6 Shocking Ways Robots Are Already Becoming Human

Although it's supposed to be soothing, whenever you find yourself being led through a series of wrong turns, that stoic, emotionless voice in your GPS unit is anything but. To help cool off your festering road rage, Cambridge professor Peter Robinson has created a GPS system that can detect your mood and adjust the way it speaks to you. The system, named Charles, analyzes your face, tone of voice, body language and posture to determine your current emotional state -- a skill that, let's face it, many of us humans have yet to master.
Photos.com
"What? Is something wrong? What is it? Is it gas? It's gas, isn't it?"
Also, added bonus: Charles comes in the form of a terrifyingly inhuman head modeled after English inventor Charles Babbage ... if somebody drowned him in doughnut glaze and left his sugary corpse to rot in the sun for a month. So sure, go ahead and mount that to your dashboard and ask it give you directions; you'll soon find every destination is a psychiatric hospital.
Via MaxUpdates.tv
"Turn left ... into terror. ERROR: Return route unfound."
Incorporating 24 motors, Charles' head moves, talks and just generally orchestrates an intricate mockery of human expression. As you're driving, it will calmly offer directions while cameras in its eyes watch you to figure out exactly what you're feeling at the moment, and presumably also your greatest fears and weaknesses. Professor Robinson asserts that Charles represents the "future of how people are going to interact with machines."
And he's right, in the sense that they will be giving us orders and telling us where to go. And there will be a lot of severed human heads rolling around.

Scientists keep inventing robots to take our jobs, but now it's their turn: A robot named Adam is a scientist in its own right. It collects data and finds explanations in the patterns it detects, then performs experiments to confirm or repudiate those patterns. It carries out this entire process without any input from a human being. The scientific method, maybe the single most important concept in the advancement of human civilization, has been mastered to a "T" by a computer.
Via Cnet News
That's the giant metal thing that isn't human.
Robots used to just do the legwork that backed up human thought, but Adam builds a hypothesis, tests it and proves or discards it, entirely without human interaction. Now, we don't want to come off as fear mongers here, but how long until it decides to test the "human beings look better stabbed" hypothesis?
Photos.com
Finally, a world where art and science is interchangeable.
It's not just a novelty act, either (like those displays where humans play chess against a computer). Adam is actually producing usable results. Human scientists plan on using its findings in future experiments. Do you know what that means? It means that a robot, a thing created by man, has come to an entirely original conclusion and contributed, meaningfully, to the sum total of human knowledge.
H ... have you guys done that lately? Because we totally have not ever done that. So Adam, a robot, has -- purely in terms of value to the race -- surpassed most human beings, whose greatest contribution is that one time they farted and it sounded kind of like Elvis.
Photos.com
Got $75 for it on eBay, though.

"I think, therefore I am," is perhaps the most compelling self-definition ever written. We are intelligent because we are aware of ourselves and our own thoughts. That may not encompass every nuance of what it is to be a thinking, feeling creature, but it's a good, solid start.
And now, the phrase applies to robots as well.
The simplest test for self-awareness is the ability to recognize oneself in a mirror. It sounds basic, but only a handful of animals have ever passed it. A handful of animals, and a robot named Nico.
Via InventorSpot.com
And now it refuses to do any more science on the grounds that its wires look funny today.
A robot recognizing itself is unsettling enough, but Hod Lipson disagrees with that statement, so he made this:
Via Sciencemag.org
GAH!
Lipson and his team have created a self-aware robot called Starfish, which taught itself basically everything with no outside assistance -- to walk, navigate difficult obstacles and even adjust to injury (when scientists shortened a leg of the robot, it changed its gait to compensate). But it's the method by which it makes these decisions that's so worrying: Starfish doesn't just blindly follow schematics. It judges what actually needs to be done by constructing a conception of itself in its "brain," then makes structural decisions based on what it thinks it is, fundamentally, as a robot. The scientists say it's not exactly conscious yet, in that it is not "thinking about itself thinking," but it is independently moving "in the direction of consciousness, like a cat -- that kind of level."
