6 Absurd Gender Stereotypes (That Science Says Are True)
If you've watched bad stand-up or beer commercials or listened to awful morning drive time radio DJs (Science has yet to prove the existence of any other type) you know about all of the supposed differences between men and women. The #1 topic of conversation among male hack comics is their nagging, chatter-box wives, and for hack females it's... well, vibrators. But their insensitive, slob of a husband is a very close second.
Well, it turns out there's a reason those comics and beer companies keep making those jokes. Many of the exciting advances in brain mapping and genetic research are proving that some of the oldest, most hackneyed gender-based stereotypes are totally true.

There is allegedly one thing women and blind men have in common: their ability to navigate. Even Google loves this stereotype, tossing back an impressive 75,200,000 hits when we typed in "women can't park."

Then there are the supposed differences in the ways women and men get from one parking spot to the next, a practice often referred to as "driving." According to the Hollywood formula, men navigate by compass directions and a stubborn refusal to ask for directions ever, while women get from here to there by using landmarks, a winning smile and a little leg. Tell a woman to turn north, then east and then north again and every sexist comedy writer we polled here at Cracked agreed she'd get turned around faster than a frog in a blender.
So, if this ridiculous stereotype were true, then Mother Nature has given men a serious edge in the "getting around" department. But that can't be right, because the decade of the 70s promised us that Mother Nature doesn't favor people based on race, sexual orientation or whether or not there are dangly parts between their legs.

This is what equality looks like.
What Science Says:
Several studies have shown that heterosexual men are better at both navigating by north-south directions and at orienting themselves in three dimensional space than women. Why did men win the spatial perception jackpot? No, the answer isn't sex this time, it's food. Well, actually, it's both.

Some things aren't better when combined.
In the days before grocery stores and mini malls, mankind had to actually go hunt and gather for his daily mammoth chops. Scientists think that testosterone helped early men find their way home again after a long day of hunting, ensuring that they were the ones impregnating their mates and continuing their line while the spatially challenged became saber tooth tiger snacks.
Not only that, but one researcher actually scanned the brains of over a million kids and found that by age four, the boys were already surpassing the girls in spatial ability by a ratio of 4:1. She also found that while girls did just fine at seeing two dimensions in the brain, boys had the ability to see a third dimension, allowing them to understand the concept of depth at an earlier age.
And yeah... the same isn't necessarily true for gay men, who tend to navigate like women. Literally. That was not an insult.


If detergent commercials have taught us anything, it's that the female nose is so highly evolved that it can pick out the stench of sweaty gym socks from a thousand paces. And once she has the scent in her delicate nostrils, a real woman cannot rest until the malodorous insult has been found, eliminated and replaced with a Linen Tides Breezy Cotton Fluff-n-Fresh (Now With Real Strawberries!) scent.
Their men, meanwhile, can wear the same sweat-stained T-shirt for a week, and will let garbage pile up in the kitchen until somebody calls the health department.
But that's loco right? It's like saying women were predisposed toward cleaning up after men or something, which is totally whack.

She LIVES for this shit.
What Science Says:
Women really are better sniffers than men. This is despite there being no physical differences between the male and female nose or the number of receptors they have. Not only are women better at detecting smells, but studies have also shown that women use a bigger chunk of their brains when processing smells than men do.

"Is that wet fish offal I smell?"
So why the difference? What biological reason can there be for your mom to be able to detect your sweat soaked socks through a closed door? The same reason that she was able to detect your dad's horny musk: sex. And though women generally detect all odors better, their noses really won the stink jackpot by having the knack for detecting male body odor.
Why? It seems that locked in that sweaty stench are chemical markers that can tell a gal when a fella is sexually aroused, even without her knowing it. Plus a woman's superhuman sense of smell is at its peak just as she's ovulating. So what does this mean for you? Forget Ax body spray. If you want to get laid, you need to smell like you've been watching porn in a sauna.

This is as basic as stereotypes get. Guys are bigger and stronger and traditionally are thought of as the more badass of the sexes. Women are frailer, smaller and prone to the sniffles at the slightest injury.
The one exception, of course, is childbirth, when even the weakest woman is an Amazon warrior when it comes to tolerating labor pain that would make a grown man whimper like he just took a paintball shot to the nuts. So call a woman frail, and she'll reply that if men had to give birth, the human race would have died out a long time ago.

What Science Says:
Women do have a lower pain threshold, but it has nothing to do with toughness. Men simply don't feel pain the same way women do, and what they do feel, they feel a lot less of. Women have more pain receptors in their skin for starters, amplifying their exposure to aches and pains.
Researchers believe it might be tied to the presence of GIRK2, a nifty little protein that not only affects pain threshold, but how well morphine and other painkillers work to block the pain once it's been inflicted. The next time you tell your girlfriend to walk off that cramp she got trying page 46 of the Kama Sutra with you, try to show a little compassion, she may just have less GIRK2 than you.
Ultimately, a woman's body can require more than double the amount of painkiller to get the same amount of relief.

