5 Misconceptions You Had About Star Wars Before Seeing The Prequels
Some of you may be young enough to live in a universe where Star Wars always consisted of 6 episodes. But most of us have seen the original films first. With the prequels, we had to accept the cold fact that we were simply wrong about some things.
Just The Facts
- After the original Star Wars, George Lucas did not direct a movie for 22 years.
- A New Hope was made with a budget of 11 million dollars. The prequels each had a budget of over 110 million dollars.
- Han shot first.
5. Can't get enough of those cute droids!
Moviegoers love robots. Be it merciless killing machines like the Terminator or friendly chaps like Number Five. Damn you, moviegoers, if you only knew what kind of damage your robophilia would do to Star Wars.

Actually, he was constructed to be a merciless killing machine.
The world of Star Wars was always filled with droids, but with the exception of R2-D2 and C-3PO they all stayed friendly in the background, rolling around on the Death Star or being tortured by Jabbas minions. C-3PO, being the original trilogy's Jar-Jar, was quite tolerable, and R2-D2 could even be considered cute. Hey, the two had their own cartoon series in the 80s.
But the prequels pushed the droid count to insane numbers. Droids were everywhere. Droids fighting battles. Droids commanding battles. Droids building droids. Droids with fucking light sabers.

He is made of metal and he is annoying. He MUST be a droid.
The only droids that could be accepted were those shielded rolling ones. They were kinda baddass. The average battle droid was simply pathetic. Why exactly did they talk to each other in english? Human language is clearly a slow, poor form of communication for electronic devices.

You know, we could probably coordinate our forces a lot better if we had built-in WLAN. But I am sure saying "Roger Roger" in clear english will somehow terrify our enemies.
Battle droids turn into expensive scrap the moment their control station is destroyed. A little kid stopped thousands of them by accident.
Watching endless lines of fighters that look, sound and move identical quickly became an annoyance in The Phantom Menace. Fortunately, George Lucas added human soldiers in the second movie, so we finally had some variety. No, wait.

Thank god the part of basic training were they brutally kill off our individuality was left out.
What about the beloved trash can and golden tin man droids? Artoo suddenly discovered his ability to fly, which he never used again in the whole saga, and Threepio was even more useless than in the original trilogy, which is astonishing for a protocol droid who couldn't even prevent a bunch of Ewoks from trying to eat his friends. Ewoks that thought he was their god.
4. Jedis as the guardians of peace and justice
Our picture of a Jedi was formed by an old man, hiding himself from the allmighty empire by living alone in the mountains, screaming like a big animal sometimes and cleverly disguising himself with a different first name. His fighting style was unmatched for its grace and slowness. When he grew tired of fighting, he simply let himself be killed, while teasing Darth Vader about coming back even more powerful.

I get young people to listen to me. That's a lot of power for an old man. Unfortunately, they still don't follow my advice.
Not later than Attack of the Clones, all that was left of our long-conserved image of the Jedis was the funny clothes. Guardians of peace my ass. Jedis were suddenly generals, squad leaders and even front line soldiers, which wasn't that clever considering there were already millions of clone troopers bred exclusively for this purpose.
Yeah, they still had the force, but Lucas ruined even that aspect by explaining it with funny microorganisms. You could probably give anyone a blood injection and turn him into a Master Jedi. However, all of the Jedis with their midichlorian power couldn't forsee a coup overthrowing the whole fucking republic. Anyone with political insight or common sense should have been able to do that.
Granted, light saber battles were a lot cooler in the prequels, but we had a hard time imagining that everyone completely forgot about the awesome, martial-arts inspired fighting style for no reason and suddenly started to use medieval fencing techniques.
3. Darth Vader is, was and will always be a badass
Darth Vader, our favourite plastic-wearing villain, was omnipresent in the original trilogy. The image of his black outfit and his absolute refusal of doing anything considered non-assholish was burned into our brain since we first saw him choking some faith into one of his officers. The nicest thing he ever did was to burn in his armor without diffusing poisonous fumes. If we could imagine anyone in the universe who had never experienced something like a childhood, it was him.
What will current and future generations first see of Lord take-no-shit Vader? A rather annoying, geeky, kid.