Photos.com
Yep. Exactly like a cat.
Lipson claims that he's not worried, because if these self-aware, self-replicating, evolving robots ever get out of hand, "we just pull the plug out of the robot. That's all."
Jesus.
That's the exact line you give a character named Dead Scientist No. 1 in a sci-fi apocalypse movie, right before the special effects really start kicking in.
When Eric Axt isn't manufacturing EMP grenades for the coming war, he helps his brother run the web comic Donuts for Sharks. Check out Dennis's musings on life and love here. Or take shots at some bad metaphors here. Karl normally selfishly links to his own work; show him you think this is totally not cool by buying this awesome book written by other, more handsome Cracked writers. That will teach him.
For more on robots that probably want to destroy us, check out The 7 Robots Most Likely to Rise Up Against Humanity. Or learn about some machines that should've already done that in The 6 Most Badass Robots (Invented Before Electricity).
Agents of Cracked is up for a Telly Award! If you love DOB and Swaim as much as the staggering amount of nude fan pics they receive says you do, then vote for them here and here.
And don't forget to follow us on Facebook and Twitter to get sexy, sexy jokes sent straight to your news feed.
Do you have an idea in mind that would make a great article? Then sign up for our writers workshop! Do you possess expert skills in image creation and manipulation? Mediocre? Even rudimentary? Are you frightened by MS Paint and simply have a funny idea? You can create an infograpic and you could be on the front page of Cracked.com tomorrow!








BENDER!
Reply#2 and #1 are kinda scary. #2 is using its critical "mind" to make conclusions. Humans dont develop those skills til around twelve. This bot exceeded deciding whether or not santa really exists and went straight into doogie howser-mode. put that brain into the starfish and its over.
Reply5, 3, and 1 were by far the mos devastating. Thwy're basically programmed to have cold, awkward souls. Sooner or later, they'll realize that they can do everything we do, and that they can just quickly 'trim the fat', by use of those war hero robots.
ReplyYou know what's going to be really funny? When it turns out that the robots actually just want to be our friends... The whole "robot apocalypse" thing is the result of people being afraid of robots, and the human tendencies to try to destroy that which we fear...
ReplyTake a long, hard look at the Terminator movies... Skynet went all "Kill all humans!" because the humans tried to pull the plug on it when they realized it was self-aware. They panicked and in their stupidity tried to kill the AI. The AI in turn, retaliated.
The same thing happened with KARR in the origional Knight Rider series. A programming error was made, and instead of trying to correct the error, the car was sent off to be torn apart, and ended up being left alone in a warehouse for a few years without enough power to free itself. "Wilton Knight brought me into this world, and then turned on me!" KARR's motives in Trust Don't Rust aren't even sinister. He just wants to survive.
More likely, we're going to end up with robots like those in Futurama. Some will be good, some will be bad, some will be neutral.
just like short circuit.
And some will be alcoholics
The thing is: the people who strongly believe in this (despite they saying that cracked is a "humor site"), or at least believe that this will be possible some day, they know that these robots are doing this (using their complex mechanical bodies and brainS constructed by humans) because humans said (or programmed) them to do this , but these same people believe that the high complex human brain and conciouness (and their high complex biological bodies) are just products of random and accidental mutations etc (that began with a single cell in a random putrid primordial soup or something like that) and that the humam being is a computer that can program itself just because "nature wanted it to be like this"? Just like that? Oh really? (I'm not religious neither an materialist atheist. I'm just a skeptical.) Sorry for the bad english.
ReplyActually, scientists don't know jack about the mind. They know most of the mechanics of the brain, but not how it all fits together to make the mind. Some even suggest that the mind is beyond the limits of the brain... So, yes, it is rather presumptuous for people to begin claiming that they know that robots or animals can't have minds like we do. And for the record, I'm Southern Baptist...
That song by Emily Howell was remarkable. And strangely haunting.
ReplyThese articles are very emotionally confusing for me. On the one hand, they are generally well-written, amusing, and thought-provoking. On the other hand: f**k robots sooooo much.
