4 Evolutionary Explanations for Modern Annoyances
Soren Bowie is on assignment in the jungles of South America. Filling in for him today is Los Angeles based writer Joe Donatelli.
At some point, your appendix was vital to your survival. Well, not yours in particular. Yours is useless. But humanity's collective appendix was an evolutionary advancement that kept the species alive. The trouble with evolution, however, is that it's painfully slow. Sometimes long after the threat is gone the solution still lingers, wasting space and getting in the way. The following are four metaphorical appendixes we're still forced to deal with daily despite how annoying they might be. At one point each of these social evolutionary steps was the glue to our civilization, but we've come a long way since then, and now they're just sort of annoying.
#4. Women Take Forever to Leave Parties

Let me preface this by saying that it comes from first-hand experience. I have a lot of time to think about how women take forever to leave parties because I spend a lot of time standing in doorways watching my wife and her friends take forever to leave parties.
Getty
"Wait, there might be someone in the bathroom I haven't said goodbye to."
Women say goodbye to the host, to their friends, to people they've met that night and even to strangers. In fact, when it comes to strangers, the saying of goodbye often becomes the saying of hello, which leads to the conversation they should have had during the party, which goes on for minutes, which finally ends with a second goodbye.
With her friends, it's not enough to say goodbye. Compliments are exchanged. Promises of phone calls and emails are made. Dates are set for future rendezvous. Goodbye is not just goodbye. Goodbye is "I love you and goodbye and let's plan when we're going to see each other again and goodbye again."
Getty
"My boyfriend is already in the car. We've got another half hour of nitrous balloons until he gets pissed."
For those of you keeping track, that's two goodbyes apiece for friends and strangers, plus more planning than took place before the Yalta Conference. Finally, 20 or 30 minutes after my wife and I had the "Ready to go?" conversation that all couples have before leaving parties, we go.
When I'm at a party with my friends, I do the polite thing: I thank the host and leave. I do not say goodbye to anyone else unless they meet one of the following requirements: 1) They have been my best friend since we were 5 years old 2) They are dying and if I say goodbye now it will save me a trip to the hospital later.
I then drive home safely.
Getty
Passing out at parties is harder when you have to find couch space for a second person.
When I leave a party with my wife I get in the car and mash the pedal so hard our windshield looks like the Millennium Falcon making the jump to light speed because I was ready to leave an hour ago and want to get the hell home now. Meanwhile she's in the passenger seat on the phone calling all of the people from the party she didn't get a chance to say goodbye to.
There might be a very good scientific reason for our diametrically opposed goodbye techniques.
In research published by Daniel Balliet, Norman P. Li, Shane J. Macfarlan and Mark Van Vugt of the American Psychological Association in Psychological Bulletin, men cooperate better with other men than women cooperate with other women. Researchers reviewed 272 studies containing 31,642 participants in 18 countries. Each study contained one social dilemma. In a social dilemma experiment, two or more people must choose between short-term self-interest and long-term group interest. The research revealed that women were more likely to cooperate when men were involved and women were less cooperative than men in same-sex situations.
Getty
"We'll get right back to those Q3 numbers once Sandra closes her giant,
gaping vagina to every man in a three-block radius."
This reminds me of the BBC's Walking with Cavemen, a documentary that featured a shocking amount of caveman dong and also explained how cavemen lived. The men walked together. They hunted together. They scouted together. They fought in war together. It was in their interests to get along. The cavemen from the documentary were just like the guys from Entourage, with the main exception being that Vincent Chase is the only caveman dong on that show.
In the documentary, when a female named "Lucy" joined the group, she took a fancy to the alpha male in the group. The females, naturally, hated her guts and said things like "oog" (translation: "She's fat") and "ghuh" ("I hear she is on drugs") and "pit" ("Slut") and "pit-pit" ("Total slut").
Getty
You don't even want to know what "sloog" means.
Lucy was ostracized by the females until the alpha female took Lucy under her wing in an attempt to keep her away from the alpha male. Because things like convents and boarding schools and Cheaters had yet to be invented, the alpha female eventually discovered Lucy and the alpha male overcoming their third-date jitters next to a boulder.
