Halo Reach
If you like Halo games, you will probably like Halo: Reach. Early impressions are that it is in fact a Halo game and functions as such.
Halo: Reach

Halo: Reach is the sixth game in the Halo franchise which, like most video game franchises, stops numbering sequel titles at some arbitrary point and starts inserting random words after a colon instead. So for instance the first sequel was called Halo 2, then there was Halo 3, then they decided to mix things up with Halo 3: ODST. Also there was an RTS called Halo Wars, even though all Halo games are about wars. But we digress.
We don't want to spoil the plot of the single-player mode, though Halo: Reach is a prequel to the original Halo, so if you have played any of the previous games you sort of know the ending (SPOILER: THE GOOD GUYS EVENTUALLY WIN). Let's just say that it involves level after level of shooting increasingly strong aliens using more and more powerful weapons. The plot of the multiplayer is similar, only with the added layer of teenagers vigorously reading from a thesaurus of racial slurs.
The Halo series exists in rare air in the video game industry along with the likes of the Mario, Zelda and Grand Theft Auto franchises, in that the release of a new game grosses the kind of money rarely matched by any product launch--Reach grossed a mind-boggling $200 million its first day. In the middle of a worldwide economic collapse.

The game has received favorable reviews, which is not a surprise as all Halo games are competently made and generally pleasant to play. Reviews also are useless for a franchise like this. If you are a fan of the Halo games, you already own it and in fact are playing it right now instead of reading this. If you dislike Halo games, this one will not change your mind. If you have been resisting trying Halo games through the first five games over the last decade, there is probably no reason to get into them now. You apparently already are satisfied with your life and your other hobbies. You and Halo can continue to coexist in the world without impacting each other's existence in any way.
Bungie
If you follow the industry, Halo: Reach is significant because it will be the last Halo game developed by Bungie (the studio who created the whole thing). Bungie had made the games exclusively for Microsoft consoles and recently announced it was parting ways with them. However, Microsoft owns Halo, not Bungie, so the split required Bungie to leave their most beloved child behind.
Halo will continue, as Microsoft actually created a studio (343 Industries) to do nothing but focus on future Halo games.
Bungie, meanwhile, jumped from one industry monolith to another: they signed a deal with Activision Blizzard, aka The Largest Video Game Maker That Has Ever Existed, to create a brand new video game series from scratch, which presumably will not involve space marines or armed dune buggies unless they like getting the shit sued out of them.







