Why Obama Makes Americans Want to Stockpile Ammo
The prosecutor addressed me, his back to a courtroom full of my peers, my friends, my family and Gladstone. The prosecutor spoke.

"Please state for the record your name."
"Sure. D to the-"
"Into the microphone, please." I leaned forward and tapped the small microphone a few times.
"Check. Check. Can you hear me in the back? One. Two."
"Yes, that's fine, now-"
"Three and to the four, Snoop D-O-B and Brockter Dre is at the door."
"Just your name, please," the prosecutor said.
"Ready to make an entrance, so back on up."
"That's plenty." The prosecutor again. Brockway stood up from his seat at the
defense table.
"'Cause you know we 'bout to rip shit up."
"Order," the judge shouted, banging his gavel. For real, judges still use gavels. It'll always amaze me that, in 2009, where we have the Internet and indoor plumbing and spaceships, it's still acceptable for a respected official to express his opinion by bashing a giant, wooden hammer over and over again. It's not like I wave a giant sword around my head whenever I'm bored. I mean, I might now. I'm just saying if hammer-smashing is so socially acceptable, I should be able to swing a sword around or chuck some grenades when the mood strikes me.
"What do you have to say for yourself, Mr. O'Brien," the prosecutor asked. I paused thoughtfully.
"Mr. Prosecutor, Dr. Judge, members of the jury: I'm just saying if hammer-smashing is so socially acceptable, I should be able to swing a sword around or chuck some grenades when the mood strikes me." The courtroom was completely silent, except for Brockway who immediately chimed in with, "Seconded."
"Mr. O'Brien," the prosecutor began, "your time may be utterly worthless but, please keep in mind, the jury's time is not. You and Mr. Brockway have a lot to answer for. So? Start talking." I was at a loss. My entire strategy hinged on the fact that the prosecuting attorney would be a decent-to-attractive chick, so I could say, "More like proseCUTEST" as my opening and closing statements, with some very convincing push-ups thrown in between.

Since the prosecutor was, in fact, a man, my whole defense strategy was pretty much shot right to shit. I looked to Robert Brockway, the co-defendant in this case, and Michael Swaim, who was acting as our lawyer. They both looked very optimistic, so I got myself started.
"I guess I'll begin with the truth," I said.
"OBJECTION," Swaim shouted. Brockway shook his head violently.
"No," the judge said, "I'm... I'm going to allow the truth."
"Thank you, your honor-I-barely-know-her. So, it's like this. We've got this United States president elected, right? Tall guy. Hampton something-or-other. "
"Barack Obama," the prosecutor offered. I looked to Swaim and Brockway, who both shook their heads, agreeing with me that the prosecutor's clearly made-up name was some kind of trap.
"No, I think you're wrong about that. I'm pretty sure it's Hampton something. Anyway, he's elected president, and you know what that means."
"Why don't you elaborate, Mr. O'Brien."
"If, as you so kindly pointed out, Mr. Prosecutor, the jury's time is so important, I think I'd rather not waste it by saying what everyone's thinking. We all know what an Obama presidency means. The first year is almost up, so... you know." I lowered my head and raised my eyebrows, as if to say 'So... you know.' The prosecutor was not impressed.
"So, Obama is president. Is that why you and Mr. Robert Brockway stockpiled 800 firearms and 65,000 rounds of ammunition in the Cracked headquarters?"
"Well... well, yeah," I said. "But it's not like I'm the only one. According to that article that I somehow linked to in this spoken conversation, sales of guns and bullets have gone up considerably ever since Obama took office. Americans purchased two billion more rounds of ammunition than we normally do and, currently, gun sellers can't even produce enough ammo to meet the demand. We the people are literally buying bullets faster than bullets can be made."
"Yes, I understand that," the prosecutor said. "I clicked that link, same as everyone in this courtroom. I'm still a little confused."
"How can you be? Look, Prosecutor Face, the times are changing. This new world requires fast moves and bold actions. And sometimes that involves buying all the bullets."