Eventually Lucy would die of random bludgeoning (random bludgeoning being the No. 1 cause of death in those days), but not before she gave birth to the alpha male's baby, forcing the females in the group to choose between legitimizing the baby by raising it or leaving it to die with its slutty mother, therein providing the inspiration for the first Lifetime original movie.

Lucy would go on to have a lucrative career as a corpse.
Evolutionary psychologists believe we are at least partly who we are today because of who we were on the savannah thousands of years ago. They say men are wired to accumulate resources and procreate and women are wired to compete for men. Of course, in the civilized world, we're beyond that now. Women don't depend on men solely for resources and can have a child without one. But their internal wiring was put in back when being labeled a bitch might be a death sentence.
So why do women take forever to leave parties? Maybe it's because, deep down, they have evolutionary trust issues. A woman isn't just saying goodbye at parties. She's subconsciously saying, "We're cool, right?" "We don't hate each other, right?" She's covering her bases because she knows that if she slights even one woman in the room, that woman could spend the rest of the party calling her a "pit-pit."
#3. Men Throw Money at Sex, But Not the Way You're Thinking

Have you ever wondered why cocktail waitresses wear skimpy outfits? It's not because we all want to see some old showgirl's muffin top. It's because men are more likely to risk money when they're thinking about mating. This doesn't just happen in Las Vegas. Pharmaceutical companies hire former college cheerleaders as sales reps. High-end restaurants hire good-looking waitresses. Fitness centers are managed by gorgeous women. Sex sells. It sells because, when it comes to money, men normally exhibit a behavior called "loss aversion."
Getty
"I'll buy the house, but only if it comes with tits."
Loss aversion is the tendency to choose avoiding losses over acquiring gains. Loss aversion in men is reduced, according to researchers led by Arizona State professor Douglas Kenrick, when a man is looking for a mate.
Said one author of the study, "For men in a mating frame of mind, loss aversion completely disappeared and they became more focused on wins than losses. For women, on the other hand, mating motivation led them to be even more loss averse, to focus less on possible gains and even more on the pain of loss."
Of course. Reproductive decisions are more costly for females; they pay the higher costs of pregnancy and nursing.
Getty
We're not sure what's going on here, but we know it's easier than a C-section.
When researchers put subjects in a more "self-protective" frame of mind, men and women became more loss averse. This could explain why so many people do not spend money in a bad economy even when they have money to spend.
According to evolutionary researchers, natural selection has endowed modern humans with a psychology that encourages us to make decisions that increase the likelihood that our genes will survive, thrive and replicate.
Getty
Which is why you don't see so many pocket protectors these days.
What does that mean, in terms of money? It means men are more likely to spend money when sex is on the mind. Women are less loss averse when mating is not a factor; think of the older, married woman on a shopping spree. Fewer people invest in the stock market during hard times, even though that's when they should. Also, all of the hot young staffers chasing congressmen around Capitol Hill could explain why the country is broke.
Popular Cracked Videos
-
Sex as Understood by Adolescent Boys
Why Mario is Secretly a Douchebag
Why the Ending of 'Star Wars' is Secretly Kind of Dumb
Recommended For Your Pleasure
-
25 Propaganda Posters For Everyday Annoyances
721,677 views -
-
-
6 Adorable Cat Behaviors With Shockingly Evil Explanations
4,220,279 views -
5 Scientific Explanations for Your Sexual Perversions
1,000,061 views
841 Comments
Trending Now Friends' Recent Activity
Flashback
Cracked Shows
Most Popular
Elsewhere ...



This reads like it's half finished. All the set-up is there, but not much follow through.
ReplyYou have to click next to get to the other half of the page...
Even if evolution were true, I would have difficulty believing that these are a result thereof.
ReplyFor instance, the last one at a party is usually-- me. I am male.
So how on earth does evolution factor that in? Or the many women here complaining about women who won't leave after a dozen goodbyes?
Yes, because specialized and single cases overrule studies that incorporate the many. And, therefore, "evolution" (which is obviously falsifiable according to the many citations and first person accounts present in the Bible) must therefore be untrue. Because science, when making its breakthrough, forgot to account for YOU. Dumb scientists.
