Home > Blog > » Robots

Robots on The Cracked Blog

Two-For-One Disappointing Robot Monday: The Daily Nooner (EST)!

Monday, April 21st, 2008

What’s With All These Stupid Robots?!

I might not know anything about building robots, but based on these two clips, it seems like the people who actually build them don’t either.

In the first video we’ve got some sort of mobile garbage can that can walk around like a crab, roll dice, and bang on its own head while repeating the same Japanese phrase over and over and over again. Which would be pretty convenient if you wanted to start a gambling operation for quadriplegics in your house or something, but we all know that quadriplegics don’t gamble much, and even if they did, what makes you think they’d want to do it in your house and not in a regular casino? Also, what if they don’t understand Japanese? That’s like inventing a robot to help gay Eskimos come out to their parents, or to teach Latvian orphans how to panhandle; it’s a great idea, but what are the rest of us supposed to do with it?

Then we’ve got the second one, which serves such little purpose that it pretty much has to be an art project of some kind. A pair of dismembered robot legs that periodically shoots fire while aimlessly pushing around a shopping cart? I’ll admit that’s kind of awesome, but again, what are we supposed to do with it? Should we look at it and think about the artist’s statement on mindless consumerism? Sorry, robot maker: Dawn of the Dead did it better. Is it supposed to make us think about the homeless problem? I’m looking at it right now, but the only problem I’m thinking about is how bad these robots suck.

I’ve been banging this drum for a while now, but maybe if I keep at it I can get the robot-making community to listen. If I were them, I know I’d definitely want to take advice from a Cracked blogger with absolutely zero knowledge of engineering. Is an enormous mechanized iron monstrosity with flesh-searing lasers and projectile weapons so much to ask for? Actually, screw it - pretty much ANYTHING with flesh-searing lasers would do. If you’re reading this, guys who made these two robots, just add flesh-searing lasers and we’ll be good to go.

See - I’m willing to compromise, robot-making community. Now it’s your turn.

Amazing New MIT Robot Can Make Faces, Point At Stuff and Make Me Yawn: The Daily Nooner (EST)!

Monday, April 7th, 2008

MIT’s Nexi MDS Robot

So apparently they’ve come up with a new kind of robot over at MIT. They’re called “MDS” robots, which stands for mobile, dexterous and social. According to the project’s website, the robots are meant “to support research and education goals in human-robot interaction, teaming, and social blah blah blah words words words.”

Congratulations, MIT: somehow you found a way to make robots boring.

Here’s what the so-called “geniuses” over at MIT completely forgot: designing robots that attempt to act like humans is LAME. What the hell happened? Did I go to sleep last night and wake up in a shitty mid-90s anime flick? Am I supposed to be dazzled because some robot can make a few facial expressions and point at stuff? I make facial expressions and point at stuff all the time, but you don’t see me bragging about it on YouTube, do you?

If you’re reading this, MIT guys, let me give you some advice. I bet you never thought that one day you’d be taking advice from a blogger on Cracked.com, huh? I never thought I’d be giving you guys advice either, and yet here we are. Crazy world.

The way I see it, MIT guys, there’s no point in trying to make robots that do stuff that humans do (like making facial expressions and pointing at stuff). Instead of that, why not try to make robots that do stuff that human beings CAN’T do? Since it’s so difficult for you guys to actually come up with good ideas, I’ve done you a favor and made a list. Wake me up when you make a robot that can:

  • Figure out how much everyone owes on a restaurant bill with more than 4 people
  • Successfully operate a self-checkout machine at a grocery store
  • Definitively end the argument over whether cats or dogs are “better”
  • Explain how the stock market works… to me
  • Fly (although I guess that would just be an airplane)
  • Kill Rachel Ray
  • Okay, I’ll admit it: those would all be pretty shitty robots. I guess that’s why I don’t go to MIT.

    I For One Welcome Our New Robotic Dog Overlords: The Daily Nooner (EST)!

    Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

    Robotic Dogs Are Coming To Kill You

    Remember when everyone was freaking out about killer bees? Back in the 90s they were the imminent threat du jour, pressing northward in a buzzing swarm of honey, stingers and death. We were completely terrified knowing that these insanely aggressive bees were coming to destroy us all…

    And then nothing happened. The killer bees never really showed up (other than in a few parts of the southwest), America turned its attention to other, more pressing matters (like, oh, I don’t know… TERRORISM?), and the vast majority of our great nation avoided the stinging wrath that was supposed to have been the killer bees.