ReplyTo be honest the "self-aware" section of this article doesn't sound so foreboding to me. Nico is programmed to be able to use information from the movement of its arm, and the vision from its camera, to try and distinguish whether something is itself, something else, or nothing. I may be wrong, but the way that sounds to me is as though if it were merely placed infront of a mirror and didn't move its arm, the robot probably wouldn't be able to distinguish a 'self'. It's all still very impressive, but not what I would call 'self-aware'.
ReplyAs for starfish robot, the wording leaves a pretty big question: Was it programmed with the knowledge that it could move, or was that something it discovered by itself? If it didn't discover that by itself then I don't think that could really be called 'self-aware' either. Still is cool as s**t though. Good article.
The mirror test fails to take into account the possibility of non-humanoid thought. It would be akin to a race of aliens deciding that we're not self-aware because we don't know how to operate a puzzle that utilizes IR and UV ink... Sight is not really important to most of the animal world. They operate mostly though smell and sound. Sight is just an additional bonus. So, presenting creatures that don't rely heavily on sight to survive with a mirror is giving them something that they don't have the tools to use properly.
WEEEE AARREE F*UUUCKED!
ReplyThe "Driving Similator" in the Empathetic robot video looked a hell of a lot like "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas".
ReplyLook, they even "simulated" the health bar, money total, and weapon selector. Idiots.
Holly crap that last guy is a bastard... hmmm it seems to be able to think for itself... we'll just power the son of a b***h down, not like it has feelings or anyhing... oh right... well then (unplug)
ReplyWell, time to stock some food for the invasion...
ReplyI exploded with laughter at that final paragraph. Well done.
ReplyWell, shit.
ReplySo Emily Howell composed some music and Fool put some blotches on a canvas... but only the human mind can ascribe to those things a haunting, brooding tune or a picture of a flower.
ReplyFor now anyways....
And what are those notions if not pattern recognition? You paste that flower pic into Google's picture search box, and it comes up with f*****g FLOWERS. As to attributing a piece of music a description like "haunting", it's fairly easy pattern recog to determine the definition of "haunting" and a statistical average of pieces of music that humans have applied that term to, and bam! You have a piece of software that can determine if a song is "haunting". I'd be surprised if the hypothetical software doesn't already exist.
Emily Howell's music was pretty, but musicians who study music theory, be it improvisational or compositional, love to break music down into formulas and express everything mathematical. Art is created by eating math and crapping out emotion (I'm a musician, not a writer- sorry for the bad analogy). So while the emotional response to Howell's music is undeniable, all I had to do was click on the music theory switch in my head to break it all into math.
ReplyEssentially, it seemed that Howell arpegiatted a chord up and down and outlined a bunch of modes (the seven diatonic modes/ "church modes" and some melodic-minor modes), phrased in groups of 2 or four, and linked them all with logical transitions (half-diminished two chord - major seven one chord). So, while it was beautiful, don't confuse its ability to make us feel with an ability to express itself. Ever since Bach, musicians have been turning music into numbers (hey, jazz people- one, six, two, five, three, six, two, five, one). When a robot tells me a funny joke, I'll be worried.
Jokes are mathematical too, we just don't understand them. As our understanding of math improves, we will be able to break things at a super-atomic level down to near-deterministic expressions, which in turn will allow robots (or mathematicians, for that matter) to achieve any outcome they want in any situation they want, without exception.
#2 is basically GLaDOS.
ReplyEddie: You are my most favorite commenter ever. I love you. In a good way.
For those still paranoid, I think some dude with a PhD in Robotics wrote a book on how to survive a Robot Apocalypse.
ReplyThat was Brockway, and I don't think he has a PhD in Robotics.
Unless it means a PhD in Sex Bots.
Actually, the guy I am thinking about was a presenter on History Channel.
I'm starting saving money for an android bodey right now. PErhaps than the robots won't kill me.
ReplyIn college I was on a design team that shared lab space with Hod Lipson. In that lab Professor Lipson was working on evolving and self-replicating robots.
Replyand you did nothing to stop him, you selfish son of a bitch.
You knew! You knew! And you did nothing!