10 Movies That Famous People Don't Want You to See
Hey, remember The Star Wars Holiday Special, which George Lucas has basically begged you to never watch? It turns out there are a whole bunch of movies that the stars have been trying to hide from everyone, mainly because they're afraid someone will make fun of them.
That's all right, though. That's what we're here for.

If you look closely at the horror section of the video store, you may notice something odd: a cheesy The Texas Chainsaw Massacre sequel you've never heard of that happens to feature two Hollywood superstars as the leads. And we're not talking about something they cranked out decades before they were famous, either.
The movie is Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation, which the studio buried to avoid pissing off a respected actor.
Getty
This guy.
Originally known by the equally nonsensical title of The Return of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre, the 1994 movie starred Matthew McConaughey (who was months away from becoming an A-list star) as a psychopath with a robotic leg. Oh, and it also starred freaking Renee Zellweger, as the lady who runs and screams.
Also, in the movie McConaughey and his brother Leatherface work for the Illuminati or some stupid shit like that. Judging by this promotional reel, half the movie consisted of McConaughey screaming like an idiot:
The movie was supposed to be released in 1995, but Columbia Pictures tried to sabotage the film because McConaughey had suddenly become a big deal. Producers had already agreed to delay the movie until after a little movie Zellweger was starring in called Jerry Maguire came out in 1996. But by then McConaughey had starred alongside Sandra Bullock and Sam Jackson in A Time To Kill and had Spielberg's Amistad coming up, so he probably wasn't so eager to be seen in some shitty slasher sequel anymore.

At this point, McConaughey was known for playing idealistic lawyers, not choking Jerry Maguire's girlfriend.
According to producer Robert Kuhn, McConaughey's agent was "putting pressure on them not to release the film theatrically." The movie eventually got a limited 20-city release in 1997 because of this, in edited form and with a different name. The producers then got their revenge when they released the DVD version under this awful cover:

If you cover the top and the bottom with your hands, it totally looks like a porno.

Don's Plum is a movie starring two of the highest-grossing American actors of all time -- and because of a lawsuit by the stars themselves, it can never be released in the U.S.
DiCaprio and Maguire claim they made the film as a favor to friend, but never actually intended it to be seen: they agreed to let it be shown in film festivals and stuff, presumably under the understanding that nobody goes to that crap anyway. However, after Titanic came out and made obscene amounts of money, the director began meeting with distributors. DiCaprio, Maguire and other actors appearing in the film responded by trying to (illegally, according to the director) block the movie's domestic release.
Getty
Tobey still hasn't stopped his maniacal laughter.
At this point Don's Plum became a bit of a Hollywood legend: what exactly was in it that the actors didn't want America to see? Some news outlets covering the court case described Don's Plum as "the story of a young man exploring all kinds of sexuality and human emotion," which featured "Leonardo DiCaprio as a bisexual who appears nude in one scene." Adjectives like "sexy" and "steamy" were liberally thrown around, making it seem like this was the next Pamela Anderson/Tommy Lee tape.

Only, you know, with these guys instead.
But, despite being banned in the U.S., the film did come out in Europe, and it's not as controversial as everyone thought (or hoped it would be). Turns out DiCaprio's role consists of him sitting in a diner booth for 90 minutes, being a huge asshole:
The movie is a fairly typical black-and-white independent film with all the '90s trademarks like nonlinear editing, a retro soundtrack and characters who seriously won't shut up. It's about a group of friends getting together in a place called Don's Plum and talking about sex and drugs while not actually doing a lot of either. At no point does DiCaprio remove his clothes or declare his bisexuality (that's someone else), so maybe he didn't want the movie released simply because he thought it sucked.

Or because he does come off like an annoying little turd in it.

The "Censored Eleven" are a bunch of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies cartoons (one of them starring Bugs Bunny) that were withdrawn from syndication in 1968 and never aired again. The 11 animated shorts have never been officially released in home video, and Cartoon Network's owner Ted Turner personally vowed to never let them be shown.
Why would they ban some harmless WB cartoons? Well ... probably on account of all the racism.

