7 Reasons the 21st Century is Making You Miserable
Scientists call it the Naked Photo Test, and it works like this: say a photo turns up of you nakedly doing something that would shame you and your family for generations. Bestiality, perhaps. Ask yourself how many people in your life you would trust with that photo. If you're like the rest of us, you probably have at most two.
Even more depressing, studies show that about one out of four people have no one they can confide in.

The Sad Bear 1, by Nedroid
The average number of close friends we say we have is dropping fast, down dramatically in just the last 20 years. Why?
That's not sarcasm. Annoyance is something you build up a tolerance to, like alcohol or a bad smell. The more we're able to edit the annoyance out of our lives, the less we're able to handle it.
The problem is we've built an awesome, sprawling web of technology meant purely to let us avoid annoying people. Do all your Christmas shopping online and avoid the fat lady ramming her cart into you at Target. Spend $5,000 on a home theater system so you can see movies on a big screen without a toddler kicking the back of your seat. Hell, rent the DVD's from Netflix and you don't even have to spend the 30 seconds with the confused kid working the register at Blockbuster.
Get stuck in the waiting room at the doctor? No way we're striking up a conversation with the smelly old man in the next seat. We'll plug the iPod into our ears and have a text conversation with a friend or play our DS. Filter that annoyance right out of our world.

From outofbalance.org

Oh, yeah. Right in the crotch, buddy.
Lots of us were born into towns full of people we couldn't stand. As a kid, maybe you found yourself in an elementary school classroom, packed in with two dozen kids you did not choose and who shared none of your tastes or interests. Maybe you got beat up a lot.
But, you've grown up. And if you're, say, a huge DragonForce fan, you can go find their forum and meet a dozen people just like you. Or even better, start a private room with your favorite few and lock everybody else out. Say goodbye to the tedious, awkward, painful process of dealing with somebody who's truly different. That's another Old World inconvenience, like having to wash your clothes in a creek or wait for a raccoon to wander by the outhouse so you can wipe your ass with it.
The problem is that peacefully dealing with incompatible people is crucial to living in a society. In fact, if you think about it, peacefully dealing with people you can't stand is society. Just people with opposite tastes and conflicting personalities sharing space and cooperating, often through gritted teeth.
Fifty years ago, you had to sit in a crowded room to see a movie. You didn't get to choose; you either did that or you missed the movie. When you got a new car, everyone on the block came and stood in your yard to look it over. You can bet that some of those people were assholes.

Your parents, circa 1982
That's right. Even though they had almost no ability to filter their peers according to common interests (hell, often you were just friends with the guy who happened to live next door), they still came up with more close friends than we have now-people they could trust.
It turns out, apparently, that after you get over that first irritation, after you shed your shell of "they listen to different music because they wouldn't understand mine" superiority, there's a sort of comfort in needing other people and being needed on a level beyond common interests. It turns out humans are social animals after all. And that ability to suffer fools, to tolerate annoyance, that's literally the one single thing that allows you to function in a world populated by other people who aren't you. Otherwise, you turn emo. Science has proven it.
I have this friend who uses the expression "No, thank you," in a sarcastic way. It means, "I'd rather be shot in the face." He puts a little ironic lilt on the last two words that lets you know. You ask, "Want to go see that new Rob Schneider movie?" And, he'll say, "No, thank you."
So one day we had this exchange via text:
Me: "Hey, do you want me to bring over that leftover chili I made?"
Him: "No, thank you"
That pissed me off. I'm proud of my chili. It takes four days to make it. I grind up the dried peppers myself; the meat is expensive, hand-tortured veal. And, now my offer to give him some is dismissed with his bitchy catchphrase?
I didn't speak to him for six months. He sent me a letter, I mailed it back, unread, with a dead rat packed inside.
It was my wife who finally ran into him and realized that the "No, thank you" he replied with was not meant to be sarcastic, but was a literal, "No, but thank you for offering." He had no room in his freezer, it turns out.

