6 Habits of Highly Annoying Public Speakers
Watching public speaking -- at a corporate seminar, a presentation, a high school assembly -- is more often than not a miserable experience. Part of the problem is that a lot of what's being presented is bullshit, which already doesn't bode well, but lots of speakers make it even worse by trying to glaze the bullshit with decorative cake frosting and sprinkles, so to speak. They'll dress up a five-minute talk on the most obvious and meaningless statements about sexual harassment with annoying gimmicks and tricks to the point where everyone leaves the seminar determined to sexually harass somebody, just out of spite.
Here's a couple of their worst habits:

I think a lot of us have run into a guy like this at some time in our lives. Now what can we see here, other than that stock photo minorities are apparently very vindictive people?
Well, the most annoying thing, beyond being nagged to do something you don't really want to do, is that the speaker is basically blaming you, the audience, for not being enthusiastic about something as stupid as his initial greeting, or maybe a catchphrase he wants you to repeat later, or maybe some opinion you're supposed to get excited about.

Well, that's his job. He's supposed to get you excited by making the subject matter exciting, not by guilting you into pretending to be excited. Does the pizza delivery guy have the balls to lecture you about not paying him for the pizza when he hasn't brought you any pizza? Does he tell you that good customers pay money? Does he act disappointed in how little you care about the pizza he didn't bring?

It's even slimier when a speaker equates lack of volume with the audience not caring deeply enough about the subject -- especially when the subject is some morally good cause. "That's it? That's all I get when I talk about building houses for the poor?" or "Come on, don't you care about Darfur a little more than that?" You could be giving a thousand dollars a month and passing out flyers all over your campus, but apparently because you don't yell loudly enough at a speech, you don't REALLY care.
Sometimes the speaker means well and naturally shouts about anything he cares about, and is just mistakenly projecting his extroverted personality onto everyone else, but sometimes the speaker is deliberately hoping to redirect well-intentioned audience guilt about a good cause toward cheers for himself. In which case maybe those vindictive minorities above aren't too far off.

An acrostic is that piece of shit I made above. It's different from an acronym, I guess, in the sense that saying the whole thing in order doesn't have to make sense, and you can have sentences. Every motivational book or speaker has to have one, and the famous ones are "good" in the sense that they're easy to understand and you can remember what they stand for.
Unfortunately, that means that every high school speaker and bush league pastor thinks that using them is the key to success.

As you can see, when you have to force your points to begin with the letters of whatever cutesy word you come up with, like "SMART" above, you'll end up with convoluted phrases like I've got, or you'll be digging in a thesaurus and coming up with obscure, hard-to-remember synonyms for the word you really wanted. It completely defeats the purpose of the acrostic in making your points easy to remember.
Another variant on the same thing is "the 4 E's" or something similar, where you make every point begin with the same letter. This really forces the thesaurus usage.

In this case, it would probably be easier to just make people memorize those three sentences than to make them try to remember the weird, barely used word you came up with, and then figure out what that word was supposed to mean.
Seriously, if you can't think of a clever, compact way to make people remember your points, just pass out a goddamned outline. The printing press has been around for over 600 years, maybe make some use of it.

All that said, I want you to memorize the acronym for Forced Audience Participation (FAP) because it's very apt. FAP is basically a speaker getting his rocks off by having the audience do things that he can fool himself into believing are a sign of how interested they are in his fascinating speech.
For example, there's a kind of bad habit going around where the audience has a printed outline of the speech, and at certain points, the speaker asks them to stop and circle a key word. Sometimes this makes sense, I guess, if you're introducing a new term like the 180 degree rule, or if the word is central to all the points you're making. ("Quentin Tarantino goes in a lot of exciting directions in his films but it all comes back to his foot fetish. I want you to circle 'foot fetish.' We're going to come back to that a lot.")
Filmdrunk
"Just like Tarantino does."
Of course, all this depends on a grasp of what words are vital and recurring in your speech, and you know what? Most people with that skill know how to emphasize those words without making people circle them on a piece of paper. So most of the people using this trick have no idea what words would be appropriate to circle. I have seen speakers tell me to circle words like "the" and "and" in a desperate last-ditch effort to feel like the audience is listening to something they are saying.
And it's very self-gratifying when you give an order and everyone obediently scritch-scratches with their pencils. It's easy to fool yourself into thinking, "Well, that particular 'and' I asked them to circle must have been a very important 'and' indeed." But if that's not enough, you might make them repeat key words or phrases out loud, which is annoying in the same sense as forcing a louder "good morning" out of people is annoying.
But if you still can't get an erection after making people dutifully circle and repeat things, you can make them really pretend they're into it by dragging volunteers up to the front of the room and having them participate in stupid skits. You can give them goofy props, to make it funny. Just don't give them anything sharp.