OK, definitely because of all the racism.
This isn't just Bugs Bunny doing blackface for a few seconds, by the way -- the racist jokes are so central to the plot of these cartoons that no amount of editing could salvage them. Ethnic stereotypes are cut from old cartoons all the time, but if they did that here, all they'd be left with is the WB logo and "That's all folks!"
For example, one 1937 cartoon, "Clean Pastures," is set in what appears to be an all-black section of heaven called Pair-O-Dice (that's the least offensive thing here). A black version of Saint Peter is worried because not enough black people are going to heaven, so he sends his slow-witted angel on a mission to Earth. But wait, at least they're casting black people as saints and angels -- that couldn't be bad, right?

OK, never mind.
The mouth-breathing angel then stands in the middle of Harlem trying to convince people to come to Pair-O-Dice by offering things like food, travel and, of course, watermelon.

Which hadn't been classified as "food" in the '30s, apparently.
Eventually, only a group of hip, jazz-playing angels are capable of convincing the people of Harlem to come along to heaven, which happens instantly, so we're guessing there was some sort of mass suicide or rapture involved. Another short called "The Isle of Pingo Pongo" is a parody of a travel documentary showing a tropical island where the black natives are seen playing a "primitive, savage rhythm." You know where this is going.

The joke being that those black people sure like jazz!
And of course there's the Bugs Bunny one, "All This and Rabbit Stew," which is actually available in some cheap unofficial DVD releases, since it's in the public domain. It's the typical cartoon where Bugs Bunny outwits his opponent, except in this case the person trying to hunt him happens to be every black stereotype combined.

The character's voice is even more offensive than the way he's drawn. Somehow.
Last year Warner Bros. admitted they are considering releasing the Censored Eleven through the Warner Archives program, which is when they charge you a lot of money to burn you a copy of an otherwise unavailable DVD, basically. The videos are incredibly popular on YouTube. Yes, that would technically be profiting off of blatant racism, but Warner Bros. has spent 50 years proving that they will not tolerate racism so long as it's not profitable.

Cocksucker Blues was supposed to be a backstage documentary showing what happens behind the scenes of a Rolling Stones tour in the '70s. When the Stones saw the film, they were so outraged by it that they sued the director to stop it from being released ... despite being the ones doing most of the crazy shit in it.
Via SimplyArtOnline.net
"That's disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself," they said to the director.
Highlights include: baffling close-ups of Jagger groping himself in a bed, graphic sex scenes in unlikely places and so much drug consumption that Colombia now specifically mentions the band in their national anthem. There's even some rare footage of Keith Richards having a difficult time handling his drugs:
Jagger is also seen snorting coke backstage. We all know they did that stuff, but it's still kind of shocking to see it. It's one thing to hear your grandad saying, "Why, I used to be crazy like you kids, too!" and quite another to actually watch him get drunk and punch a hooker.
At one point, members of the entourage start having sex with groupies while the Stones watch and play percussion instruments. It's like a scene straight out of Caligula.

Oh, and all of this happens inside a plane, by the way.
The production of Cocksucker Blues was rather unusual: anyone in the entourage could basically pick up a camera and just film whatever, which is why you get long sequences where it's just unknown people doing coke in a hotel room and raving nonsensically interspersed with the Stones doing press interviews, meeting Andy Warhol and Truman Capote at a party and occasionally playing rock music.

She must be diabetic.
The documentary has never been officially released, and due to a court order, it can't be shown unless the director is standing in the same room. That doesn't mean he can host Rolling Stones marathons at his house every day, because the court order also specifies he can only screen the film once a year.

For years, nobody working for the band Kiss was allowed to so much as utter the name of their first and only feature film, Kiss Meets the Phantom of the Park. Seriously.
So why did they make that movie? The reason, shockingly, is money. In the late '70s, Kiss had reached the height of their popularity and their manager felt that this whole "music" thing had taken them as far as it could. So the band began venturing out into other media, starting with a ridiculous Marvel comic book where they had superpowers. Then it was time for the next step in their plan: a somehow even stupider movie where they battle evil robots in an amusement park.