"And what," the prosecutor began, spinning on his heels and pointing at me, "are you going to do with these bullets?" He smiled, shark-like. Like a shark prosecutor who just cornered some other fish in Ocean Court, and like the shark was real proud of itself, because it was a lawyer. This seemed like a big moment for him, but, honestly, I hadn't really thought of what I planned on doing with the bullets. I hope his case wasn't built on me having an answer. I looked to Brockway, and it appeared that he too was considering this for the first time. After some thought, he shook his head. I looked to Swaim, who was taking this opportunity of introspective thoughtfulness to rob Brockway.
"I guess nothing, really," I said, finally. The prosecutor froze, like an ice shark.
"What? You don't have any plan?"
"Narp. But, you know, it's good to be prepared. With a buncha bullets, that is. I mean, you see where the world is going. It's a world that requires me to have bullets. Socialism.Health Care. Social Care. Gay-Sex-Marriage-But-Not-The-Good-Kind. The Economy. Uh... Hy... Hybrid cars, is that one of the things we're mad at?" I looked to Swaim, who shook his head while holding up a hastily made sign that read 'Immigrants.' "Oh, right, that's it. Hybrid Immigrants, we're pissed at that, too. So, you know, we bought all those bullets." My stance on immigrants that run on peanut oil is well-documented, so I didn't think I needed to elaborate.
"You have no idea why you're buying bullets, do you?"
"All the bullets," I corrected.

"Objection," Swaim yelled. "What if my client is buying bullets in anticipation of laws that would take away guns and bullets from America? If, for example, we were suddenly forbidden from buying bullets because of Soc... Socialist Health Gay Care," he said with a wink, "then we'd be utterly defenseless against outside forces."
"Overruled," I said. "There haven't been any bills or laws restricting gun ownership. In fact, the opposite is true. We're legally permitted to carry guns in more places today than we have been in years. Nice try, asshole." Swaim slammed his fist on the table. Brockway took some vicodin.
"So, as I understand it," the prosecutor said, "no one is trying to take your guns or bullets away. You have no intention of using them any time soon, but you're still buying them by the caseload and stockpiling them in your office. In fact, you're wearing three bandoliers of bullets right now, at this second, while you're on the witness stand."
"Uh huh."
"And you still maintain this has something to do with Obama?"
"More like Nobama," I said, slyly.
"OBUMa," Brockway added.
"OBOMBa," Swaim said.
"Obam...GAY," I concluded. Swaim and Brockway nodded their approval.
"Look," I said, "I'm just a regular guy. I put my pants on one leg at a time, just like you, and I hate doing it, just like you. I don't want the government to have my money. I don't want death panels to murder my grandparents until they start smelling bad. I want to be able to say what I want, when I want to. I want to be able to make all the money in all the world, forever, all the time. And if I feel like any of these freedoms are even vaguely threatened, I want to, you know, buy a shitload of bullets."
"But why?" the prosecutor whined. "What are you going to do with them? It's just so confusing, Mr. O'Brien. You worry that taxes will raise the price of ammunition, but in obsessively buying it every time you get a paycheck, you, along with other people in similar mindsets, are effectively forcing the price up on your own, because you're manufacturing a higher demand. And you understand that, when someone writes an article about kidnapping the president's daughters and then starts hoarding thousands of rounds of ammunition, it's enough to give us pause, right? Look! Look at you, you're buying bullets off of co-defendant Robert Brockway, right now!"
"Can you blame me? Look, your screaming is just scaring the shit out of me, and this is what I do when I'm scared."
"Ditto," said Brockway, as he repurchased the bullets he'd just sold to me (at a substantial price increase).
Here, the judge interjected. "I'm starting to wonder why I called this trial in the first place, and further agreed to suspend the laws that typically govern court rooms in this country."

The prosecutor started: "Your honor, this is not an isolated incident. There are people across America just like Mr. OBrien," he paused here, probably because he was impressed with how many bullets I can fit in my mouth (so many),"almost exactly like Mr. OBrien. Its not just this court room, its the nation, your honor!
