6 Great Action Heroes (Who Should Be Convicted of Murder)
There's a reason action movies don't zoom in on the awesome explosions close enough to see the dozens of innocent burn victims in the vicinity. Nobody wants to get dragged down by the plight of these nobodies.
But still, some action heroes take the collateral damage (and lack of concern for it) to a level that blurs the line between hero and villain, and probably wouldn't have looked so good in a court of law.

If you ask any Matrix fan about their favorite part of the film, their answer will invariably involve Keanu Reeves's breathtaking performance as Neo. From the inspiring "I know kung fu" speech to his tender and heartfelt "whoa" monologue, his brilliant and multifaceted portrayal made Neo a compelling symbol of humanity at its best, alive and vibrant in a world dominated by oppressive machines.
Also, it was totally awesome when he killed all those guys in slow-motion.
So What's the Problem?
So when Neo's mentor Morpheus gets captured by the bad guys, Neo responds by arming himself with an arsenal larger than that of most developing nations, slaughtering a cluster of security guards before they can even draw their guns, before dropping a bomb on the ground floor of the building just in case there were a few errant cockroaches that weren't killed in the earlier carnage.
Wachowski brothers fans have noted the deliberate parallels between the messianic Neo and the Biblical story of the moneychangers in the temple, in which Christ pulled out a Beretta and killed about 50 security guards.
The thing is, it's explained early in the movie that there are bad guys who are entirely computer-generated (the "Agents") and then there are regular people who, when they get shot in the Matrix, die in real life. And those security guards were the latter.
Yet, for some reason it's played so that Neo is totally free from any guilt over killing a bunch of people, instead of just generating a helicopter and grabbing Morpheus from the top floor. You know, like they wind up doing anyway.

Or, if that wasn't an option, instead of walking in with machine guns, show up with canisters of gas that would render everyone unconscious. Sure it wouldn't have looked nearly as awesome as the guns, but at least it wouldn't have felt as wasteful (of both human life and ammo). So at the end of the day the lesson is apparently that it doesn't matter how many civilians you kill as long as you make sure that you look as cool as possible while doing it.
Of course, there's also the rationale that Neo was fighting for the greater good of freeing humanity from the Matrix. And thanks to the sacrifice he forced those security guards to make, their families could now be free to starve in a filthy underground city while being relentlessly pursued by killer robots.

They're superheroes, they're in a summer action movie, it's sort of assumed we in the audience are going to be on their side. It helps that Jessica Alba is on that side too.
So What's the Problem?
Literally every single problem in this entire movie can be traced directly to the Fantastic Four's general incompetence. Don't believe us? Just take the scene when the Thing, in a bold act of heroism, saves a man from being hit by a car by causing a massive car accident that almost certainly killed the driver, and killed him in a way that his widow will never be able to adequately explain.

It gets better. In order to distract the crowd that has gathered at the accident site, the Four decide to spark a huge explosion. Amazingly, this well thought-out plan turns out catastrophically and the resulting blast nearly kills everyone on the bridge.

There's probably a deleted scene in which Mr. Fantastic attempts to pull a kitten out of a tree and winds up causing a nuclear meltdown.
You know, you never see Batman doing stuff like this, and he doesn't even have three superpowered teammates to pitch in. And at least when the Hulk damages property, he's doing it on purpose.
When the Fantastic Four finally confront their nemesis Doctor Doom for the heroic cause of saving their own asses, the only reason they prevail is that these heroic underdogs outnumber the villain 4-1.
The Fantastic Four do learn their lesson though, and in the sequel they basically step back and let the Silver Surfer save the world for them, probably saving countless innocent lives in the process, though not as many as they'd have saved if they'd just stayed home from the beginning.


By the time of Alien Resurrection's release, Ellen Ripley was already one of the most beloved characters in science fiction history, following an epic arc from an escape from the first vicious alien, to her fierce battle with an alien army and their queen, all the way to her final confrontation with a single alien puppy.
So What's the Problem?
In a revolutionary new direction for the alien series, in part four Ripley and her unruly crew of extras are trapped in outer space with a swarm of aliens. When confronted with the problem of how to destroy them, our heroes carefully consider their options and decide that the best course of action would be to crash the ship into earth. After all, if you have to die, you might as well take out as many innocent bystanders as possible.
Of course, they manage to kill the main alien by blasting it into the vacuum of space (didn't see that coming did you?) which means that they basically blew up who knows how many people on the ground for no reason at all, other than maybe to justify a special effects budget.