"Perhaps they will look less ridiculous in comparison."
Oh yeah, and they had powers here, too. Gene Simmons could breath fire, Paul Stanley could shoot lasers from his eye and control minds, Ace Frehley could also shoot lasers and teleport and Peter Criss had ... "leaping powers."

"Because you suck, Pete, that's why."
The movie was cheaply produced and plagued with problems, most of which stemmed from the fact that the band didn't have any acting experience. Or, you know, talent. The screenwriters had spent some time with the band in order to make the script more authentic, but that didn't go so well: Apparently Ace did nothing but squawk at them the whole time, so in the original script all he ever said was "Ack!" (and that's still the bulk of his lines in the finished movie). In some scenes you can tell one member of Kiss is being played by someone else, because he's black.

"No, no, that's the fifth Kiss member ... um, Jamaal."
On top of all that, the original TV broadcast used generic disco music and cartoon sound effects instead of Kiss songs (other than the ones played "live"), presumably because they were too cheap to license their music to their own movie.
The movie was one of the highest-rated TV films of 1978, but the band still hated it for making them look "buffoonish" (apparently they had never seen themselves in full makeup before). Eventually it was re-edited and released theatrically outside the U.S., with an actual Kiss soundtrack this time. It's hard to imagine it helped all that much.








Hey folks I'm cool with the fact DiCaprio and Maguire had a bisexual relationship in real life. I believe it was some sort of phase for both of them. I hear they are exclusively straight and they will probably stay this way. Not that there is anything wrong with the fact that they had gay sex with each other. I just think; as far as it affects them, they have somehow moved away from that lifestyle most likely for their careers.
Reply"talking about sex and drugs a lot without doing much of either"
ReplySounds like the most realistic teen movie ever. All it needs is attempted suicide and lying about who you lost your virginity to.
Where's "Italian Stallion" by Sylvester Stallone? He spent millions of dollars trying to destroy every copy of it...
ReplyI loved "Up the Academy" My dad took me to see it when I was about 11 or 12.. we laughed our asses off.
Reply#1 just explained a hundred Animaniacs jokes for me. Thank you.
ReplyDo u want to make friends or date with sexy girl or handsome,rich man online today ? Are u looking for friends or lover online? If you are, your timing couldn’t have been better! Online date is comfortable. And you only need to visit and sign up on __ kissingrich,c~0-m or billionairepal,c~0-m__. It is free to check and register. My friend named likoo is busy with a online date and she has found her bf on those sites a few days ago...
Replyc********r Blues and Super Friends Kiss... HFS WTF? I can't say I blame them for wanting to bury those cinematic turds... (I wonder if c********r will make it past the filter...)
ReplyYay! c********r didn't make it through! Score 1 for the Stones!
Tara!!!
ReplyWot? No Song of the South in the list? Disney seems to be determined to erase this movie from the face of the earth.
ReplyWell to be fair, Song of the South wasn't really as racist as everyone says. It was just boring as hell, so the parts in it that could be considered racist tend to stick out. Gone With the Wind had much worse scenes, and it's not remembered as racist.
Disney did all sorts of 'racist' sh*t, but most of it was just ignorance. All of these are also when cartoons were made for primarily adult audiences in a time when the races were heavily segregated. I personally am looking forward to the day that everyone's so blended that racist jokes and portrayals can once again be mixed into comedy and be only moderately offensive to those it offends.
Criticizing racism and stereotypes on #8 and then just a few paragraphs later "...and so much drug consumption that Colombia now specifically mentions the band in their national anthem"... Americans...
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesI'm going to go ahead and point out that most of the well off people here in Colombia are involved in the drug trade. And no, I'm not making a stereotypical generalization. I'm sitting in Colombia. I can see it if I take a quick look around.
You might want to take a quick peek at the author bio and check where he says he lives before you go and get all snotty.
