7 Planes Perfectly Designed (To Kill The People Flying Them)
We don't know if you've ever tried it, but trust us when we say that building aircraft is really, really hard. It takes large teams of smart people a long time and a lot of money. Building a military aircraft is even harder -- it not only needs to fly, it needs to survive repeated attacks and make other planes dead. So you can imagine the care and expense nations put into building them.
But sometimes, they just slap something together and send the pilot off to die.

It was a pretty simple idea. During World War I, the British Royal Aircraft Factory, or RAF, wanted a fighter plane with guns that could shoot forward. So they took an existing plane and stuck a gunner onto the front of it. Seems like a pretty straightforward solution.
The only problem ...
Their method of adding a gunner? Strapping him in front of the propeller in a plywood box that earned the nickname "the pulpit," presumably to try to remind the gunner that he was about to meet God.
Should the BE. experience even the lightest crash, the gunner was guaranteed to be crushed by the firing V8 engine mounted to his back. It honestly didn't matter, however, since the gunner was much more likely to be sucked into the whirling propeller blades like a Bond villain long before then.

Because there was no shielding used whatsoever between the gunner and the roaring vortex of death behind him, anything loose on his person, be it a scarf, wallet or goddamn arm while swinging the gun, was instantly sucked into the propeller blades. The gunner had no choice but to literally hold on for dear life until he either tired out or landed. And because the screaming engine was placed between the helpless gunner and the plane's oblivious pilot, the gunner had no way to communicate his fatigue to the pilot until the spray of his guts hit him in the face.

Low on airports and resources, and destined to lose and spend the next century as the go-to villain for lazy sci-fi writers, the Nazis needed a plane that could turn the tables. The Natter promised to be that plane. And it lied.
Instead of taking off from a conventional runway, the Natter saved space and time by being launched with rockets off a vertical structure. Once in the air, it would take down enemy aircraft with its own weapons before ejecting both the pilot and its rocket engine. Its cheap build was mostly wood, and it had a wingspan of only about 12 feet. And because there was no landing or takeoff, the pilot (supposedly) needed no training to fly!

What could possibly go wrong?
The only problem ...
OK, let's review: The plan was to take a tiny wooden plane with a wingspan shorter than a Mini Cooper, power it with rockets capable of over 4,000 pounds of thrust, aim it straight up into the air, pilot it with some random dude not considered a good enough pilot to fly a regular plane, and send the whole rig careening off into the clouds at 500 mph.
Oh, and its weapons? Thirty-six unguided rockets. Because if you're going to base an airplane on what's basically a suicidal mad-lib rocket and have it flown by whoever called "not it" last, you might as well throw three dozen more rockets into the mix.

"More rockets! -- Hitler"
The amazing thing is that, from the day the idea was first mentioned in the Nazi "Increasingly Ludicrous Ideas Proposal Meetings," it was designed, built and given its first test flight just six months later. Most people spend longer deciding on cell phone providers than the Nazis did planning this rocket-fueled disaster.

It was the T-Mobile of fighter planes.
And because the war made supplies hard to come by, huge corners were cut in its construction. Like an eight-year-old pasting together models, the Nazis made the Natter out of wood and glue because, hell, at this point they're just making their "pilots" a flying coffin anyway. They also couldn't afford to make an ejection seat, instead letting the (and we cannot stress this enough) woefully unready pilot unbuckle himself and leap out while going over 600 mph, but not before opening the canopy held on by an old furniture hinge.
The first and only manned test flight ended when the canopy ripped off in mid-flight, striking the pilot in the head and sending the plane screaming into the ground. Finally seeing the ridiculousness of the Natter's design, the Nazis abandoned this aircraft for good ... but not before building 36 more for immediate use.

Those wacky Nazis. When will they learn?
Almost all of them were intentionally destroyed not for their insanity, but because the Nazi designers feared the Americans would steal this awesome technology. The question of why the Americans would want to steal the designs for a plane that killed more of its own crew than any enemies is the main reason why Hitler's brain is preserved in a jar to this day.

