5 People Who Bragged About Awful Crimes Via 'Art'
The world is full of terrible things, things like ugly people and responsibility and consequences. Fortunately, money and fame have always acted as a force field against these afflictions. Hundred dollar bills work like a Kevlar vest against the bullets of hardship, provided hardship doesnt decide to shoot you in the head. In the spirit of Zero Accountability, the following is a timeline of five wealthy or renowned people throughout history so far removed from responsibility that they were able to commit horrible crimes and then earn more wealth and renown out of unapologetically bragging about them.

Right around the time the American colonies were throwing tea into the bay and complaining about taxation without representation, Giacomo Casanova was wrapping up a self-guided sex tour around Europe. Between 1746 and 1774 he had sex with more woman than you have Facebook friends. He bounced back and forth between major cities during an age when most people rarely moved more than fifty miles from where they were born, so it shouldnt be surprising that Casanova would end up sleeping with at least one person in this family tree. Unfortunately, that one person happened to be his daughter.

When Casanova was thirty-five he accidentally seduced his own 17-year-old daughter, Leonilda. He even proposed marriage to her but the mother, Donna Lucrezia revealed that Casanova was the girls father before the two could marry. In a situation where most people would likely rip their eyes from the sockets, Casanova took it on the chin. He calmly rescinded the proposition of marriage and proposed a threesome instead. A big family threesome. Just so were all on the same page, Casanovas solution to the problem was to fight incest with more incest.
Look Giacomo, sex is not that answer to everything.
In 1789, Casanova wrote Histoire de ma vie (History of My Life) which is a twelve volume, 3500 page collection, all primarily focused on his sexual conquests. Included in the autobiography, is the story of Leonilda. He explains the threesome he shared between her and her mother in shameless detail.
"On the other side of the bed [Leonilda] undresses completely and gets in next to her, saying that as her father I was at liberty to see all my handiwork. Her mother is proud of her, she praises her, and she rejoices to see that I find her beautiful. It sufficed her that she was in the middle and that it was only upon her that I extinguished the fire with which she saw that I was burning. Leonilda's curiosity delighted me to the soul.
Moved to pity, Leonilda sends her mother's little soul on its flight with one hand and with the other puts a white handkerchief under her gushing father."

Arguably the pioneer of existential philosophy in the nineteenth century, Soren Kierkegaard is widely known for his analyses of religion and the human condition. He is considerably less known for seducing a child. Kierkegaard was twenty-four when he met fourteen-year-old, Regine Olsen and decided it would be in everyones best interest if he had sex with her.
Theres something about Olsens.
To his credit, he wasnt interested in only, Hitting and quitting that (a common 19th century saying). Kierkegaard wanted to develop a monogamous relationship with Olsen, so monogamous in fact that she would never be able to love anyone else but him.
Like most teenagers, Regine Olsen was fairly impressionable. Kierkegaard became a close friend of the family and had a subtle hand in influencing her taste in art and culture while a less than subtle hand worked furiously under her dress. For two years Kierkegaard contributed to shaping her into a woman who couldnt possibly fall in love with anybody other than him until naturally, she did just that. Kierkegaard then proposed when she was eighteen and then for no clear reason other than to screw her up a little more, he called off the engagement after a year leaving Olsen devastated and hopeless.
I made you rabbit, Soren.
Six years after breaking the engagement Soren Kierkegaard wrote The Seducers Diary in which the listless and bored protagonist infuses himself into the life of a young girl with the intention of manipulating her into falling in love. He proceeds to influence every aspect of her taste until she gives herself entirely to him right before he leaves her. The story is so thinly veiled that its a wonder Kierkegaard even bothered to change the names, and it reads like someone insisting that the world sit up and take notice of this amazingly heartless feat.

Socrates once said, By all means marry; if you get a good wife, youll be happy; if you get a bad one, youll become a philosopher. No one took this advice more literally than Louis Althusser. A Structural Marxist philosopher from the early 20th century, he remains a favorite topic among literary critics and philosophy majors, or as you know them, those assholes in college-town bars with the tweed jackets and the gravitas beards. In fact, the only thing this group of dilettantes likes more than correcting people who pronounce Althusser wrong is ignoring the fact that he strangled his goddamn wife.
