7 Movies Based on a True Story (That Are Complete Bullshit)
We don't ask a lot from our movies. A nice story, maybe with some sex, violence and Batman thrown in.
But sometimes a movie comes along and takes on special meaning because it's based on a true story, and so we watch with rapt attention knowing that some real dude lived through all the awesomeness on screen. But if you're going to go with the "Based On A True Story" tag, all we ask is that you make the stories sort of, you know, true. You can do that, right?
Not if these movies are any indication.
The Hollywood Version:
Chris Gardner is a hard-working man with a pain-in-the-ass wife and an adorable little son boasting one of the greatest afros we've ever seen on a child. All Gardner wants to do is make enough of a living to provide for his son.
Through what we assume is black magic, he solves a Rubik's Cube in record time, wowing an employee at Dean Witter and he apparently passes the only test needed to qualify a man to become a stock broker. He toils for months, sleeping in subways and churches with his son at his side, but in the end it all pays off when he claims the one and only opening at Dean Witter, crying tears of joy and getting jiggy wit it in the streets of San Francisco.
In reality ...
Gardner did get a chance to show his stuff in the Dean Witter training program (though we're sad to report his acceptance had nothing to do with solving a colorful puzzle game). But, as the more honest book version points out, he apparently wasn't quite the father the film made him out to be.
First, he was so focused on getting a job and earning his first million that, well, he actually didn't even know where the hell his son was for the first four months of the program.
Chris, Jr. was apparently living at this point in time with his mother, Jackie. Did we mention that the boy had been conceived when Gardner was still married to another woman?
In addition, instead of being arrested just before his big interview due to parking tickets ... well, it seems that Chris was actually arrested after Jackie accused him of domestic violence.
"That's right son, you gotta keep that pimp hand strong."
Don't get us wrong, Chris did indeed get his life turned around after landing the job as a broker. There were just some things in Gardner's past that they couldn't quite bring themselves to have Will Smith do on screen. Like selling drugs (as Gardner admits he did briefly), or doing cocaine with his mistress, with little doses of PCP and a hearty helping of Mary Jane tossed in for good measure.
Adulterous sex? Cocaine? Neglecting your child for months at a time? It says something about the man that he didn't drop the pursuit, despite having pretty much found happyness already.
The Hollywood Version:
Ben Campbell is a math genius excelling at MIT, home to some of the brightest young minds on the planet as well as a really smart custodian. He catches the eye of Kevin Spacey, appearing in all of his "phoning it in" glory, who recruits young Ben for the MIT Blackjack Team. At first, it all seems harmless enough, as they play just to learn the age-old art of card counting.
Once they get good enough, Spacey whisks the team off to swingin' Las Vegas to give their new talent a try in a real world setting. Of course, things don't go quite as planned (typical), and after a severe beating at the hands of Cowboy Curtis, Ben learns some harsh lessons about life and love before tromping off to Harvard Medical School.
In reality ...
If there's anything we can learn from 21, it's that Hollywood won't give an Asian man a starring role unless it calls for someone who can do karate while getting berated by Chris Tucker.
In fact, 21 gives us perhaps the greatest whitewash in recent Hollywood history--a broad, sweeping stroke of Caucasian across the majority of the cast.
The real MIT Blackjack Team was almost totally Asian, but you'd never know that from the film. Even Kevin Spacey's character was based in part on an Asian professor, who has been known to dress like a woman in order to sneak into casinos. Apparently, a transvestite Asian math genius isn't as interesting as Spacey in the "just make sure the check clears" stage of his career.
But hey, at least they did cast a pair of Asians as members of the Blackjack Team. Naturally, in sticking with current Hollywood trends, they were made into goofy loser sidekick types, while the white kids handled all of the heavy intellectual lifting. Not since Mickey Rooney's performance in Breakfast at Tiffany's has Hollywood treated Asians with such respect and dignity.
The Hollywood Version:
Joe Clark is a bad man. And we mean that in the best possible way, as in "don't fuck with him." When Paterson, New Jersey's Eastside High School found itself on the brink of being taken over by the state due to piss poor test scores, Clark was brought on board as principal to right the sinking ship.