The video at the end is hysterical
Reply"The exercise, you should do it." You earned a hearty laugh from me, Christina.
ReplyTHIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CATS!
ReplyChristina, you've taken a position of bitter cynicality that could very easily birth quality humor, and you've written with the tone of a high school research paper. Fix this somehow.
Replyit is a common problem when you have someone who has to hire a speaker and they see the website or the brochure and they make the guess that this person will do a good show. that's one piece of skill and education that is often lacking. sometimes the most qualified people are the worst self-marketers, and vice versa.
Replyi am a professional speaker myself, and it saddens me to hear again and again that so many people are doing the job poorly. sad to say, many people go into "show business" for their own needs for attention and affirmation, not for their skill in perceiving the audience. that is rarely taught anywhere. to have that, as well as some unique relevant content . . . hard to find. and even harder to persuade event owners to do something outside the standard and familiar.
Not quite on topic, but on a similar note to forced acronyms, how about:
Replyagreeing to end a war, but rather than signing the ceasefire as soon as possible, leave it an extra day so that the date and time would look good.
FAP is the probably the most hilariously appropriate acronym for forcing the audience to jump through hoops. xD
ReplyI've never been to anything with a motivational speaker. Closest we got was this Christian group who came to speak to us about Jesus and made us sing "There ain't no party like a Jesus party" about sixty times because we weren't being loud enough.
Replyit's nice to read a christina h article that doesnt bore me to tears
ReplyI don't get it. I've found all her articles to be good, mostly. f**k everyone who just pretends they hate her articles because it's cool
I'd sit around and listen to some bastard use irritating public speaking tactics for 30 minutes under the condition that they MUST break a single board of plywood over their head in the end.
ReplyDane Cook. nuff said.
ReplyAnd here I thought I was the only one who got annoyed by acronyms.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesI'm currently in university and have an evening job at a nursing home washing dishes, and even I still have to go to seminars twice a year. I swear to God these people have acronyms for everything from identifying when someone is abusing a resident to using a fire extinguisher, because apparently when the liver and onions in the oven catch on fire I'm going to be racking my brains trying to remember what the hell the first "S" in "PASS" stood for again instead of pulling the damn lever and pointing it at said raging inferno.
One problem though, you missed out on the overly cutesy mascots they have for a good fraction of those acronyms. Every time I see "Charlie Check-It" the anthropomorphic waving check mark, I'm pretty sure I die a little inside.
Eh, I think PASS actually gets a pass, because that's one that everyone uses. I'm pretty sure it's the national way to teach someone how to use the thing.
I volunteer at a hospital, and they tried to drill seventy acronyms into our ADHD, teenage little minds. I still can't remember what half of them mean, I just know I'm tackling the dude harassing the pregnant lady in radiology.
And yes, Charlie Check-It is one of the most depressing things I've ever seen. xD
"PASS? We did that a couple months ago! It went, Pull, Aim...Sweep...um...fuck."
This article should be called "6 Stupid Ass Habits That You Are Taught in Speech Class", because I'm in Communications and this is what my teacher is spewing from her mouth hole. Thank you for pointing out 6 of the moronic chapters in my speech book. *Applause (but not too much because it was only a speech)
ReplyNo.
If Christina H is a good example of female humour then female humour can kindly go f**k itself. Preferably on webcam like a good girl.
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesOh, I get it; you like her, so you rip on her. Who decided to hook the Junior High up to the internet?
What's a Junior High. Also she writes bad humour articles for a website so really, how attractive can she be lol.
Why did you all of a sudden start talking about how attractive you think she is?
The sexist basis of your comment is disgusting and pretentious. Other than that you have a right to your opinion... and I have the right to speculate about the impossibility of a person like you having sex with anything that isn't drenched in clammy lubricant and made of plastic.