The Sad Bear #2, by Nedroid
So did we really need a study to tell us that more than 40 percent of what you say in an e-mail is misunderstood? Well, they did one anyway.
How many of your friends have you only spoken with online? If 40 percent of your personality has gotten lost in the text transition, do these people even really know you? The people who dislike you via text, on message boards or chatrooms or whatever, is it because you're really incompatible? Or, is it because of the misunderstood 40 percent? And, what about the ones who like you?
Many of us try to make up that difference in sheer numbers, piling up six dozen friends on MySpace. But here's the problem ...
When someone speaks to you face-to-face, what percentage of the meaning is actually in the words, as opposed to the body language and tone of voice? Take a guess.
It's 7 percent. The other 93 percent is nonverbal, according to studies. No, I don't know how they arrived at that exact number. They have a machine or something. But we didn't need it. I mean, come on. Most of our humor is sarcasm, and sarcasm is just mismatching the words with the tone. Like my friend's "No, thank you."
You don't wait for a girl to verbally tell you she likes you. It's the sparkle in her eyes, her posture, the way she grabs your head and shoves your face into her boobs.
That's the crux of the problem. That human ability to absorb the moods of others through that kind of subconscious osmosis is crucial. Kids born without it are considered mentally handicapped. People who have lots of it are called "charismatic" and become movie stars and politicians. It's not what they say; it's this energy they put off that makes us feel good about ourselves.
When we're living in Text World, all that is stripped away. There's a weird side effect to it, too: absent a sense of the other person's mood, every line we read gets filtered through our own mood instead. The reason I read my friend's chili message as sarcastic was because I was in an irritable mood. In that state of mind, I was eager to be offended.
And worse, if I do enough of my communicating this way, my mood never changes. After all, people keep saying nasty things to me! Of course I'm depressed! It's me against the world!No, what I need is somebody to shake me by the shoulders and snap me out of it. Which leads us to No. 5 ...
Most of what sucks about not having close friends isn't the missed birthday parties or the sad, single-player games of ping pong with the wall. No, what sucks is the lack of real criticism.
In my time online I've been called "fag" approximately 104,165 times. I keep an Excel spreadsheet. I've also been called "asshole" and "cockweasel" and "fuckcamel" and "cuntwaffle" and "shitglutton" and "porksword" and "wangbasket" and "shitwhistle" and "thundercunt" and "fartminge" and "shitflannel" and "knobgoblin" and "boring."

And none of it mattered, because none of those people knew me well enough to really hit the target. I've been insulted lots, but I've been criticized very little. And don't ever confuse the two. An insult is just someone who hates you making a noise to indicate their hatred. A barking dog. Criticism is someone trying to help you, by telling you something about yourself that you were a little too comfortable not knowing.

Above: A flamboyant transvestite with about
five times as many friends as the average person
Tragically, there are now a whole lot of people who never have those conversations. The interventions, the brutal honesty, the, "you know, everybody's pissed off because of what you said last night, but nobody wants to say anything because they're afraid of you," sort of conversations. Those horrible, awkward, wrenchingly uncomfortable sessions that you can only have with someone who sees right to the center of you.
E-mail and texting are awesome tools for avoiding that level of honesty. With text, you can respond when you feel like it. You can measure your words. You can pick and choose which questions to answer. The person on the other end can't see your face, can't see you get nervous, can't detect when you're lying. You have almost total control and as a result that other person never sees past your armor, never sees you at your worst, never knows the embarrassing little things about yourself that you can't control. Gone are the common quirks, humiliations and vulnerabilities that real friendships are built on.
Browse around people's MySpace pages, look at the characters they create for themselves. If you've built a pool of friends via a blog, building yourself up as a misunderstood, mysterious Master of the Night, it's kind of hard to log on and talk about how you went to prom and got diarrhea out on the dance floor. You never get to really be yourself, and that's a very lonely feeling.
And, on top of all that ...
A whole lot of the people still reading this are saying, "Of course I'm depressed! People are starving! America has turned into Nazi Germany! My parents watch retarded television shows and talk about them for hours afterward! People are dying in meaningless wars all over the world!"
But how did we wind up with a more negative view of the world than our parents? Or grandparents? Back then, people didn't live as long and babies died more often. Diseases were more common. In those days, if your buddy moved away the only way to communicate was with pen and paper and a stamp. We have Iraq, but our parents had Vietnam (which killed 50 times more people) and their parents had World War 2 (which killed 1,000 times as many). Some of your grandparents grew up at a time when nobody had air conditioning. All of their parents grew up without it.
We are physically better off today in every possible way in which such things can be measured ... but you sure as hell wouldn't know that if you're getting your news online. Why?
Well, ask yourself: If some music site posts an article called, "Fall Out Boy is a Fine Band" and on the same day posts another one called, "Fall Out Boy is the Shittiest Fucking Band of the Last 100 Years, Say Experts," which do you think will get the most traffic? The second one wins in a blowout. Outrage manufactures word-of-mouth.
The news blogs many of you read? The people running them know the same thing. Every site is in a dogfight for traffic (even if they don't run ads, they still measure their success by the size of their audience) and so they carefully pick through the wires for the most inflammatory story possible. The other blogs start echoing the same story from the same point of view. If you want, you can surf all day and never swim out of the warm, stagnant waters of the "aren't those bastards evil" pool.

