6 Companies That Rigged The Game (And Changed the World)
Living in the age of countless corporate scandals and skyrocketing CEO salaries, it's no coincidence that we've become a cynical bunch when it comes to corporate America. We've almost come to expect companies to screw everybody over so that their top executives can spend their time buying solid cocaine statues of Gordon Gekko and betting on hooker boxing matches hosted on yachts in international waters.
However, sometimes when you see the scheming that goes on behind the scenes, you do have to kind of admire it. Not approve of it, mind you -- just appreciate the kind of balls it takes to ...
#6. Convince the World That a Common Substance Is Rare

So, why do you think diamonds are valuable?
Most people will probably tell you the same reasons: they're very strong and visually striking, but most importantly, they're rare.
Getty
"We only have enough for the first several millions of you."
There's only one problem with that: that last one isn't true. To explain why you think diamonds are scarce, let's rewind about a hundred years.
Via Wikimedia Commons
That's one diamond mine. That thing to the left is a town.
For much of human history, diamonds were valuable because they could only be found in a select few places in the world. In the 19th century, however, that actually changed as people started to find massive deposits, most notably in Africa. Those deposits were large enough that the rarity of diamonds was quickly becoming a thing of the past.
Photos.com
"Sir, if you continue dropping these on the ground, I'll have to give you a ticket for littering."
Faced with stockpiles that were on the verge of being significantly devalued, the owners of those deposits had three options:
A) Compete against each other and watch the value of their diamonds plummet as the law of supply and demand drove prices down;
B) Forget the diamond market and just use their land to invest in Six Flags Over Zimbabwe;
C) Band together to form an evil multinational monopoly that would inflate prices and earn them billions upon billions of dollars.
Photos.com
We know. Stupid morals.
Go figure, they chose the third option, forming the cartel we know as De Beers. To maintain the perception that diamonds were rare, De Beers not only significantly limited how many diamonds they mined each year, but also literally started buying up all the other diamonds and just stockpiling them (along with their own excess supply). Combined with a decades-long advertising campaign, they created a perception out of thin air that diamonds were rare and valuable, and that you had to drop thousands of dollars on one to prove you loved your spouse.
So, if all that's true, how in the hell do they get away with it? Shouldn't it be illegal?
Getty
And if so, what time does the riot start?
Actually, it totally is. The monopoly De Beers holds is so blatantly illegal by U.S. antitrust laws that they've been banned from selling in the U.S. (they're forced to sell to intermediaries on the international market). Until they pleaded guilty to price fixing charges in 2004, their executives wouldn't even set foot on American soil because they feared they'd be arrested on sight.
While there are indications that the cartel might finally be slowly losing its grip on the market, it's been a pretty damn impressive run.
#5. Fix an Auction Via Secret Code

Let's say you're on eBay, shopping for some Pokemon cards, but somehow you know all of the other bidders -- like they're people you play against all the time. Rather than get into a bidding war that would leave one of you spending $1,000 on a foil collectible Charizard, it would make more sense for all of you to get on the phone and negotiate out who needs what. If they let you win the Charizard, they can have the prism foil Squirtle. You designate who is going to "win" each auction, and everybody else submits artificially low bids to keep up the charade.

What, you thought we were kidding?
Everyone gets what they want, but you all wind up paying the seller way less than you would have under a real, competitive auction. And while it makes sense, in the business world it is illegal as shit. When large companies do this, they have to get clever, which brings us to one of the biggest auctions of all time: when the FCC decided to auction off spectrum resources to major phone companies in 1994. These bits of the spectrum have to be reserved by particular companies to keep different signals from interfering with each other, and all of this is enforced by the FCC. Prior to 1994, the FCC simply gave those rights away for free. Then, realizing that they were missing a prime opportunity to make money, they decided to start auctioning them off by region.
So, the companies all submitted their bids for the various regions, all of which were made public.

But some experts noticed an odd trend with a few of the major companies involved. Not only were these companies winning markets for much less than anticipated, but also they did so while submitting oddly specific bids. For example, instead of simply bidding $313,000 for a market, they'd bid $313,378. So why tack on $378 to the end of a bid?
Getty
"Sold, to the guys who gave us coke money."
According to analysts, it was code. Remember when we said the bids were made public? Those three digits at the end of the bid were area codes of markets that they wanted other companies to stop bidding on. In other words, the major telecoms were divvying up markets by telling each other, "We'll stop bidding on this one if you stop bidding on that one." The result? According to the aforementioned study, the companies involved "won more than 40 percent of the spectrum for sale and paid significantly less for their overall winnings."
It appears that the telecom industry had just made out like bandits, and they did it in broad daylight.
Via Wikinvest.com
It wasn't the first time, either.
#4. Invent a Disease, Then Cure It

When Listerine first hit the market in 1879 as a surgical antiseptic, its creators weren't entirely satisfied. While there was certainly money in the surgical antiseptic market, there wasn't the "use your profits to buy a small island in the Pacific and staff it with monkeys dressed like little maitre d's because fuck you" kind of money they were looking for. So, in an attempt to expand their business, they sought out new ways to sell their product.