junior high is middle school in some parts also BWM, welcome to the internet.
Possiblities:
1) Desperate plea for female attention, ANY female attention.
2) Trying to work a 'neg on the real Christina in some crazed hope she'll throw on a diaper and drive cross-country to rescue him from his virginity before it's too late. (But it's already too late, because the 47 punctured blow-up dolls in his closet are all named Christina, and they're starting to whisper to him in rubbery little voices in the dead of night. Soon he will be able to make out what they're saying. Soon after that they will figure out how doorknobs work, and then it will be far too late for anything but screaming.)
3) Failed Remedial Humor 101 six years in a row because he never quite figured out that "randomly, pointlessly offensive" does not equal "funny."
Seriously, man. If you're going to be an asshole, at least make sure it's funny. Don't get me wrong, no woman will ever, ever f**k you, but at least if you make us laugh while you're being a douchebag we might not actually mace you on sight.
Protip: Anytime you find it necessary to write "lol" after a humorous statement, it's a pretty good indicator that you're kidding yourself.
You, sir, are the epitome of intelligence and maturity. Why, you must be at least 8 years old!
Jeez our company spends thousands and thousands of cash on motivational speakers. They don't work. They just don't. People will stay the way that they are no matter what. LOL. They will only change if they want to.
ReplyOn the plus side you get out of work for however long the seminars goes on, and they're usually catered, so free food.
I'd honest to god rather be working.
...You'll have plenty of time for rolling doobies when you're living in a van down by the river!
ReplyI like the article. It pointed out some good pitfalls in public speaking, but none of the things mentioned here (as you point out in the caveats almost every point has), can be effective and good, if used properly.
Reply Hide All See All 4 Replies2. though isn't really correct. It's not local pandering, it's about establishing a relationship with the audience and making the subject matter relevant to them. If you can't keep the subject relevant and connect with your audience, then they're going to stop listening to you after the first minute. Empirical studies have shown that the audience attention span (averagely, regardless of speaker and content) spikes in the first minute and a little bit near the end. It's your job as a speaker to keep them somewhat engaged and make sure, they can actually remember what you've said, so they can use it later on. All the examples you used are of people who mess it up. They're obviously using it incorrectly.
Gold star for you buddy. That's why the article is ABOUT "Annoying Public Speakers" ergo those who do it wrong - get it? Still no? Never mind.
If the subject matter is something relevant to both you and your audience, it's not pandering.
If it's something relevant only to your audience (or something you *think* might be relevant to your audience) and you're only pretending it's relevant to you - that's pandering.
Today's lesson has been brought to you by the letter P, and by Solario, who I'm guessing is a terrible (and terribly un-self-aware) public speaker.
No, here's a better idea; if your subject matter is not inherently relevant enough to keep people interested, you shouldn't be giving a speech on it. You don't need tricks, by definition, if the speech is actually about something they need to know about.
@Solario, that's the theory anyway. In practice it usually feels extremely condescending.
The one quality that negates all these complaints should the speaker possess it: charisma.
Reply Hide All See All 4 Repliesi put all my points in dex
Uh, no. Charisma has limits. Even cult leaders only convince a minority of people how how awesome they are.
Because saying charisma negates awkwardness is the same as saying charisma can do anything. You sure showed them!
I would say the one quality that negates all these complaints is that the speaker is really, really good looking.
Let me tell you about my cats. COME ON PEOPLE let me tell you about my cats.
ReplyTell us about your cats.
i spit out a bunch of carrot when i saw the TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT guy on 6. he's on a pillar at the con center that hosts anime st. louis. except, on that pillar, he's screaming about MEETINGS!!!!!!!!!
Replyyeah awesome story, i know. i'll show myself out.