Youre dwelling on the corporal while Im trying to engage you in the metaphysical, dude.
Its common for couples to offer one another massages after tough days. It is considerably less common for these massages to be issued from the front, exclusively on the neck and with enough force to crush a windpipe. Still, thats exactly what Althusser claimed occurred on November 16th of 1980. He explained that he was giving his wife (who assumedly was made entirely out of eggshells) a front-neck-rubdown when she stopped moving. While the neck is a vulnerable part of the body, generally a person being strangled will indicate that he/she is unhappy with the situation, especially while face to face with the person doing the strangling.
Zero Accountability Moment
Althusser never stood trial for the crime, instead he was admitted to a psychiatric hospital where he wrote L'Avenir diure Longtemps (The Future Lasts Forever). The book is a memoir that recounts the most important moments in his life, including cherished childhood experiences and also that one time he murdered his wife. He writes,
I pressed my thumbs into the hollow at the top of the breastbone and then, still pressing, slowly moved them both, one to the left, the other to the right, up towards her ears where the flesh was hard. I continued massaging her in a V-Shape. The muscles in my forearms began to feel very tired Hlnes face was calm and motionless; her eyes were open and staring at the ceiling.

Long Island is known best for two things: its ice tea and Amy Fisher, both of which are bad for you and rely heavily on duplicity. Amy Fisher started a relationship with the mechanic Joey Buttafuoco in 1992 after crashing her parents car and asking Buttafuoco to work on it without telling anyone. What should have been an ordinary setup for softcore porn launched to international fame because Amy was underage, Buttafuoco was nineteen years her senior and because Amy then shot his wife. Fisher drove to the Buttafuoco house one night in May and shot Mary Jo Buttafuoco in the head, but poorly because she survived. The story made headlines across the country, partially because of the love triangle, and partially because Buttafuoco is a hilarious name. Amy spent three years in prison for attempted murder and Joey Buttafuoco also did time for statutory rape.
Zero Accountability Moment
After her prison sentence, Amy was released and confused why she wasnt famous anymore. In an effort to redeem her popularity, or at least remind people she existed, Fisher wrote a book about the whole experience called If I Knew Then. The autobiography leaked intimate details about her relationship with Joey. The book was popular for around a week and then she faded into obscurity again.
Out of desperation to stay relevant, Fisher went on talk shows to meet with the Buttafuocos again. She also leaked a sex tape and started a career as a stripper where she promised to donate some of her tips to Haiti relief. All of these flickers in her dark life were attempts to get the world to look at her again and remember that she was once that little girl who shot that nice woman in the head.

It would be wrong to build a list of celebrity crimes without consequences and not include O.J. Simpson. The football hall of famer allegedly stabbed his wife and Ron Goldman to death in 1994, and when I say allegedly I mean unquestionably. Simpson was acquitted of the murder charges in a criminal trial confirming once and for all that in a doubles match with evidence and motive vs. fame and money, evidence and motive will always lose miserably.
And lose by way of stabbing
After the trial, O.J. Simpson promised to launch a tireless man-hunt for the real killer across golf courses all over the country. So far, his findings have been inconclusive at best.
Zero Accountability Moment
In 2006 O.J. Simpson tried to prove that crime does, in fact, pay by writing a book entitled, If I Did It where he hypothesizes how the murders might have happened if he had done it. The insane plan to cash in on the death of his ex-wife and her friend left the entire country incredulous. No one knew if he was bragging about what he had done, or bragging that if he would have had the chance, he would have done it ten times better than the actual killer. Just about everyone suspected that book would never see the light of day, but Goldmans family received the rights to the story to satisfy an unpaid civil judgment. They published it with a new title, If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer. The "If" in the title was emphasized a little less than Simpson might have wished ...