Joss Whedon's script doesn't exactly help make Ripley more sympathetic. While excessively clever dialog might be tolerable coming from the teenagers on Buffy, glib one-liners probably aren't the best way to inform someone that they have been infected with a horrific parasite that will soon burrow its way out of their chest, killing them in the most agonizing way possible.








*AHEM* I beg to differ. Glib one-liners are the ONLY good way to inform someone that they have been infected with a horrific parasite that will soon burrow its way out of their chest, killing them in the most agonizing way possible.
ReplyEven proposing that V himself would become the new leader of anything is preposterous. V (as is pointed out on several occasions) considers himself, not a man, but an idea. He's the personification of his cause, and his cause is to overthrow the corrupt, not to reinstate anything new. The people following him are following his idea and not the man himself, and by not assuming a name or title he is one of them. Even if he agitates the population and works as a catalyst for change, the people are responsible for overthrowing the government.
ReplyI'm not critic, but not your best work. It reads more like a hit-list than your other articles. I guess these are "Six Movies I Only Watched For The Action"
ReplyForgot Superman. Watch any cartoon he is in. Throwing people through buildings willy nilly. gas lines and cars exploding. Buildings falling over. I mean in an effort to save 3 people from the villain, he kills like 3,000 in collateral damage. Plus think of all the insurance companies going bankrupt paying out all those claims.
ReplyYou didn't watch Casino Royale very well, because it's the bad guy he's chasing who knocks the guy off the girder and causes the explosion, as well as shooting two policemen. Bond does cause the explosion at the embassy, but the end of the scene clearly shows that none of the soldiers died as a result. Basically the only person he kills is the bomb-maker.
ReplyI'm pretty certain that the authorities would most certainly have tried V as a murderer. He was a known and wanted terrorist after all.
ReplyI want that ginger from the Snorg Tee ads. I don't want an effin Snorg Tee though.
ReplyWhen I think "great action heroes," I don't find myself thinking of any of the films on page 1. Seriously, what the fuck?
ReplyHoly shit; as much as I love Cracked, you all really don't do any research on this Casino Royale parkour scene, do you? Bond is NOT the one that kicks the construction worker - it is Mollaka. Plus, the canisters explode because he is a welder, and apparently, after reading comments on another article about this scene, they are highly sensitive and would have most certainly detonated upon impact.
ReplyPlus, Bond had killed Mollaka to escape. He grabbed his bag because he knew there was evidence there, and in the resulting scene, it is shown that Bond didn't kill any of the guards - just heavily fucked them up.
in the matrix anyone can be possesed by agents its better to leave no one alie so they cant just bring in more bad guys
ReplyUm, I think you need to rewatch the chase scene from "Casino Royale." The bomb-maker that James Bond is chasing is the one who actually kicks a construction worker (who was trying to apprehend him) down the ground, causing an explosion (and he had something explosive tied to him, not sure why). Also, the suspect shoots two other workers while climbing the scaffold.
ReplyYou are correct that Bond does reckless things during that chase, such as driving a giant bulldozer and ruining the construction project, but it doesn't APPEAR that he hurt anyone with the bulldozer. The movie also makes it APPEAR that Bond kills no one when he storms the embassy, although there isn't any possible way that all of those soldiers survived the explosion when she shot the explosive barrels.
And I also agree that James Bond, having to play poker to catch a terrorism funder, was quite ludicrous.
The original James Bond (from the novels) was supposed to be a callous killer with a complete disregard for human life. More of an anti-hero than a hero, non-chalantly doing whatever it takes to get the job done.
ReplyIn the book.... well, really, I dunno why I'm even gracing the film with a mention here, but.... In the book, V's torture of Evey is "explained" by his conversation with her after, and you feel that, although he's a nutcase, and morally dubious, you can sort-of see his point. This speech was severely stupidised in the film, although the whole film was such a crime against intelligence it's hardly even the worst bit.
ReplyIn the book, Evey was a 16-year-old girl who worked in a match factory and lived in 1 room. In the film, she's a 26-year-old who works in the media, the VERY INSTRUMENT OF OPPRESSION! And she's hardly innocent, when in the book she's completely innocent, necessarily.
