people obviously wouldn't be as excited and the only thing in the moon is rocks, samples of which have already been brought back in the multiple other trips. It would be a colossal waste of money for the US government (and we just know that the US just desperately needs another thing to throw its money at) with no real reason to do it other than to say "NOW YOU CAN SEE NEIL ARMSTRONG THE THIRD LIVE IN THE MOON USING GOOGLE, SHUT UP ABOUT THAT STUPID CONSPIRACY ALREADY".
Because the moon has some H30 inside, this can be used to make a f**k load of energy to keep las vagas goin, so the first country to mine, the first country to sell the energy.
Because the moon has some H30 inside, this can be used to make a f**k load of energy to keep las vagas goin, so the first country to mine, the first country to sell the energy.
Well, I'm no expert on NASA, but I do know this: The Apollo rockets have been out of commission for a long time and the current space shuttles aren't made for landing anywhere but on our primitive Earth runways. My guess is that they need to build new means to actually land on and return from the moon, among other preparations. I'm also guessing this all takes time.
They've already developed the Ares rocket system. They've begun testing it, in fact. Do some research on the Ares I-X, the Ares V, and the Orion spacecraft. A lot of the preparations you're speaking of are already close to finished.
As Trolloks clumsily suggested there's tritium (not in heavy water form, so no H3O) on the moon that can be used for fusion power. It's also not "inside" the moon. It got there from the accumulation of billions of years of solar wind. So it's just sitting on the surface. Personally I don't see why there needs to be another space race over it. One mission to the moon could mine a few hundred kilograms of tritium, which would be enough to see to Earth's energy need for thousands of years. It's not like there's going to be a constant demand for the stuff. And, lunar space programs aren't cheap. Monoxx, there's no real point to establishing a colony on the moon. There's not really anything of value there besides the tritium; and why put yourself down a gravity well that you're going to need to climb out of again. MagicalPJ, it's not just that the Shuttles can't land on the moon. They don't have the operational ceiling. They can't make escape velocity. They can't get out of this gravity well. All they can do is low orbit. Hell the I.S.S. actually has to adjust its orbit lower to make a rendezvous with a Shuttle. Quite frankly they're pieces of shit.
Thank you Cracked. This hoax conspiracy is indeed bullshit.
ReplyAlso funny.