Too on the nose?
O.J. Simpson never made any money from his story. Ironically, the book Simpson hoped would simultaneously bring him more wealth and fame proved that a man capable of killing two people with a knife, was completely incapable of killing two birds with one stone.









Did statutory rape laws even exist in Kierkegaard's time? I mean, not saying what the guy did wasn't sleazy, but I don't think any legal basis for that existed at the time, and wasn't it normal for girls to get married at 14-16 to men well over 20 during that time as well?
ReplyThat picture of Ledger as Casanova is far creepier than any of his work as the Joker.
ReplyLoved the Oedipus reference xD
ReplyIn a situation where most people would likely rip their eyes from the sockets, Casanova took it on the chin.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesI'm thinking his daughter took it on the chin. And cheeks, forehead...
To GoForthAndDie
NICE!!!!
and apparently her handkerchief.
Kids these days, no respect for simile.
I may be incorrect, but to my understanding OJ was paid up front to attach his name to the story which was ghost written. OJ only lost future royalties.
ReplyWow, only 3 years for shooting someone in the head? Hmm...
ReplyFor attempted murder by a minor.
A white(ish), female minor at that.
You know, I was hoping to see the Camden Town Murder series on this list, but I'm not objecting. Holy shit.
ReplyYou can add casey anthony to this list now. Only she not only got away with killing her own baby but she also got 200,000 dollars from fox news to cover her story BEFORE THE VERDICT WAS EVEN OUT. So she got more money in the span of a few weeks then i make in 4 years while still on trial for murdering her daughter. She could have been found guilty and still got the money. She would have at least been in jail but now she has 200 grand and is a free woman who sucessfully murdered her child soley because she was a burden to her party life. She was like an object to her, just like so many of the narcissistic monsters growing up today. Anything that hinders them from doing whatever they want they just get rid of like garbage. Its all material. But the worst thing about it all is a little girl lost her life and no one gave a s**t everyone just watched it like they watch all the others. Every person involved got that sweet cash and now they are all going on with their lives a bit richer while that little girl died before experiencing life. I hope those f*****g lawyers had a good time partying and drinking 10 minuets after the trial.
Reply Hide All See All 4 Repliesthey're going to burn in hell
I thought that money was from ABC News?
I'm fairly certain the money came from ABC News, and that is what she used to pay her lawyers. So...you're wrong in just about everything you said.
i love how the justice system is only flawed when it disagrees with what we all know.
soren bowie, how long have you been waiting to make a reference to soren kierkegaard?
ReplyNice job painting a completely false picture of Soren Kierkegaard. He truly loved Regine Olsen from the beginning, but in the heat of the engagement, found that he could not reconcile commitment to her and his passion for philosophy and Christianity. He left her for her own good as well as his own, knowing that he wasn't in any position to dedicate himself to her the way she deserved. The choice haunted him for the rest of his life. Olsen went on to live a fulfilled life with a husband; the rest of Kierkegaard's life, on the other hand, was mired in regret and depression. Kierkegaard was nothing like how this article represents him.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesYeah, I've used that excuse a ton of times as well.
He also "loved" a 14 year old. So yeah, there's that.
Claim that he 'truly loved' Olsen all you want: Most pedophiles do.
Your trying to defend a man that seduced a 14 year old girl in the most influential point in her life while having sex with her for years while she was underage then dumps her after she finally is brainwashed enough to "love" him back? then after that heroic act he wrote in detail boasting the whole story as some Shakespearean love saga? Which is what you just tried to twist it to be. Its not a love story its a story of a f*****g pedophile that had his fun while she was a child then when it came to true commitment and she no longer had that pedo look he left like a coward. Thats the bottom line. You can rationalize it all you want it wont make it right. I suspect your a fan and are ashamed of the truth so you manipulate it with fantasy to validate his actions. Every person on this list was a criminal that never got what they deserved. Plain and simple. I pisses me off when people try to defend classical "artists" for blatant acts of violence or demented perversion based on the fact that they had such a great "soul" and "passion" for blah blah. I don't give a s**t what you accomplished in life or how intelligent you are. A crime is a crime and these people all got away with it.
