A Serious Man
The Coen Brothers have always been great at creating dimwitted characters that everyone loves. Well, everyone loves them except the Coen Brothers ...
Bobby "Fatboy" Roberts Review of 'A Serious Man'
I want you to keep one thing in mind before we dive into this review of A Serious Man, the newest Coen Bros. piece: The words I write will be shorn completely of any decorative hyperbolic statement. You may disbelieve the veracity of that statement, especially considering its location on a site that houses lists like "The 6 Most Recently Quoted Bullshit Animal Facts," but I assure you, everything that follows is written as plain-faced and hyperbole-free as possible.

A Serious Man might be one of the bleakest things I've experienced since Cormac McCarthy's The Road.
Before stepping into Burn After Reading, I was curious as to whether the Coens could get more misanthropic than their Oscar-winning adaptation of McCarthy's No Country for Old Men; co-starring Tommy Lee Pockmarks, the dumb bartender from Cheers, and the 15 year-old-chick from Trainspotting who hid Renton's meatwhistle in her ham wallet. For the record, that was the last thing McGregor fucked onscreen that wasn't Batman, fanboy expectations or Tilda Whateverthefuckthatis. Burn dripped comedic condescension, like Ian Malcolm demonstrating Chaos Theory, liquid contempt rolling off the "Brad Pitt is funny!" side of the hand instead of the "Fuck Josh Brolin" side. But it was just as potent and just as mean as its predecessor.

"Man, Dana Delaney went south like a motherfucker after China Beach, huh."
See, outside of Raising Arizona, The Big Lebowski and maybe O Brother, the Coens don't like people, and enjoy ruining them thoroughly. Usually, they give an out, like Fargo, where the audience is invited to openly mock doofy Midwestern accents and blank, uncomprehending yokels, and feel comfortable in knowing that the Coens are sharing their intellectual superiority, that the idiots they're skewering are safely beneath you and there's nothing more satisfying and karmically hilarious than ignorant hayseeds sowing the seeds of duh.
A Serious Man shivs everyone, though. Imagine if you were in prison with Danny Trejo, and some bitch in a half-shirt and a do-rag told him you had three packs of smokes in your asshole. You'd be standing there, looking goofy and out of place like Andy Dufresne, and Machete would be like "hey ese." And you'd go "whuh?" And he'd shiv the fuck out of your liver until you farted Lucky Strikes. A Serious Man is like Danny Trejo's knife. It is quick, it is merciless, it shines brightly and it wants to perforate soft parts of your body.
Sure, there's more to the film than just relentless discomfort: It's beautifully shot by Roger Deakins, evocatively scored by Carter Burwell and hilariously underplayed by Michael Stuhlbarg as our protagonist Larry Gopnik. This is technically a black comedy, but not one as relatively easy to digest as "I've watched The Office. The British one, the one where the fat limey with Patricia Arquette's teeth sweats a lot. I know about black comedy. I know about awkward ha-has."
They even headfake at it being a goofy, whimsical Coen Bros. kind of comedy, starting the film with a non-sequitur of a prologue where someone shoves something sharp into Fyvush Finkel, something that's been a long time coming ever since Picket Fences was unleashed on an unsuspecting public.

"Seriously. Eat a sack of dicks."
But damned if I can tell you everything the movie is trying to get at after one viewing. I'd watch it three or four times before writing this thing if I could, but I can't. It's not like that'd matter, though, because even if I nailed every possible interpretation correctly and you took the Cliffs Notes in with you, the film works in efficiently uncomfortable ways that defy simple explanation. It's really fucking unnerving, even as it's shocking disbelieving chuckles out of the audience.
Gopnik is suffering through a tense time at work, between vying for tenure at his school and enduring blackmail schemes from a shit student. He's in the midst of a money crisis, living with a cold fish of a wife who is openly dating someone sort of like Francis Ford Coppola on Quaaludes (played brilliantly by Fred Melamed). His kids are selfish and vapid wastes of skin. His older brother (Richard Kind) keeps him up all hours of the night by vacuum pumping a cyst on the back of his neck. His faith in Judaism is about as rewarding as sleeping with Courtney Love. Situations stack on his sad shoulders like soul-rending Lego blocks made of barbed wire and brambles. And what he clings to--almost mantra-like, as the Coens throw crisis after crisis into the back of his head like a snowballs made of razorblades--is the statement: "I didn't do anything."
It's that ineffectual shlumpiness that dooms him. The movie screams at Gopnik to sack the fuck up and do something, anything, to help himself out of the situation, but he quietly suffers, developing fissures in his sanity, fissures that leak increasingly sour dreams into his subconscious. But a sentiment that simple--"You have to look to yourself to improve your life. Passivity is a prison and you already know what Danny Trejo will do to you there,"--seems too easy for what's bubbling under the surface. I'm sure there's more to it, though, and I'll be seeing it about two more times to find out just how wrong I am.
The Coens are deceptive fuckers. Deconstructing their films is often like counting rings on a redwood. Sometimes it's even like said counting rings until the Lorax himself pops up and says, "You're still not smart enough to get this. Start over and try again." But maybe A Serious Man is a cautionary tale, and the Coens are simply ("simply." Right, sure) saying, "If you're willing to let the world run you over like that, you deserve every shitty thing a couple of sadistic jackasses like us can bounce off your throat."
But that could simply be me trying to make sense of what really unnerved me about the film: More than any movie in recent memory, this one makes the case that sometimes bad things happen to decent people, and there's no reason for it, and there's nothing that can be done about it, and it'll never get better, and you'll never stop sinking no matter what invisible person in the sky you ask to save you.
Basically, what if Woody Allen wrote Requiem for a Dream, and two of Hollywood's best dreamed it? You'd wake up and bolt upright in your cot, exhausted and sweating, like Larry Gopnik does almost every night.






