Discrimination in the Workplace
Minorities and broads often face discrimination in the workplace, but thanks to education, we are making significant progress, and gals' career chances are looking brighter today than any previous point in history.
Just The Facts
- Sexual discrimination - showing preference to men over chicks - is the most discussed topic in workplace discrimination.
- In February of 2010, babes outnumbered men in the U.S. workforce for the first time, holding 50.3% of the nation's jobs.
- Though no longer blatant and intentional for the most part, gender discrimination still occurs, due to unconscious and unintentionally demeaning attitudes towards dames that many men still retain from years of indoctrination by society.
Challenges In Bigotry Today
Back in the day, it was easy to keep people out of your workplace because the color of their skin or the configuration of their genitals, factors that vitally affected the quality of their work. It was a scientifically proven and commonly accepted fact that non-whites could not do complex tasks like sit at a reception desk, and women could not perform manufacturing jobs, such as riveting.

Riveting was best left to strapping young fellows like this one.
Unfortunately, those simpler times are gone, and America is now a place of restrictive and unfair laws preventing most types of job discrimination, including discrimination based on race, gender, age, national origin, and even religion. Yes, even if their religion is stupid.
Being a bigot takes a lot of creativity and determination these days. Instead of focusing on the things we've lost, like racism and sexism, we need to focus on the opportunities that are still there. Like fat people. And bald people.
Laws can't stop you from keeping fat people and bald people out of your workplace, or, if you are fat and bald yourself, can't stop you from deliberately hiring fatter and balder people to make yourself look better at work.

Abercrombie & Fitch, long known for cultural sensitivity
Or if you've still got that itch for some good old-fashioned racism, you can try to be more subtle about it, like Abercrombie & Fitch. They're not allowed to prohibit black people from applying, so they prohibit cornrows and bald hairstyles. Also, instead of just saying "no" to minorities, they take the positive proactive approach of reaching out to good-looking white customers and asking them if they'd like to work there because they've got the Abercrombie "look," which is officially described as "All-American".
This is a delicate little game, and you want to avoid blowing your cover by having an employee carelessly tell an applicant, as one A&F employee allegedly did, that they already had "too many Filipinos" at this store. Try to go with the more roundabout, "not enough All-Americans".
How To BFOQ Over Applicants
One way to sidestep discrimination laws is to claim Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications, or BFOQ. For example, when hiring a Catholic priest for a Catholic church, it is reasonable to expect them to be, you know, Catholic, and it is not considered religious discrimination to turn down a Satanist for the job.
Hooters, a restaurant chain where your food is served by large breasts with possibly a waitress behind them, has also cited BFOQ to avoid hiring men, which doesn't seem too out of the ordinary, and unattractive women, which is a little more boorish and of interest to the aspiring bigot. Airlines have also gone to court now and then to defend their right to keep their stewardesses pretty.

Gratuitious Hooters waitress picture
Funnily enough, since BFOQ is primarily intended to protect a company's ability to provide its services, it isn't any help in protecting the company's attempt to protect its employees. A battery company's attempt to keep pregnant women and potentially childbearing women from working with lead was shot down in court because the women were competent and capable of doing the job, or in other words, putting the women there wouldn't hurt the company. Just them.