Just going to point out here to no one in particular that rape laws vary by state and country. Black and white never did no nothing good; it's not like you're born knowing 16 is a badder age than 17 or whatever your state's law tells you.
What even counted as statutory rape in the 19th century?
I thought 14 was 'Just Ripe' in that day and age.
How does Al Capone die from and STD but this guy died from what? This Louis guy and Soren are like two guys I know. The whole Amy Fisher thing happens everyday on Long Island. As for O.J. he knows Nicole is smiling down on him from Heaven.
ReplyRemind me never to go to Long Island if your teenage girls are frequently insane, murderous, and strippers.
If Nicole is smiling down from heaven it's because she can see that his ass finally ended up in prison.
What about Jack the Ripper? The paintings he supposedly painted show himself with holes in his penis and his murder victims arranged just as the photos from the crime scenes showed.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesI'd say that should be #1. Or do you think the Jack The Ripper case is still unsolved?
It is dumbass. Nobody ever found him so how the hell was he bragging about his crimes? They could have been an accomplice's paintings for all we know.
Let me guess: you believe that nonsense about Sickert being the killer.
Jack the Ripper wrote letters to the newspapers and police. Maybe. He did kill five women. And he was never found.
Thats funny, I read the article about infamous mystery people with Jack the Ripper, no Sickert comment (that i read anyway). Then here, with no mention of Saucy Jack, a Sickert comment.
Ah, you guys had to be there.
Ha, Buttafuoco. Ha ha.
Reply"...a man capable of killing two people with a knife, was completely incapable of killing two birds with one stone."
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesEasily the greatest half-sentence written in 2010 (poor punctuation excepted).
I am sure you meant to write "Your poor punctuation accepted."
No, he's excepting the poor punctuation. It is except from his analysis.
You mean "exempt" from his analysis?
Look! A jackass-tree right here in the comments section! WEIRD!
wow.
guys, i'm billing you for the twenty seconds it took to read this exchange.
Soren, what is your source of information about kierkegaard? I've read a lot about Kierkegaard, and nowhere have I heard it told from this type of perspective. For one thing, it was not statutory rape for a 14-year-old to be engaged to a 24-year-old back then; it was a perfectly normal age for marriage in the 19th century! Women were brought up to mature more quickly because life was short. You can't use today's cultural standards to judge people who lived in completely different times and cultures. Also: all this about his having sex with her? molesting her? Where did you get that? Where? Nowhere have I come across any information of that sort. He was a very, very devout Christian who was very, very in love with Regine (her family was supportive of the marriage), and he called it off for mostly religious reasons. I'm afraid your desire to make this article funny has compromised your ability to get the facts straight. Seriously. You realize that some people read things on cracked and trust them fully? I know it's a comedy site, but you have to be SOMEWHAT truthful. You can't twist facts however you want them to make people laugh/cringe/whatever. That's Glenn Beck's job. That's right. I JUST COMPARED YOU TO GLENN BECK. That's how ridiculous I found this article. Or at least the bit about Kierkegaard. Provide me with a reliable source on Kierkegaard elaborating on his molestation of Regine and maybe I'll listen to you.
Reply Hide All See All 5 Replies...Because devout Christians are incapable of committing terrible acts.
so then how do you explain the book where he totally admits to having done just that?
Have you actually read the book, Bill? He does nothing of the sort.
Well said. Kierkegaard's "awful crime" is pure bulls**t.
LOOK EVERYONE! PEOPLE AR PAYING ATTENTION TO MY COMMENT ON THE INTERNET! CAPSLOCK IS THE BEST FOR INCITING ANGER AND RESPONSES!