An agile German fighter plane during World War I, the Albatross D-III was amazingly aerodynamically advanced for its time. Its final redesign was very quick and maneuverable, making it a favorite for this guy named Manfred von Richthofen, otherwise known as the Red Baron.

The Red Baron flew it, racked up over a dozen kills, painted it red and made it one of the most iconic fighter planes in history. The final redesign, that is.
The only problem ...
There were problems with the early designs. No big deal. It could just, you know, literally melt the pilot's face off.

Face-melting ain't nothin' but a thing.
The plane's radiator was mounted directly above the pilot's head. Though this made it aerodynamic, any slight damage caused it to shoot its boiling contents straight into the pilot's face.
Imagine it like a clown getting hit in the face with a pie at the end of a joke, except instead of pie, it's a lava-hot, face-melting stream of water, and instead of a clown, it's a surprised pilot hundreds of feet in the air, and instead of being at the end of a joke, it was every time its wings cracked, which was all the time, thanks to another flaw that caused the wings to fail at high speeds.

Typical German pilot, circa 1916
In fact, the first draft of the Albatros D-III nearly succeeded in something thousands of men before it had failed at: killing the Red Baron. He suffered the wing-cracking problem during a flight and managed to land (many other pilots weren't so lucky) and refused to fly the damned thing until they fixed the design. This is a guy who routinely flew through thunderstorms and enemy territory to fight nearly a hundred battles against superior forces, and he felt spending another second flying in the D-III was too dangerous.

After WWI, Soviet Russia got to building planes the same way it built everything else: huge, and terrifying to look at.

Russia isn't exactly a subtle country.
The Kalinin K-7 was no exception. Measuring over 92 feet long, it had a 174-foot wingspan, making it bigger than the B-52. It had seven engines, seven gunners and 12 crew members were needed to keep the behemoth in the air.

Sup, comrades.
The Soviets planned to use the massive K-7 as a bomber, a cargo plane and, upon Stalin's bafflingly hypocritical request, a luxury high-end transport for VIPs. And because it could fit 120 people on board, the Soviets planned to drop bombs, paratroopers or even a goddamned tank out of it.
The only problem ...
There's a concept taught in middle school science called "resonance." If the right frequency is emitted, an object will resonate sympathetically. The designers of the K-7 were not familiar with this concept and equipped it with engines that hummed at the same frequency as the plane. On the K-7's maiden voyage, its tail shook like it was trying to escape from the rest of the craft, and the pilots were forced to land it before it fell apart.

"Perhaps if we made it larger ..."
Luckily, using the keen attention to detail that Stalin-era Russia was known for, the engineers sought out a subtle, elegant solution to the K-7's aerodynamic flaws ... oh, wait, no, they just haphazardly grabbed steel beams and welded the tail on. Carnies show more care repairing their dragon wagons with gum and duct tape than the Soviet engineers did fixing the K-7. Certain that this would be enough to fix that pesky wobbling tail, they held another test flight. We'll give you one guess as to how that turned out.
After the tail vibrated itself off, the airplane plunged straight into the ground. Upon seeing the colossal failure that was the K-7, Stalin understood and forgave its designer, Konstantin Kalinin. But not before arresting and executing him as an enemy of the state.

And that was the last time a Soviet engineer ever cut corners.