Lets see.. You are called "Ani", have never known your dad, your hobby is building robots and you talk like some pre-school smartass. You will have SUCH a hard time at puberty. What are you saying? You never even had a dad, but were conceived by the force? You're screwed, kid.
And the sooner we forget about the the lovesick talk of adolescent Anakin, the better.

It's been ten years, and you never managed to get a girlfriend? See, I told 'ya.
When Anakin finally regained his true bastard self, Lucas had to go way too far by making him murder little children. Damnit, even the original Darth Vader knew when to stop. He only killed kids when they were out of his sight, like on the planet Alderaan.
By the way, Anakin decided to become an asshole and fuck with the galaxy because of a dream he had, which is a totally retarded reason.
2. The whole timeline
Remember when Ben Kenobi first tells Luke that he wasn't called Obi-Wan since... (dramatic pause) before Luke's birth? He has a look in his eyes like he's talking about a time long, long ago. Think centuries. Many people thought this guy is a thousand years old, and the clone wars were a curiously named conflict ages ago.
Well, we did learn that the clone wars are closer to the time of episode IV than the vietnam war is to our time.

I'll tear you a new asshole, but only after you eet the peanuts outta my shiet!
Okay, that's more of a subjective perception and not really an inconsistency. But what about the Death Star?
With all the empire's man- and droidpower, this thing took 20 years to finish and still had fatal design flaws. It was operational decades after the empire came to power, at a time were they probably had enough star destroyers to obliterate a planet just by sitting in the orbit and spewing their waste water on the heads of its unlucky inhabitants.
Let's not forget Princess Leia. She told Luke she remembers her mother to be "beautiful, but sad". Yeah, the force is strong in this one, but we still don't buy that Leia has any memory of a person that lived for around one minute after she was born. And to say Padmé was in a state of "sadness" during that period would be quite an understatement.
1. No matter how often I see these movies, there will never be anything I hate about Star Wars

Youssa been sooo wrong.