One final crime was in the rape near the beginning. They went to great lengths to point out how ugly, greasy and unhygeinic one of the rapists was. Because obviously it's MUCH worse to be raped by someone unattractive. If he'd put on a bit of aftershave and combed his hair, she might not have had to bathe in bleach for 6 months afterward. There was also the impression that this was a "rogue" group of police, that the rest of the police were mostly the honest decent sort of police you tend to get in totalitarian states.
Most people in totalitarian states are honest and decent.
If you don't believe that. better not visit any recently-democratised countries, because those are all the exact same people.
The POLICE in totalitarian states, however, are usually corrupt and have the main job of propping up the government and stamping on democracy-lovin' dissidents. The general populace may or may not be lovely but my point is about the police.
In Fantastic Four, there's a scene where the Thing pulls the (unharmed) driver out of the wrecked truck. And "decided" to spark an explosion? I don't remember that, but I'm not sure I want to watch the movie again to find out.
ReplyI was pleased that you acknowledged that V was supposed to be morally ambiguous in the graphic novel.However,you did fumble #1 anyway.Half of the movie is spent trying to track down and capture V,so you can't say that he wasn't convicted for murder when he should have been.And V tortured Evey Hammond because he wanted her to live without fear--they say as much in the movie.He tortured her to make her stronger.Again,in the graphic novel he's deliberately morally ambiguous,but they do explain that it wasn't just cold-blooded torture to convert her.
ReplyWait a tick! James Bond didn't knock the guy off the girder in Casino Royale! The villain fecking dropped kicked him!
ReplyYou'd have a hard time convicting some of these people for murder. They were killed in the course of actions you identify.
Replythat wasnt Ripley that was Alien hybrid clone#8
ReplyInteresting idea about the Matrix, but it does lead to larger questions. For example, I don't think anyone would argue that defeating Nazi Germany was a bad idea, but it's also pretty clear that not every German was a hard-core National Socialist. Lots of German soldiers and civilians were killed just because they happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, or didn't really have a choice in the matter, or didn't have the ability to make an informed choice. Is killing the security guards less moral than killing a Nazi soldier who was brainwashed by the Reich from birth, or was drafted to fight for a cause he didn't believe in, or disliked Hitler but wanted to defend and glorify his homeland?
ReplyWars are morally complex things, and I don't think there's any doubt that the struggle between Zion and the machines was a war.
PS, the helicopter wasn't "generated" - I don't think it was ever suggested that the insurgents could spontaneously create things inside the Matrix. The helicopter was already there, on the roof - they just used it.
They could find a helicopter simply by looking on the computer, upload instructions on how to fly it, and steal it easier than you stealing a candy bar from 7-11. Either way, I think they did more than suggest it. They flat out said in the first film that they could load and generate ANYTHING they need, from clothes, to cars, to guns. That's how Trinity got the motorcycle she jumped off the roof in Reloaded, and how they got the bomb they blew up the building with in the scene mentioned from the first film.
Killing Germans helped the war effort. Shooting in sleeping gas wouldn't hurt Zion's cause except for the very small risk of Neo throwing the sleeping Morpheus into the helicopter and missing.
"bad guys who are entirely computer-generated" ... The Agents move around possessing people, they don't ever have their own bodies.
ReplyWhen Trinity shoots Jones on the roof, it's the helicopter pilot we see falling to the ground. When a dozen copies of Smith are fighting Neo, Smith steps on that tomato because the woman he's just taken over had dropped her groceries.
THIS. THIS. THIS. How did it take so long for someone to point out this glaring flaw in this article? The agents are not just "computer-generated." They "move in and out of any software still hardwired to their system." Meaning, innocent bystander not dead=potential vessel for agent. The WHOLE point was for Neo and Trinity to buy themselves time to save Morpheus without agents pestering them. Neutralize them with knockout gas? Hell no. That does not disconnect them from the system. As soon as the agent took over the effects of the gas would be moot (consider the drunk bum who's body Agent Smith takes in the Subway. He's suddenly not so drunk, is he?).