Simply using the word 'thereof' does not make your comment any more intelligent.
Fire Steve was hilarious!
ReplyUntil he got married, that is.
This is a really crap article, hey lets make s**t up based on my feelings and then trawl through random s**t science papers to support it. Hell at this rate I'll be a creationist
ReplyGod, I'm female and I f*****g HATE women who can't leave parties. My parents did that all the time when I was a kid and I have friends who do that too. I would be ready to do as a kid after 3 hours and I'd say "It's getting late. Can we go now?" and they'd say "We'll leave in a minute, honey" and then ANOTHER HOUR GOES BY before they even get the INKLING to leave, and then it's ANOTHER hour of saying goodbyes. The worst part is MY DAD DOES THE SAME THING. It's so great that I can just look at my boyfriend and say "We should probably leave now" and we just get up and go.
Replyi was kinda lost reading this article, not really written the regular cracked style
Replyyea, he's got the MLA format going. It reads more like a newspaper trying to accurately cite its sources. Just throw that s**t in there. Isn't everything on the internet true anyway?
Yay! #1 doesn't apply to me! I've evolved beyond conventional human limitations!
ReplyYay! Evo-psych bullshit! And hey, it justifies sexist bullshit! What are the freakin' odds?
ReplySame odds as some loser getting all over excited about an article on a comedy site.
Yay! You just finished psych 101!
good one
ReplyI'm so glad I wasn't the only person who had trouble following this. I can even read "psychology speak" on most days and this was just rambly.
ReplyThis article's conclusions could have been more in depth...kind of vague conclusions to each of the 4 statements/paragraphs/whatever you want to call them...
ReplyThe conclusions were vague, yes. I also found myself re-reading the headers and article title because I could not seem to follow this bizarre train of thought.
yes
This article's conclusions could have been more in depth...kind of vague conclusions to each of the 4 statements/paragraphs/whatever you want to call them...
ReplyThe big problem is this: research looks at 32,000 people in 18 countries and makes a 'women tend to do X more than men' comment and random person says 'yeah, women do that', when it's clearly nothing more than a mild leaning.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesMost normal people realise that it means that it's a very minor difference between genders that only shows up in large volumes - just like the concepts of 'men are faster than women' or 'men play more video games' - there are very fast women and many who play video games, though undeniably both are true no matter how much research you do 'on average'.
Hence: this article was poor, as some of us guys say goodbye to people too and have interesting male married friends.
THe problem with agreeing or disagreeing with studies is that people want to say a statement or hypothesis is either valid or invalid. you can't do that in real science, you can only "generally accept" hypotheses for given scenarios. O__o
You are not a man if you spend more than 2 minutes saying your goodbyes at a party.
funny, i've found myself waiting in doorways and cars more often than i remember holding up the show....but of course we don't remember when WE are the ones being an a*****e amirite
I'm female and I have no idea where the writer came up with this stuff. I have constantly waited on men to say their 'goodbyes' at parties and a lot of men I know talk on the phone much more than I do to stay 'cool' with their buddies. I am polite and give friends hugs perhaps but I certainly don't stick around when I'm meaning to head out that door. Studying anthropology as well...I honestly have never heard of this junk and think some people spend a bit too much time focusing on wanting there to be so many differences because of gender. The gender 'lines' are crossed constantly and many things males do, females do too and vice versa. Judging people as individuals really tends to be easier than just lumping people together for silly stereotypes.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesYep. Every time I see "according to evolutionary psychologists ..." I just roll my eyes.
You've clearly never left a party with my girlfriend before.
Exactly, you are a female, so you don't realise when you do this.
Right, so there's these things called personalities... they're different in other people. Also, it's why they act different. Maybe she just doesn't want to be left alone with him. That's an option.
cadbury_egg is also a tranny. Yes, gender differences do exist. Not in the ways most people think, but they do exist.
Hamsterjelly touched on something that I think is really important. We all exist on a scale. you aren't just man vs woman as in black vs white. Some people have penises and vaginas. some women have more facial hair, some men more body fat (no offense ladies). So there, not only is evolution real, but everyone is bisexual too.