One of my favorite aspects of the film was how no matter how serious the problem being had, once the advice was sought, the person was always unable to tell him anything, and manage to show him how much they really don't care at all, and how in listening to his problems they're really only trying to talk of or benefit themselves.
ReplyOh, and I also loved how the young rabii used the parking lot to show "God's gift",
it was a perfect analogy for that ridiculous tactic people use to "spread the faith"
Brilliant movie though, I'm halfway through it now.
ReplyAnd it's not difficult to understand at all,
I wanna give an analysis but I'll miss the rest, haha
Why is everyone always so insistent upon the "main character" being liked? I know it's been done, it's a simple idea, but, I'd love to see some movies where we're intended to hate the person the camera is most intimate with.
ReplyIt's a fine idea and I agree to a point. But if the main character is drawn as the worst, malicious and mean, and just down right awful, people won't relate and will stop watching the movie. You have to have a fine line between utter hatred and a character being terrible but relatable. If the character is just a jerk without any real reasoning or no progression other than to just kick dirt in people's faces, then the audience will turn away.
Fantastic article.
ReplyThat being said, I would hardly consider Marge Gunderson a dumbass :-S
I'll say it, as much as I love the silly cracked articles, I hope this style takes off.
ReplyA few cheap jokes don't amuse me that much anymore. The best humor is derived from truth and this article stays close enough to reality to be enjoyable.
Most cracked articles are incredibly boring for the most part (hate to admit it but it's true) with a bunch of good chuckle worthy jokes surrounded by comedic misfires. This was genuinely entertaining for me the whole way through.
Didn't watch the movie, was told it was boring and pointless, glad I found this article. I need to stop listening to the internet masses when it comes to movies.
ReplySounds like my kind of thing.
I like your view on it though, he keeps telling himself he didn't do anything yet that's exactly what these things are happening.
It was also an adaption of that Jewish story, but that was just plain sadistic. At least this does have a way out it seems, do something. The jewish story was pretty much just "Gods like a kid and sometimes he has to torture you and kill you to prove to his friend that you would still love him"
A Serious Man is an awesome movie, and you nailed the review. I almost didn't read it after you reviewed The Informant (that movie sucked HARD and was so boring)but you just redeemed yourself
Replythe best Coen movie to the day! and by the way, i'd like to f**k Courtney Love just for the thrill
Replythe thrill of dying from mutant stds seconds after finishing said copulation?
whatever, your dime, buddy.
Seriousely, the guy's name is Gopnik? Do the Coens speak Russian?
Replythis is probably gratuitous coen brothers love defending their one constantly mentioned "flaw" but here it goes. They seem to hate their protagonists? ok, look at raising arizone, then the hudsucker proxy, then watch burn after reading. if you still think they need to be "nicer" to the people you root for, get off cracked you aren't old enough to be on here
Replyinteresting fact, the Coens actually helped make The Evil Dead....
Replywow learn something new every day
thanks for teaching me a new word "veracity"
ReplyFirst of all, this article is brilliantly, brilliantly written. Congratulations. I read this several months ago and after finally watching the movie, I came back to it.
ReplyThe Coen's are control freaks, surely. Just take a second to think that after every cold blooded thriller comes a screwball comedy and then something that defies classification.
A Serious Man is such a movie. I would place ASM together with Barton Fink as one of their "weird" films (or, in Larry's words, "what's going on?"). Meaning that even though the plot is not complicated, five minutes into the end you start getting anxious about the level of WTF.
What you wrote allowed me to come to some conclusions: Larry "quietly suffers" because he's Jew, and maybe the whole movie is a kind of metaphor for the Jewish plight and idiosyncracy. It may be a satirical look into a people that are so trapped in tradition that they don't really now who they are or what they want, and can do nothing about it except convince themselves that they haven't done anything wrong.
On a bleaker interpetation, the absurdity and randomness of the events (especially the third rabbi's message and the tornado) may underline what lies at the core of most Coen's films: that life is basically abusrd and that, as you said, bad things can happen to good people, and that's because we are on our own in this world (Larry's brother yelling "Hashem hasn't given me shit" is particularly illustrative of the dicotomy of faith.)
I could go on for hours because the movie is full of symbolism and even if it wasn't, it is very entertaining. The irony is that I laughed a lot, but it left me quite depressed.
Its an adaptation of the book of Job dude.
blah
ReplyI really want to watch this movie.. the screenplay is nothing short of amazing
ReplyWell done - I've got to say that I've been curious about this movie (and curious about what the f**k is going on in the Coen Brothers' heads) and I've got to say that it's good to have an answer to the first, and an inkling that I might've been right about the second. Thanks a bunch - keep up the good work.
Replybased on what i can gather from this review, this movie scares the s**t out of me
ReplyWhile certain people don't get it, the tone of the article reflects the tone the film projects. Or, to put it more simply, it's about "A Serious Man" and is a serious article. Q.E.D.
ReplyGet off my nuts faggot. f*****g s****y article.
Replyf*****g s****y you.
This is a movie review. I guess if you're pretentious enough to know every single reference in there, then yes, it's funny. But seriously, there's a style I come to expect from Cracked humor, where it's mostly funny because of contrast or basic association, not because I've seen enough German expressionist films to realize you made a verbal pun relating to the soundtrack of a porno.
ReplyWhat the hell is this shit? Why is it being featured? Otherwise, good review, man.