Actually, if you count the guy holding the camera, this man
statistically has more friends than most of us do.
Only in that climate could those silly 9/11 conspiracy theories come about (saying the Bush administration and the FDNY blew up the towers, and that the planes were holograms). To hear these people talk, every opposing politician is Hitler, and every election is the freaking apocalypse. All because it keeps you reading.

9/11 photos. Circled: Conspiracy
This wasn't as much a problem in the old days, of course. Some of us remember having only three channels on TV. That's right. Three. We're talking about the '80s here. So there was something unifying in the way we all sat down to watch the same news, all of it coming from the same point of view. Even if the point of view was retarded and wrong, even if some stories went criminally unreported, we at least all shared it.
That's over. There effectively is no "mass media" any more so, where before we disagreed because we saw the same news and interpreted it differently, now we disagree because we're seeing completely different freaking news. When we can't even agree on the basic facts, the differences become irreconcilable. That constant feeling of being at bitter odds with the rest of the world brings with it a tension that just builds and builds.
We humans used to have lots of natural ways to release that kind of angst. But these days...
There's one advantage to having mostly online friends, and it's one that nobody ever talks about:
They demand less from you.
Sure, you emotionally support them, comfort them after a breakup, maybe even talk them out of a suicide. But knowing someone in meatspace adds a whole, long list of annoying demands. Wasting your whole afternoon helping them fix their computer. Going to funerals with them. Toting them around in your car every day after theirs gets repossessed by the bank. Having them show up unannounced when you were just settling in to watch the Dirty Jobs marathon on the Discovery channel, then mentioning how hungry they are until you finally give them half your sandwich.
You have so much more control in Instant Messenger, or on a forum, or in World of Warcraft.
The problem is you are hard-wired by evolution to need to do things for people. Everybody for the last five thousand years seemed to realize this and then we suddenly forgot it in the last few decades. We get suicidal teens and scramble to teach them self-esteem. Well, unfortunately, self-esteem and the ability to like yourself only come after you've done something that makes you likable. You can't bullshit yourself. If I think Todd over here is worthless for sitting in his room all day, drinking Pabst and playing video games one-handed because he's masturbating with the other one, what will I think of myself if I do the same thing?

