5 Great Men Who Built Their Careers on Plagiarism
As anyone here at Cracked will tell you, without even the slightest provocation, writing is hard. When the strain of coming up with new material becomes too great to bear, a writer has two options: He can pepper his work with penis jokes and pictures of cute animals (see our entry on T.S. Eliot, below), or he can steal his words from a better writer.
Occasionally, a brilliant (or at least sort of clever) mind comes across a bad spell of writer's block and gives into the temptation to be a cheating plagiarist. Sometimes this blatant plagiarism ends up being the catalyst that launches their career like a rocket powered by lies.

What'd He Do?
In a nutshell, Ambrose invented pop history. He was the historical advisor on Saving Private Ryan and wrote the book Band of Brothers, that miniseries about WWII that starred the guy from Office Space.

"You know, the Nazis had little pieces of flair they made the Jews wear."
Ambrose also wrote award-winning biographies on Presidents Eisenhower and Nixon. If you've ever wanted to become a famous historian, chances are Stephen was one of your inspirations. Also, chances are you're a massive nerd.
What's the Problem?
In 1995, an almost unknown historian named Thomas Childers published the book Wings of Morning. It was a well-received but relatively obscure novel about the crew of a specific B-24 bomber during WWII.
Ambrose was a fan of the book and, as a firm believer that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, he proceeded to plagiarize the fuck out of it for his hit 2001 novel, The Wild Blue, which was the account of a different group of B-24 crewmen. Ambrose ripped off whole passages of text and stole several sentences and descriptions word for word. Then he got his book published and just sort of hoped no one would notice.
In the writing business, that's what we call "textual rape."

Show me on the table of contents where Dr. Ambrose touched you.
Unfortunately for Stephen, but fortunately for truth, he got caught. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard noticed what was going on and revealed it to the world. Ambrose was fast to respond.
He had cited Childers' book in his bibliography (although he hadn't come close to listing everything he 'borrowed' from his fellow historian's work) and basically claimed that he'd just "forgotten" to attribute the stolen passages in the text, like he was supposed to.

This chart comes from the Weekly Standard's article about Ambrose, written by Fred Barnes. See what we did there Stephen, you dead bastard? We gave the original author credit for something they fucking wrote.
Is That All?
For a little while, Stephen's apology was enough. Ambrose was famous for turning out books at an astonishing rate. He was the meth-addicted prostitute of popular history, turning tricks faster than anyone else on History Whore Blvd. Of course he was bound to make the occasional mistake. Most people considered the matter settled.
Mark Lewis, of Forbes.com, was not one of those people. He read the first story about Ambrose and, like a good investigative journalist, proceeded to tear apart everything the pop historian had written in his search for the truth.
Lewis first hit gold when he found several blatant thefts in the book Crazy Horse and Custer, which Ambrose pretended to write in 1995. For that novel, Ambrose molested the work of esteemed historical writer Jay Monagham. Here's an excerpt from the Forbes article:
MONAGHAM: "On August 28, 1859, Custer returned to West Point. Cadet James Barroll Washington, a great-great-grandnephew of George Washington, entered that year. He remembered hearing the crowd shout, 'Here comes Custer!' The name meant nothing to him, but he turned, and saw a slim, immature lad with unmilitary figure, slightly rounded shoulders, and gangling walk."
AMBROSE: "When he returned to West Point, Cadet James B. Washington, a relative of George Washington, remembered hearing the crowd shout, 'Here comes Custer!' The name meant nothing to Washington, who was just entering the Academy, but he turned and saw a slim, immature lad with unmilitary figure, slightly rounded shoulders, and gangling walk, surrounded by back-slapping, laughing friends."
The Vanilla Ice to Monagham's Queen (featuring David Bowie), Ambrose exerted less effort covering his ass than a high school student who just discovered Wikipedia.