Check where the author lives? Nahhhhh, Salcov would rather just post ignorant remarks... Non-Americans...
The plot of 'The Day the Clown Cried' actually sounds really good. But of course the execution could still be terrible.
ReplyHA Ha... Word play.
An-n-n-n-d THAT would be just about the level of wit and sophistication you would expect to find in such a piece of work.
ALL ABOARD, GENTS! Just step right in....
What's so racist about the Bugs Bunny one. You guys over there are so sensitive about racism. Nothing wrong with black face.
Reply Hide All See All 4 Replieswhat the fuuuuuuuuuuck
nothing wrong at all - execpt that, in the end of "Clean Pastures" there's a knock at the door after the Black St Peter puts "No Vacancy" on the door. The door is answered by St. Peter and a voice from the other side says "Can I come in?" Peter smiles and says, "Sure, always room for one more!" Which sounds so cute and innocent... Until the door is opened the Satan walks into "Pair-O-Dice", welcomed by the black st peter. ...Totally not racist.
O.K. Here's what ya do: rub the black shoe polish all over your face, and paint on some hilarious red rubber lips. Then I will drop you off in a neighborhood I know about, and drive briskly away, leaving you to explain to the folks about the inoffensive nature of black face.
Wow, he still got 4 thumbs up. I guess broadband has reached the South.
I've never been able to understand why stars are able to sue to get their names taken off a film. The material was obviously made with their consent, they are almost always allowed to read the rest of the script so that they know what they were getting in for, they would have signed a contract in which they allowed the producers to distribute the film with their performances in it and they received payment for their performance. The producers are not defaming or misrepresenting anybody when they advertise the star's performance and involvement in the film. In a legal sense, they aren't defrauding anyone either.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesIn contrast, can you imagine what the response would be if you tried to get your name or image removed from an embarrassing advertisement or porn film that you agreed to and got paid for? Even if it was harming your professional reputation and damaging your career?
Well, the thing is, you see, HE'S Robin Williams, and you ain't.
I'm guessing "manipulative editing" and "changes to the original script" are commonly tossed around in these cases.
"Well, the thing is, you see, HE'S Robin Williams, and you ain't" That's a compliment, you know.
#8: Yeah, it looks bad, but you gotta remember those were made during a time when that was the majority of white people's perception of black people. Doesn't make it "okay", but I don't think it makes them horrible people for doing those cartoons. Honestly, I'm kinda sorry they censored them. Pretending it didn't happen doesn't make it go away, and it shouldn't be forgotten.
ReplyI saw Up The Academy a bunch of times on HBO. Its just a typical dumb 80s teen sex comedy, not particularly awful. Whats-his-name from Newhart was the f*g conselor, had some cute 80s tramp in it.
ReplyTalking about stereotypes and in the part where you said that Colombia should mention the Stones' name in our anthem, i feel that is pretty damn stereotyping! Have you even been to Colombia? Read and find out who the biggest consumer is a*****e before throwing words like that!!! I'm amazed you can even write two single coherent words!!! I will take this further and write a letter to your editor, AND send this piece of "article" to the department of tourism in Colombia, maybe they will feel this as humorous as you think it is! Uneducated american, as always thee worst of all americans!!
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesPlease, tell us how you really feel. Don't hold back now.
Oh, and as far as "writ[ing] two single coherent words" goes, does the old adage about 'people living in glass houses' mean anything to you?
'i feel that is pretty damn stereotyping!...Uneducated american, as always thee worst of all americans!!'
I haven't been to Colombia but there is a statue in Cartagena of one of my ancestors. I'd want to go... if I would be sure I wouldn't be kidnapped by a cartel, for being an American.
Cracked is a comedy site. We, as Americans, all know that the Rolling Stones cocaine usage isn't in Columbia's National Anthem, or anything about Cocaine for that matter. We also know that not everyone in Columbia uses Cocaine. If a politician had said this, I would understand your outrage, but on a comedy site, really!? Comedy is a form of art, and art is subjective.