The Sad Bear #3, by Nedroid
You want to break out of that black tar pit of self-hatred? Brush the black hair out of your eyes, step away from the computer and buy a nice gift for someone you loathe. Send a card to your worst enemy. Make dinner for your mom and dad. Or just do something simple, with an tangible result. Go clean the leaves out of the gutter. Grow a damn plant.
It ain't rocket science; you are a social animal and thus you are born with little happiness hormones that are released into your bloodstream when you see a physical benefit to your actions. Think about all those teenagers in their dark rooms, glued to their PC's, turning every life problem into ridiculous melodrama. Why do they make those cuts on their arms? It's because making the pain-and subsequent healing-tangible releases endorphins they don't get otherwise. It's pain, but at least it's real.
That form of stress relief via mild discomfort used to be part of our daily lives, via our routine of hunting gazelles and gathering berries and climbing rocks and fighting bears. No more. This is why office jobs make so many of us miserable; we don't get any physical, tangible result from our work. But do construction out in the hot sun for two months, and for the rest of your life you can drive past a certain house and say, "Holy shit, I built that." Maybe that's why mass shootings are more common in offices than construction sites.
It's the kind of physical, dirt-under-your-nails satisfaction that you can only get by turning off the computer, going outdoors and re-connecting with the real world. That feeling, that "I built that" or "I grew that" or "I fed that guy" or "I made these pants" feeling, can't be matched by anything the internet has to offer.
Except, you know, this website.
David Wong is the Senior Editor of Cracked.com and the author of the dongtacular horror novel John Dies at the End, available wherever books are sold or by clicking those words.