The exception is when they are pregnant or have just delivered a baby. Endorphins and a cocktail of other feel good chemicals build up over the pregnancy, ensuring that mom can deal with the delivery and likely explaining the real reason expectant women have that special glow.

So, to recap, yes women have crazy strong pain thresholds right around childbirth, but any other time of their lives their capacity to endure pain is far less then men's, due to the way their nerves are wired up. Either way, be nice when her lady-days come.
Popular Cracked Videos
-
Sex as Understood by Adolescent Boys
Why Mario is Secretly a Douchebag
Why the Ending of 'Star Wars' is Secretly Kind of Dumb
Recommended For Your Pleasure
-
24 Things Other Countries Suspect About Life in America
1,003,826 views -
22 Ill-Advised First Drafts of Great Ad Campaigns
10,003 views -
5 Widely Believed Dating Myths (Science Says Aren't True)
2,550,842 views -
5 Gender Stereotypes That Used To Be the Exact Opposite
1,872,790 views -
6 Slacker Behaviors That Science Says Are Good For You
1,988,585 views
1320 Comments
Trending Now Friends' Recent Activity
Flashback
Cracked Shows
Most Popular
Elsewhere ...



Er....I think these are a bit extreme...
ReplyTone it down a bit, Susan H. Five out of the six gender stereotypes you mentioned were portrayed as demeaning toward women, and the only fact about men on this list asserts that women are pre-genetically designed to clean up after men, and that their noses only exist otherwise for the purpose of sex. I understand that the article's point was clearly not for the case of feminism, but neither should it express the "scientific" opinion that women are inferior to men. If you are going to be offensive, at least try to be funny. I don't come to Cracked to read articles promoting sexism.
ReplyI don't really think this was demeaning toward women, but hey I'm male so I don't have the linguistic powers of the female mind.....
No man or woman is worth your tears..(On my name)A__fantastic__place__for__young man_and_older_ woman__singles to dating..?CougarFlirts...c^0^m?..there meet your best cougar partner.For fun,For friendship, relationships, or even marriage!
ReplyRed, yellow, and blue are the primaries. If you mix red and green paint, you get brown, not yellow. I suppose that diagram is for computers or something.
Reply Hide All See All 3 Replieswe see in RGB, mate, update your software. You're too obviously an alien trying to blend in by not knowing that.
there are numerous combinations of primary colors, and we usually use 3 primaries, thats the minimum. our own vision is trichromatic which means we use 3 kinds of receptors to see light(short medium and long). we do not use the receptors for specific colors, but they are tuned to different wavelengths. the tuning even varies between people with normal sight, so we all probably see colors a tiny little bit different..
You're sort of right. As any professional animator should be able to tell you, there are two sets of primary colors because there are two types of color. Additive color deals with how light combines (mix them all up and get white), while subtractive color deals with how pigments combine (mix them all up and get black). Since this article is about the workings of the human eye, it's dealing with additive color.
My husband breaks most of these stereotypes. He has a terrible sense of direction (but he is a better parker than I am!). He is also a NEAT freak, and I'm the slob (though I do have a stronger sense of smell). And he is very sensitive to pain, when I usually grin and bear it. However, I absolutely talk a lot. Well, there are exceptions and nuances to everything, and I'm grateful he doesn't fit all the stereotypes. :-)
ReplyAll true, but it's also important to remember that all of these are also tendencies. i.e. Women are less likely than men to have strong spatial sense. But there are still tons of women who have masterful sense of direction, easily as strong as any man's (a know a couple). The problem with gender stereotypes, even the ones based on reality, is that assuming them screws over the people who don't fit the mold.
ReplyIndeed! There are people who don't fit the usual. My mother has a better sense of direction than anyone I know, but she's also a spatial learner. And my husband and I don't really fit any of the stereotypes (he's the clean one, I'm the slob, etc.) and though those are small differences, it's really funny the assumptions that have been made about us when we first got married, when we just didn't fit the norm at all.
Word, man.Stereotypes are only bad because they bunch people together, and try to wedge in even those that don't fit the mold. Generalising has the same problem. There's always going to be one bloke who breaks the pattern, and he or she deserves just as much respect as average joe who has the mold mounted on his mantlepiece.
This article is indeed fascinating. I always find myself wondering whether it's nature or nurture. Or prenatal conditions, in some cases. As for the spacial-perception, that tends to average out over the course of a lifetime.
ReplyI agree,when discussing researched and proven differences between the sexes in anything it's almost always brought into question how much of it is biological and how much is conditioning and socialization. I can tell you from taking Psych 101 class (aren't I clever) that the pain sensitivity difference is absolutely biological. They've done studies on newborns that have come up with the same results, that female infants have a lower pain threshold than males. It must of taken an especially fucked up scientist to come up with such an experiment, but the results are still fascinating