I'm seeing a lot of philosophers on this list.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesOddly enough, when I was in high school, I had an English assignment where I wrote about why prisoners should be allowed to write about their crimes. I used the Amy Fisher example (while she was still in jail), saying that people were paying the Buttafucos, Amy's family, and her other boyfriends all kinds of money to get their side of the story (and the movie rights, of course), but that no one had paid her anything. I think my point was, if we (society) are going to pay to hear and see sensationalised accounts of sex and violence, then why are we unwilling to pay the people who inspired those accounts?
But, hey, I was seventeen. What did I know?
Because the culprits shouldn't profit from their crimes.
If some guy murdered my family and then became rich and famous selling the story of his killing spree, I would be pissed. But maybe you wouldn't?
Socrates "allegedly" f**ked little boys. So did Plato and Aristotle. The more you know!
So did everyone else in greece, retard.
Pedophilia was kind of like being into anal in ancient Greece.
You’re dwelling on the corporal while I’m trying to engage you in the metaphysical, dude.
ReplyCasanova's daughter and her mother accepted Casanova's offer without any objection. Maybe they were into it before the sexcapades of Casanova came to a full circle. Then again who am I to judge.
Reply Hide All See All 11 RepliesIt doesn't matter if your daughter wants to have sex with you, it's still f**king wrong.
Why? Because society says it is?
Casanova might as well have been a sperm donor, he had absolutely no relationship with her until she became an adult.
(I'm not implying that it is but most people don't have a well thought out answer)
Yeah, 'cus sperm banks were totally a thing in the 18th century.
Way to either completely miss the point or ignore it, Altius.
Let's see what I can remember from psyche class on the subject of incest.
During the first six early years of your life, if you grew up in close quarters with someone you and they (I think they also are affected, don't remember exactly) build an 'immunity' to being attracted to one another.
So sibling separated at birth? Yes, they will be attracted to each other. See also; kissing cousins. It is indeed mostly society (And its good sense not to bloody inbreed ourselves to retarded death) that imposes these taboos.
Hahahaha....Looked at mrawesomo's comment and busted out laughing. Its just so to the point.
Don't just throw "society" out there like it's some global, uniform boogey-man. Vastly different cultures all around the world have an incest tabboo. I realize a lot of philosophy majors will now jump down my throat because "marriage was an institution invented solely as a way of using their women as bartering tools between other tribes, ergo incest was an obstruction to that goal." Consensual or not, social contract or not, incest is creepy. And no.
there are countries today where incest isn't illegal. i can't easily research its taboo status in those countries, but trying to appeal to majority to say it's automatically wrong is just poor argument.
present a rational reason why non-reproductive incest should be avoided, anyone?
anaris, you can go ahead and f**k your cousins. Just don't get all self-righteous about it all over the internet.
Casanova was most likely full of shit, like everyone else who feels they need to brag about their fantastic (in the most literal sense) sexual exploits.
I think incest is tricky because of the power dynamics present in many families (and encouraged in many cultures). I understand that you're talking about incest when pedophilia is not on the table, but even if your country's laws say you are technically of age, how much power does a, say, 16-year-old really have against the parents who provide them with everything? How are you really able to truly tell if they are giving uncoerced consent, when the person asking for it is able to withhold food, money, education, freedom, etc.?
It's less clear cut when it comes to incest between siblings, but often family dynamics give similar power to the oldest child, or the male child, which could also leave a sibling feeling like they "can't say no."
When it comes to adults who live independent of each other, I think those power dynamics can still be in play and be tricky, but ultimately there needs to be a point where the law isn't dictating the choices of adults, even if they're potentially "icky" choices.
As to why I wouldn't partake in incest, it's because I find it gross, but that shouldn't dictate other people.
#5 was f**king hot. I now feel moved to form a family. I only hope I only beget females.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesPlease don't.
If there is a God, you won't procreate.
I am not a religious person, but I pray that you are sterile.
Just because some pervert in the 1700's thought it was a good idea to have it off with his daughter does not make it a good idea.
Luckily, there is no god. Go for it.
I know I should not laugh, but the mindset of Casanova is hilarious "Oh s**t, that was my daughter, s**t, s**t, s**t... threesome?"
Reply