This is a fantastic article, but I will admit the people it advises are just too varied for this to be a therapeutic article for the masses. But it does what any good piece does, and that's making the reader think and see from other perspectives. (:
ReplyOne of the 21st century technologies that I rebel against is (are?) web filters. If web filters try to tailor everything to our existing tastes and interests isn't that dangerous? It means we'll never get exposed to different ideas or a chance to expand our world view or learn new things. It narrows our range to what we're already familiar with and won't help us think critically.
Reply*On the thing about people being more lonely because they do more of their communicating online, I feel that yeah the author has a point, but what about the people who communicate online because they have trouble communicating with people offline and are really lonely? I have problems making friends offline because I tend to feel intimidated around other people, even people I know. I find it easier to communicate with people I can't see. Before I had internet connection, I was very depressed and suicidal all the time because I was so lonely but the internet allowed me to make friends and feel a little bit normal.
Replynice article
ReplyI can't speak for anyone else, but 21st century technological communication and social interaction has been a Godsend for me. Dealing with people face to face has always been incredibly stressful for me--even telephone conversations have become difficult. I get overwhelmed so easily and life is SO much more pleasant, for me, online.
ReplyI get what you're saying, but this whole article seemed really technophobic. I'd like to see it written about the same facts but by someone who doesn't think the increase in online interactions and friendships is the end of our lives as we know them. Like, as you briefly touched on, how about the wider range of media available leading to more accountability for people in power and more access to the truth? How about people who have trouble socializing in person being able to finally be accepted somewhere? How about easy accessibility and unification?
Reply"You want to break out of that black tar pit of self-hatred? Brush the black hair out of your eyes, step away from the computer and buy a nice gift for someone you loathe. Send a card to your worst enemy. Make dinner for your mom and dad. Or just do something simple, with an tangible result. Go clean the leaves out of the gutter. Grow a damn plant." Yeah, guess what, I saved up for months to buy a bunch of gifts for a friend (who I knew only online at that time) before we met up in real life and got together famously, although since then because of my recent suicidalness she seems to be avoiding me. I blew all of my money on Christmas gifts for friends and family. I don't have dyed hair. I don't loathe anybody except myself because I feel crippling guilt whenever I'm unjustly negative to anybody. I draw and make other art (tangible things) all the time. I spend time with my mum and have mostly reconciled with my dad, whose obsession with control and anger management problems tore us apart.
Leave the therapy to real therapists. Your well-intentioned advice doesn't come off as the positive criticism you mentioned above; it comes off like an attack on the lifestyle of people who've grown up with technology and are isolated by people in real life, regardless of how much or little time they spend on the internet or texting. You're trying to blame people for what they're going through, which may or may not be justified. But you're talking to a wide audience, and some people are going to take it personally because that's what their mind is susceptible to at this moment. And the people who aren't actually having problems will likely blow off your advice because they see no reason to follow it.
I'm sorry for ranting, but this article obviously touched on some personal issues and seems to rely on stereotypes (of "emo teens") to sound wise.
I will say that this article made me think, and the statistics quoted are really saddening.
tl;dr
Those bear illustrations were probably the saddest I've ever seen. I seriously feel like curling into a ball and crying right now.
ReplyExcellent article. One of the best I've read here. Definitely makes me think I need to change my ways a bit.
ReplyIncidentally, postmodern people are cynical about church and 'organised religion', but the whole point is to learn how to love, and you can't very well do that if you isolate yourself or only mix with people you find it easy to like. So having to exercise relationship among the unlovely is really the whole idea.
Two words: The Crusades.
Well, at least tech communication makes us autistic people sound almost normal. It's hard to do much of anything face-to-face when you can't understand social nuances and can't really bring yourself to care all too much. That's one thing about human society that isn't very forgiving of differences... such as my inability to convey anything except 'Aah! Somebody's talking to me! Make it stop!' with my body language... But I digress.
ReplyDissagre. Its called technology, you either accept it or you live long enough to be a troll (??). Article is describing things from the industrial era, that era is way over. Now we live in the informatic era.
ReplySo acording to this article, probably the people who cound't meet people from other countries by internet, read online crap like this or watch porn for free(!) were miserable compared to the old folks who were happy burning witches and dying by unknow disseases?
I can't agree specially with the 1-2. Guess what? they didn't have any of those things 3 centuries ago.
I guess this was supposed to be fun or sarcastic, well, let's just imagine the crap they will say when the 22 century comes (if).
Now I'm seriously considering mailing naked photos of myself with my Christmas cards next year, just to see who I can trust.
ReplyWow. You are a downer.
ReplyWow. You are a downie
Wow. I had a brownie.
I can agree and disagree with text messaging and all that. Also about the teens cutting themselves, I was a teen doing that before my parents allowed me to be on the computer more than 2 hours a day (and that was strictly monitored) so yeah, doesn't always apply.
ReplyAlso what REALLY helps is if someone responds to a text you made or whatever, and it upsets you, you are better off sucking it up and asking in what context they meant it before getting all pissed off (which I do all the time)
Also I am not a huge fan of TONS of online communities now that my favorite shows have gone to s**t along with my favorite movies, so I am forced to do actual things. Even when I was at the height of my "ZOMG HOUSE IS THE BEST SHOW EVER" phase, I still managed to connect face to face with a rabid fan. We were both broke off our asses and lived in seperate states but we MADE it happen because we KNEW it was important to see each other as opposed to just texting.
The girl I am good friends with online right now, I have active plans to meet her set in place for spring of 2012. IF you make an effort to take the online relationship one step further it can be the best expereince you ever have, and I know from things I've actually been through!
Have fun with your " girlfriend". By the way, she's a 45 year old man who wants to murder you.
Some of the best times in my life go back to when my buddy and I would go diving for lobsters or spearfisfing. No tech whatsoever just simple hunting essentially. And we'd eat a 21.99 a pound dinner for…well free.
ReplyWow! That article is very eye-opening! I can honestly say that I may change some of the ways I live by. Thank you for this!
ReplyGrow a Damn Plant!
ReplyWords to live by
Yeah, I'm inspired to get out the house and tend to my veggie garden a little more
after reading the very last point...
ReplyAFK
That's the saddest bear I've ever seen. I'm sad just looking at it.
ReplyI don't know, I saw the polar bear on the tiny chunk of ice floating away from the Arctic main-ice-chunk. At least this bear isn't real.
Those are some choice, interesting words to be called.... some of those combinations I would have NEVER thought of on my own.... thank you(?) for expanding my vocabulary
ReplyJust finished reading your book by the way. Creepy, disgusting, hillarious. Did I say creepy? I meant 'haunt my dreams' scary. The hands in the tv...very...uh...yeah.
ReplyWhere was I? Oh yeah, the article, that's right! :) Liked it, nice writing and sum up of where we've gone wrong. I'm gonna keep this in mind next time I have an annoying customer. I'll just keep repeating 'they're doing you a favour'.
:)