"Holy shit. Everything I want to say about The Grapes of Wrath is RIGHT HERE."
Ambrose's web of lies didn't end there, either. In total, seven of his books were found to contain some degree of plagiarism. His fucking college thesis was even loaded down with other people's unattributed writing. The most famous historian in the world built his career on a foundation of deception.
Did He Pay?
He really didn't. Evidence of his wrongdoing came up very shortly before his death from lung cancer in 2002.
The real tragedy here is that Ambrose's work which, plagiarism aside, was incredibly significant, has been tainted by association with his crimes. Dr. Ambrose was not a bad writer or a bad historian, but his flexible ethics and lack of regard for his fellow writers sent him down the path to infamy.

What'd He Do?
T.S. Eliot wrote several great, enduring poems, such as "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" which had a ridiculous title, and "The Hollow Men," which, we were depressed to discover, wasn't about a naked, invisible, murdering lunatic. Perhaps his greatest work was a poem entitled, "The Waste Land," which was a haunting statement of his disillusionment with the post-war era. It was a literary milestone, and is still celebrated today as one of the greatest works of poetry in history.

What's the Problem?
The problem with this is that Eliot didn't write "The Waste Land." Not all of it anyway. As it turns out, the idea behind "The Waste Land," and a fair amount of its content, was plagiarized from an almost unknown American poet named Madison Cawein.
Cawein worked hard all of his youth, scrimping and saving and putting aside enough money so that he could begin finally working on his true love: poetry. He put out several volumes of work that is very well regarded, but he never gained any recognition and died almost unknown. Which just goes to show you that, if you work hard in this country and believe in yourself, you'll die alone and under appreciated.

He's SO obscure, that Google Image Search doesn't even have a picture of him. This is a wiener dog.
Cawein's poem was even named "Waste Land." It was first published in the same issue of Poetry as Eliot's "Love Song," and contains several metaphors that were later used word for word by Eliot in his "The Waste Land." (Eliot's lucky he died before trying to publish his "The Romeo and Juliet" and "The Tyler Perry's Diary of a Mad Black Woman.")
But the poor, unappreciated Madison Cawein wasn't the only person Eliot stole from. This passage from "The Waste Land:" "The Chair she sat in, like a burnished throne / Glowed on the marble," was slightly altered but still stolen from Shakespeare, who wrote, "The barge she sat in, like a burnish'd throne / Burn'd on the water".
Eliot's line, "Sweet Thames, run softly, till I end my song," was stolen entirely from Edmund Spenser's "Prothalamion."
Is That All?
Most of "The Waste Land" was just cobbled together out of quotes from other writers. Until very recently, most scholars have been happy to simply chalk these up as "allusions" to the work of other authors. For a long time, it was regarded as something poets just did, as a way of honoring their influences.
On a slightly related note, tune in next Tuesday, where we'll be streaming a high-resolution allusion to Lord of the Rings movies all day!
Did He Pay?
"Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal"
This is a quote from Eliot himself. You see, T.S. was rich, famous and beloved the world over. While he was alive, everyone just sort of ignored all of the evidence that he was a tremendous bastard. He died renowned as one of the greatest poets in all of history, which he was, but he was also a plagiarizing cockbag who denied a much worthier artist a place in history.

What'd He Do?
We're not saying that King wasn't an incredible person who did more to advance the human race than most of us can ever hope to do. We're just saying that he was also a plagiarizing butthole.
What's the Problem?
For starters, his own university admits that his doctoral thesis, the very foundation of his career, was significantly plagiarized. Seriously. They had an official inquiry and everything.
"We had many of the same professors, we worked in the same atmosphere during our graduate studies," said John Cartwright, an MLK scholar and member of the committee that investigated his plagiarism allegations, "under no circumstances would the atmosphere under which he did his work condone what Doctor King did. It's incredible. He was not unaware of the correct procedure. This wasn't just done out of ignorance."

"Oh, I'm sorry, it must have slipped my mind while I was changing the fucking world.
Despite clear findings of plagiarism, the committee did not recommend he be posthumously stripped of his title, due to Dr. King's incredible services to the world. And due to their extreme fear of being beaten and castrated by hordes of angry MLK groupies.