Excellent use of the word "broad." There is a term we don't see used often enough for my taste any longer. Two thumbs up!
ReplyYet another reason to hate Abercrombie & Fitch.
Replylike anyone needed more reasons
BFOQ seems perfectly reasonable to me in most cases, I mean, Hooters definitely should be able to exclude non-big boobed chicks, I mean come on, it's Hooters. X3
ReplyIn '05 someone made authentic looking Abercrombie & Fitch posters, but with Nazi imagery instead of the... Anyway, they then broke into an abandoned storefront here in SF and displayed said posters for the amusement of some, anger of others.
ReplyMore of this should be.
well i ca tellya. i work used to work for a landscape company and they werent affraid to higher women. But when i worked with them. Even know they are extremely attractive. They couldnt lift heavy things, they would complain alot. And wouldnt put as much effort into tasks. and i completely deserve to get paid more for being more capable of demanding tasks.
ReplyI being a female.. I agree with you... Girls want the same pay? They better do the f*****g work they've been paid to do. If it's too heavy, ask a couple of gals to help out. >.>
Glad you got weed at your job, but why would only men be allowed to get 'highered'?
On which flights are the pretty stewardesses?
ReplyThe one's from the 1970s? That or porn
European and Asian airlines. Oh, and any flight originating in Texas.
Of the women you work with, how many are putting on their coats at 4:59 PM? All of them except the one that gets paid more than you.
ReplyWomen are paid less than men because they're less productive. They take more bathroom breaks, ask for more days off and they get pregnant. Companies aren't stupid.
Reply Hide All See All 10 RepliesI'm not saying discrimination is OK but the wage gap in the article is provided without context.
Let me get this straight: you're not saying that discrimination is okay, but you are saying that discrimination is okay. I would also like to point out that your random "facts" are provided without context. And by context I mean proof.
And... if you and I are on a sinking boat, for some reason all the women and children get to f**k off in the life boats first. That's a buck fifty and hour surcharge.
uuuuuuh....none of those things are true save pregnancy.
The chart doesn't contain any context (proof) either.
LaLu FTW
@LaLu: No, he's saying it's not discrimination. The wage gap studies did not show women earned less for the same work, just that women earned less. Accounting for job title, seniority, etc. reduces the gap to about 97 cents per $1 earned by a man (i.e., not statistically significant).
That comment is entirely idiotic. Being a woman and having been in many different jobs over the years I can tell you I have consistently outperformed men. It's bad enough that I have to work twice as hard as the guys in a work place to prove that I am equal to them (and I don't mean it is twice as hard for me, I literally have to do more, better and quicker than them) I then have to deal with idiots like you who have no idea what they are talking about and, judging by the ignorance of your statements, probably just graduated high school if you graduated at all. I'll agree that there are women who consistently under perform and don't get me started on the women that think "feminism" and "equal rights" mean special treatment and lowered standards all around, but there are men who are the same way. I have enough men fired for under performing compared to me to have convinced me that men are just as lazy and incompetent, if not more so, than women because they think their gender is all they need to insure their "rightful" place in the corporate world.
DAMMMMM wow thats a douchy thing to say.
Coming from someone who just read all of these, the people against what SonRolo said seem emotional and their replies idiotic. The people who seem to be FOR what he said, however, are making good points. I think someone should look into this. It shouldn't be any of you, because you all have an agenda (proving yourself right) and it cant be a woman (too close to the topic) but someone should seriously look into this.
@J.D.L.: Can't really be a man, either, though, can it? Also too close to the subject. I know! Hermaphrodites. Perfect. Volunteers?
Hooters = Boobs with plastic mixed in
ReplyAnd thank god for that!
Because Americans sure like their blow-up dolls!
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I've been to hooters and I have to say I've seen a lot of ugly women working there, like the picture of that one they're showing right now, yes she has large breasts but honestly she is no where near pretty for my standards.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesYeah, but you're a girl.
plus, that chick is pretty much objectively hot. like, i'm popping a huge boner over here, and i lack the necessary organ too.
depends on which hooters. They do have 'meh' chicks in mine. You just need a vagina and you're hired.
Big floppy boobs don't make a woman attractive. I've they already have a pretty face, then they shouldn't be overweight (but still have a bit of fat) and should have perky breasts that don't need to be supported by a bra. Oddly enough, I've never met a man that thought big fake breasts were attractive, even if they watch a lot of porn. I mean, men seem to have a fetish for Asian chicks and they usually have NO tits.
It's totally true about Utah. Working for the bank the LDS Church uses for its funds + not LDS myself = HEATHEN.
ReplyI disagree with the implication that the battery company was trying to keep women safe, and the horrible, evil judicial system destroyed their benevolent plan.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesIf I theoretically wanted that job, they could refuse to hire me on the grounds that I'm a woman of childbearing age, even though I'm never going to ruin my life by having children. They'd be making the decision to "keep me safe" for me, and that's shitty.
yeah that sure makes sense
I think I've got a better idea. They didn't want to be accused of a potentially expensive lawsuit.
you say you dont want a child that will ruin you life i bet its just cause no one wants to screw you.
interesting stuff
ReplyShit.... how can I be a feminist and still love Hooters? Someone tell me before I have to choose between them. You can't make me!
Reply Hide All See All 3 Replieshooters supplies women with meaninful jobs, so we all win
Hooters also supplies everyone with delicious wings and beer and Wrestlemania! So we actually do all win!
Answer? You can't. You're either okay with women being legally objectified, or you have some self respect. Pick one.
The gender wage gap is a crock of shit. It's based on the average pay of men against that of women of the same age (taken at age 30, if I recall). That average doesn't take experience, seniority, education, or job commitment into account. Warren Farrell (feminist and 3 time NOW board member) did a great deal of research on the subject and discovered the gap to be mostly fictional, writing what he found in his book "Why Men Earn More" (title shortened).
ReplyThe only reason people keep bringing up the "gap" is because "76 cents on the dollar" is a better rally cry than "If you were more career-oriented you'd earn more, but hey, let's piss away money on government monitoring programs anyhow."
Here here. Lest we not forget also, as discriminatory as it may seem but really isn't, men are conditioned from a young age to let their jobs define them. Women are conditioned to let their families define them. This may sound sexist or morally wrong but it doesn't mean it isn't true. And when there are more women than men in the workplace, as this article said has of occurred in 2010, without real career aspirations (not saying all but likely a majority) then of course they wont get paid as much.
Bona-Fide? More like Boner Fide Occupational Qualifications!
Reply... If someone else made this joke already, know I was too lazy to check the comments for the word "boner."
I hate coming across as a chauvinist pig but... I've got three words about being sure when i go to buffalo wild wings i'll be able to watch football while a sweettits gets me beer and wings. God bless America.
ReplyIf only they could discriminate by logic/intution measurements...
ReplyAn old story my dad used to tell me. There was a bloke who was the bastard son of an Englishman and a Chinese girl (this being in Hong Kong) and the poor guy, no Chinese business would dare hire him cuz he looked too English, and no English business wants to know him cuz he's Hapas. If there's any justice in the world, I hope this guy made it big time or became a mean Mofo or converted to Islam and decided to kick pommy butt.
ReplyBTW, you want weird discrimination? I know I didn't get a promotion or a position cuz I was too fat at one, too tall and in one instance, cuz I didn't smoke.
Judging by the 'pommy', I take it you're down under? I feel for your troubles getting a job there: My missus did a year's working holiday there and couldn't get a job for not having a 'natural' hair colour (And I don't mean somekind of freaky Green, it was a kind of subtle rouge.) She also lost a job because she got flu and called in sick. She then was told to come back in. After demonstrating that she clearly was sick and explaining that by being there she'd just end up infecting the entire office, they fired her! That second one's not so much discriminatory as completely retarded. Unless 'impervious to known viral infections' is common in today's workplace...
One time we were in a Chinese restaurant and we had our friend, who spoke Chinese, order for us. The waitress looked at our friend blankly for a moment and then replied "I'm Korean."
ReplyCool story. Now can we get back on topic?