    That being said, allow me to introduce you to our latest national crisis. Fuck a bunch of bees1 - we’ve got robot dogs2 to worry about.

    Why would the scientific community do this to us? Don’t we already have enough to worry about in the world without robot dogs running around our forests, adding knowledge to their AI databases until they’re ready to come kill us all with ruthless efficiency? What possible reason did scientists have to create such a thing? I can only come up with a few possibilities:

  • To keep our forests clear of litter and Al Qaeda operatives
  • Part of a plot to kill off all the cats in the world to end the lolcat phenomenon
  • To bring humanoid robots their slippers and newspapers
  • Because someone was like “I think I can make a robotic dog” and the other guy was like “Yeah right”
  • All perfectly valid, but none of them really do anything for me. The only benefit I get from this development is that I now get to live with the knowledge that there’s a robot dog out there somewhere; one that can almost certainly outrun me on pretty much any type of terrain. Thanks, scientists.

    1 Warning: Do NOT actually attempt to fuck a bunch of bees.

    2 I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that there’s a “Robot Dog” wikipedia entry.

    Old Robots Vs. New Robots and Energy Air in a Can: The Daily Nooner (EST)!

    Thursday, December 13th, 2007

    Awesome Video Of The Day

    Elektro: The Smoking Robot

    Robots are everywhere these days: assembling our cars, detonating our landmines, and freaking out our cats. They’re simplifying our lives in new ways all the time, taking over tasks that we’d rather not do ourselves, and while that’s great news for those of us that are too lazy to freak out our own cats, let’s face it: despite their functionality, today’s robots are a total snoozefest.

    It was a different story back in 1939, when Westinghouse premiered Elektro at the New York World’s Fair. Weighing in at 265 pounds, Elektro “spoke” off of pre-recorded 78 rpm records, had “eyes” that could distinguish between red and green light, and could walk on command. He also smoked cigarettes and knew a handful of terrible pick-up lines.

    Today’s robot manufacturers could learn a few things from Elektro. Why can’t they make a Roomba that’ll hit on my girlfriend, or smoke cigarettes, or do anything cooler than SWEEP MY FLOOR? You’d think between the advances in technology and decline in morality that we would’ve come up with a really awesome robot by now, one that can kick ass, talk trash, cook food and literally shit out awesome new next-gen video game consoles. Instead we’ve got Roomba, the magical plastic disc that can sweep your floor. If Isaac Asimov were alive today, I’m not sure if he’d be bummed out or relieved. Although I’ve never actually read any of his books, so I guess that makes sense.

    (more…)

    The Love that Dare Not Beep its Name

    Tuesday, October 16th, 2007

    You’ve heard the arguments, of course—that gay marriage will lead to a moral permissiveness which will rip apart the very fabric of our society. What they fail to mention is that this slippery slope may also lead to a future filled with funky robot lovin’, according to one scientist:

    “My forecast is that around 2050, Massachusetts will be the first jurisdiction to legalize marriages with robots,” researcher David Levy told LiveScience… At first, sex with robots might be considered geeky, “but once you have a story like ‘I had sex with a robot, and it was great!’ appear someplace like Cosmo magazine, I’d expect many people to jump on the bandwagon,” Levy said.

    Assuming that Dr. Levy is correct—and let’s face it, if they can put a man on the moon, there’s no reason they can’t give us the infinitely more important robotic sex machines we all deserve—here are six sultry cybernetic models which I believe should be first off the assembly line:

    kellyl1.gif
    Model: The Lisa
    Inspired by: Kelly LeBrock
    Build: Makes Farah Fawcett look like Pat Benatar
    Hair: Brown, flowing dramatically backwards into some kind of timewarp or something
    Pros: Imparts lessons about life, love, and believing in oneself to troubled teens
    Cons: Sometimes visited by unpleasant martial-arts-programmed ex-husband “Seagalbot 3000″
    Memorable quote: “Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful, or made of titanium.”

    pris1.gif
    Model: The Pris
    Inspired by: Darryl Hannah
    Hair: Blonde, broomlike
    Build: Almost so manly it’s hard to believe we used to think she was a sex symbol
    Pros: Stylish use of eye makeup, low-cost plastic wardrobe
    Cons: Homicidal robot boyfriend, unhealthy relationship with “other brother Darryl”
    Memorable quote: “Standard pleasure model”
    (more…)