Comments on: 7 Dinosaurs You Could Take In A Fight

By: i-shappy

i-shappy — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:48:04 +0000

brian will be missed, he died in the name of human power

By: Kelly Riley

Kelly Riley — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:31:58 +0000

Dinos Freakin’ Rock!!!

That one Dino in #2 looks like it’s got Zebra stripes, freakin’ aweswome if you ask me!

ALso, I dunno if I would wanna fight a Carnotaurus or not, from what I’ve seen in “Dinosaur” they seem to be pretty darn scary!

Also, I am guessing that the last dino on this list, the one that only had a picture is a Baryonyx… one of the most creepy dinos out there (next to the guanglongs… anyone who has seen Ice Age 3 would agree with me!)

Either way entertaining article, keep it up!

By: Nessie

Nessie — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:59:49 +0000

@Pikmintaro

I don’t understand what you’re saying not because you’re views are asinine, but because you don’t seem to know what punctuation is. One would think you would be able to get that…since there is a lot of it in the bible.

By: shleeroy

shleeroy — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:09:20 +0000

wow. there are alot of whiney bitches leaving messages on here with regards to facts. i was under the impression that this was a comedy website and not the discovery channel

By: Maddog

Maddog — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:09:14 +0000

The only issue I have with atheist evolution is the total rejection of the laws of entropy/chaos when it comes to the formation of life. Living organisms have the ability to capitalize upon error and chaos, but can chemicals develop habits and patterns? If so, then how do they oppose the deconstructive forces of the universe that cause all matter to degrade to Simpler, rather than complex, forms? Lemme know if any of that made any sense to anyone… Any (just fo good measure

By: totalisbadass

totalisbadass — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:36:43 +0000

I once killed a t-rex with a lightsaber, It was easy once i got the lightsaber from him

By: otusasio451

otusasio451 — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:23:53 +0000

@pikmintaro: I am not an atheist. In fact I am Episcopal, and very religious, and sir, I must congratulate you…

…on destroying the reputation of all pure beleivers in intelligent design. That’s one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard anyone say. I think God had to do with evolution, sure, but not like that! Scales aren’t merely folds of skin, and in many cases, they actually have what looks like a central vein, which bears an uncanny resemblance to the central rachis, or shaft, of modern-day bird feathers. And the fact that some modern birds have wing claws is even more proof that YOU ARE WRONG!!! That shows they come from a long evolutionary lineage of birds with claws. And Archaeopteryx WASN’T pure bird BECAUSE IT HAD TEETH!!!!! Gahh!! And a bony tail, AND a reptilian skull.

The Earth HAS to be older than 6000 years old. Seriously. Carbon dating proves it. And DON’T you throw that Mount St. Helens crap at me!! The reason carbon dating says it’s old is because IT IS!!! Magma only melted rock, rock that is the age carbon dating says it is. Get it? GOT IT?!? Good.

Oh, and in case you think I’m uneducated on the subject, my username is the old scientific name of the Eastern Screech Owl (although it’s now called Megascops asio).

And @minion: I believe science. I believe in God.

Chew on that, intelligent design buffs.

And that’s not a Velociraptor, it’s Masiakiasaurus knopfleri, a dinosaur from Madagascar found in 2000. And yeah, it’s pretty small. Carcharodontosaurus, now THAT’s a different story.

By: Lorenzo

Lorenzo — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:06:22 +0000

@ Pikmintaro
I hope your life ends in tragedy!!!

YOu are unbelievably IGNORANT!! You say “How can evolution be true and how can Scales turn into feather”? BUT HOW THE FUCK CAN THE EARTH ONLY BE 6000 YRS OLD!!?!?!??!!??! YOU ARE A TRUE KNOB ARENT YOU? GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF THE GUTTER!

By: Bobby Jay

Bobby Jay — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:38:20 +0000

Wait? If I challenge a Carnotaurus to a swordfighting competition, can I use the Sword?

By: huuuur

huuuur — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:10:06 +0000

minion:

scientific theory is different from the normal definition of theory. A regular theory is what you are describing; a guess, or a simple belief. A scientific theory (i.e, evolution) has substantial evidence to back it up.

lrn2term before you comment next time, kay?