And right it he did, by fighting expelled students in the hall and throwing chains and padlocks on the doors. After all, if Joe Clark was going to go out in a blaze of glory, he was going to take as many students with him as possible. In the end, thanks to a hip new school song and the bullying ways of Principal Clark, Eastside saw a meteoric rise in its test scores and everyone celebrated by joining together in song, as inner city ruffians often do.
In reality ...
Apart from the fact that the test scores never really improved, or that state takeover had never actually been threatened, or the various ways they fudged facts just to make sure the audience was aware that Joe Clark enjoyed putting foot to ass, it's pretty close to the real story. That is to say, a man named Joe Clark did serve as principal at Eastside High for a short time at the end of the '80s.
The biggest goal of the filmmakers was apparently to make Clark as menacing as possible, giving him a bullhorn with which to more loudly crush the spirits of students and faculty alike, and having Morgan Freeman spend the entire film wearing such a fierce scowl that you'd swear someone just shit in his punchbowl.
Here's the punchline to the whole thing, though: One year after Clark resigned and less than two years after the film's release, the state came in and took control of the school. And since they weren't actually threatening to take over in the first place, we're forced to assume they got the idea from the movie.
The Hollywood Version:
It seems that back in the '70s, there was a plucky little football player who dreamed of nothing other than playing for the Notre Dame Fighting Irish. Unfortunately for young Rudy, his support system consisted of people who went out of their way to point out his flaws, of which there were many, and let him know repeatedly that dreams are the main ingredient in the devil's pudding.
"Son, how many times I gotta tell you, goals are for chumps!"
Thankfully, Rudy's best friend from back home got blown right the fuck up in a freak accident, inspiring him to play football for some reason. And play he did, no thanks to the evil scheming of Notre Dame coach Dan Devine, who only allowed Rudy on the field after the entire team threatened to walk out otherwise.
In reality ...
The real life Dan Devine was actually the one who insisted on playing Rudy in his final game. Hell, even when the movie was being made, Devine gave the filmmakers permission to turn him into the film's villain in order to help Rudy, who he considered a good friend.
Devine sounds like one helluva guy, right? So naturally he was repaid for his kindnesses by being turned into the Snidely fucking Whiplash of college football (sans mustache), and forever being remembered as the crotchety coach to whom winning football games was more important than anything. Anything other than ensuring that Rudy's dream would die.
Devine was the father of the vaunted "tied to train tracks" defense
By the way, ever wonder who saw Rudy play that day and got so inspired he just had to make it into a movie? Nobody. It was Rudy himself who spent a full decade trying to convince studios that his life was so awesome it deserved a movie, before one of them finally relented. That's the spirit, little guy!








Dont call it Bullshit! Its not the accuracy that matters, its the message
ReplyThere are Bollywood (Indian) movies which are more rightly titled: "based on true rumors"
Replycan yall do one of these with Wild bill ( 1995 version ), wolf creek, crocodile dundee, point break, killer elite, and what other one is also full of s**t
Reply"Invincible" had only a couple instances of bullshit, but they were enough to kill the movie for me. First, the movie omitted that Vince Papale had played in the World Football League so he had pro football experience. Second, that touchdown he scored - it never really happened. And I knew it as I was watching it even though the movie was set in what, 1976? I was totally enjoying that movie until that happened. PISSED me off.
ReplyI've long know that "based on a true story" meant that "some guy did some thing so we're making up a movie out of it and no we don't care a s**t about any other thing that guy has ever done in his life"
ReplyAlso, what in the HELL happened to the comments font?
I agree with you here completely, this is how I view ALL movies with the words "based on a true story" on them.
I completely agree with you, what the hell DID happen to the comments font?
The whole "complete bullshit" tag on the title is pretty misleading. Sure, most of these movies made a lot of crap up, but few of them are close to 100% bullshit, which is what the title implies.
ReplyI think after a certain point, the number of omissions and alterations turns a story into a complete lie. If I wrote a movie about the True Story of President George Washington, in which the first President of the US is really a samurai from Japan with chainsaws for arms, it would be safe to call it complete BS even though there really was a man named George Washington.