I feel like this was written in a pretty convoluted fashion. It went off in to long rambling tangents about research but never really tied any of it back to the initial list point. They just stop abruptly. Like: This researched showed that this and this and this and this, which is kind of tangentially related to this, end.
Replyyeah, that's exactly the right conclusions to draw from those studies.
ReplyEvolutionary psychology is weak enough without being twisted and misinterpreted.
Not to mention that no caveman has EVER been found, foremost, and all skeletons found usually lose their steam and just become another vague node or tip on an arbitrary "tree of life."
This was generally pretty badly written. It was disjointed and the conclusions it drew didn't make sense.
ReplyNotions of gender "hard wiring" have taken a battering and are increasingly discredited. Problematically, they are often trotted out to back up sexist stereotypes, usually about women, or in an attempt to justify existing social inequalities as biological therefore "natural". This article lays on the evolutionary psychology with a pretty thick hand, but there are many more, complex determinants of "gendered" behaviour. A good reference on this topic is "Delusions of Gender" by Dr Cordelia Fine.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesMen and women are different. Don't believe me? Look down.
Great, another tranny. Look, you a*****e, gender roles do exist. Yes, lines can be crossed. But this whole "differentiating between gender and sex" thing is extremely stupid. Do you have a penis? You're a man. A vagina? You're a woman. You don't have to act like a girly girl or a macho man, but you're still a man or a woman.
Yes, I've heard of Cordelia Fine. I heard plenty about her from my sociology prof and her "six genders". If there was really no difference, there wouldn't be a whole thing in most vertebrates called "sexual dichotomy".
@hamster: why do you not believe in the differenced between sex and gender? The former is decided by your sexual organs and secondary sexual characteristics, determining whether you are male or female. The latter is a much more complex set of norms, beliefs, and behaviours, determining whether you are masculine or feminine. The sexual dichotomy you refer to refers ONLY to sex. As humans, we have another whole thing to consider, and that is gender, which is not decided by what your body looks like or which hormones are dominant. It is decided by attitudes and beliefs, something not found in other vertebrates.
I am interested in the way humans are able to -- supersede their own natural behaviors and replace them with others; sometimes, to such a degree that neither evolution OR creation seem to describe them with utmost adequacy.
For instance, furries are only a small step away from fully human, but sometimes are just bipedal animals; yet further still are those who actually want to have sex with animals, whether it be dogs, cats or deer.
Homosexuality is another case where there is NO reason for it to happen. Every instinct in one's body must SCREAM to mate with the opposite sex; otherwise, we are simply performing an action that is meaningless to the propagation of our species.
Then again, playing video games, singing and dozens of other things are virtually pointless if all of life is a means to some undefined "end."
It's almost as if we are machines with code written to accommodate anything that can be conceived of. If one can imagine it, there is at LEAST one person on earth who has had the right experiences and natural inclination to create a characteristic that enjoys aforementioned thing.
Heh, mainly about womyn. I feel like the title is wrong. Not what I expected and I like my lists properly labeled.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesYou misspelled women.
I somehow like his spelling better. Is the singular form "womun"?
No it's some of that passive-aggresive feminist garbage, since the CORRECT spelling has the word "men" in it.
I actually kind of prefer the spelling "womyn". It interjects the "y" over the the "e" effectively removing the reference to "men" in the spelling.
Of course, it does so by using symbol of the chronosome which is unique to males, proving that passive aggressive feminists are short sited as well.
The alternative to womyn w/o ruining the joke is "wimmin", "womban", or "wom!n" according to Wikipedia.
Since "man" refers to all of humans, it would be reasonable for females to slightly alter the name to accommodate the differences; she is still a member of "man," but not a man, and very attractive; thus, she is known as "WHOA! Man."
It seems odd that women want to remove any reference to men from various names. We ARE part of the same species, so having a word in common seems reasonable to me.
Man, and woman. Male, and female.
I suppose it does imply that the essential gender is male, and the female are sort of a sub-category therein, but then again, men are stronger, event more stuff, and go to war. I think we earned the right to have some words.
No!!
Reply