The 6 Most Important Things Humanity Just Plain Forgot
If you could draw a graph showing the growth of mankind's knowledge and technology, you'd think it would look like a staircase, steadily edging upward year after year as we get a little bit smarter than our ancestors.
It's not true, though. Some of the most amazing things ever discovered wound up lost or forgotten for centuries, for utterly ridiculous reasons. Such as...

A whole lot of the modern world you're enjoying right now exists thanks to the invention of the steam engine, which kicked off the industrial age. It was invented in 1712 and later improved by James Watt, who would get all of the credit (right down to everyone using his last name to measure electricity).
Wait, did we say it was invented in 1712? Because that's actually off by 1600 years or so.

Some time in the first century, an engineer called Heron of Alexandria, or Hero to his friends, set to work on an aeolipile--a small, steam-powered turbine that propelled itself by shooting steam out of one or more orifices. Freaking 1600 years before the Europeans declared that the "new" steam engine would completely revolutionize the world.

Poser.
How Could We Have Forgotten It?
It was too far ahead of its time. Think about it: This is a damned steam engine built during the era when the New Testament was going on. It would be like somebody making a prototype Warp Drive during World War I. No one could figure out what to do with it.

Look at it. It's like Sputnik. Is it a toy? A cooking implement?
Whatever Hero intended for his cool whatsamabobbit, everyone else just saw it as a novelty. Which is too bad, because it really could have got the modernization ball rolling a lot earlier. Inventors like Watt were wasting their talents inventing an engine that had already been invented, rather than perfecting x-ray vision and hoverboards.

The Golden Buddha is a solid gold statue that is almost 10-feet tall, more than 12-feet wide and weighs in at an impressive five and a half tons. In other words, it isn't the sort of thing that slips between the couch cushions and vanishes.
And it's old. Experts' best guess is that it's from the 13th century. So about the time that Marco Polo was pretending to explore China, somebody in Thailand was shaping a buttload of gold into this guy.

BUDDHA HUNGERS.
Yet, from the late 17th century until the 1950s, no one had any clue that the statue existed. Even though it was in plain sight.
How Could We Have Forgotten It?
In the 1700s the Burmese were invading Thailand, and the Thai king needed to protect the country's most precious assets, among them being this ginormous solid gold statue, which was sittin' around, all shiny and rich looking. So the king ordered that the locals cover it with plaster and stick it in an inauspicious temple.
A year later, the Thai population revolted against the Burmese occupation and took back control of the city. Although accurate records are lost, it is speculated the Thais celebrated their victory with Red Bull, a pinata and not bothering to take the plaster off of the Golden Buddha right away.

Uhhh... guys?
Eventually, people forgot there were 11,000 pounds of gold under there. Let's see, gold is currently worth over $1,100 an ounce, 16 ounces in a pound, so... that's about two hundred million dollars worth of gold.

Enough gold to make Manute Bol look like Spud Webb, and really really black.
Decades passed and Golden Buddha still sat in stucco. Eventually the statue was relegated to a tin-roofed shed because it was simply just in the way. It was this ugly, plaster thing that was way heavier than it should be. But it couldn't be destroyed, because it was a Buddha statue. Ultimately, even the shed started falling apart, so in the 1950s the monks figure they'd better put the effigy somewhere out of the rain, lest they risk the wrath of the Enlightened One.
Even with the finest crane technology available in Thailand in the 1950s, the monks still botched the job, dropping the statue in a mud puddle. Attempting to dodge the karmic lightning bolts they incurred through their inept hoisting, they fled the scene, leaving the statue in a puddle overnight. Seriously, monks, get it together.

Flaky-ass cenobites.
When one of them poked at the statue the next morning, some of the plaster scraped off, revealing that, oh, wait, this is one of the most valuable things in the history of mankind.

Before meth addiction was the #1 cause of tooth loss among otherwise healthy pirates, it was scurvy. And scurvy, as hilarious as it sounds, is no ball of laughs. First your gums get all bloody and your teeth loosen, then your skin gets spotty and you start bleeding from your mucous membranes. Finally, you develop open sores and become immobile. It was the scourge of sea-going folk for centuries.
Then in 1747, a naval doctor named James Lind demonstrated that scurvy could be cured with fresh lemons. Lemon love was even enacted into law: All ships in the British navy were required to provide a lemon juice ration for their seamen.

The lemon juice ration led to British sailors being dubbed "limeys," because at the time, people thought all citrus fruits were basically the same, and all citrus fruits were called limes (FORESHADOWING: THEY'RE NOT ALL THE SAME). The point is, thanks to lemons, scurvy was a thing of the past.
But scurvy was just gearing up for Scurvy 2: The Revenge. Most diseases need to develop a new strand to have their big budget sequel, but all scurvy needed was everyone to forget the cure, which everyone promptly did. This was bad news for a team of British scientists who took a three year journey to the South Pole, and packed nothing but biscuits, canned fat, cocoa, butter and sugar, which was supplemented by their horses when the starving time came. Despite the fact that it was almost 200 years after the cure for scurvy was discovered by one of their own damned countrymen, they were plum baffled when everyone got scurvy.

