Parental advisory stickers have been a mainstay of modern music since sometime in the mid-1980s, when Tipper Gore realized she was too shitty of a parent to keep Prince songs about masturbation out of her kid's hands without some sort of assistance from the government. So, a congressional hearing was called, and the "fuck" word warning we've all come to know and love was born.
Rest easy, parents!
Fortunately, the program was a resounding success, and nary an utterance of the word "shit" has caught parents by surprise on record ever since. It's a good thing, too; getting blindsided by an unexpected swear word can be a real motherfucking day-breaker. We talk about a few more things that should ideally never happen without advance warning on this week's Unpopular Opinion podcast ...
... where comics Delanie Fisher and Nick Kaufman and Rotten Tomatoes editor Sarah Ricard join me to talk about friends who come over unannounced, dudes who like to show off their dicks, and so much more.
For the purposes of this column, though, I'll just stick to music. Since we're on the verge of celebrating two decades of completely telegraphed swear words, I wouldn't mind seeing some labels for a few of the other unwelcome surprises that sometimes pop up in modern music. For example ...
7Still Sounds Nothing Like the Old Stuff
I've said before that I think criticizing bands for changing their sound is usually a bullshit complaint, but people complain about it nonetheless, and as the old saying goes, "Where there are people complaining, there are people who need to shut right the fuck up." People who whine about bands not making the exact same album 10 times in a row need to do just that, and this label might help. Say goodbye to the days of going online to complain that Metallica's St. Anger album doesn't sound anything like Ride the Lightning, because duh, motherfucker, it says so right on the label. The bandwidth we'd save in angry message board posts and YouTube comments alone is worth the investment this sticker would require.
Should Apply To:
The aforementioned Metallica is an obvious choice here. People have been complaining about Metallica not sounding like Metallica for about as long as there's been a Metallica.
Some would argue that Weezer deserves it, but I'm more of the opinion that their sound hasn't so much changed as their songs have just kind of started to become awful. It still probably applies, though.
A more recent contender is Best Coast, a band who released a few early singles that sound like they were recorded on a 1980s boombox placed in front of a floor-model television speaker ...
... and have been dealing with fans clamoring for them to make songs that "sound like the old stuff" ever since. Sure, by the time they released their first proper studio album they'd already moved on to recording in much more acoustically pleasing closets ...
... but people still treat every moderately well-produced record the band makes ...
... like some kind of radical departure from "the sound that made them famous."
That seems a bit harsh to me. Can we at least give them a chance to become legitimately famous before we start giving them shit for selling out once they became famous?
6Cannot Be Recreated Live
The recording studio is a magical place, capable of making even the most dreadful of noises sound somewhat music-ish. While employing the various technological bells and whistles that modern musicians have at their disposal can make for a fine experience on record, too much studio trickery can lead to an album full of songs that the band in question is completely and totally incapable of recreating in a live setting. It might seem like a minor sticking point if you aren't the concert-going type, but people who rarely attend concerts are the ones who need this label the most. Concert tickets are expensive. Should it ever come to pass that you find a song so moving that it compels you to spend that kind of money, wouldn't it be nice to have some assurance that you aren't making a foolish investment?
Should Apply To:
There are actually a few practical applications for this label. As mentioned previously, fancy studio tricks are always difficult to recreate onstage, so R&B sensation T-Pain would be an ideal candidate ...
... if people still gave a shit about that guy. There are plenty of acts that are just as deserving, though, and most of them are way less honest about the magic they employ to make their voices presentable.
Even in cases where bands can reproduce technologically complex songs in live settings, the odds of them doing it regularly are slim to none. Case in point, check out this performance of Radiohead's electronics-laden "National Anthem" single:
If I'm not mistaken, playing that song in concert requires the use of an old-timey telephone switchboard and at least one 13-inch television monitor.
A band might be fine hauling that kind of contraption around when the songs are fresh and new, but rest assured, five years down the road they'll have reworked all that fancy computer music into something they can play on regular instruments.
Also, it's probably a moot point now that Courtney Love definitely didn't kill the band's lead singer years ago, but Nirvana's landmark Nevermind album probably should have come with a heads up about the differences one should have expected to hear when those songs were released into the wild. So much trickery went into making that album sound HUGE in the studio ...
... that a three-person unit could never come close to accurately recreating them in concert:
Like I said, it doesn't matter now, but it's something you might have wanted to know in 1992 or whatever.