I just knew naked Cortana had to be in there...
ReplyWell really there are only 5 halo games since Halo Wars was by a different developer.
Replyit was still canon so there are 6
stfu shatteredwindow
Never played Halo until a few months ago. Long story involving incredible ineptitude at FPS games. Now I love the s**t out of it, singleplayer only. f**k 12-year-olds. I mean Ringworld meets Starship Troopers, wtf?
ReplyI love tea-bagging. I'd still do it even if I got nuked every time.
ReplySome people might even try to weaponize it. Killing others in the blast radius by teabagging? Priceless!
I hope Bungie makes another Marathon. Now THAT would be kickass!
ReplySpeaking from under the rock- Is there really supposed to be a "Halo" movie? If so, chalk that one up to another great story murdered by Hollywood assholes.
ReplyThey killed it because the cost was through the roof and the risk was high.
- - - NO. ALL WRONG!
ReplyI'm still waiting for "Halo Reacharound" to come out (FINALLY.)
REACH SUCKS!
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesViolates all of the canon of the books.
Hmm.... Fun game, or keeping it canon with the books that only diehard nerds read.
Yeah, I'm gonna go with "Fuck you. This is fun."
PS: The books suck.
Yeah, the guys who wrote the series violated the canon set by the guys who wrote the books (AKA, the guys who didn't write the series)
Christopher, you're try reading A book sometime.
Actually, Bungie explained it all in the limited edition. It DOESN'T violate canon.
Eeer are you guys stuipid. microsoft says the books are all cannon to the same series as halo, and the canon is only very mildly inaccurate because reach. Also the books were amazing books. I thought they would be s**t and only making sales cause the title says halo, but they are actually great books to read.
Asid... yer stupid. The books aren't canon, only the games are. As has been stated in the past. The games came before the books there for *Gasp* The games are canon! So there for Reach is Canon. I'm not a huge Halo nerd but I love the series none the less.
how does Reach violate canon? it takes place BEFORE Halo Combat Evolved
The poster is too awesome really nice job
ReplyMmm. Naked Cortana.
ReplyNow now, no need for any sort of discussion when there are dick jokes to be made.
ReplyFirst-person shooters suck. Why are they so popular nowadays?
Reply Hide All See All 10 RepliesBeacause they don't suck.
Tech. If you don't enjoy shooting enemies with a shotgun than you're not a gamer my friend. FPS for life!
I don't dislike first-person shooters and never have, but I have also never really got into them to the point that they seem to be all I play.
Tech, I think the answer lies in attention span. Strategy games and many other genres take time, thought, planning. I"m not saying these things can't come up in an FPS, but they are not required like other games. It also goes into the "instant gratification" area of the mind. "Hey I killed that guy!, and that one! OOHHH a power-up!" All within a game that may last 15-20 minutes, and BAM awards and then all over again. Civ 5 for 20 minutes would maybe get you to the bronze age. Which all goes into the fact that FPS's ,especially modern ones, are very quick paced games, BAM, BAM, BAM. It keeps people interested.
But in general I find many people like those games merely for the competition of fighting against other people online in a relatively quick paced game. Most people want a 20 minute round against a buddy (or whoever) so that they can shout "I R da most leet, u nub." They don't want to spend multiple days building up their empires resources so that they can build a military force, or enough diplomatic power to put a stranglehold on your enemy who may be on a completely different landmass then you. They takes much time, planning, and forethought.
thus..boils down to FPS = quick, far more instant rewards and gratification. perfect for these kids now-a-days.
Whoa. Now your a guy that has too much time on his hands. There's no need for your antagonistic and belittling point of view.
Now now, no need for our discourse to degenerate into a reflection of the awful unwashed savages that we are, he made a compelling argument.
Now now, no need for a serious debate when there are dick jokes to be made.
It's really only console FPSs that suck. PC FPSs are pretty cool.
Generally FPS's learning curves aren't very steep (learn some guns + maps = good to go). RTS's require significantly more time to learn to play properly and generally games take a bit longer. Of course these are just generalizations, but I think FPS's popularity is based on the fact that they are easier to pick up and play (online jerks aside), the fact that less time is required to reap enjoyment makes it more appealing in this factor.
Tech. Are you serious? It allows males (and females) to exercise aggression and the urge to trash-talk by kicking ass in a make believe world with no consequences.
As a fan of strategy games, I can say that Civilization sucks. It sucks demon cocks in Hell.
Cortana, I'll take you home.
Reply"Bungie, meanwhile, jumped from one industry monolith to another: they signed a deal with Activision Blizzard, aka The Largest Video Game Maker That Has Ever Existed, to create a brand new video game series from scratch, which presumably will not involve space marines or armed dune buggies unless they like getting the s**t sued out of them."
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesI'm guessing the author has never heard of Starcraft, a Blizzard original.
Blizzard also copied several elements of the Warhammer 40k series.
Yes, I went there.
Why would you guess that, nothing that he says would make you guess that.
oh and everything you think they copied from Warhammer Warhammer copied from Heinlein's Starship Troopers.
How about it's just really hard to come up with completely new ideas, and anything anybody does is probably copied or influenced by some other series?
Or Marathon, a Bungie original, pre-Microsoft days. (Granted, it doesn't involve a buggy, but the playing character is a, yes, a space marine. Sort of.)
Which is why Bungie should finish Starcraft Ghost, an FPS Blizzard promised us in 2003 but it never left the ground.
About the Warhammer thing, I just realized something. The Orks are a (partially) fungal alien race. The Flood, fungal alien race.
So blizzard makes another series instead of fixing the fail rpg WOW. Also known as the game millions of retards play since they dont relise that WOW is boring, and steals more ideas then hollywood. And yes i know all games now a days usually are almost direct clones of others, eg medal of honour, COD, insert other s**t game im only not bothering to think of so i can say cod and medal of honour suck without having completely awful grammar.
But the thing is thay WOW rips off a massive amount of games and brings 0 new to the table, and on top of all that, the graphics are mediocre. Blizzard may be the biggest company but aparently money makes u have worse ideas.
I dont mind if a game steals ideas, i do mind it if they dont bring any of thier own ideas.
And now bungie in 10 years will be known as the company which is part of Blizzard and activion, the companys that USED to be good.
Starcraft fans please dont mock me as i have never played starcraft nor have i ever liked that style of strategy game.
I loved everything about this article and all the comments I read before losing interest in them.
ReplyPeople become significantly more annoying when they talk like Alvin and the Chipmunks the PS3 community is well aware of this.
ReplyLol'd at the Cortana thing. xDDDD.
Replywho is cortana? never heard of her. maybe i should check the interwebz
The problem with the exploding teabaggers would be the teabag Kamikazes.
ReplyAnd they would be called "Members of the Tea Party"!
f**k Microsoft's legal department. If they had any respect for mankind a.k.a They gamers that buy the damn Microsoft 360 consoles, they should let Bungie continue making Halo games out of respect for their customers. As for camping...camp in a place that is well hidden and strategic, dont sit there with your scope pointed on a spawn site. That is a b***h move and if you do it you are a pathetic player. You should not call yourself a Halo fan. Hell a true sniping expert can kill WITHOUT the scope. Watch "Halo Reach: BETA best kills". There are people in there that are like surgeons with the sniper.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesWow. Wrong board for you, brobot.
LOL @ Cory
Cool story, buuuurrrrrroooooo.
whats this got to do with microsoft. Microsoft doesent own bungie. Bungie got a contract with activision. Therefore bungie would be sued if they made more games, microsoft couldent help them at all.
The contract bungie signed with activision says they have to make what activision and blizzard want for 10 years and if they make another halo activision will terminate the contract, and take all the money bungie was getting. This would likely bankrupt bungie
Because... you know our military's snipers are pussy's for using scopes... should be able to snipe a mile away without it :P A true sniping expert uses their scope, uses their cover and moves from place to place to keep the enemy guessing, not stand stationary the whole time. You get found eventually like that.
he means in game dumbshit
Nice, video games have needed the campfire for years.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesIf the goal is protect the objective, camping is ok.
In games where the goal is just kill, it's poor sport for those who want to play the game as developers intended.
i agree fully
They do have a campfire type thing on some servers on Counter Strike and TF2 etc. If the person has been standing still for more than twenty seconds, they give out a big red pulse and it takes a bit of health from you each time.
I bought "Halo Reach", and then lit it on fire. Kept me toasty warm, but I have scar now...