But how do you rebrand a surgical antiseptic? Well, if you're Listerine, you just start making up random illnesses your product cures and hope people believe you. After all, the stuff does kill germs -- they're not exactly lying. They scoured medical textbooks, found the words "chronic halitosis" (which was at the time nothing more than an obscure medical term for a condition that didn't really exist) and decided that their product would be the be-all end-all cure to it. See, your breath doesn't just smell bad, you have a medical problem.
Photos.com
Hope you have health insurance, asshole.
Naturally, when you tell people that they're sick and you hold the only known cure, they're probably going to listen to your pitch. People who lived their entire lives without mouthwash suddenly felt the need to cure their newly discovered ailment, and within a few years Listerine's sales increased to around 70 times what they were before.
Via Mandydale.com
Oh, and did we mention that they're still doing it today?
Listerine tried to ride the "make up random applications for your product" train for as long as they could, marketing their product as a cure for dandruff, and later trying to market their own brand of cigarettes. None of those ideas ever really caught on, but the mouthwash business seems to be working out just fine for them.
Via Tobaccodocuments.org
It was a good try, though.








got the million dollar man's theme song stuck in my head now.
Reply"They've grown slightly fonder of intellectual property rights since." For some reason that killed me!!
Reply#2 is used by Rosetta Stone. Which linguists, educators, and anybody who has actually tried to learn a language will tell you is pretty much the biggest scam not selling fat loss and easy money.
ReplyAfter a conversation with some friends and colleagues about how the program actually discouraged people from learning a language (pretending that you can and should learn a language like children do, and that children can learn a language in mere days), I googled criticisms of the product, to see if we'd missed anything. Guess what I found?
Hint: it was a bunch of affiliate sites praising with faint damnation.
No.1 reminded me of this segment on the Flintstones, years ago, where they're all in a tub singing about SoftSoap.
Replylast one was perfect.
ReplyIt's genius. Sell cigarettes to make the breath smell bad, and then sell listerine to make breath smell better! Perfect!
ReplyI feel like I should be angry at this article about something, but really, it's just not worth it. Interesting article.
ReplyHow ironic that Listerine also tried to market their own brand of cigarettes, when it's a well known fact that smoking can cause oral cancer. Add to that the relatively new claim that alcohol-containing mouthwash (which is just about all of them, including Listerine) increases the risk of oral cancer, and that smokers who regularly use these types of mouthwash are more at risk.
ReplyBut hey, bad breath.
Evidence of this "relatively new claim" please.
No mention of Veggie Libel laws, or Monsanto? Really??
ReplyLol, De Beers is the very first thing we talked about when I started Supply and Demand section in my Microeconomy class.
Replyomg my son has one of those foil collectible Charizard. I paid $100 for it around 1998 or something ...
Reply Hide All See All 4 Replieslol I have one too, I have one too.
I still have the one I got when I was younger too, but I didn't pay that f*****g much for it, even back then.
Way back when when I was a kid into Pokemon cards one of my friends had one and told me how valuable it was and I was like "yah yah". Now I wonder just how much he's gotten for it XD.
I got it in a regular pack of Pokemon cards. I only found out about a year or two ago how valuable it is. I probably have a bunch of valuable ones, but I can't be bothered to look up all this for stuff I was into when I was a kid.
==I just paid $ 22.87 for an iPad2 - 64 GB and my girlfriend loves her Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $ 38.76 there arriving tomorrow by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $ 675 which only cost me $ 62.81 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, CoolCent . com==
Reply Hide All See All 3 Repliesdie, spambot. Just die
And this is the 7th company that tries so hard to rig the game and fails.
Well said, Caleb367
Actually, it wasn't just distance that sparked the movie studios to set up shop in Hollywood. At the time the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals basically made zero efforts in the way of enforcing patent and intellectual property law. Hence the studios were able to give Edison the finger and know that there wasn't a f*****g thing Edison could do about it.
Reply Hide All See All 4 Repliesactually the article stated that.
To be fair to urh and his tiny, tiny brain the article didn't specifically make a link between the lack of enforcement and the studios moving.
I fucked Edison once, he was terrible in bed but extremely eager....
shutup fag!
Pretty good article all around, though I think Lucasfilm was just being cheeky rather than profiting off nerd rage (That just came as a pretty nice benefit).
ReplyAs if they're mutually exclusive.
Did #1 remind anybody of Futurama, when Fry and Mom bid over the anchovies?
Replygood times..
Number one is brilliant.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesAgreed. It was the only one where the little guy won.
It made me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
I'm proud to say that I have not less than three bottles of Softsoap in my apartment right now. And yes, it was freakin' brilliant.
f*****g ballsy, too. What a risk!
That's capitalism!
Wow CRACKED has a HUGE right wing bias.
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesMan I hope you're joking.