Hang on, he might be right, what's the line between racism and a joke? Maybe the only important opinion is of thous who might feel offended.
If the joke was about watermelons and black people, would it be offensive? I am not colombian, so I don't know how sensitive the cocaine issue is, it could be really delicate and this is offensive.
Then again, Obaez starts a racist tirade against uneducated americans, and that's not good either. So the only way to know if this is racist is if we ask colombians.
But there's also the simple difference that sometimes a joke can be racist just for the sake of being outrageous, and does not seek to validate an stereotype or demean a group of people. It's not serious and its intention is not to divide, just entertain. I have seen several jokes about american being fatasses and I don't see as much hatred. So, it's about being oversensitive? I'd hate for comedy to die because of PC. Context is important, and the context here is just to entertain.
Does that make the WB cartoons as valid? maybe not, because basing an entire cartoon on racial jokes of one group is bound to have some sort of malice behind it.
You... DO realize he didn't say all Colombians snort lots and lots of cocaine, right? It simply said the obvious: Colombia is the world's largest producer of cocaine. If not The largest, it's EASILY Top5. And I dare you to find anything that contradicts it. This is a fact.
Before you go around writing letters to anyone, you should perhaps learn how to read. It'd do wonders for you.
The author isn't even American, he's Chilean.
That lil wayne thing scares me.
ReplySharia Law might be oppressive, but at least it would rid the world of people like him.
The only good thing I have ever heard about Sharia Law
You want to see some racist old cartoons, watch some early Popeyes. In one, he punches an American Indian off screen and he comes back down as Ghandi.
ReplyHow is punching an Indian racism..?
Life is lonely and sometimes even boring. You may need a fresh thing
Replyto excite your mind 《Cougarchats,C om 》 is a popular cougar dating
site that makes your online dating journey fun and exciting. The cougars
and young men at 《Cougarchats,C om 》 are seeking for friendship,
dates, romance and even marriage.
you poor lonely post bot. What about all of the kittens?
Lil Wayne - Addiction to pot my ass, if you actually allow yourself to get addicted to a substance that is about as addictive as eating crusty turds, you sir are a loser.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesCough syrup addiction is one thing, but marijuana addiction? I've never met a pot smoker who said that they could quit anytime, and failed to prove as such. I quit for weeks to months on end, and suffer no side effects resulting from addiction withdrawal(well except for the occasional irritability that last no longer than a few days, and usually 1 or 2). So yea, that's technically a withdrawal symptom, but it's far less dangerous than something like caffeine withdrawal.
Really enjoying something is NOT an addiction. Not being able to pull away from the things you enjoy, but know are hurting you and do have the desire to quit, now that's addiciton.
Then prove it. Don't smoke another joint for the next ten years and I'll believe you.
Remember what they say: There's no such thing as "beating" an addiction until you're dead.
Marijuana is not chemically addictive, the way nicotine or heroin are addictive. There is no chemical dependance and there will be no physical symptoms of withdrawal. However, just like almost anything, it can be psychologically addictive. It can be addictive in the sense that people rely on it as an emotional crutch to deal with stress or self-medicate depression or anxiety. This is not to say nobody should smoke pot. In moderation it's harmless, potentially beneficial and most people are highly unlikely to get addicted, especially if their use is occasional rather than constant. I like the odd joint myself, it's a lovely way to spend time with friends and less hassle than getting drunk. I've very rarely met anyone who's life was seriously negatively impacted by marijuana use - but very rarely doesn't mean never. If someone doesn't feel happy until they've had their first spliff of the day and can't sleep unless they smoke it at night, then that's dependance and it is a problem. Anything you can become reliant on to get you through the day is potentially addictive, whether it's food, gambling, weed or whatever.
ah, pot-heads.... the "it's not addictive" schtick never gets old.