Umm, its absolutely nature. For starters all nurture is nature, since any learned behaviors are the products of the genes which created that ability. And then specifically, most of the things being talked about here are about different levels of proteins or the sizes of different parts of the brain. Those are not things nurture can do.
Fascinating stuff, and it does make sense from an evolutionary perspective. We are a TINY bit different physically, and so have different strengths and weaknesses based on the jobs we had to fulfill in nature before hunting and gathering involved a trip to Walmart. Said inborn strengths and weaknesses can be overcome easily, or might not even be a problem for someone depending on your personality, education or environment. Why is that such a big deal?
ReplyBasically environmental, educational, and other genetic factors as well as your own particular personality are going to mean a million times more than these possibly scientific factors anyway, so there's no reason to feel like this article is painting you in broad strokes regardless of your gender. It's the very same capacity for learning and reasoning that has evolved us past a point of hunting for meat and berries in loincloth.
I'll admit I probably have a lower pain threshold than you, but I can almost guarantee I have a higher pain tolerance.
ReplyI call bullshit on the brain and color spectrum "science". I'm a great conversationalist who can't seem to shut up. I can also see all the colors a female can. I can do all of this despite the "handy-cap" of of being male.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesSame here. Are you gay too. perhaps? Our kind does seem to share qualities that women also have no matter how big, burly and masculine we are.
Gay and same, with an additional crippling inability to remember directions.
Note that it says *might* not be able to. It doesn't mean that NO man will be able to. If anything, it will depend on how good your one x chromosome is at deciphering color. Color blindess is more common in males for this reason.
And if there's one isolated incident in which the rules aren't true, the rules must be wrong!
You realize that this is talking about "generalities" in the population, right? This is talking about the fact that the center of the bell curve for each sex is different in these various areas. Outliers always exist.
I'm a girl and I approve this article.
ReplyDa fuq is wrong wich u?
There's some evidence that some women may have four types of cone cells (color receptors) instead of the normal three, a condition called "tetrachromacy." So when they point to two apparently identical colors and say they're different, they may be right.
ReplyHmm, so women feel more pain? But it seems the stereotype is that men tend to be bigger "whiners" when they are experiencing pain or illness. I'd like to know if that's truth or fiction... but it does remind me of this quote: Man endures pain as an undeserved punishment; woman accepts it as a natural heritage. --Anonymous
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesJust guessing based off the article and my experience, I think it's more that... well, sort of like your quote. Women feel more pain than men. So they're more used to it and don't mention it as often. Men aren't used to it, so when they do feel it they want everyone to know.
Perhaps we tell people so that they won't start bitching with us at such times and thus risk getting a punch in the face? Or we tell people we are in pain so that they'll know why we're getting easily irritated and may throw an insult their way; kind of like 'nothing personal, but I'm in pain and don't feel like listening to your stupid s**t so for fucks sake shut the f**k up before I sock you in the mouth, but we're still friends even if I do'.
I don't understand all the hate for Acro.
So if testosterone is what helps with direction sense, how does that explain why homosexual men don't trend with their heterosexual counter parts? In fact, I believe if you ask most psychologists they'll tell you that direction sense is swayed towards men because of cultural reasons. It is a result of observational learning and what is expected of our genders. Yes even as early as age four we have already started to figure out whether we belong on mom's team or dad's.
ReplyI'm gay and have never gotten lost in my life; when I was 2 y.o I was in a store I'd never been to before along with my older sister and I kind of got stuck looking at toys and suddenly realised that my sister was nowhere around. So I figured she'd gone home so I exited the store and walked eleven blocks home all by myself. No problem. I did freak my sister out (whom had just walked one aisle over) that I had just disappeared like that though.
So I think that gay men not being as good at orientating themselves is bullshit.
A whole lot of crap.
Reply Hide All See All 5 Replies-it's hard to learn to orient yourself if you're kept indoors most of the time. So, since our society gives most of the outdoors jobs to males, males get to orient themselves better. I realized this after OCS: I hadn't changed sex, but I suddenly was great with both 3 or 2 (map reading) dimensional orientation.
-I parallel without problem and the only car accident I've been involved in, was when a women didn't stop at a red light and rammed into my car (can't blame her though: she was having a heart attack)
-I'm 52, had 5 kids, but I've yet to have either PMS or a "monthly cramp" (BTW, if mood swings were dependent on hormonal balance upheaval, guys would be emotional wrecks every 3 days, since their cycle is of 72 hours, instead or an average of 28 days for women).
-pain threshold also contain a psychological factor: the more stressed you are, the less physical pain you can endure up to a point. Beyond that, stress actually numbs you to pain. Many scientists have concluded that there are more differences between individuals of the same gender, than between the genders. (It's the same conclusion they have reached about ethnic variations, by the way)