Get to the point councilor! the judge bellowed, his hammer poised.
"It's just," the prosecutor said, faltering. "It's just all so retarded."









This was f*****g hilarious
ReplyActually, looser gun laws are always a good idea.as it is,restricting the type of guns an average man can buy DOES NOT restrict the kind of guns any criminal can get their hands on thanks to the black market.it just keeps your average joe civilian from being able to defend himself against said criminals.
ReplyThis is my favorite article on this site! On the (very) off chance you read comments on old articles DOB, this s**t is just fantastic.
ReplyThe number of handguns rose by 3.5 times the population increase since WWII.. However, there is no comparable increase in murders. In fact, despite how the media portrays guns as these spawns from hell, murder rates have been dropping since 1993, and is now the lowest it has been since 1960. More guns does not lead to more murders. That is a simple minded way to look at it. Its not only statistically false, but logically incorrect as well. Truth of the matter is, when murders occur, people purchase guns for protection. Also, criminals will have no problem attaining a gun through illegal means. If a law abiding citizen cant protect themselves from a felonous activity, what option do we have?
ReplyBelieve me, I have a HUGE paper due on this 2 days from now. If you dont believe the statistics I have given you, look them up for yourself. I will gladly debate against anyone who argues against me...
Not true, actually. It is actually rather difficult for criminals to get guns in areas with very strict gun laws, because typically they'd just steal them from someone who has it legally. If the laws are so strict in your area that very few people do, it becomes difficult for them to buy one. Not impossible, mind you, but it's not this roaring underground market like drugs are.
Gay-Sex-Marriage-But-Not-The-Good-Kind. - oh yes. I can't agree more.
Replyi hate people that stockpile ammo
Reply1.) it costs more for me to buy it
2.) it gives us more normal gun owners a bad name
3.) it makes the person that is being reacted to look like the sane and rational choice by comparison
...America is a democracy... the government wouldn't start "taking over" unless we specifically wanted them to. All the stupid things America has done in the past was usually a result of the American people supporting it. We may bash away at Bush all day long in 2011, but during his term, the majority of Americans cheered at his every move. America will only collapse if it's people decide to let it happen. And presidents who try to restrict guns aren't trying to put you under a totalitarian regime- that's just paranoid. They're trying to keep people from shooting each other (though whether that's a good thing or not is a debate between the left and right). Plus, dictators would be nothing if they didn't have a population to back them up.
ReplyOh, this is rich. I can't wait for him to see what the government thinks of the average citizen when he sees how it treats SOPA and PIPA. Man from the past, you are in for a rude awakening when it gets to the slightly less past (the future for you) and all your illusions of justice are shattered.
Um, there is a reason America hasn't been successfully invaded for (meaning someone took us over and killed alot of us) since we've been a nation. Or Canada (lots of gun owners). We also haven't had a dictator. That is why it is also for protection from our own government. If we weren't armed, you bet someone would try that s**t, thats why I don't trust presidents who try to restrict it. Thats usually how dictators begin taking over, is unarming their citizens. Its in their handbooks.
Reply Hide All See All 9 Repliesugh
They burned down the f**king white house
The reason people don't f**k with america in america is because we have a military and nuclear arms your guns don't scare the russians or their bombers
Also, America is out of the f**king way, with a VERY powerful navy able to stop any nation that tries to get close, as well as having neighbors that don't give a s**t about destroying it.
Wait, wait... Dictators have handbooks? Can I get one on ebay?
It's actually because we buy people booze. I know this pisses republicans off but, it's actually due to us negotiating with crazy ass motherf**kers. Which is a good thing. Elementary school should have taught you that not every problem can be solved by waving your dick around.
235 years isn't really that old for a country to be. Give it a couple hundred years and I'll bet we'll be invaded in a fashion that will come close to take-over or severe destruction. No matter how many hillbillies with guns we have.