How Could We Have Forgotten It?
They never really understood the lemon thing in the first place.
Which is why the British Navy switched the ration from lemons to limes in the early 19th century; limes were plentiful within the empire. Unfortunately, they're not as rich in vitamin C, and no one made the link between vitamin C deficiency and scurvy until 1932--almost two hundred damned years after we first figured out lemons helped. And not only were the limes not as chock full of anti-scurvy nectar, but the navy didn't serve it fresh, they served it as juice. In the process of juicing, they got rid of a good deal of the vitamin C.
It turns out there's a downside to living on boats in the middle of nowhere for months at a time.

At the same time, better naval technology shortened voyages, so scurvy didn't have the chance to manifest itself as it used to. So everyone thought limes were doing the trick, but they weren't. And, as if there weren't already Three's Company level misunderstandings, the dominant theory was that rotten meat, not lack of vitamin C, caused scurvy. And all of these things combined in one horrific expedition to the Antarctic.
It wasn't until 20 years later that people actually used something called "science" and "evidence" to nail down the actual cure for scurvy. Which, it turns out, was the same cure discovered a couple of centuries before.








And apparently, the Pantheon in Greece is made of concrete, and according to a documentary I've half-forgotten, calculations show the inside is still partly wet, and hasn't set yet.
ReplyThe Aeolipile has been analysed since, and was found to be completely useless as a practical engine. Without cylinders or a turbine, it's fuel efficiency made it hopeless for any practical purpose.
ReplyAre you sure Europeans didn't know about it? It wouldn't have provided any tips for the steam engines that actually worked, which started off with the Atmospheric Engine, itself not really steam-powered (more heat-powered and air-pressure-powered), which led Watt to the invention of the proper steam engine.
You totally forgot to mention steel. Steel was "invented" during the industrial revolution, but some ancient civilization (I can't remember which) had it long before then. It was probably forgotten about because they thought the secret ingredient was the urine of a red-headded boy.
ReplyI'm pretty sure they all had it - what they didn't have were the means to mass produce it. So you could make enough for swords and high-end armor, but not enough for ships or rail networks.
randall1985 is right. The great wall can't be seen from space. think about it guys. the average height is only 16 feet tall..so as tall as my house. Can my house be seen from space? no. Why would something be more visible from space just because it is long? that is stupid. This has even been proven by astronauts. If you really use logic and think about it it might be the most absolutely ridiculous thing ever. The only way it can be seen from space is in a low enough orbit that everything else can be seen too
ReplyI believe hall counts as the Muslim word for kosher.
Replythat's supposed to be 'halal'. i haet tyops.
Awesome article. What else have we, as a civilization, lost to the sands of time? Besides my house keys, I mean.
ReplyI live in India, and not in one instance have heard or read about the great hedge and that lady with the sword is Rani Lakshmibai. We had to read about her all the time when we were in school
Replyno that hedge would not be seen from space not even the great wall is seen from space
Reply Hide All See All 5 Repliesthe great wall of china can be seen from space, just not from the moon
Oh dear....oh dear.
Of course the great wall can be seen from space. Have you been living in a cave until now?
Yep, I'd heard the Great Wall was a myth. It's mostly the same colour as the surrounding landscape and while it is long, it is also relatively thin. So it would be like trying to make out a piece of brown string in the dirt from the top of a building.
give me a big enough telescope and I can see you from space - didn't the Americans have a spy satellite that could read number plates from orbit?
The old steam machine would be useful for inventing steam boats! No infraestructure or great amounts of technology and metals needed, that could be perfect. I think the inventor or sponsor was an a*****e and he didn't want to share the machine with others, so nobody could invent anything based in that.
ReplyThey didn't have machine tools put what you are thinking to work, during those times.
Actually, we haven't "Rediscovered" the secrets of Roman Concrete. We've gotten close but the stuff they used is actually BETTER than the common stuff we've made today with our modern technology. I think it was "Building an Empire" or an episode of Modern Marvels that they went into how the stuff Romans used in the Coliseum was BETTER at maintaining stability in running water and eroded less than what we're using today.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesFascinating stuff...
^ This.
There's a reason the Colosseum is still standing 2000 years after it was built, as are portions of Hadrian's Wall, and a number of roman roads throughout Europe. Modern concrete is designed to erode better so they can upgrade and change, it's also the reason that every goddamn road has a pothole in it.
...where the hell did it go, then?
The Dark Ages really weren't as bad as this article makes them out to be; the Library of Alexandria was lost in Caesar's day, and the other stories you've heard were just medieval Christians and Muslims trying to smear each other (and modern Protestants smearing both). The real problem was that infrastructure had collapsed, and "Enlightened" Protestant (and the Catholics in Italy and Spain, whose motives were equally obvious) "scholars" went out of their way to bury all Western thought from the era. It's not the kind of thing you'd keep secret...