It depends on the author of the article. Some are fairly conservative, others blame George Bush for the Vietnam War.
Actually, it depends on the writer and subject. Cracked has a wider political spectrum than probably 90% of other sites that I've seen.
Many of the writers are in the comedy side of the political spectrum. They go where the jokes are.
As an Australian I'll put the usual 'Who gives a damn?!' comment.
Seriously. What's the big deal who you vote for or what direction? They do just as well as the other during their time in office so whoopdifreakindo!
Umm, what?
@silversatyr As an Australian, I though you put another shrimp in the baribie...
For years Listerine commercials had to state that Listerine does not cure the common cold. The FTC (Or the FCC, one of them) required them to after they claimed it did.
Reply#6
Reply Hide All See All 14 RepliesDe Beers has worked with several corrupt governments in order to cement its control. In fact, ownership of diamond mines in Africa is split between local governments and De Beers. Also, the group created to monitor "blood diamonds" reinforces the cartel as it is made up of large diamond companies and the governments that partially own them.
#5
There is nothing inherently wrong with signaling people during an auction. Personally, I'm wondering why the FCC auctions off spectrum at all, seeing as though common law and the homestead principle could probably take care of the problems and establish a way to own and protect spectrum without handing it over to large interests exclusively.
#4
Hardly a big deal. A company oversold the usefulness of its product. You don't have to buy it. I know the article was about how these actions changed the world, and Listerine probably did change the world, but I'm going after those who want to throw out nonsense like, "That's capitalism!" As if everything in this article is meant to be a "proof" that capitalism is evil/unworkable.
#3
Patents are the essence of government enforced monopoly. Need I say more?
#2
I don't see anything too wrong with this. After all, if you don't like neighbors, feel free to buy up all the houses in the neighborhood. If you want to create a website that talks about how much a product or company sucks, get more creative and think of something that they didn't think of and make them buy it from you!
#1
This worked, but it would be impossible for Soft Soap to control the market on soap dispensers forever. I'm sure if taylor ever started charging a monopoly price, competitors would have began producing other, cheaper soap dispensers/soap combinations. His stunt allowed him to corner an inexpensive to enter market for a short period of time, but it was hardly a perfect, long term strategy. This one didn't have anything to do with government, but that is because it is pretty irrelevant and more of a fluke in the history of business as well as being unsustainable.
I bet you're fun at parties.
For #4, you don't think there's anything wrong with lying about what your product actually does?
your sister is following me to the back of my car and she's about to wrap her lips around my penis.
need i say more??
You're a virgin, aren't you? It's okay. All annoying know-it-all dicks are virgins. You could start a club. A know-it-all club.
u fukin cheeky kunt i swear to god i will wreck u
i agree! gtfo! we can't contribute to this discussion so we'll just make fun of you.
buzzkill know it all. go nerd rage somewhere else.
Wow, they didn't even try.
Wow, really guys? Flaming him because he's discussing the f*****g article?
No he gets flamed because he seems to have missed the point. Then he listed his comments by number. It really doesnt matter what you say, if you make a list in the comments section you will be flamed. Ericho is the lord of the list comments and there can only be one king.
#6 - that was an interesting way to simply reiterate what the article was already telling us and/or implying.
#5 - it is ILLEGAL to signal someone during an auction, as it is a form of collusion. Try again.
#4 - false advertising, for starters. It is ILLEGAL to deceive the marketplace for monetary gain. Once more, try again.
#3 - patents/trademarks/copyrights are meant to protect intellectual property holders. The problem is that the government doesn't enforce patents fairly or evenly.
#2 - bad analogy. You can't "buy up all the houses in the neighborhood" unless your neighbors are selling. It could takes YEARS or even DECADES to pull that off. Buying up the means for consumers to protest against products is moral gray area, as it's a way for companies to prevent people from voicing their opinions in a meaningful way.
#1 - Did you only read half-way through this one? The guy was able to sell SoftSoap for 5x what he paid to corner the market. It doesn't sound like it was ever meant to be a long-term strategy. He simply found a way to screw his competitors and force them to pay out big-time to get back to business as usual.
Hell yes. Let's burn the False List-Dude to the stake! Get your asses in gear, people, we have a blasphemer to torch!
La dee da.
pdxguy for your #2 you can only buy domain names if people are selling them. Most are up for first come first server but if a complaint blog is fast enough they can still buy it.
To all you statists, Rothbard and the Mises institute both outlined the involvement of government power in creating and maintaining the diamond cartel. Try again.
Reply Hide All See All 5 Replies"Whenever a corporation does something evil, it's the government's fault!" You stay classy (and insane), lolbertarians.
The people you idolize ARE the state you claim oppresses big business. They always have been.
*slow clap*
JMA I want to have babies with you.
Yeah, libertarain haters are usually circle jerky like this...
More like ass-to-mouth circle-y.