"Royal Aircraft Factory, or RAF" - uh... isn't that Royal Air Force?
ReplyWith all I've learned from this site, I'm convinced that the Nazis were actually run by Cobra Commander. It'd explain their cartoonish villainy and incompetence.
ReplyWhat make this article funny for me is all the documentaries I've seen on the History Channel detailing the amazing weapons the nazis were designing and how the whole course of the war would have been changed if they had been put into full production.
ReplyAnd what about F-104 starfighter a.k.a. "flying coffin"?
ReplyThis peace of...craft should be here not only for it's eccident records but for its catapulting system, that ejected pilot downward making it extremly dangerous on altitude below 500 meters and absolutely suicidal during landing or taking off.
The Eurofighter was called "Widowmaker" for a long time. Unfortunately, the widows were those of the pilots. I heard from a Bundeswehr/Luftwaffe mechanic that when the electronics fail, this thing falls out of the sky like a rock.
#4 Looks like one of those flying machines from Pokemon cartoons.
ReplyAttempting to characterise Nazi aeronautical engineers as incompetent might be one of the stupidest things I have ever seen on this site. Some German aircraft designs were terrible, but let's see what you crank out under the pressure of regular bombing raids and a psychotic dictator demanding miracle weapons to turn the tide of war. Oh did I forget to mention that end of the war was a time when Germany was maybe just a little short on resources? When plywood and glue are the some of the more plentiful materials around, it makes sense that engineers under immense pressure to produce results would turn to whatever was cheap and accessible. around I won't even bother enumerating the myriad of stunning achievements made by the aviation scientists in the Third Reich, but I'll leave you with one name: WERNHER VON BRAUN. Any aviation historian worth their salt would never make such a flat-out moronic across-the-board statement as claiming that the Nazis were "bad at designing planes".
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesAll in all, this looks more like an attempt to cater to the mouth-breathing "Inglourious Basterds r00lz" crowd than a serious attempt at presenting historical evidence. For shame.
Nothing you said justifies the fact that Nazi Germany created the worst planes in recorded history.
They also probably had no time in between killing Jews to really look into their designs.
So, we're NOT allowed to point out the ridiculous design of that particular aircraft just because of their other accomplishments? It doesn't look good when you get all defensive about the decisions made regarding the Nazi war effort. Anyway it's not like the article didn't mention the situation the Nazi designers were in.
Yea, defending Nazis is pretty much never okay. And "They were short on resources," and "Hitler was a dictator who needed miracle weapons," doesn't really make up for the fact that the planes were deathtraps. I'm sure Katy Perry just wants to make billions of dollars and has record executives breathing down her neck, that doesn't excuse her music. And that's a far easier sell because 1) Katy Perry is incredibly attractive, and 2) Katy Perry is not a Nazi.
plus, you know, he's trying to be funny. kind of what this website is for buddy
I agree totally. German aeronautical engineers during WW2 had some amazing designs. They were so well respected that Russia and America were racing to see who could capture the most during the closing stages of WW2.
If it weren't for them there would have been no moon landing in 1969. Just Saying.
Dude, world war II is over. You guys lost, and these plane designs were terrible. Get over it.
The thing about the He-162 was that it could've been a good fighter, if not shackled with the whole "cheap disposable plane for barely-trained cadets" idiocy. When the Nazis came up with that idea, Heinkel was already working on designing a lightweight single-engined jet. They just hadn't gotten to the point of building physical prototypes; it existed only on paper. So they adapted it to be what the Nazis were asking for, even though it was idiotic. The Nazis were paying the bills, after all.
ReplyRAF stands for Royal Air Force. Formed in 1918 it is the oldest designated air force in the world. Morons.
ReplyWhen the Be9 Pulpit was made (1915), the planes for the Royal Flying Corps were made at the Royal Aircraft Factory, or RAF. In 1918, the Royal Flying Corps became the Royal Air Force and the other RAF became the Royal Aircraft Establishment.