...America is a democracy... the government wouldn't start "taking over" unless we specifically wanted them to. All the regrettable things America has done in the past was usually a result of the American people supporting it. We may bash away at Bush all day long in 2011, but during his term, the majority of Americans cheered at his every move. America will only collapse if it's people decide to let it happen. And presidents who try to restrict guns aren't trying to put you under a totalitarian regime- that's just paranoid. They're trying to keep people from shooting each other (though whether that's a good thing or not is a debate between the left and right). Plus, dictators would be nothing if they didn't have a population to back them up. They don't disarm their citizens, citizens disarm each other.
games had seen it all, there's plenty candidates to invade america and elsewhere, it's just when.
Are you guys f*****g retarded? Who the f**k could invade America? The two only neighbouring nations you guys have are either poor or poorly inhabitated. Just look to the start of the 1900's. The USAs military was f*****g awful back then, and still nobody could touch them because they weren't close enough to anyone with a army that wasn't laughable
This was some of the best comedic writing I have ever had the pleasure to read. And being able to so clearly put Swaim's, Brock's, and DOB's face to the commentary made it all the funnier. I hope you guys keep writing forever and never seek the psychological help that you all so desperately need.
ReplySeconded!
It really is retarded. Still hilarious though.
ReplyPew pew pew pew
ReplyAh, DOB. You succeed at comedy but fail at life.
ReplyI ain't gonna read all this s**t.
ReplyWhy, your brain shut down at words with more than two SYLLABLES. Ah, I just melted your brain.
I believe that guns must be lisenced, registered and that in order to gain the right to buy one you should pass a simple and free exam on gun safety that would have to be repeated every 5-10 years to held keep the knowledge fresh. Apart from that go nuts, keep safe and don't go flashing the damn things around.
Reply Hide All See All 3 Repliesshall not be infringed on....so f**k what you think.
Everyone should be allowed to own guns. Only certain liscensed people should get ammunition, though.
And _uncertain_ licensed people should get ammunition that invariably fails to fire. We can't have those indecisive motherf**kers running around with guns loaded with ammo that actually _works_, now can we?
I don't know why people are so upset about our current president wanting to abolish the right to bear arms. He'll never be able to do it, there's not a shot in hell. He can jump up and down preaching all day and go touring across the states in this vendetta against American rights but he simply can't get rid of them.
ReplySo stop worrying. It's not anything that can ever happen or anything you should be concerned about. And just practicing simple common sense with firearms, such as keeping them locked up around ignorant children and not treatin them like toys, will prevent unnecessary or unwanted injury.
For people who can't defend themselves, or even just people that enjoy the equipment, I think guns are not just a previlege disguised as a right but a right that is necessary to have. If you don't believe in the right to bear arms, then don't bear any.
We're upset because he WANTS to do it. And if he gets his cronies on it then it WILL happen, some of his followers have stated that they want to CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION. And, hey, he got health care through who says he can't get the gun law through? He'll probably slip it in another bill somewhere and shove it through congress before anyone has time to read it. That's how this terrorist of a president workPr
Erm, you do realise that We have changed to constitution many times already? And that is not a bad thing; the constitution—while it is generally a brilliant doc*ment—is not infallible. It was written by mortal men whose thinking was informed by the culture of their time and hence prone in many respects to fail to meet the needs of a society with a constantly maturing sense of ethics and morals. Do not forget that in its original form, the constitution only grants suffrage to white land-owning males and declares black people to be subhuman.
I don't advocate wholesale redrafting of the constitution by any means, but I would be a fool not to realise that declaring the entire doc*ment sacred and clinging to every word of the original draft leaves us trapped centuries in the past with our laws becoming more and more irrelevant to the present.
POTUS!
ReplyWell that seems very high, but seeing as most of my have has been or is in the military, that could be fairly accurate, but at the same time seems extremely improbable. Could you please source your 50% of the time a bullet is fired, it is at a person you actually know?
ReplyKnowing that much? Knowing if someone owns a firearm or a dog is hardly any information at all, you are less likely to know how many people live in the house then if they own a gun or a dog.
If I can not get the point across here are a few quotes and there view points on gun control.
‘‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.’’
— Mahatma Ghandi, "Gandhi, An Autobiography", page 446.