Roman Concrete is better because it used volcanic ash which resists water better.
It is not accurate to say that 'scholars' from the Dark Ages were burying all Western thought from previous eras. Monasteries were known for safeguarding books/knowledge not burying it.
Roman Concrete used volcanic ash.
Farstate: That's kind of what I said. "Scholars" from the *modern* era were burying *medieval* Western thought.
It gets a brief mention in #3 but, what about the fact that the Earth is round? Eratosthenes estimated the CIRCUMFERENCE of the earth in, what, 350 BC? How did the middle agers forget it?
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesBecause they were too busy dying at the cruel hands of disease-ridden rats and fleas, or wearing badass bird masks, to pay attention to science.
They never did Bat. I know this is a humour site, but jokes about people in the Middle Ages believing the world was flat are just getting tiring now! It was a 19th century Enlightenment myth that got repeated over and over again and now u have ppl actually believing it - Goebbels was right - repeat a lie over and over again and it becomes the truth - no one in the Western world believed the world was flat - heck, u ever see medieval statues of Jesus hold a flat plate in his hand with a cross on it to represent the world? Its always a globe with a cross on top of it!
They never forgot. Not only did they never forget, but even then there are even references to someone thinking the world is flat to demonstrate provincialism.
What they DID forget was heliocentrism, but that never really caught on, anyway - it was under debate in the Hellenic era, geocentrism won, and then heliocentrism took over in the Late Middle Ages.
Well there's still the flat earth society today
hey i live in India never heard about the hedge,really not in history books.
ReplyLikey*
ReplyLimey scoffle!
"you god damn British and your lime" Haha as a Brit/English I found this line hilarious, always found the Likey insult a bit week along with goading our love of tea but this line was brilliant... Bloody good show old bean!
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesI think Limey is more of a polite ribbing than it is an insult.... you limey... uh.... we need more insults for you guys
Hey, I won't insult your tea. British tea with milk is awesome. Way better than coffee.
^
This.. Tea with milk owns.
I know a lot of the jokes are tired now, but hearing the USA's stereotypes for us still makes me smile.
I've genuinely seen a dick drawn onto an old Roman wall.
ReplyIt's how I learnt the word "phallus". I worte about it in my history report when I was 12.
Limeyman! Hear to kick ass and drink tea! All out of tea!
Reply Hide All See All 3 Replieslol, bakura.
I love you
Shenanigans! No true Englishman would ever be out of tea!
Limes! XD
Replyskateboarding hehe
ReplyThe funny thing about the roman concrete with the dick drawing in it is that it's entirely possible that it's not some photoshop, or that you won't ever find a roman-era piece of concrete with dicks drawn in it.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesThe Roman penis is legit. It is in Pompeii and it directs people to the closest brothel
They actually carved dicks into most peoples houses as a fertility shrine.
See? It's tradition!
I actually went to Pompeii once and there was one house that had a portrait of the guy who owned the house. It looked accurate, except that his dick is not in his toga and it's about 20 inches long. He's holding it on a platter. So, a lesson, Romans were perverts too!
There was a history book about the romans inventing steam power like in this article but the reason they didn't use it.... Slaves
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesWhy have a machine that i would need to train people to use and other people to fix when i could just use slaves?
Try to train the slaves, they just wont do the job... so you beat them and they still refuse, sooner or later you have beaten them to death and therefore wasted the time training them.
Uhh, what? Nope, the slave worked just fine.
They would do the job though, that's why slavery was so popular all over the world, because it did work.
But if they can just let the boat go with a steam engine, as opposed to having to row, they have more free time. That means more time to think and more time to plot. That's never good.
The way I heard the story was that when Heron showed his invention to the king, the king was horrified by the implications and demanded that the invention be destroyed. You see, the king was afraid that they would have to free (or kill) all the slaves who would instantly become obsolete. This would cause much political upheaval with either a) all the newly-freed but unemployed slaves revolting, b) all the slaves revolting in order to avoid being killed, or c) all the slaveowners revolting against the government destroying their "property".
The trouble with slaves is that they're expensive to keep. It's actually cheaper to use the lower class; if they get sick, that's not your investment.
This may be apocryphal, but I've heard that the steam engine was proposed as a way to lift blocks at construction sites. One of the Flavian Emperors reported replied along the lines of, "Then how will I feed my hungry?" He could clearly see that his work projects wouldn't be making so much work with this invention. (What he didn't see was the Industrial Revolution, but who can blame him?)
The problem with the said steam engine was that it was inefficient. They needed pistons for that. They also need to seal it properly. They also need large amounts of wood. They need machine tools.