Reply"Hollywood chose to Stallone the s**t out of it" :)))))))))))))
Apparently only 5% of the story has to be true in order for Holly to stamp the "Based on a True Story" tag on it...
ReplyWho's Holly? I meant Hollywood. Should have paid attention in typing class...
You might not have realized this, but all movies are approved by a woman named Holly Wood, a 78-year old retiree living in Baton Rouge.
"Thankfully, Rudy's best friend from back home got blown right the f**k up in a freak accident, inspiring him to play football for some reason."
ReplyDear God that line killed me.
Wolf Creek is one of the most blatantly false "true" stories I've seen. The only true thing about it is that there was a murder in Australia once.
ReplyIt said based on real events. The killer was modeled after a guy who killed hikers and a smaller page was taken out of a real story where a wife was accused of murdering her husband in the middle of nowhere. I agree it's misleading, but Based on a True Story is entirely different than something Based on Real Events.
Based on true stories means that they took some event that happened, maybe two, modify them slightly, then build write an entire movie around it.
Braveheart. I love that movie, but damn, is it complete bullshit historically.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYeah, they could do an entire article on the bullshit made up in that movie.
Don't even try and say lightning didn't come out of his ass.
It didn't. Thunder did.
Kevin Spacey is so concerned with "concealing" his gayness that he would want nothing to do with a cross-dressing asian man........... in a movie.
Reply"cheaper by the dozen"? surely you cant leave that one out??
ReplyHow about "The Strangers" (2008) - inspired by true events? Look it up.
ReplyDon't forget Cool Runnings. Those bob-sleding Jamaicans barely made the cut, then came in dead last.
Replythey still did in the movie... its just that everyone loved them.
The accuracy doesnt matter, its the message that is important
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesThe inaccuracy, combined with the fact that they advertise these movies as "based on a true story" reflects poorly on the honesty with which these movies were marketed. That is arguably more important than the messages.
If the accuracy doesn't matter then why even make a "based on a true story" movie? Why not just make a fictional film with a positive message?
Because a fictional film with a positive message doesn't create the same marketing buzz that "based on a true story" movies make.
You need to learn what "based on a true story" means. It means hollywood found out about some event and decided to write a movie about it. Without finding anything else out.
Another thing these films have in common, they are all shit.
ReplyI dunno, Lean On Me seems pretty interesting from the scenes of it I have seen so far.
That said, calling it a true story is still unacceptably dishonest.
I actually like Lean on Me and Mississippi Burning. I knew it was bullshit, but I still love it.
No matter how good these movies supposedly are, (have yet to see them, though I have seen scenes from Lean On Me) calling them true stories is unacceptably dishonest. Shame on anyone who participated in these movies.
ReplyHollywood: f*****g the truth out of true stories since 1918
ReplyHurricane Carter was: 1. Convicted on the evidence of the murderer being 'a black male' with the same model car as him (but a different colour, just in case that wasnt a noticable thing) 2. A boxer from a troubled background, he was convicted of an assault, but that was before he took up boxing, and 'hes black, hes a boxer and hes committed crimes' is enough evidence to lock up Mike Tyson instead of Carter, i.e. not enough to prove anything. And being booted by the military? Neil Patrick Harris would have been booted from the military in those days for being gay, and any organisation that is an enemy of NPH's is an enemy of mine. 4. Lie detector tests are bullshit. They pick up on signs of you being nervous whilst youre speaking, and having just been served with a triple murder charge (a life or death punishment situation) on a ridiculous charge where the prosecutors have no evidence (they never gave the court the transcript of the witness statement) and you have alibis and witnesses to testify your innocence but they still find you guilty would make me a teeny-tiny bit nervous. 5. You said in your article: he wasnt given a fair trial because there was no (real) evidence against him. Thats kind of a big thing.
Reply Hide All See All 4 Replies.
Shut up, hippy.
There's a world of difference between being kicked out of the military, and being court-martialed FOUR times.
Hurricane did it and used race as a weapon to get sympathy. A man doesn't live the life he did, have the record he had, and get convicted twice without reasonable cause.
And in the movie he's in his army uniform with all those ribbons on it - I think it was the exact same one Denzel wore in Courage Under Fire.