read your own links. the K-7 was destroyed on November 21, 1933. Kalinin was executed in 1938, and not even for the K-7
ReplyYup. Stalin had him work on yet another flying wing bomber concept, which had its own problems. When he couldn't fix those, Stalin had him shot.
Very sad for the pilots who had to fly these things. However, the guy who plays the Red Baron in Blackadder Goes Forth...Dead ringer to the real guy! Looks very similar to him.
ReplyThese planes were end of war designs. Throwing s**t on the wall to see what sticks was the name of the game. They reek of desperation. I would never defend the Nazi ideology, but considering that the jet engine was a fairly new concept it is amazing they made anything that would get off the ground. To contrast with these laughable failures the Messerschmitt Me 262 was developed all during the war with proper planning and budgeting, and it had a 5 to 1 kill ratio over allied planes. It took off in mid 1944. Good thing they didn't get it operational in 1943, when there were still lots of veteran pilots left.
ReplyNo Ramjet ?
Reply#2 kinda glosses over a very important piece of explanation for all this: "April 1945".
ReplyBy the time this thing entered service, most of the German military had crumbled, the Allies were steamrolling across Europe and Himmler was busy trying to surrender. Go and watch Downfall to get an idea of how effective the German government was by that point.
The other thing - "only 90 days?" Methinks the author should look at one of the most successful fighters of WWII - the P-51 Mustang.
Contract signed: day 0
Prototype rolled out: Day 108. Not that much more than 90 days.
Now, if we took away some of the issues such as the wrong glue - which is not a fault of the design of the HE-162 - or the initial plan to use Hitler Youth (also not the fault of the plane) and look at the plane itself- it's not "designed to kill its user." It did actually reach operational status, and did gain a (very) few victories - not due to issues with the aircraft, but little things like "My airfield is now a mass of craters" and "I'd love to fly, but I have no fuel," familiar refrains at the end of the war.
Oh, as far as the engine being behind the pilot? Two words. Ejection seat. Jet engines take air in. They do not simulate black holes.
War brings out the genius and crazies alike.
ReplyThis article was actually stupid. Some parts were funny, don't get me wrong. But the statement, Nazi's made really bad planes. Seriously? The writer should be slapped for that. Here are a few examples: Fw190, Me Bf 109, Me 262, He 111, Junkers Ju 87 Stuka, Horton Ho 229 (basis of the stealth bomber, and yes it was actually stealthy in 44) and the Bf 110.. shall I continue?
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesRemember, it was also the Nazi's who gave the US the Apollo Programme.
they also made planes that made japanese kamakazees look sane... I'm sure thats what he was referring to
The Nazi's made bad planes is 100% true. He didn't say The Nazi's ONLY made bad planes. Before you get all mad and want to go author slapping, make sure your motives are clear and accurate.
Mr. Leetspeak is totally right. The Nazis made great planes, but not without tons of crap plans in the process. The Nazis seemed to love experimental engineering, but the result is many of the "successes" were still crap.
And...seriously, wow. The Nazi's did NOT in any way give the US the Apollo Program. Nazi scientists worked in America following the war, yes, and much in the area of rocketry. But the Apollo program wasn't even a twinkle in anyone's eye yet. Oh and one other big thing: The Nazis didn't "give" the US anything; we f*****g had to take it through the deaths of thousands.
Sounds like you have a bit of chubby for the Nazis. f*****g fascist.
i love the sc2 reference! thank you cracked!!
ReplyYou mean carriers? Those were in the original as well.
"Stalins bafflingly hypocritical request" - Wait, why? That was the wholee point of Stalinism, wasn't it? Thats why Trotsky got an icepick, and every revolution from Germany to China to Spain got sold out by Russian advisors. Stalin was all about the privileged VIPs. Even the end of the Soviet Union was about screwing over most Russians forthe sake of well placed bureaucrats. Russia was communist the way North Korea is a Democratic Republic...
ReplyAll communist countries are communist the way North Korea is a "Democratic Republic."
"Typical German pilot, circa 1916" This is why i come to this site lol.
Reply#1 inspired the piloted bombs in "Captain America". Mind you, I'm not sure why those had ejection seats...
ReplyI know! I got a chuckle out of that.
Holy crap, the Soviets were building an airship!
Reply