So far, the only statistical significant difference I've found between males and females is that, among mammals, the male tends to be larger and hairier than the female. All the rest is more cultural than natural
Why did you write it as "monthly cramp"? They are real. Forewarning, entering what some may consider the TMI zone of women's repro health:
cramps are largely caused by the cervix dilating to allow blood clots to pass. The larger or more numerous the clots, the more it dilates, the worse the cramps. Simply taking a blood thinner (aspirin, aleve, ibuprofen, but NOT tylenol/paracetamol, which is NOT a blood thinner) can help--not by working as a pain reducer, but by reducing/eliminating blood clots.
So good on you that you never had cramps. That doesn't mean others don't experience genuine ones.
You have provided anecdotal "evidence" to attack scientific composite studies. There is no way to find "statistical significance" through anecdote. Sorry, Mutzka...your refutation is actually a whole lot of crap!
I get monthly cramps, and so do the other women in my family. Some of my friends do, but some don't. Like with anything, symptoms will vary from person to person, so it proves nothing that you've never gotten them. I do envy you though :(
they've done pain studies on newborns and found the same thing, that females have a lower threshold for pain. must've been an especially fucked up scientist to come up with that experiment, but it least it cuts right through your anecdotal bullshit.
source: science and my very hairy self
half a century old and you still use anecdotal evidence...... are you a politician?
And this is why we can't have nice things...
ReplyPlease, PLEASe look up "anecdotal evidence" before you comment about how your friend disproves an entire study because he/shes the odd one out.
ReplyTo see females get mad, see below comments.
ReplyThey dont seem to understand that having gender related trait advantages=/=sexism.
Because seriously theres no other way to explain the butthurt and self righteouness of the people in these comments other than that fundamental misunderstanding.
And now see comments above.
This article is ridiculously wrong, and the author definitely needs to revise their definition of the word "science." I would start by reading "Sexing the Body" by Anne Fausto-Sterling. For instance, in the first example, men have better spatial perception beginning at an early age. However, it does not take into account that boys are given balls and cars and trucks and basically practice spatial skills on a daily basis, while girls are given dolls which develop a completely different set of skills. Studies show that spatial skills are very easy to learn, but women are not given the same opportunities to do so (see: Fausto-Sterling). Stating something like LGBT brains being different without considering any aspect of socialization is ridiculous. Women have had this crap shoved down their throats since they're born--what they're good at and not good at, and it's not "science" to say this becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Please stop perpetrating narrow stereotypes that will only limit us more.
ReplySounds like somebody's daddy wanted a boy.
Socialization certainly plays a role, but there do seem to be some innate tendencies despite socialization. Even early on with out any outside pressure little boys and little girls will demonstrate a degree of difference. Boys for example are more likely to use their dolls as some kind of weapon (My grandson pretended they were some kind of sword-type device and clubs) even when they've never been exposed to violence on TV, cartoons or fellow children. On the other hand, my grandson also pretended to breast feed his doll. :) Then there was his mother (when she was older): played with legos as you'd expect, and also used them as extra people in her dollhouse, alongside her Barbies. So does this argue against her having good spatial perception given the differences in size? Or that she had a great imagination? On the other hand, she never seemed interested in "playing house" per se, her Barbie dolls were having wild Indian Jones type adventures; No play housekeeping, cooking, or fairy tale weddings--there was no mothering of baby dolls by THIS little girl (now a mother of FIVE).
Inherently little boys seem more likely to exhibit more aggressive behavior, throwing, hitting, tearing, etc. But this is a very generalized statement with a huge range of "normal" for both boys and girls. I do think that at least a fraction of gender-specific behavior is social, given that boys and girls are typically given different toys, but even with all things being equal they will often freely choose "sexist" toys--to a degree, and depending on solo play, vs. group play. Girls are also not encouraged to play sports, let along group sports,and that has been proven to have a pronounced benefit in learning how to work as part of a team, valuable in today's society.
Moreover, while there are some measurable differences between genders (as well as gay/lesbian--primarily homosexual males) there is an inherent chicken/egg problem. Did the difference in training/tendencies cause the physiological changes, or were the differences there first and that influenced behavior?
Probably both.
Is this why my boyfriend always needs an f-ing GPS to navigate his own neighborhood, and I never get lost?
ReplyApparently, you and your boyfriend are both homosexuals.
Navigation ability seems to vary even among men. I can visualize in [monochromatic] 3D the layout (floorplan) of a building I haven't been in in years/decades. My dad on the other hand could get lost going to my grandmother's place even though he's been there countless times.