Please don't hurt us.
The first allegations of King's plagiarism were hushed up, denied, or 'excused' by academia. However, the accusations continued to flow in. This timeline shows how the realization of King's plagiarism unfolded. Not only was his dissertation plagiarized, but many of his student papers and sermons were stolen in whole or in part from other writers.
The staff of the King Paper's Project at Stanford even admits that, "King's plagiarism was a general pattern evident in nearly all of his academic writings."
Is That All?
Perhaps the most notable example of King's plagiarism was the general tone, and several select lines from his famous "I Have a Dream," speech. Theodore Pappas presents a detailed accusation in his book, Plagiarism and the Culture War. Most of the issue centers around the closing lines.
Here's how King's speech ended;

"This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with a new meaning, 'My country, 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim's pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring.' And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania! Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado! Let freedom ring from the curvaceous peaks of California! But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia! Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee! Let freedom ring from every hill and every molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring."
Compare that to a much earlier speech by another Civil Rights activist, Archibald Carey:
"We, Negro Americans, sing with all loyal Americans: My country 'tis of thee, Sweet land of liberty, Of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, Land of the Pilgrims' pride From every mountainside Let freedom ring!
That's exactly what we mean--from every mountain side, let freedom ring. Not only from the Green Mountains and White Mountains of Vermont and New Hampshire; not only from the Catskills of New York; but from the Ozarks in Arkansas, from the Stone Mountain in Georgia, from the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia--let it ring not only for the minorities of the United States, but for the disinherited of all the earth--may the Republican Party, under God, from every mountainside, LET FREEDOM RING!"
Did He Pay?
Not during his lifetime. To be fair, it takes balls to accuse the greatest civil rights activist in history with plagiarism. Now, if you'll excuse us, we're all going to go hide in an undisclosed cave with a bunch of loaded guns, and enough crystal meth to keep us awake all year.