‘‘A government resting on the minority is an aristocracy, not a Republic, and could not be safe with a numerical and physical force against it, without a standing army, an enslaved press and a disarmed populace.’’
— James Madison, The Federalist Papers (No. 46).
@Silent Empathy
Replydo you realize that nearly 50% of the time a bullet is fired, it's at a person you actually know... and that if the thief knew THAT MUCH about what is inside a person's house, he probably would have already stolen a shitload of things
Does any one else think that it is odd that all gun owners are personified as retarded, presumably red neck, people who do not even know who the current POTUS (President of the United States) is. Yet I find it odd that people, mostly liberals, can not propose why stockpiling guns is bad, without personifying the opposing argument as retarded. While reading the article I did not find one good counter argument for gun control.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesFurthermore but yourself in the shoes of a thief or murderer, would you break into a house that maybe the owner owns a gun, or one where you know that the only means of protection they have are knifes, if that, and maybe a dog. Armed with your knowledge of knowing you have a gun where as the persons home you are breaking into does not have any means of viable protection, you are choosing the one that does not have gun.
Also I do no impose my will upon you, telling you that you have to own a gun, I am just proposing, merely, that I should not be judged negatively because I have a different view point from you. Saying that it is fine for people to own a gun, also the only reason that guns are easier to own now then ever before has nothing to do with Obama, the Supreme Court ruled, that there legally can not be gun control laws. To get around this ruling, Obama is trying to increase the taxes on ammunition.
I can not wait the bashing I will receive for posting this, but I realize that I have a separate view from most of you out there, but I do not have a problem that you do not own a gun. Just that because you do not own a gun, no one else should.
you go dude, you're totally right. Not all gun-owners are retarded rednecks, and you're also totally right that guns are a form of protection, not just something that apparently scares the living hell out of democrats. I totally admire the fact that you are so open-minded about your opinion being different, if only everyone could be that way instead of bashing someone for their own difference in thinking. No bashing here, dude! Pr
So i know this was posted forever ago but... 2 cents: I don't think the article is about gun control or the politics of anyone on either side of the issue. It's more about how as soon as we elected a democrat "socialist," there was a roaring response from tea party types along the lines of "hes a commie! gonna take our guns! jesus f**k its time to buy up some guns before he makes them illegal!" This all stems from adults somehow retaining the kindergarten notion that the President is the f**king king of America or something and can by himself personally strike an amendment straight off of the Bill of Rights. Instead of stopping to verify their fears at a local library or elementary school, they immediately got out checkbooks and REAL MONEY to arm themselves to the teeth which YES IS COMPLETELY RETARDED. It isn't saying that opposing gun control is stupid (I identify as a staunch liberal and see great arguments both for and against it. On the fence, really.), but rather that the knee-jerk reaction of buying ludicrous amounts of weapons out of fear that your commie president is going to take them all away in a month is. Which is accurate.
So that was less like 2 cents and more like a couple bucks but whatever.
Bravo, all three of you. Whoever thinks that Obama can and will take away our right to bear arms MUST have come from Lookatmeimadumbassville, and gone to Special Are You Elementary and High School. And I might also go as far as to assume that they graduated with a Master's in d******key.
Um, there is a reason America hasn't been successfully invaded for (meaning someone took us over and killed alot of us) since we've been a nation. Or Canada (lots of gun owners). We also haven't had a dictator. That is why it is also for protection from our own government. If we weren't armed, you bet someone would try that s**t, thats why I don't trust presidents who try to restrict it. Thats usually how dictators begin taking over, is unarming their citizens. Its in their handbooks.
"...they immediately got out checkbooks and REAL MONEY to arm themselves to the teeth which YES IS COMPLETELY RETARDED."
But good for the economy. ;)
if you ass muching knob gobling assholes invade us we will nuke the fuck out of you. yes that is a good way to solve problems. in fact i propose we use nukes to solve this recession thgy. we nuke the only other riicher country then us and steal there shit and we would be fine.
ReplyNothing has ever made more sense ever!