Register

Lindsay Lohan Is Boring, But FoxNews Doesn’t Care

Normally, I wouldn’t comment on a video. That’s really an art best left to semi-literate, secular, Satanists like my cohort Ross Wolinsky, but while cruising FoxNews, I saw something truly shocking. A story on Lindsay Lohan that defied all expectations.

Was she high? No. Was she having anonymous sex with a stranger? No. Was she exposing her genitalia? No. So where’s the story?

Well, according to FoxNews, LiLo was furious that photographers were snapping pictures of her from behind. Click here to watch Lindsay get mad FoxNews teased.

So I clicked. I must say, her level of anger is truly terrifying. The way she screams. The flailing of arms, the spewing of expletives, the way she devours a baby kitten alive. Or the way she actually does none of that. Personally, I’ve gotten more pissed off waiting in a fast food drive thru line.

But God bless FoxNews. Why would you ever let photographic evidence prevent you from writing a story about a “fuming” celebutante who “stormed off”? Oh, and God bless FoxNews for encrypting its vids with some code that required me to do the most awkward screen shot of all time. (And yes, I tried full screen, but it didn’t work).


Check out some more Gladstone over HERE and OVER HERE.

Last 5 posts by Gladstone

This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 19th, 2008 at 3:00 pm and is filed under I hate my co-bloggers, Lindsay Lohan, News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

28 Responses to “Lindsay Lohan Is Boring, But FoxNews Doesn’t Care”

  1. linsay lohan Says:

    Fox News is for the far right which is about 9 tenths of the states

  2. comic book guy Says:

    Lindsay Lohan is a pretty drunk skunk with funk.

  3. cheryl Says:

    AGREE, AGREE… STOP WATCHING FOX! I stopped watching FOX altogether about 4 years ago and trust me, better yet trust you. I did, and in view of the fact that I dismissed that hideous network from my programming schedule; I have not missed much.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w39FnpuMRfo

  4. Fandango Says:

    “Was she high? No. Was she having anonymous sex with a stranger? No. Was she exposing her genitalia? No.”

    So this was merely someone who looks like Lindsay Lohan.

  5. fragg Says:

    Don’t forget: “I feel sorry for the man she will marry some day.” Get your act together, Andy.

  6. Andy Pants Says:

    I completely agree with this article and all of your arguments in general, this is what’s wrong with America. That stuff like this is allowed to even happen at all. Makes me sick, all this shit.

  7. kingmonkey+1 Says:

    LINDSAY LOHAN SLAUGHTERS HALF OF CALIFORNIAN POPULATION IN FIT OF GENOCIDAL RAGE

  8. squaresquare Says:

    I’m also glad to see that Snorg is back.

  9. fragg Says:

    The version of the newspost that Fox used is actually a much tamer version of the original:

    “LINDSEY LOHAN MURDERS SIX ORPHANS, HAS SEX WITH MALE PROSTITUTE ON SIDEWALK”

  10. kingmonkey +1 Says:

    Woa, I just watched the video. I’ve never seen such blind rage, such reckless hate and wanton fury in a woman! She almost obliterated the Earth with the power of her anger!

  11. squaresquare Says:

    Holy crap now I’m really looking forward to Mondays post!

  12. Gladstone Says:

    It may have been crapped out, but the Fox part was incidental. All the News sites run bs celeb news.

    Thanks. You didn’t offend me. I promise a better post on Monday. I’m very excited about it. . .

  13. jello Says:

    Believe it or not, I was trying to give constructive criticism to an otherwise stellar blog and blogger. This one just seemed like it was crapped out in order get the inevitable anti-Fox News reaction. *shrug*

  14. glendoor42 Says:

    I was hoping to never fucking see that again.

  15. Gladstone Says:

    Besides when I want to harsh on Fox for some attention my posts usually look more like this.

  16. DZ Says:

    The only reason anybody puts anything on the internet ever is for other people to see it; by definition it has no other use than to share information. That being said, I think it’s a little unfair to accuse poor Gladstone of deliberately attracting attention when you posted your comment in order to attract attention.

    Oh, circular logic! When wilst thou get straight?

  17. glendoor42 Says:

    How can somebody that’s job it is to post what he thinks about something, on regular basis, be an attention whore? So he said FOX news sucks and you are tired of hearing it, big deal don’t read it. What if the story had been on CNN would he still be an attention whore? CNN and MSNBC do stories every bit as banal and non substantive as FOX and I don’t think that makes him an attention whore.

    Now dressing up like Amy Winehouse well,…..

  18. Nadia Says:

    Are you saying that Michael J. Fox is an attention whore!?! Okay Rush Limbaugh!!!!!

    http://www.jellobuddy.com

  19. Gladstone Says:

    Thanks jello.

    I’m used to reporters exaggerating celebrity claims to make a story. I’ve just never seen a story that supplies video footage that proves the story is made up.

    That was notable to me. It really wasn’t about fox news.

    But i’m sure I have plenty of crappy posts due to lack of ideas.

  20. jello Says:

    Today’s blog is stupid. Why is Fox reporting a story, that has no story in it, enough of a story to warrant a post? I’m no Fox fan - they’re just as much of a sensationalist, ratings whore as the rest - but posts like this get tiresome.

    Fox sucks. Get the fuck over it. That’s well established by now.

    You know you’re going to get positive responses when you bash Fox, so the only reason this would be posted is that a, you had no good ideas today, or b, you’re an attention whore like Fox.

  21. anonymous Says:

    Hahaha…”Fox News”. Cute.

    That’s a good one, I tell ya.

  22. Nadia Says:

    Kingmonkey +1: You must have the Casnadian Paranoia that seems to run rampant in your “country”. Apparently it is deadly and destroys. I assure you Jigsaw and myself are quite content.

  23. William, the Says:

    You know, the real issue here isn’t why fox news did this story, the real issue is involving where on earth my pants have gone to.

  24. Mandie Says:

    This is why I hate Fox. Lindsay Lohan is not news, she is AIDS-infected, cum-guzzling hellspawn and should be burned at the stake.

    Can Fox do that?

  25. Miss Debater Says:

    Hey look, more evidence that Fox news SUCKS.

  26. Tommy The Brat Says:

    More like FAUX news, amirite?

    By the way Fox News are legitimately horrible.

  27. kingmonkey +1 Says:

    On an unrelated topic, I just read a news article that a girl named Nadia has recently gone missing here in Ottawa (Casnadia). Nadia, please call your folks– they’re worried sick.

    Oh, and you shouldn’t make fun of FOX “news” (you’ll notice how I put “news” in quotation marks to emphasize my sarcasm). They’re fair and unbiased… all their ads used to say so. If you can’t place your trust in the marketing department of a multimillion dollar media empire with no private agenda, who can you trust?

  28. Nadia Says:

    I guess unbiased FNC was burnt out on elections and political scandals, so they turned into TMZ.

Leave a Reply

Cracked stuff on