Whoa, plagiarism does, actually, suck. It's one thing when you have to turn in that 1000 word essay for your bullsh-I mean Literary Deconstruction class, and it's quite another, apparently, when your rise to undeserved fame and wealth dooms a true genius to a life of poverty and bitter ignominy by your theft.
Replyfurther, your example "The Romeo and Juliet" does not lend much creedence to your argument, seeing as how Shakespeare's play rips off (according to this logic) an old Italian romance; or how about the well-known Greek tragedy Pyramus and Thisby, which Shakespeare inserts (albeit in a humorously, bumbling way) in A Midsummer Night's Dream?
Reply Hide All See All 3 Repliesi know, i know. comedy site. what can i say? i study literature
I guess you haven't got to the those big letters that sometimes are in the beginning of "sentences" yet?
Hipsters don't use capitals.
So if you steal something that's already plagiarized, it's not stealing? Who wants to buy a copy of my newest book, "A Short History of the World?"
eliot? plagarizing? ever hear of intertextuality?
ReplyThere's intertextuality, and then there's copying outright, and sentencing an artist who has sacrificed his entire life to produce something excellent to die unfamed for your greed.
Where is Thomas Edison and Carlos Mencia?
Replynot technically plagiarism, and not a great man, respectively
H.G. Wells didn't broadcast The War of the Worlds on the radio; that was Orson Welles. He did write the book on which the broadcast was based, however.
ReplyWell picked.
What's with the title of the article? It's quite obvious you don't consider all of these men "great". In fact, it seems most of them are mostly portrayed as scum. Why the need to assure readers you still think they are great? I could speculate on why the disclaimer was put in there, but it would be just that; speculation.
ReplyH.G. Wells is famous for his Sci-Fi stories not for those books, so placing him in number 1 is just stupid. It's like saying that the guy became famous and respected for stealing something that anyone knew or read.
ReplyNothing you say can change the fact that he was scum.
He and T.S. Eliot are like the Thomas Edison's of their genres.
This is one thing that's good about the internet. It's easier to plagiarize, but it's also easier to expose plagiarism.
Reply"Also, he looked kind of like a pedophile / And sort of like Steve Buscemi."
ReplySteve Buscemi looks like a paedophile - or at least, he looks sleazy. That's why he's typecast in weaselly, weak criminal roles.
Yes. Also, Jamie Foxx is black. That's why he's typecast in black person roles.
Was this article made just to piss people off?
ReplyNo.
haha annals of history
ReplyIn regards to scumbag king---If we were to start judging blaks by the content of their character
Reply Hide All See All 3 Repliesthey would quickly be begging us to judge them by the color of their skin. Ironic huh?
only scumbag here is YOU! i feel sorry for your sad, racist self. and plus learn what irony means before deciding to use it.
"Blacks" has a "c" in it.
Overall, "African-American" culture is pretty s****y, especially when compared to actual elements of African culture.
However, we have to ignore the skin tone of those around us. That's the way to avoid racism. Racism isn't about never saying that a race is bad, it's about ignoring the race as a defining characteristic to begin with.
Why are you commenting about this, anyway, dypshit?
Originality is a tricky concept, particularly when it comes to literature. Every single text can be considered nothing more than 'a new tissue of past citations' (Roland Barthes, 'Theory of the Text' 1981 - originality may be tricky and perhaps nonexistent, but I've still been taught to name my sources).
Replywow. never expected to see a barthes reference amid all the dick jokes and star wars allusions on cracked (which i also enjoy). kudos to you, jaderuth
I know this article was posted in 2009, and I'm sure someone has pointed this out by now, but I really cannot contain my nerd rage.
ReplyH. G. Wells is not "probably most famous for his radio drama War of the Worlds". H. G Wells published the NOVEL 'War of the Worlds' in 1898. The first transmission of a human voice via radio did not occur until 1900. You're thinking of Orson Welles (same pronunciation, different spelling) who, in 1938, adapted Wells novel for the legendary radio broadcast.
What I find funny is looking at the comments decrying all the people calling this article racist, but when I search for them, there are none. I counted about four or five comments calling commenters racist for calling the author racist, but I found no actual comments calling the author racist.
ReplyThat was a racist remark.
@MindedOne:
Racists tend to have 'killer arguments' that they'll use without checking whether it fits or not.
For example, the Southern Poverty Law Center often runs articles about bigoted black or Islamic groups. However people are constantly coming on there to say "you only talk about racism when it's white people. You're the real racists!"
I am th president of the Plagiarism Accosciation of America thank you for bringing these vile beasts (other than MLK) to my attention.
ReplyWay to spell "Association" wrong.
I find it even more impressive that he spelled "the" wrong
Morlocks made him do it.
ReplyWhy I read Cracked: "Thank God the Internet doesn't exist yet, or I'd be fucked."
ReplyEliot intended for all of his quotes to be recognized and was quite pissed off when people didn't recognize their original sources. His poetry wasn't about writing flowery language but uniting disparate cultural works and seeing how they work together to create his day's culture. It was actually a reasonably fashionable style of poetry during the Modernist period. If he was stealing, it was in the way a found poem "steals". I'd also add that Eliot didn't want to call the poem The Waste Land. That was Ezra Pound's idea.
ReplyThanks for illuminating.
Too bad "uniting disparate cultural works" couldn't involve any kind of recognition for the originators of said works. Seems like a pretty convenient "style" for the modernists to adopt.
If this is at all like "Found Art" then it's time to realize my dream of stealing Van Goghs and painting my name on them.
The author of this article refers to both Wings of Morning and Outline of History as "novels." Since it appears from other things that he writes that he is aware that both these books are nonfiction it would appear that he regards the word "novel" as being just another word for book - which is bizarre to say the least.
ReplyIt's very common. I've had my collection of short stories and poems reviewed by several blogs that have called it a novel.