I think the author needs to watch the films again. Leia was ADOPTED, so the mother she was referring to was the one she grew up with on Alderaan, NOT PADME. Pillock! Sorry for being a geek, but then again that's the very definition of this article.
ReplyIn Jedi Luke refers to Leia's real mother(the one that died long ago aka Padme')
but I loved phantom menace:o i literaly only heavily dislike attack of the clones, it runs forever. empire strikes back all the way! like if you agree:D
Replyain't nobody gonna agree with you about this. can only use phan- (i can't even type it) and empire in same statement in a compare/contrast context.
"Leia has any memory of a person that lived for around one minute after she was born." actually, she's most likely talking of her adoptive mother. why do people assume she talks about Padme??
ReplyBecause Luke specifically asks her for her memories of her 'real' mother. Sure, it's possible her adopted mom died and her father subsequently remarried, but that's a pretty roundabout way of handling the situation. It also renders that part of their conversation completely pointless in RotJ.
Why does everyone hate the prequels? I mean honestly, even supposed star wars ''super fans'' hate them, they were pretty good, the time line was absolutely perfect, it introduced some very cool aliens, cool planets, and just generally elaborated on a lot of things, (I love the original trilogy too) but everyone critiques the prequels for some reason, well, I hate people who hate the prequels, and I guess that's that.
ReplyLet's address that point by point, shall we?
"the time line was absolutely perfect"
In the sense that there weren't any glaring chronological inconsistencies? Yes, I suppose so. But you can still make a s****y prequel even if you end it in the year that it's supposed to end.
"it introduced some very cool aliens"
It did? I remembered a miserly scrap dealer voiced to sound like a Jewish stereotype, a race of frog-creatures who sounded like a racist's impersonation of the Japanese, and the worst black stereotype since Stepin Fetchit.
"cool planets"
Oh, wonderful. A host of CGI planets with one feature, like "stormy planet," "desert planet #1," "desert planet #2," or (my personal favorite), "Less-realistic looking Bladerunner city."
"and just generally elaborated on a lot of things"
Ding ding ding! You win the grand prize for missing the point!
Here's the thing: the prequel trilogies felt the need to show us every person possible from the original trilogy, no matter how contradictory their appearance might be, or simply how utterly pointless.
Boba Fett was a clone? Okay...and? That explains why a palette-swapped version of him got to fight Obi-wan, but why do we need to know this? He contributed nothing to the story, and vanished without a trace after being abandoned in a warzone holding his father's severed head.
Chewbaca was there at the fall of the Jedi? And was some sort of Wookie general? Then why is he a smuggler's first mate in the original trilogy? Why doesn't he contribute more with the knowledge he has?
And let's not forget C-3PO and R2-D2. They were there, from start to finish. They were present for the rise of Vader and the Empire and the fall of the Jedi...so why didn't they say anything about it? And did Vader just 'forget' about the two droids who knew almost literally everything about him?
If the Jedi are guardians of peace and justice, why are they acting as generals and soldiers, leading a brainwashed slave-army? And if 'midochlorians' can be measured with a tiny-ass blood sample, why couldn't they find the Sith in the Senate? Current-day police departments would *kill* for the discovery of such a reliable forensic tool.
So yeah. That's why people hate the Star Wars prequels. And yes, as you put it, "supposed star wars 'super fans'" are allowed to hate them, in the same way that you can enjoy a delicious steak, but aren't forbidden from hating it when the head chef fires the rest of the kitchen staff and starts taking a dump on your meal.
by the time of OT, there isn't a mention or relative of most of the species/races shown in the prequels. just sayin'
I loved the prequels.
Replylets not forget that general grievous wasnt just a f*****g robot with lightsabers, he was a f*****g robot with lightsabers and the force.
ReplyHe wasn't a robot. He was a cyborg.
And he didn't have the force.
Okay. George Lucas did screw up a lot, but if you believe everything here, you would think that literally everything about the prequels was crap. Which it wasn't.
ReplyAnakin? An annoying douchebag of a angsty preschooler/teen/young adult. Complaining because first he was whiny, then went too far and killed children? Stupid. He's a Sith Lord, not a f*****g pony. He probably had a back room on the Death Star full of babies to cook up for breakfast every morning.
Making fun of Grievous, the most badass character of the prequels, is equally dumb. Obviously he couldn't hold a candle to Palpatine or Vader, but then he wasn't really supposed to. Frankly, he deserved way more screen time. They gave us this incredible character and then killed him off in half a movie.
Jar Jar figures prominently in my nightmares.
Oh, lastly, claiming that the Jedi lost their image of peacekeepers in the prequels is the result of what happens when you DON'T f*****g PAY ATTENTION TO THE MOVIE. It's made abundantly clear that the Jedi are by no means happy about the measures they have been forced to take. But with Separatists threatening to tear apart peace forever and a hidden Sith Lord plotting evil plots of plottiness, they had no choice.
But yeah. They seriously screwed up that timeline. And Episode II as a whole made me want to drown puppies, preferably George Lucas' puppies.
Yeah, including a 'realistic american civilian' character named 'jar jar' was a bad idea. The annoyance moviegoers felt at jar jar's stupidity and incompetence mirrors my own annoyance at dealing with the majority of you sheeple. Not to be confused with the occasional awesome ninja I get to hang out with that can actually do useful things and not just break stuff, hurt themselves, fall down randomly in uneven terrain, and fail to comprehend simple things that are currently happening.
ReplyI GUESS I WAS TOO YOUNG WHEN I SAW EPISODE ONE TO REALISE JARJAR WAS OFFENSIVE
Replyand still too young to know what the caps lock button is, apparently.
Grievous wasn't annoying, just incredibly disappointing. Annoying is Jar Jar Binks.
ReplyThat said am I the only one who actually liked the third prequel? I thought it's high up there with The Empire Strikes Back, especially considering how Jar Jar and C-3PO (the two most annoying characters in the series) barely appear at all.
STFU HYPERNERDZ